international
Discord ID: 308950154222895104
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1250/3012
| Next
XD
You know I had to do it to em
a bunch of black people blocked the streets in Sacramento because a car jacker got shot by police
rip
โโTis is civil disobedience
I'm glad they did
Police niggas wildin
They vrazy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpNaV2Usxlc
@everyone
He did nothing wrong. That is all.
^^^
>international
>no African
Well that's about what I'd expect tbh.
Lol
Hello chat
Oke
Is this y'all
Greeetings
.gloop
i am looking for a plantation sim. any one have any suggestions?
Daily reminder that the centrist will get the first bullet in case of any revolution
The eternal (((american)))
I hate Americans
On the west coast almost all of them are mutts
Look at YouTube videos from California
like the shit Buzzfeed spews out
Most of the people are Asian-Hispanic-Whire hybrid mongrels
God I hate them so much
And the USA ruins everything
They destroy any country that challenges the elite and the system. *cough cough* Syria, Libya, Iraq, Nazi Germany
if I ever see someone doing a flag burning of the US flag, I will join in.
White Juche NOW. Fuck Capitalism and FUCK THE INTERNATIONAL JEW.
Hitler was right btw. He did more for workers than any communist.
NatSoc Gang
Hitler was a capitalist dingoid
False tho
So the economy of the third reich was socialist?
That is the second word.
Labor based new currency.
Arrested Rothschild.
Autobahn.
The Volksgemeinschaft.
So how much of the economy was controlled by workers via the state and how much of it was privately controlled or state controlled?
Listen. You can stick to pure ideology... Sure. Or you can realize there is nuance. Hitler really did uplift the German working class.
Home loans for the newlywed.
Why are you avoiding my question
Interest was illegal.
New cars for all.
What do you even think capitalism and socialism are?
Perhaps too arbitrary terms.
They aren't arbitrary
It's important to understand them within an acedemic and historical context
If you can't grasp what they are then you can't make a statement about whether the third reich was capitalist or not
NS is a transcendent worldview to me.
I understand it esoterically.
It synthesizes elements of both.
It creates a classless society.
Through unifying the Volk.
It synthesizes capitalism and socialism?
There was a market. But it was kept in check. It had to serve the Volksgemeinschaft.
You know these terms describe property relations that are diametrically opposite and can't be brought to marriage?
I mean that exists in basically every developed country now
Completely laissez-faire free market economies have never existed
Unemployment didn't exist in the Reich. Wages went much further. The people were given socialised everything.
That's still capitalism
''Characteristics central to capitalism include private property, capital accumulation, wage labor, voluntary exchange, a price system and competitive markets''
These all existed in the third reich, no?
They did, BUT.
Very socialist elements also existed in COALESCE.
This is why I love it. True synthesis.
Better than either alone.
What do you understand socialism to mean exactly?
Hitler was syndicalist
:3
Woke
haha yes goys
gay
@โฆColton of Yoreโฆ#2152 God dammit, you have no idea what you are talking about.
I hate TYT
they're idiots
and they're like hardcore liberals
Mr E is Cenk
Vroom
Ty
No
๐ฆ
Cenk is a racist faggot
So no I aint
Especially considering that Im not even liberal lol
Liberal in denial
Not liberal but ok lol
You are a liberal
He's clearly a liberal
He has mental issues and thinks liberalism isn't centrism
He thinks centrism is an ideology
He is delusional
Is this a bully server
Let's all be friends
Or y aren't invited to my birthday party
๐
@Deleted User Hitler was a good commie
I sucked off Hitler
True story
same
another day off thanks to my anprim friend
he called in a bomb threat at my school
from canada
so now i got a day off thanks to him
he looks gay
Sex
@buyXRBpls#2128 gay with me
Ok
@Vex#5989 Didn't expect to see you here mr spic.
The British Empire was communist, convince me I'm wrong
ur not wrong
knew it
It has been decided
is he flashing his tits
I hope so
Next presiden
What
Fuck britain
Anti anglo gang
@Erika.ฯฯ๐ฎ๐ช How did a marxist insurgent group like that manage to break up into three groups that hated each other?
is that the ra?
Yeah
idk
marxism never worked
true
Marxism is an analytical tool for analysing socioeconomic relations. It's always worked.
marxism gay
no it hasnt
exactly
against human nature
Yeah, pretty sure it has considering the fact that it's been a mainstay in social science departments for ages.
Human nature is fake and gay. Not an argument.
Like what?
your anarcho communities have never worked
:c
I'm not an anarchist.
Most people do not want to work for the good of others without a profit
Marxism is not the same thing as communism
explain the major difference
There are social scientists that utilize Marxist theory but are not Marxists in the political sense.
Marxism is a socioeconomic theory that communism is based on
Marxism is not communism
they're different entities then
Yes
I guess
Communism is a specific stage of socioeconomic development according to historical materialism.
Yes I've heard of the steps of humanity
I think it starts with feudalism
It starts with hunter-gatherer societies.
Who cares dude both are retarded
No, they're actually really badass.
Disagree completely
killing millions of lives is not badass
especially when they're innocent
That's fine. You can disagree and cite unreliable statistics that aren't supported by common sense or the historical record.
it is and nor do I have unreliable statistics
I just trust common sense dude
and historical records
totally not propaganda
totally trustworthy population statistics too
No, it's actually not. Those numbers can be confirmed by the population statistics in the Soviet archives.
Yeah in the soviet archives ๐
Totally not communist propaganda at all
I get my archives from the Lord.
True story.
That is honestly more believable than commie propaganda tbh
There's a good reason why the villainous kulaks were liquidated. They were far from innocent, and the poor and middle peasants would agree.
Middle peasants. Lol how to lose an argument in 2 words.
You just proved your ignorance of Russian socioeconomic relations at that time. Middle peasants were a thing.
Marxism is VRAZY
Not a communist
But Marxism is pretty interesting
I know I never said it wasnt
This wasn't a highly advanced western capitalist nation. This was a nation that was evolving out of semi-feudalism.
Which is why soviet socioeconomic relations were retarded
"Peasants" how very non reactionary
How very progressive
What's so reactionary about that? The peasantry was a social class that existed at that time and had it's own divisions.
How is it not reactionary?
I can tell you how it was
"Peasantry"
As simple as that
I mean this is common sense dude
That would be like calling the industrial working class reactionary. Again, this was a nation evolving out of semi-feudalist social relations. The peasantry was a class of agrarian laborers. Just because you're a sperg-lord that only thinks of it as an insult and not an actual social class, doesn't mean it's not a valid socioeconomic descriptor.
No it would be like calling peasantry reactionary.
The industrial working class and peasantry are not the same.
No fucking shit. How is it reactionary?
One chooses to work that way one doesn't have a choice and grows up that way.
I just told you.
Peasantry
like in the medieval times
lol
No, you didn't. Just because the term is used as an insult in the West doesn't take away from the fact that it was a well-established social class in feudal and semi-feudal nations.
dude no wonder communist leaders end up trying to have a dictatorship or monarchy lol
I did
I never said it was because it was an insult
Then how is it reactionary?
Because "peasantry"
Peasantry is reactionary
It's pretty self explanatory tbh
Well I guess that's if you actually studied in school of course
Again, you're assuming that in every context it has a negative connotation. It doesn't. The peasantry was a social class in feudal and semi-feudal nations. The Russian peasants never took offense to the socioeconomic terminology and even had political movements organized around peasants rights.
It does
What makes it reactionary
Peasantry
No, it doesn't. You're talking out of your ass. Your logic doesn't add up. Admit you're mistaken and move on.
what about peasantry makes it reactionary
A peasant is a pre-industrial agricultural laborer or farmer, especially one living in the Middle Ages under feudalism and paying rent, tax, fees or services to a landlord.
tru
Okay? And?
"especially one living in the Middle Ages"
What
"middle ages"
Hm
Yeah, the peasantry was widespread in the middle ages and was virtually non-existent in Europe post-industrial revolution. They still existed in the East, however.
Which is rather primitive
As many places like Russia still had not done away with feudalism entirely.
Gee I wonder why it was practically non-existent once they got more advanced while the commies in the east didn't.
It sure is a mighty mystery for me
First of all, it was the commies that transformed a semi-feudal backwater into an industrialized world power. So you should really fact check yourself before you wreck yourself.
Yet they still had peasantry around lmao
tells you alot about communism if you actually think about it tbh
But yeah dude I gotta do some more important shit rn
So peace
Is this still the reactionary vs non reactionary argument
No, not after they had become an industrialized world power. Semi-feudal relations were done away with.
That never had a resolution
I was looking forward to that
This guy is such an overly emotional fag. He clearly has a grudge against shit he knows nothing about.
๐ฆ
Muh evil commies! Muh 100 gorillion! Muh Soviet propaganda!
Ignorant cuck.
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1250/3012
| Next