are there any documents or anything that suggests this

I dunno, read one of David Stevenson's books

Probably more info in there

is this the only historian that says this

Nope

Max Hastings talks about this

Modern talks about the cause of World War I are often cop-outs because people are pussies and don't want to blame Austria or Germany like they should

You could argue Germany was willing to participate in a war against Serbia

but not against all of Europe

Maybe to an extent Russia as well

Yes, Hastings is just as confused about that

And that leads to his conception that Germany desired domination.

Just because some Austrian guy got shot, all of Europe goes to war?

No, Germany played a massive role in making things worse.

He doesn't have enough evidence to base it off, if it's just germany said they would austria in any way against serbia

Russia choose to help Serbia

and France choose to help Russia

Yes, that is handing Austria a blank cheque to do whatever.

Of course it backfired because Germany lost.

France and Britain would've never joined if they didn't want to maintain the geopolitical balance that was there previously

If anything their joining was a significant contributor

And all of the debt they incurred was the cause of the populist rhetoric that caused Hitler's rise to power.

and it was only powered by their geopolitical desires

Britain was not involved in the machinations that started the war.

France and Russia, yes.

Britain, no.

No but they were probably likely to join regardless

they didn't have to defend Belgium

But they willingly went in a dedicated millions

You mean they didn't have a pact with Belgium

a pact from like 1830

But Belgium was an allied country so they defended it.

That's just the right thing to do.

What Germany did was kinniving and evil

What Britain did was righteous.

The right thing to do, increase the death toll and size of an already horrific war

You're brainwashed

>good goys

>bad goys

To beat back Wilhelm, yes.

it's not that simple

They're both in the wrong

Not at all.

Without Britain's intervention, Europe would be speaking German.

Again, Germany wanted domination of all of Europe.

Very much so, they both had geopolitical interests in the war, which was the predominant reason for their participation

Same intention as the Nazis.

What, you think after Russia was beaten, Germany would say "welp, that happened", and just stop murdering everyone?

They would probably conquer a large swathe of eastern european land

Germans didn't want European domination

They were going for the whole continent.

Adolf only wanted back the land Germany had pre WW1

The movements of their military prove they wanted the whole continent.

Like west Prussia

Nazi Germany wanted America speaking German.

Hitler didn't even want war, lol.

Bullshit.

Hahhahaha

Not bullshit hahaha

You guys have a bunch of weird pseudohistorical ideas

It's like history isn't actually real things that happened to you guys

Revisionism, right?

It's like you only look at it from one side

GreatestStoryNeverTold.tv

There is only one side. The side that wins.

I think he did want war, but only against the Soviet Union

this here is a nazi site but it's good infomration here: https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/nothanks/wwr00.html

@MrSally

"Peace offer"

"Everybody do what I want you to do, or I'll kill you, but if you do what I want you to do, we can have peace ❤ "

Isn't that exactly what we said?

After Hitler said it.

Peace with other countries @MrSally

i hate niggers

not with jews, lol

and jews

He said he's taking back his rightful land no matter what but if they stay outta his way then they can keep theirs. Quite respectful no?

Retaliation for the invasion of Poland and France is pretty much justified.

Poland is one of the last white ethnostates we have left

long live Poland

Lol

Enjoy becoming a plurality son.

not that im complaining or anything

but what is the logic in britain

@MrSally except he only invaded France to reclaim the Rheinlands stolen after WW1 and only invaded Poland to regain west Prussia

Is all of Europe white, or do you think some southern parts of it isn't? what's your opinions?

and their pact with poland

they said if germany invades they will declare war to protect poland

Absolute bullshit, GenZ.

I mean it sounds nice

but they didnt give a shit when glorious stalin invaded

so uh

@MrSally it's not

uhhhhhhh

opk

ok

<:merchant:323550879749898242>

@MrSally it's absolutely true, nazis only really dug in in France once the allies invaded the mainland.

Germany should be thankful it was allowed to remain a country.

After World War II, Germany should have ended.

@Deleted User Some Southern European nations have non european admixture, but they're still European in my eyes and deserve to maintain their homelands just as much as Swedes or Belgians do.

@MrSally read what denazification was like

@MrSally read about the rape of Berlin

I know about all of this shit

Doesn't make Germany look any more cushy or lovely

So they just deserved it lol?

Yes.

No but it makes the communists look like beasts

Every single person who joined that army voluntarily deserved it. Every single person involved in that government deserved it.

Nationalism is the biggest cancer of civilisation.

The conscripted men, they were innocent.

Anyone who resisted but was forced in anyways

That's innocence.

By your logic, communists deserve the same fate

@MrSally so we're British men

im pretty sure it was women that were raped and not soldiers

, French men

Like Russian commies?

The ones who weren't really commies?

They definitely deserved it.

Gotcha

you're a commie

no way in hell you aren't

No true commie fallacy

I wish Stalin got a bullet in the head.

@Deleted User same opinion

Because he was only half Jewish right? Didn't have the full ashkenazi IQ to help right?

What is this projection?

Who cares about what people 'deserve'. You get what you get.

^ based

^

@Deleted User if you're trying to argue might = right then why do you stick to communism ?

>but muh non violence and peace and equalism

That's why if violent shit ever goes down, I won't think twice before popping some bolshevik tankie in the head.

Tankies are not trustworthy people.

That's getting what you get.

Principally, I am nonviolent, but don't think for a second I don't believe in self-defense.

Naturally by that philosophy there shouldn't be intervention

you quite literally get what you get

no intervention, deal with it

no spreading around muh wealth

deal with it you commie faggot

Hahaha

It would be easier to just make the currency worthless.

" But but but private property is theft from the commons " faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaags

Private property does not exist.

Might is right is for pretentious fashgoys. Rights don't exist. There are only material forces which determine reality.

It's not theft, it simply doesn't exist.

It already belongs to the commons, people just need to wake the fuck up.

Step foot on my property and watch me blow your head off and get away with it, and then try and tell me property is a meme

You don't own private property, buddy.

>implying there is only material and no human element

You own personal property, but you own no means of production.

But everyone owns it lol?

This is the fallacy of the western middle class

You think that just because you have an apartment or a car or whatever, it's "private property".

If I'm not leasing it it's mine fam

It's not private

It's personal

>muh property
>abstract idealism of space
Haha, get rekt

>I'm going to redefine words

>if you don't use my definitions you're a retard

flawless logic

pri·vate
ˈprīvit/
adjective
adjective: private
(of a service or industry) provided or owned by an individual or an independent, commercial company rather than by the government.

>picking definitions that match your own agenda while ignoring all others offered

The other ones are irrelevant

lmao

The proper term for a home is personal property.

>homes are service or industry

If you want to talk about communism, you need to get used to this.

adjective
1.
belonging to or for the use of one particular person or group of people only.
"all bedrooms have private facilities"
synonyms: personal, one's own, individual, particular, special, exclusive, privately owned
"his private plane"

>cars are service or industry

If you want to talk about COMMUNISM, get used to using words in this way.

Burn the books. Kulak war now.

>if you want to talk about X, get used to my personal definitions

>you cannot talk about X without them

If you want to be a fucking douchebag and dance around the point, then fuck off.

@✡✡✡⎛⎛⎛ℕ𝕚𝕘𝕘𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕚𝕟⎠⎠⎠✡✡✡ oy vey

What did I miss?

Dance around the point? You're the one dancing around the point

Stirner was a hack

@Deleted User are you a Jewish brother

Oy gevalt

@MrSally getting rekt

Tell me the point this fool is trying to make

I dance around the end of the rainbow and charge $50 for a fake promise.

@MrSally if you're Jewish it'd really explain your intentions

Because I've made it clear thus far that a home, the thing you are threatening me over, is personal property, not private property.

>It is absolutely undeniable truth because I said it

>Since I said it, it cannot be untrue

:\

You're hopeless

adjective
1.
belonging to or for the use of one particular person or group of people only.
"all bedrooms have private facilities"
synonyms: personal, one's own, individual, particular, special, exclusive, privately owned
"his private plane"

My home belongs to me and Hereford fits private definition. Dude...

Everything belongs to everyone. The question is, would you want to use someone else second hand tampon. You decide.

Therefore *

Muh dictionary

@MrSally didn't you try that one first?

Learn to speak commie or fuck off

I used the definition provided that fits the context I am using.

Learn to speak fash or get the gas

You did the same, but it's not the right word in a communist dialog.

You are thinking of personal property.

>I will create a set of definitions for commonly used words and since I said so it must be the official set of definitions for X because I said so

MrSally, comrade

The idea of personal property, while an ugly phrase, is for practical reasons. Like getting AIDS and dying.

please say something valuable

or go home

Exactly.

No you're thinking of the private property of entrepreneurs and business owners, implying they should be owned by the retard who can't make his own business

This is practicality, to avoid confusion over property used for production "owned" by the bourgeoisie and property where a person lives.

Let's try again. This time in English.

These people won't make the distinction between private and personal property.

They refuse.

English is a social construct you misogynist pig @Deleted User

It is, actually.

They keep calling their house "private property" as if it's their company or something.

I'm not saying I want to take your fucking house from you you dumbshits.

Dictionaries are racist and ableist, what about those who cannot read?

Word definitions are a spectrum and we should embrace the entire spectrum.

Words can mean whatever you want them to mean

Private property is retarded idealism, and you enforce it because you are a superstitious zealot.

I don't enforce private property

I'll accept "personal property" is the way you filthy commies refer to "the means of production" but personal property IS STILL PRIVATE PROPERTY UNTIL YOU AS A DICTATOR SAY OTHERWISE FAM

I consider private property to be a myth

@MrSally Sorry, I agree. This chat is getting messy.

A little

And I have to go back to my wagecuck job in less than 10 hours so I'm going to go to bed

"Heil Hitler gas the kikes race war now" for example can mean "praise mao and stalin our greatest leaders"

At the end of the day, stop me.

Again, interesting topics

only if I mean it that way

"Heil Hitler gas the kikes race war now" for example can mean "praise mao and stalin our greatest leaders"

language is a spectrum

accept the spectrum now

Nighty night everybody, **kisses everyone on the mouth gayly**

thanks for the kiss sally-chan

Are gay kisses good?

No they lead to anal sex

http://josephsciambra.com/surviving-gaybarely/

As long as I'm on top.

It seems like you know a lot about anal sex.

Yeah, I do, doesn't mean I participate or ever will or want though, shits literally like summoning a demon, create STDs from nowhere

>summoning a demon
Sounds hot.

Read that blog thing man

>clicking on gay link
Try again jew.