oml.....

Chinese are not human though.

humans are below us

Niggers aren't either

My nigger my nigger my nigger

More floffy demon ponies for you

>Lewds about to give me a brain condition

Decent design, but the contrast between the wings and the body is too extreme

🤔

Hmm, wow. That was actually contrustive.

Okay, it's not even my art. But I see it too now.

@Deleted User You're my favorite human bean right now, until Chopin returns

~~here~~

~~You're all actually shit.~~

What an honor

@Deleted User tell me about fascism.

you're welcome, let me go get express my want for a thonking-

Fascism is a Jew

**Holds up Jew**

**Points at Jew**

This is Fascism

Fascism is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and control of industry and commerce, that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

he's slightly gay

@Deleted User Sounds like Stalinism.

Xd

It's NAZBOL

Stalin was NAZBOL

But stalinism is communism, fascism only states how the government behaves.

🤔

We should all become NazBol

and eat children together

dX

@Deleted User Who had more socialist economy, early USSR or NatSoc Germany?

🤔

It likely depends on your defination of socialism dude

Is socialism just state control?

Or is it worker control?

@Apache14 Should be followed by Blaxit

@Anglican Is planned heavy industry economy.

xd

If that is how you define it

Joke: Hitler did nothing wrong
Broke: Stalin did nothing wrong
Woke: Pol Pot did nothing wrong

then yes

early USSR was more socialism

I don't know much about the early USSR economy, so I can't tell you that

It was under war communism

it was basically a very constrained form of central planning

@Deleted User I give you a hint. There were no heavy industry in USSR at the time.

>don't read much
>Fascist
Checks out.

strikes were illegal adn everything went to the war effort against the whites.

It's actually an interesting state that the Reds were in.

They were squeezing every last drop outta the workers

and it worked

they completely fucking raped the whites and conquered a grand Empire, even though it had fallen upon it's knees.

Not to mention the allied intervention.

>When no one gets your fascination with commies war economy

xd

Yeah they reunited almost the whole territory save for Poland and Finland lol

@National Trotskyist
>commifornia breaks away from USA
>somehow this makes the rest of the country magically communist
>must be opposite day

@Deleted User It's NAZBOL not communist
Donal Trump will make US&A NAZBOL

where does donal get the BOL? I see the NAZ but no BOL.

Cause

he'd make the GOP a workers party

What's wrong with anime eee

@_@

🖖

lmao

I love communism

today I went outside

and fought a faggot nazi

i destroyed him with facts and how Jews basically are victims

He didn't know what to say

<:hrt:312036949453963264> <:hrt:312036949453963264> <:hrt:312036949453963264> <:hrt:312036949453963264>

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/342736693750792203/343156683985649665/Screenshot_2017-08-04-17-59-03-1.png

>Jews basically are victims 🤔

>Jews basically are victims

Lmao at what universe

I sense merchant trickery

Wow

You're Nazis

fuckin Jew haters

LARP more faggot

Are you actually serious though

Look at history of Poland, Jews were the owner-oppressor class here

Nevermind how they treat Palestinians now

We were thankful to Germans and Russians who removed the remnants of them

Funnily enough even Marx hated the jews

http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-what-is-the-secular-basis-of-judaism-practical-need-self-interest-what-is-the-worldly-religion-karl-marx-250994.jpg

Read "On the Jewish Question"

http://i.imgur.com/3myJV1J.jpg

`for if the goyim knew what we teach about them, the would kill us openly`

I wonder if anyone in history did so 🤔

Aren't most of those Talmud quotes faked? I've seen reply to this debunking it.

But I've read Yabamoth, what they write about it is true lol.

You can just google the quotes or look them up in an online version of the Talmud, Libbre David 37 checks out

... but I found an opposing source which says it's a complete fabrication 🤔

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLx80mu2rWU

Remember when Shit 4chan Says was opened, it looked like Reddit

It went from checking your privilege to checkin em dubs

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/318013465652494336/343137758254202880/image.png

@Deleted User I'm still confused who been more socialist natsoc or Stalin

Me too.

Get on voice

Get on voice guys

Get on Anti Fascist voice niggas

I'd say Natsocs

get on voice

But that's a discussion for another day, I am going to bed

yo

@Deleted User You suck, Chopin.

❤

Schubert owns you.

Blasphemy.

Actually Lizst > both.

I prefer Bri'ish English tbh

We are taught it in European schools

communism is Famine ism

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/136175005

**Hello Comrades. This general is for the discussion of Marxism-Leninism, the ideology of revolutionary socialism and communism.

Communism is the next stage of humanity following the capitalist stage.

What exactly is communism according to Marxist-Leninists:
**

A brief hypothetical dialogue on Leftist support for third-world invasion and also environmentalism:

Leftist: The world is over-populated, we're using up all of the earth's resources, we need to have fewer babies!
I: Most of the babies are born in Asia and Africa, why don't we support reducing the birth-rate there?
L: People in the West use much more water, land, electricity, etc with our houses and cars and computers than people in the third world.
I: Does that mean anyone who lives in a Western country places a greater strain on the planet?
L: Yes.
I: And people in the West who have lots of children do the greatest environmental damage?
L: Yes.
I: And the people with the highest birthrate are in Africa and Asia.
L: Yes, but they don't use up as much by way of resources.
I: So why are bringing them here? Won't they do a lot more environmental damage once they have houses and cars and electricity 24/7?

Yes, but that's not a good argument for why we shouldn't "bring them" here.

It's still just racist in its underpinnings.

Pure ideology.

it's logical

Let the immigrants come.

Bring them to us.

look further into it than just the surface

That's what I did buddy.

no you just brushed it off as pure ideology

You just described my entire process.

No, I looked at the ideological core of it.

Racism.

Not an argument against immigration.

>implying there is only racism

>no logic

you're lost

you don't want to see the logic behind it

The ideology behind that argument is racism.

you instantly dismiss it on the basis of racism

The logic is racist logic.

Not actual logic.

you could argue it's positive to a racist platform

Not actual, rational logic.

but there is still definitely logic behind it

'rational logic'

wow how objective

It is only positive to a racist platform.

Nobody else with a soul would use that argument.

Racists are psychopaths and lack souls.

Now we're resorting to insults

That is why only racists use that argument.

it holds weight but you don't want to see it

you're so deluded

And anybody who says they are not a racist and uses that argument is a crypto racist.

You know it's wrong

but you want to maintain your happy little perspective

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjkgD4w9w1k

😉 Ta, ta bois

I refuse to step to your level. My world is not morally destitute.

so you've just admitted that you do not want to see from my viewpoint

i always knew tolerance and acceptance was a facade

I *can* see it from your viewpoint, and that's why I personally do not.

you only see one side to it

I see exactly the logic behind it.

It's displayed in your dialogue.

you see the logic to support a racist narrative

What are we bitching about?

I understand what you said.

but not to protect ones nation

you don't see the threat

or the potential for havoc it has

I see how you could hypothetically say it is positive to some other position.

because you dismiss it purely because it has racist undertones

But only racists actually, really, would say that.

People who have souls don't say things like that.

>it's racist so it needs to be censored and given no voice

i love the left

Is it wrong to be a racist? Recongizing races are real?

you guys will be the new nazi's

Racism =/= seeing races and understanding that people are different

Oh, hate?

I agree.

holy hell is this what the neoliberal left has done to the word "racism"

Hate is wrong.

this isn't about hate at all

You say it isn't

But then when you're with your friends you probably do say exactly that.

Just like me eating food isn't about hunger Xd

A brief hypothetical dialogue on Leftist support for third-world invasion and also environmentalism:

Leftist: The world is over-populated, we're using up all of the earth's resources, we need to have fewer babies!
I: Most of the babies are born in Asia and Africa, why don't we support reducing the birth-rate there?
L: People in the West use much more water, land, electricity, etc with our houses and cars and computers than people in the third world.
I: Does that mean anyone who lives in a Western country places a greater strain on the planet?
L: Yes.
I: And people in the West who have lots of children do the greatest environmental damage?
L: Yes.
I: And the people with the highest birthrate are in Africa and Asia.
L: Yes, but they don't use up as much by way of resources.
I: So why are bringing them here? Won't they do a lot more environmental damage once they have houses and cars and electricity 24/7?

Where does this argument show any form of hate?

it's not even fuelled by hate

You say that again

But when you are with your friends, you probably say the opposite.

you don't realise how narrow your viewpoint is

When you are with your friends, you probably say "nigger" a lot.

'hes probably a racist so i'm not going to bat an eye to his opinion'

No, dude.

Saying nigger is wrong?...

>science is racist therefore i don't pay attention to it

I'm trying to listen to you.

you don't look into the dialogue i posted

But then you call your views "scientific"?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ii-bsrHB0o

>what are iq studies

Okay, so let's see the peer reviewed studies performed by actual researchers, and let's see conclusions, not just data.

Correlation is not evidence of causation in any situation.

we don't need the conclusions

we only need the data

Lol fuck off

The conclusions disagree with you most of the time.

because most people in the knowledge institutions are leftists

Researchers reach the conclusions and say "these should not be construed as races making a difference in IQ", but you don't listen.

and therefore most conclusions hold leftistb ias

Fuck you bro.

*bias

Yeah, fuck you.

of course you want the conclusions

you're absolutely deluded

Mhm. That's what it is definitely.

Leftism has become what people used to view the right

It's not that I trust the opinion of a scientist over your opinion, it's not that at all.

you're so self centered on your little view on the world

you don't preach, tolerance or acceptance

It's because the scientist is a lefitst, that's why.

>implying scientists don't have political views

It's not because I trust the opinon of a scientist over the editorialist at the Daily Caller.

i didn't expect a lot from an american

your country will be the first to fall from multiculturalism

Lol.