Attributing deaths from interventionism to capitalism, the dumb article you shared

Third time I've posted this "I gave it as food for thought versus the "Communist Death Toll" meme, I hadn't read it all."

if you disagree, it's your job to defend capitalism's legacy

not mine to defend communism's

I'm not a communist

I'm just debunking the idiotic idea that capitalism is somehow more interventionist than other systems

And what are you then?

Where did you debunk this? You posted an article to suggest Chinese involvement in Vietnam could've resulted in as much as/more death than the US's involvement

which is completely untrue

Because interventionism happens regardless, and the U.S was more isolationist when they were more free market than they are now

then why invade Vietnam?

To spread their influence in asia, as I already said

"interventionism happens regardless" < this betrays your true motive

''You posted an article to suggest Chinese involvement in Vietnam could've resulted in as much as/more death than the US's involvement'' See north and south korea

Glorious chinese backed north korea

no death there

to assert interventionism without providing a solid incentive as to why a country would expend resources to affect a change in government is your fallacy

<:lenin:322125387297456131> I AM ALIVE COMRADES!

yo

There was always an incentive to intervene in other countries to install a more friendly government

If you can't see that I don't know what to tell you

Installing a more friendly government is a one-off event contingent on the previous government being unfriendly

Profiteering is a continuous process

profiteering never ends

as long as there is profit to be had

doesn't make sense

what the soviets did in eastern europe was not a one off event fam

neither what china did in north korea

ugh

nasty anti-communist government overthrown = gone, no more intervention
nasty anti-capitalist government overthrown = gone, continuous intervention to harvest resources

capitalism is good for harvesting resources yes, unlike socialism

even if we are to take your false dichotomy at face value

LOL

"yes it's true we rape the world, our cock's much longer than the communists"

''rape the world''

you snake

Did the soviets rape russia?

YES

arguable

ahahaha

jesus christ!

They turned a backwards country with an 18% literacy rate and massive poverty into an industrial powerhouse with an 88%+ literacy rate in under 50 years

won the space race

increased healthcare provisions

top kek

and gulags don't forget that one

no free speech

typical soviet propaganda

like I said

arguable

how are you not a communist again?

because I don't believe the communist mode of production can be obtained in the near future

so what do you believe is a good system?

not how it works, you don't get to make claims about communism then attack the person

there are no rules

Answer, what do you think would work best?

I'm not sure, perhaps some Keynesian mix of automation and UBI?

gone offy quiet

did you get around to those articles yet?

No, probably won't ever read them

lol

So many things to read, don't think I'll ever get to it

shame, they provide quite a compelling case as to why military exploitation of sovereign nations is a more predominantly (if not exclusively) capitalistic feature

Well that's false right off the bat

So I'm glad I didn't read that trash

you posted it

lol

military exploitation exclusive to capitalism?

What utter trash

" is a more predominantly (if not exclusively) capitalistic feature"

What kind of a brainlet writes that?

is a more predominantly (*if not exclusively*) capitalistic feature

it's like you can't even read

IF NOT EXCLUSIVELY

Why didn't they investigate to make sure it was or wasn't?

Sounds like a shit article

Gentleman.

LMAO THE SCHOLARS DON'T KNOW DEY STOOPID

Did research but oh I can't say if it's exclusive to capitalism or not

The Jews are to blame.

Appeal to authority, what a brainlet

not this time I'm afraid, RFZ

In other words

Even happier i didn't read that trash

>178 new messages
>only 1 meme image
Wew, if only chopin was here to see this

<:feels:312925727475499008>

"I didn't read the article I gave to try and refute you, I don't plan to read it, and I don't care if it gives a strong argument that I'm wrong"

this is your brain on /pol/

No I know it's dumb since it even implies it's exclusive to capitalism

It's such a dumb statement it makes it all worthless

"is a more predominantly (*if not exclusively*) capitalistic feature"

I may as well make this my username

And you don't even know why it implies it

"is a more predominantly (*if not exclusively*) capitalistic feature"

@Deleted User "exploitation and domination of other nations is a capitalist phenomenon"

<:thronking:321284126332420097>

IF NOT EXCLUSIVELY

hurr durr I don't know, i just did the research but what do I know?

Like the image above says, it's blatantly not the case