international
Discord ID: 308950154222895104
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 90/3012
| Next
Coalition: 292 killed
Iraq: 20,000โ35,000 killed
lol!
kek
this is a troll
mus be
you are radical islamist
lol!
hahaha!
pee pee poo poo
Coalition: 292 killed
Iraq: 20,000โ35,000 killed
lol@!
lollll!
Coalition: 292 killed
Iraq: 20,000โ35,000 killed
Coalition: 292 killed
Iraq: 20,000โ35,000 killed
lol!
dead iraqi soldier
lol!
@qaysay
@Qaysar be glad that was not you!
im not iraqi
are you syrian!
there is not much difference anyways!
no
I m not SYRIAN!
you are lebanese!
fuck lebanon!
you are kebab!
I am not Turk!
you are saudi!
close enough!
saudi is US bitch
lol!
LOl!
lol!
us is saudis bitch!
saudi is us bitch
lol!
LOL! Saudi can't even beat rebels in Yemen
lol!
one of the highest spending armies
can't defeat rebels bordering them
lol!
le troll face
@Qaysar You will be hunted down by CIA!
I have screenshot of what you said!
>Saudi military strategists
@Firefly Hi, are you the server owner?
Nevermind then
Are there any fans of Thomas Aquinas here?
If so, why does there have to be a First Cause? If the universe is infinite in space and time, cause and effect goes on and went on forever.
God does not exist.
For an effect to occur wouldn't there have to be a catalyst?
I can't comment much on Aquinas because I'm still new to his work.
But that's my understanding of it.
The Compendium of Theology is a good introduction to his ideas. For more in depth explanation of them you could read the Summa Theologicae.
Nigga be gay?
are dank maymays allowed gere?
Probably
For God to have created the universe it needs to have an origin, but it is not clear that the universe ever had one.
It isn't clear that there isn't a beginning though.
it is not clear the beginning if the end was the start of the beginning
@Mros I guess you're right about that. It is ambiguous.
BRB
It would be logical to think though, that there would be a beginning.
I think the opposite is logical given there is no evidence of it ever happening or being possible.
Would it be logical to think that is has always just existed?
Yes.
If so why would it be expanding away from a specific point?
outwards
Of course the big bang is just a theory, but it is plausible.
Why does that matter? Laws of thermodynamics don't change. Energy is never created or destroyed only transforms.
True.
It depend on what you mean by beginning and end. In the extreme future the universe is predicted to cool down and eventually all matter will stop moving. That is a kind of end, even though it is one extreme end of transformation.
You can say the same about the beginning, however still, matter is not created from nothing.
Nor will matter ever disappear. It is hard to say where the role of God would be, if any.
Who knows
It's outside of my knowledge.
So it's not really something I can comment on, unforutuneatley.
They're questions worth asking though.
Theologically though, I can reason, that perfect knowledge would be hidden from us from God on purpose, so that free will is still possible.
It also fits into the hierarchy of man and God
Oh, here it is.
I found a pdf of The Compendium Of Theology
I have it. I will refer to it now.
Oh ok
Latin is such a pretty language.
It is
Ah, Aquinas says First Mover, not first cause. That's interesting. There does seem to have been a beginning of movement in the early universe. So he is saying God inspired movement, or transformation of energy into motion.
Yes
Energy is like God's clay. It can be eternal or exist outside of time. According to this theology.
First paragraph answered my question.
Thanks for the reference.
No problem.
Interesting, thanks for sharing.
Do you guys remember ''vixator''?
its shown faggots have very high suicide rates even though the world is opening up to them
you might ask why? its simply because the mental illness of homos is an infestation of the mind
Where's the server that tried to co'up /pol/nation back in 2016?
If we agree that time only began with the Big Bang event then there is no antecedent to the Big Bang. Therefore, nothing. No information existed before the Big Bang.
Energy can't exist outside of time
God is only impossible in infinite regression of the black hole cycle which is hypothetical if not theoretical
long live U.S.S.R.
nope
more like long dead ussr
died at the hands of the AFGHANI MUJAHIDEEN
Yo you afgan guerrilla i will shoot you with my mi24 hind gunship and blow you up with my t34 tank stalin will come to your house with a kgb officer and personally have you shoot by firing squad
LONG LIVE LENIN
<:svt:312032528129327106>
lol
<:che:312047280523837450>
>be ussr
>lose war against afghani farmers
its like vietnam 2.0 but the roles are reversed
Be ussr
Kill all capitalist pigs
Destroy imperialism
<:hrt:312036949453963264>
lol
invading other countries is the definition of imperialism
the ussr wasnt communist
exact opposite actually
state capitalism
or as my nigga trotsky called it
Not when ussr does it
a degenerated workers state
Be USSR
Expand communism
???
PROFIT
oops no I don't mean profit ehm
USE!
Profit is for imperialist paper tigers
ussr was not capitaliat filth and america should burn
america should be burned
Atleast we agree on that
but the USSR felt the wrath of the Mujahideen
Ho Chi Minh has an ass kicking for you
๐ค
<:classi:312043060475199488>
im not saying ho chi minh did anything wrong
all the ussr did wrong was kill trotsky and invade afghanistan
Ussr glory state never did anything wrong
๐
>Trotsky
hey mros
Hello
Hi
trotsky wasnt that bad
Stalin > Trotsky
Trotsky was cool
nah bruv
Stalin turned on christianity
But stalin is better
if trotsky had won germany would have aswell
Putin is watching
A lot of churches reopened under Stalin actually
Rekt
Putin is no where near communist
Stalin is NAZBOL
Putin is nazbol
Thats what you think
Christianity was infiltrated under Soviet regime
trotsky wouldnt have
it wasn't in communion with say, the OCA
stalin took over the power of the orthodox church
appointed kgb members to the clergy
how the hell is Putin natbol
Trotsky would have.l been even worse
trotsky believed in non intervention in church matters
and religious freedom
sure he wasnt a powerful leader
but he was idealistic
he didnt want power like stalin did
thats why he lost
he cared about the people and communism]
I'm just waiting for the rise of a Christian China
stalin just wnated power
Nah
China was cool with mao but now theyre capitalist
^
Mao was based tbh
really based
Christianity is growing exponentially in China
Islam is aswell
Fastest growing Christian population in the world
>it's a mudslime
yeah
@Mros what Christianity?
I think it's catholic
fug
Muslim China > Muslim and Christian China > Christian China > Buddhist China > Atheist China
>Muslims
>allow sex slavery of captives
yeah nah man
tbh china needs to become catholic and excomunnicate rome
>more children is bad
>become catholic and excommunicate rome
uh buddy
this is why the white race is dying
>pope francis
lol
actually that's not why
it's the nuclear family model that promotes birth
Daily reminder that Japan would be Christian today if it weren't for the Dutch protestants
you just unironically said that sex slavery is alright?
yes
***w e w***
I dont see a problem with it
Arkan did nothing wrong
๐ค
bosnia won the war though
Only with western help
Serbia strong
Otherwise Serbia would have demolished evryone
Yeah
serbia is just orthodox bosnians
other way around pal
Bosnians are mudslime serbs
wrong
kek
I lenin takoi molodo<:leni:312041955896983554>
๐ค
*molodoi*
Southern Slavs were Pagans who converted to Christianity
you retard
bosnia is aryan
just ask varg vikernes
"bosnia is european serbs are negroids" varg vikernes
im paraphrasing him but he actually said that
Varg is a source now?
I don't care about Varg
Varg shou;d be the one sourcing
no hes retarded
not the source
he thinks that spanish are BLACK
Lol varg is a retard
^
Islam is a vastly inferior religion pal
to what?
Hah, what not?
Satanist paganism?
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 90/3012
| Next