Real niggga shit

kelly are you proficient in firearms

Small arms.

Anything from a .22 LR to a .50 BMG.

do you have any videos of you firing

If the PMCs had any brains, they would've at least offered me a job.

No, I don't show-off.

awww

Besides, I'd rather tell the people with guns where to go and who to shoot.

That takes more skill than actual shooting.

Any idiot can pull a trigger.

It takes someone of composure and excellence to have it pointed at the right person/people.

At the right time.

For the right reasons.

i feel like i shooting up my school sometimes

You could just cut-class.

Just fake sick and go to trade school.

Conventional education is a massive waste of time.

I went to a continuation school, the military, and then trade school.

I have more going for me than most college students without any debts.

Most college graduates have no skills and debts.

I'm about to go on permanent disability...with that said, I'll have it better than the majority of the work-force.

That's how fucked the world is.

permanent disability
what

You can thank PMCs for making the world a giant shit-storm in which government supports the people being slaves.

Sorry, full disability that will be permanent.

I'm still getting used to the verbage.

Nah but i mean

why

have you killed a man before kelly

Nope.

Well...not directly.

What's your disability

Psychosis.

whats your MOS

@fannybandit

42A

Human Resources.

I know...I'm a badass.

Silencing people is a nazi tactic dumbass @Killmonger#2440 and I never said punching people makes you a nazi.

He's gone.

Oh what a shame

Plenty of communists are in antifa.

And anarchists. Sometimes both.

brb door

What's your view of private military contractors?

Pointless imo.

Private militaries as a whole that is.

The most dangerous entities are ones that don't need to exist to begin with.

But then again I'm not really educated on them.

Anarcho communists is a pretty up and rising sub culture atm

With young folk

Gee I wonder why

Who knows vro

Anarcho communism is one of the best versions of anarchy but anarchy is still shit either way

What about anarcho capitalism

Or

A lot of the youth just seem to obsess over equality and freedom

Anarcho meritocracism

Anarcho capitalism is probably the most idiotic form of anarchy

doesn't seem like it would work at all

I'm not too familiar with any form of anarchy

Anarcho communism is the most realistic and I'm not even communist either

O

What r u

Capitalist

I c

I'm an uwucommie

But even I know capitalism wouldn't work in a capitalist society

I look like a chick now that I shaved -_-

Oof

No

Anyway I'm not surprised to why anarcho communism is so popular with the youth

the sad thing is they're likely mentally ill in some way

you shaved?

Ur pussy?

can i get a picture my dude

No

I thought Antifa was mostly ancoms tbh

I don't show my identity much

😦

Some of them are

why dont you

some are sjws and some are far leftt

Because I just dont want to

I prefer being anonymous tbh

Anarcho anonyism

Lol

But yeah dude don't join antifa

I have an uncle in antifa

They're terrorists plus assault is illegal. Best to only hit someone in self defence or call the cops

He keeps sending me anime pictures

And won't take his mask off when he comes in the house

My uncle is an atheist and in the far left.

He's pretty chill most of the time though.

I was surprised because he's one of the only people in my family who is an atheist.

ancap only an btw

I was an atheist but now I'm more agnostic.

anarchy is just a shit show

I get the message and it's point but its doomed to be a failure

Also I was in the far left when I was younger but now I'm more of centrist.

More on the liberal side though.

"Silencing people is a nazi tactic"

Damn you Liberal Nazis and your libel laws

Your FCC

>Liberal nazis

FCC? What lol

You're the one who said silencing people in some how a nazi thing

So apparently political prisoners in gitmo,

Assassinations,

And legal limits to free speech

Make liberals nazis

Not assassinations

Most liberals like free speech

Oh because people arent silenced if they're killed

Interesting

Innteeerrreeesssttiiinnnggg

No they are for sure. But that's not what I mean.

I think you're at least smart enough to understand what I mean dude.

Wew

Almost 2000 members

Plus what legal limits are there?

I'm not asking to shut you down or anything. I really want to know.

brb

Ok Im back

Advertisement restrictions, libel laws, incitements to violence, uses copyright law, limits porn, etc

All sorts of things

Then you know, the entire period of the red scare

Gitmo today

All points in which speech is limited

Because NOBODY claims free speech is absolute.

It is when it's spoken.

Putting restrictions on what someone says and disabling them from speaking their mind is morally wrong.

There is no reality in which they differentiate between spoken, written, or other forms of "speech"

So no,

Its not "when its spoken"

And even then, libel law, and what the state deems "an encitement to violence" can still be prosecuted

Two things that happen via spoken word

@everyone https://twitter.com/leftypol_int/status/971479962300563456

So again, Free speech isnt absolute

And it never has been

fuck you commie bastard

fuck me too pls

will do babe

Each ideology sets a list of parameters for the excepted forms of speech

Nice 2000 members

Its just that a liberal set allows for Nazis to use hate speech and justifies their own convenient censorship of other ideas

<:rb:312038543046475776>

Free speech is a spook. If you can slaughter your enemies publically, no one will dare to challenge you.

imagine how rich a indian american jew would be

I just realized that lool

<:porky:315615014751043588>

No you're allowed say it but you're not allowed to actually show signs on meaning it when you seem violent. Joking or saying it won't just get your arrested especially if you don't show any signs of possibly doing it.

Yes it will

And it has

Annd

No it's not. that's not what free speech is to allow.

You're still trying to cherry pick out of an entire list I've given

so, hows communism working out

In which country or government?

can you didnt im pirating music

And the fact you think free speech selectively allows certain things over others

I need to concentrate

Illustrates my point

brb a sec

That it isnt universal

blicky got the stiffy uh

So why are you still arguing

UH

Ok Im back

Clapping cheeks to gummo is my city

I'm not you

Free speech doesn't selectively allow certain things over others

Except I've illustrated it does.

<:bour:313709044957315082> when you realize scarcity is not a myth

When?

We've "legally" violated free speech in the US throughout the red scare, we're doing it right now with political prisoners, immigrants, etc.

We also do it legally on a daily basis

With literal law

Which laws?

This isnt something you can claim isnt real when its written into the legal code of every state on earth

And holy shit

I already said libel,

Ad restrictions

Etc

I've given you the list

Like I said you're allowed speak it. Just not threaten.

Already

No, you aren't

Writing or showing is a different story

You literally are not allowed to take part in libel

And no, it isnt

Holy shit

Do you know what libel is?

That's threatening to a person

No it isnt

Its slander.

Its literally JUST slander

And it's meant to protect business

Which can ruin the person's reputation and that's threatening to the person

The same way copyright is used to protect business

Copyright also, isnt anything to do with a threat

But again, a form of limiting speecg

They're written into law and you inherently benefit from them, we all do, and you're claiming they somehow aren't real

I dont understand your malfunction

Free speech is fine and useful for arguments and debates and conversations so long as someone doesn't directly threaten someone or cause possible harm to the person.

LAW

a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.

You're wrong

I dont understand why you're still going

How so?

The point is who can say what

Is limited at any given time

Regardless as to whether we think it's "good" to limit those forms of speech

Or not

Anyone can say anything so long as it doesn't cause direct and intentional harm.

Apparently not

Apparently Nazis can run around and say all sorts of shit that causes intentional harm

And you justify it on a consistent basis

Such as?

Yet you'll use libel to protect business

You're trying to draw all these distinctions that literally don't exist

What do I justify that nazis do that causes intentional harm?

Nazi here, AMA

Gg

Wondering when the Nazis would come

What do I justify that nazis do that causes intentional harm? @Deleted User

We are always watching 😈

And I'm not going to speak to your personal actions E, don't use semantics

I mean as a liberal public

@Mr.E#2794 I dont know

Point is your definition of free speech literally isnt the one we use

I'm not using semantics. You said You're so I assumed you were talking about me.

There can only be ONE free speech

No I mean you as a liberal

And you knew I did

Not some speech is free but some aint

Hence that's the context

Again, still not contending with every point in history and present day where we violate free speech based on legal considerations

Because again, You're stretching no argument into a shit load of questions

No Im for saying anything as long as it doesn't directly harm a person. Nazi or not.

As if your questions are points in and of themselves

And that's not what we use

So I don't care what YOU say

I care abour how freedom of speech is applied

Yes it is you've even said so while listing out the laws

In the end the Nazis win, no point in trying to fight it anymore

No, but I havent

Tell that to ww2

Cause again,

You literally don't use free speech that way