international
Discord ID: 308950154222895104
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1838/3012
| Next
that fucking snake guy
No he wasnt
he was a national socialist
if you look at histoREEEE
are you autistic i was quoting steven crowder
@Mr. X thatsthejoke.jpeg
The point is these โliberalsโ and โconservativesโ flip flop between their viewpoints that supposedly define them so fucking much that they canโt even be considered different anymore
@BigBadRed9000 Oh yeah I forgot I was supposed to magically know that
Im apparently autistic because I dont know a meme you made
the quotes should've given it away
yeah, you should have because there were FUCKING QUOTES AROUND IT
"what do you mean the quotation marks mean that it's a quote?"
-probably mr. e
Thereโs a reason the joke that โif [Republican] said this, than liberals would refuseโ (and vise versa) exists
the only reason they're different is because they hate each other
conservatives say one thing and liberals say the opposite, and vice versa
They donโt even actually believe in anything, they just go along with what appears to be popular and their supporters follow them like sheep
@BigBadRed9000 Quotes dont give it a way that you're quoting steven crowder. I only knew you were quoting someone
@DA GOMMIE JOO that's life, people and political parties generally change. Unless you're a radical and set too much in your beliefs.
I knew someone who was a liberal who had previously been against escalation with Russia, but as soon as Hillary suggested it he went fucking nuts
There are no beliefs here
There is only following the leader
I guess that completely reversing your position because it benefits you more is okay
It isnโt even ideology anymore
Thats one person. Amos not them in general
From what I have seen itโs been reflected most of the time
@DA GOMMIE JOO No its better than okay, its progress.
Trump supporters who supported refugees and didnโt care about Islam until the Trump campaign
what do you mean by that amos?
they aren't even going forward
They're just scooting left and right over the y axis
they get nowhere
and accomplish nothing
No many of them cared about refugees before then
And Liberals for things like a border fence until trump said he wanted a wall
And even back then people were screaming racist
yeah a lot of liberals wanted a border fence until trump said that he wanted a wall
@DA GOMMIE JOO except they have, Trump for example.
He was a democrat and then had different views eventually and became a republican
now he's keeping the peace between America and some other countries
To claim that liberalism and conservatism are even somewhat different is practically making a mockery of political theory and practice in general
nearly starting a trade war with china and heightening tensions with russia in syria = keeping peace
If I was in his position I'd never make a deal with kim yet I think trump did the right thing
keeping peace with some countries yeah
trade wars are fine
They even overlapped on a bunch of issues but still fucking debated each other about them
if he wants to make trade more equal then he should go for it
Wouldnt communists agree?
โI support intervention against ISISโ
โI support intervention against ISISโ
โYouโre a fucking scumbagโ
โHow fucking dare you motherfuckerโ
โYouโre gonna Kill innocentsโ
They overlap on a lot of issues but disagree on a lot. Both sides are pretty flexible though
?
Seriously, there is no ideology.
There are two parties.
Thatโs it.
and let's not forget about how 2016 trump and 2018 trump might as well be different people altogether
Thatโs the ideology.
Thats straight up false
Whatever they say goes.
of course they have ideologies
2016: mexico will pay for the wall
2017: congress will pay for the wall
2018: there won't be a wall
No hes making a wall
and people's opinions change generally speaking
2013 trump: don't bomb syria
2017 trump: yeet
the wall will cost a lot
Lmao
Different time
What about the Trump supporters who still think trump is great and have always supported him from the beginning, despite the fact heโs ignored/gone back on an insane amount of his positions?
of course you're going to have a different opinion of another country over 4 years
2016 trump: mexico is terrible
2017 trump: I love mexico
That isnโt ideology. Thatโs blind following.
especially a middle eastern country
He never said mexico is terrible
you get the point though
He literally said Mexican immigrants are rapists and drug dealers.
he's gone back on a lot of what he said
Hm, letโs see.
Yes illegal immigrants do tend to turn to a life of crime
no he didn't say illegals
and they have raped plenty of women too
like in germany with the muslim refugees
>hates liberals
he said all of mexican immigrants as a whole
(right?)
>agrees with liberals
>????
No he's talking about illegals
Border wall, neutrality, not attacking Syria, attacking China via trade/diplomacy, never negotiating with Kim.
Those are just a few.
he doesnt mind immigrants hell his whole family are immigrants I think
I remember hearing about how liberals were celebrating when trump launched the missiles on syria
you can agree with liberals and disagree with them with some things
I know I do
But I tend to agree with conservatives a little more
depends on the situation too
>commies hate liberals >liberals actually agree with commies on most issues
Trump at start of campaign: โFuck Kim no negotiationโ
End of campaign: โEh okayโ
2017: โI changed my mindโ
2018: *shakes Kimโs hand* โhello sirโ
@DA GOMMIE JOO I remember liberals being upset over the deal with kim
Thank fuck he changed his mind Amos
If I was him I wouldnt change my mind
This chat is cancerous
Goodbye
Dont care, shoo
The point isnโt whether his change of heart is good, the point is that he refuses to follow his own fucking basic principles he set for himself
Brick is right
Goodbye
he does follow most of his principles though
hell hes even still trying to make a wall
trump: kim will be met with fire and fury
also trump: kim is a fine person
Good for him
>when you flip-flop more than a pair of shower shoes
its called being a human being
yknow
those types of people who's mind change over time?
And depending on a situation?
What do you think is better?
Nuclear war with korea or peace?
Is that a projection commie?
its a pity you guys remain totally ignorant about the differences between conservatism and liberalism.
I highly recommend some more research for both sides.
both are capitalist
if you do this I might read some marx
I might
so?
Not everyone on the left are communists
but everyone is at least socialist
Some not everyone
there's syndicalists and liberals
Liberals are much more closer to the right though
Minority is socialist. Most in the west are democratic-socialist, anarchists or trotskyist
but not as close as centrists and not on the right
Right
and also liberals who make up a lot in the west
like in America
And many european countries
Democratic-socialist is just another name for a progressive liberal with left tendency
socialism is a very broad term
Liberals mostly have a left tendency
but yeah democratic socialists are more to the left of course
That is not correct.
but it is
How?
For one the mapping for people who claim to be liberals are on the left but close to the centre
Like the political maps
Where?
Like the political compass among many other sites
What about it?
Like I said it maps out liberals as leftists like every time
How many times?
not to mention how communist and anarchists antifa and sjws tend to be
pretty much every time I've seen a liberal use it
like me when I was a liberal
I would like to see where you take this statistics
but its libertarian not authoritarian left
It seems subjective to me
Communists and socialists advocate for authoritarianism, but they do it in the name of โjusticeโ
Yet they also deny itโs being authoritarian
I took it on many sites but the most popular one is https://www.politicalcompass.org/
Its not totally accurate though
They literally contradict themselves
I donโt get it
Now I know why chat is cancerous
because you're here
and liberals tend to have left leaning opinions
@Mr. X I don't care about your personal experience. You were talking about most liberals having left-wing tendency. This is false.
like on welfare
Not at all
Depends on your definition of liberal
My personal experience has a lot to do with it
@Brickiest Brick My definition of liberal is just liberals in general
Your personal experience is garbage
That is not a definition
Snap
It is
Thats going in my cringe compilation
as in the general definition retard
You donโt know how to debate
I do, but what's to debate? You should do more research
You sound like someone who has a bigger ego than me
Firefly youโre wise to not talk to Mr. E
thats a bad sign
wise if you want to be ignorant
Mr. E I am on your side for the most part
I could care less
However you just make a complete mockery of everything I stand for
Which is?
liberals are still centrists with more right than left tendencies
Not at all
You donโt properly cite sources and you donโt know how to argue and debate your points clearly
You donโt even know much information oftentimes
You canโt back up what you say properly, in other words
And donโt respond with an insult
Iโm not trying to insult you
I advocate for authoritarianism without denying it is authoritarian
Now that is respectable
Authority is good for you.
Not denying that
I do know how to properly site my sources. But I dont have to cite them everytime someone asks. Especially when the sources are easy to find. Im not a special ed teacher who teaches retarded children basic information. And how could I be anymore clear. And I do know how to argue and debate but if the other side is going to be too ignorant the best I can do is tell them to do more research so they dont think Im trying to brainwash them. Its best if they find the information themselves because they clearly wont listen. Its pretty basic. And yes I do know a lot of information. And like I said I can back it up.
"I don't have to cite sources, you're just stupid!"
Or subtus, yes.
Im not obligated to serve you or teach you.
I essentially think authoritarianism is the only way we can ever achieve a society that is both morally just and capable of perpetuating itself
Well Mr. E, you have to realize that you actually are debating people who are ignorant of the facts
communism has killed 100 million people. seriously, you dont need sources to know that since everyone knows it
You need to show them research, they wonโt look it up themselves
@ashoka we won't ever really know how many people socialism has killed, all we know is it wasn't nearly enough
They often validate their opinions with sources that are just biased in their favor
are you some kind of nationalized socialist
@Brickiest Brick No they're ignorant of me, in ways you're ignorant of me
So you need to understand that you must show your sources
they're clearly not ignorant of the facts
Set in their ways but they're not ignorant of facts,
He has no sources
"I have sources, but I just won't show them to you"
sounds like
"I don't have sources and I'm in denial"
I do, I just see no point providing them and finding them for you
How would you benefitting from such obvious information benefit me? What would that gain me?
Im not in denial and I do have sources.
Yet you find the time and effort to keep responding? It seems rather contradictory. @Mr. X
Im obviously not making shit up for no reason.
anyways, as i was saying. 90% of the world is socialist under a socialist government. the eu is a good example of this, and that is why most governents are horrible. look at africa, prime axample of government intervention ruining economies. if you just let companies come in and save these poor workers and ppl without any government intervetnion, i wouldnt be surprised if africa turns out to be #1 most successful continent in the world.
the eu isn't even close to socialism
@โกโกโก Thats because responding actually benefits me. Rather than wasting my time trying to help the ignorant when they can only help themselves I can learn from others and the less ignorant.
"I refuse to debate you because you're ignorant. No, I'm not just ignoring you."
i noticed it now
๐ค
D*spacito tbh
are you kidding me? the head of eu angela merkel is literally letting rapefugees in europe and not doing anythin about it
@DA GOMMIE JOO I'll "debate" all I like but dont expect me to show you some obvious sources. Im not ignoring you as you can easily see.
if that isnt socialism i dont know whta is
socialism = rapefugees in your country
Socialism is when black people commit rape
And the more rape they commit, the socialister it is
if they're so obvious then it shouldn't be a problem for you to look them up
tbh i think hitler might be better than stalin, only 6 mil died from the holocaust while 8 mil died from the holodomor
and thats not even counting the many that died under stlain
@DA GOMMIE JOO it isnt, I told you. Im not oblegated to teach special ed class.
You overlooked a crucial detail
The only way for an ignorant to learn is to search the facts themselves. Not be spoonfed by the intellectually superior.
"I refuse to cite sources because you're retarded"
classic sterling logic
No because you're subtus.
Fucking epic high level debate
You're only retarded when it comes to liberalism and conservatism
here let me look up facts myself
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1838/3012
| Next