no u

@Pinochet Shut the fuck up liberal

Be kind to your friendly neighborhood boomer @Deleted User

I'm a 12yo anarchist

Fuck off will ye m8

meh, i am just wating bombard body language and her hot takes and that seems to be what the real boomer thinks not me

this is a high quality chat

Yea

also

there is a channel for <#507036970472570880>

@RealBullWhip Delete your fucking profile pic

why wont any server make judge pepe a meme <:ree:520000441036046336>

it's real commie hours

Stalin was more of a nationalist than Mussolini

Hence his invention and implementation of socialism in one country

Cortez is a fish

Last shitpost

Ocasio-Cortez is a fucking revisionist

Dumbass*

Cortez is a bitch

<:chad:508484033513259028>

it really annoys me that Americans insist on calling everything that is not socialism, socialism

Like Bernie Sanders

yes

God I hate him

Pre much

he's a bloody social democrat

Bernie is welfare capitalist

He's a social democrat larping as a socialist

and he ruined the fucking word

now "socialism" means just "muh Norway model"

for the majority of U.S youths

jfc

You can't talk about welfare or state intervention anymore without hearing about venezuela

because of that old fuck

that is meaning

Every boomer thinks welfare is socialism

because of him

....

didn't they think of that during Obama though?

that they were gonna bring in islamic gommunizm?

Social democrat isnt shit. Its like saying Fascist capitalist. Makes no fucking sense. Like anarcho capitalism.

I need to rephrase what I mean by boomer

I mean my local conservatives

around my age

isn't this just a feature of American....uh...exceptionalism?

that I call boomers

because they think like boomers

Hot take

Bernie Sanders is a socialist because socialism never works

Like Bernie

lmao

Gotem

And my local liberals think like robots. Take everything our teachers say like its spoon fed. All of them believe the “Gender wage gap” now in my law class.

***ARTICLE 12***. In the U.S.S.R. work is a duty and a matter of honor for every able-bodied citizen, in accordance with the principle: "He who does not work, neither shall he eat."

The principle applied in the U.S.S.R. is that of socialism: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."

How does a word with a fairly simple definition - *worker ownership of means of production* - elude so many fucking people. Do people not go and read about terms? Really? People don't check definitions? OK then.

I can't explain that to them

The definition of socialism

the argument always goes in a circle

Just show them Article 12 of the soviet constitution

.....but its the simplest fucking thing in the world

And show them the ukrainian holodomor

oh ffs

"Bernie Sanders is a socialist."

"No he's not"

"Some unrelated point about Venezuela"

Otto

kys

Clearly all of them were lazy negros who didnt work

😄

Every time

Otto ily

And venezeula rn

All ukrainians were like lazy negros who did not work, hence why they didnt get to eat

Anyways

```"Bernie Sanders is a socialist."

"No he's not"

"Some unrelated point about Venezuela"```

sounds like the average argument with boomers yes

This is a pretty red pilled server

I used to be a soft SJW.

Ukraine should be turned into an artificial lake

I was friends with some hard leftists

> I used to be a soft SJW.

....

Maybe we can bomb a federal building sometime in Fortnite <:fbi:508484036201545735>

It was advertised in a disc called “The Right Cafe” what you expect

how many yrs ago?

I'll elaborate, but it's 3 am so I won't be speaking at my best

Im an egoist that does not support lgbt rights

not that long ago

2 years

Because rights themselves are spooks

ah i see

at the longest

yeah

2

ish

2

anyways

When I say that, I mean I really was

I just didn't call what I was doing

You can do whatever you want, rights and laws are just legal fictions.

social justice

But I believed in most of the stuff, I just tried to be mr centrist about it, that is, frame it in a more accepting picture

Yet breaking those legal fictions has consequences because there are those who believe and take them seriously.

but I held the same beliefs

hmmmm

to be honest,

Except for one area

Islam

That was literally it

Islam is amazing

And

I think that most people were at some point between 1995-ish to 2015-ish some variety of proto-SJW

That was also what got me out of that

Look at Saudi Arabia

there was that certain kind of wave

that took lots of especially younger people with it

Shen Bapiro do you support the Palestinians or the Jews?

neither

Funny how I am a Strasserist yet also a egoist in certain ways

I got in so many debates with my friends over that, who held contradictory beliefs over islam

> do you support the Palestinians or the Jews?

why, you should support the Levantine Federal Socialist Republic instead

I was never given proper responses

nO

Just that usual "You're part of the problem" shit

that you get

Tf

I actually ocne got a response like

in all caps

rOJaVA iS bETteR

Thats not an argument thats retardation

> rojava
> better

*shivers*

"YOU CALL YOURSELF A PROGRESSIVE BUT SOMETIMES YOU GIVE CONSERVATIVES A HELPING HAND"

I swear

Thats legit dumb as fuck.

My friend at the time actually said that

sYrIA gOoD AnTI ImpERiAlIsT

But sounds like the left

lIlIlIlI

Economically I haven't really changed

I'm still pretty much where I was

but socially and politically

I definitely have shifted far away from the left

its funny, I tend to consider right and left strictly in terms of property relations and economics

I don't see it as a social issues division

I do, and I think I did back then too

Because you know

back then I thought that was what really mattered

if you hated fags or not

was what determined if you were a good person

I am exaggerating a bit

but the NPC meme is real

left-wing = collection of systems revolving around *social ownership of means of production*
right-wing = collection of systems revolving around *private ownership of means of production*

the reason for this definition being that every other definition is vague, transient and changes depending on the generation etc. whatever social current or pendulum swing. But the economic substance remains always - because the productive relation is a tangible thing

Lost many friends over my stance on Islam

yeah

Im just saying how I viewed it back then

it gets very murky when you try to apply the "left" and "right" of french revolution to the "left" and "right" of, say, 1960s (internationally) - they share nothing in common. so in order for the left/right dichotomy to remain relevant you would have to tie it up to something concrete.

but yeah that's perhaps an unnecessary tangent on my part. but yeah I do get what you mean, and Islam *is* shit no question

I absolutely hate both the left and right wing for both failing me

Hence why I am now a Post-Right Stirnerite Hitlerist

I could not bring up legitimate criticisms of Islam

I was usually hostile in debates, but I think it was in response to that

How I was treated like I was a problem

>any Abrahamic religion in general

It wasn't allowed

must be a country difference, but I've never found making criticism of Islam difficult in my country

I'm in the United States

my country is Finland

nah, that is left and center, right is taxing exports and imports

to fund the gov and letting the people be free

I came to realize that with many people into social justice, it's really just about justifying their own existence rather than actually making a difference.

They would rather feel self-important than actually make change

com> natsoc> ancap

yeah no doubt about it

SJWs are usually on egotrip

its usually a personal project

not meaning greater than just the level of gov

in which the other people and issues are just decorations

or frames for the self-narrative

its in many ways quite narcissistic - not the original intent behind the movement

but what it has become

commie has greater gov than natsoc that has greater gov that wild west

i am all for wild west

>Having anything that isn't a union of egoists

pedos were shot in the wild west, commies seem to be all AIDS faggots

>pedos

so it could be a scale of aids too

Legit fuck off moral fag

morals do exist, contrary to Stirner's claim

I can rape -20 year olds as much as I want

aids faggots BTFO, no spred with snek

@Xinyue They do exist yet they have no physical existence, like a thought

@Deleted User -20 if you are 40, sure

Words on a piece of paper have existence, they are not spooks.

they have a material basis

a) in the genes
b) in the socialisation
c) in the resulting, developmental neurobiology

so yes, morality is a very complex phenomenon that emerges in the human brain due to a number of causes, some of them material, some others relational

Oh wow

Genes dont affect morality

they do in fact

Morality is a purely mental conception, developed as you progress through life

that is rather idealist

Your conception is rather idealist as well

There is no specific gene that will make you evil or some shit

consciousness emerges in the brain, and its myriad faculties, which themselves come about as determined by the imperatives and directives of the genetic code.

so yes

you can trace back the material basis of morality to the genes and the neurobiology that it begets

Morals are not objective truths however

Exactly like saying "Capitalism is ethical"

morals are relative truths, which are emergent in the material subject

I wouldn't say "subjective" truths because there's more to it than just the individual mind

It is a fact that a stone is made of minerals.

That is an objective truth

It is not a spook.

It is mere reality.

morality, too, emergent from your neurobiology is, likewise, a mere reality of the material world

its a relativist reality

in that it is dependent on you, the subject, in relation to X, Y and Z

Yet the ideas contained within that morality are not objective truths.

but it does have objective basis

what you are trying to say that there is no *absolute* moral truths, which I would tend to agree with. but there are materially dependent, relativist moral truths that vary from one physical, living being to another

~~~Marxism is a spook~~~

Funny way I can find to defend myself when someone calls me a pedophile for liking lolis

I just tell them their morals are spooks. and their argument continues to break down from there.

Do-do you actually like lolis?

or are you just joking

@Deleted User you never did tell me who my double was, who is the other super smart guy that you thought i was?

@The Big Oof Why?

Would you hate me either way?

Yes

I'm just asking: Do you actually like lolis?

I like furry lolis actually

Remove fags who use "moralfags" un-ironically

Unironically hang yourself

>I like furry lolis

Nigg er

Okay, so you're just shitposting

You first sicko

Define sicko

You like loli's

Oh wait you cant because the very concept of one is a spook you fucking nigtard

pozzed blogger, sir antifa, literally said spreading aids was good on some stream today

antifa are now bio terrorists

sad

I see, we are dealing with a level 80 stirnerfag

I actually will rape you and your sperm cells, not your children until theyre born

Ebin

I actually am a trap

Not ebin

ebin