general
Discord ID: 507035890640486411
101,748 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 21/407
| Next
This is why people want to just put the whole "communism never been tried crowd" on an island
<:fbi:508484036201545735>
@RealBullWhip hey
Isn't it interesting that Jewish Subversives aren't successful in Goy led Authoriariocracies
What the Frankfurt faggots figured out is that class warfare wasnt working.....so they switched it up.
Its not that hard to figure out
There are a lot of "muh cronie capitalism" dudes who argue that real capitalism has never been tried
Rich Amerifats already had a revolution
You cant use what worked in RUSSIA in the USA
etc.
as soon as you have a Liberal Democracy, they are free to subvert, in Socialist Poland and Hungary that didn't happen
USA didnt have the aristocracy like EUrope
@RealBullWhip my account got shoahed could I have an invite to that server the one with jd in please
Hello, Rommel. Be sure to check <#507040801860091914> and <#521916756852342784> as suggested by the Emperor
@Khat Emperor curpuratisum
```Upon his return, Adorno helped shape the political culture of West Germany.
tfw the supposed Guldural Margists apparently helped to shape the political culture of the capitalist Germany lmfao```
"capitalists" used y'all, just like they use ANTIFA, doesn't make Antifa capitalist..
"Fight the aristocracy! Fight the class system" ---- "Amerifats, we did that. 1776, bro"
Please explain how these cultural marxist are using marxism to subvert cultural, none of you said anything worthwhile up until now
So the marxist had to switch tactics
Shiet gubbermint tho @PunishedMuskovy
really easy to understand
shieeeeeeet gooberment
Egalitarian Liberty = Marxist Principle
and and and welfare
socialism!
can we at least agree on that?
> What the Frankfurt faggots figured out is that class warfare wasnt working.....so they switched it up.
***Press X to doubt***
what do the colors mean? i know red means ussr and orange china
Capitalists were shitting their pants for the better part of 20th century
Egalitarian liberty is more close to pre marxian french socialism
@Xinyue the trajectory matters mate
but im not sure if india went commie
in the early stages, socialism was very popular there
since then it went into decline
Wasnt workin in the USA, clown
seize the means of poo production
they saw it for what it was when the news started coming out of USSR and Socialism became a bad word
USA is irrelevant to muh "Frangfrund Sgool"
they all ended up in US
@Xinyue Yes, the anti colonialism was working fine in shitholes everywhere
@Xinyue i thought you said Hippie were a product of such
that whole school of thought
Just not the US
and they developed the theory in Germany, afaik @AdorableStormtrooper
am i wrong though
What wasn't working in the us ?
hippies
:dab:
US did also have enough of a worker's movement for McCarthyism to become a thing
the entire Post Colonislist Studies, Gender and Women's Studies and Ethnic Study courses are their giving
developed and perfected in American Academia
Wat ?
```US did also have enough of a worker's movement for McCarthyism to become a thing ```
Hollywood and Media elites are the Workers Movement?
So liberalism indentity shit is Marxist now ?
and none of it is Marxism. and even if your argument was correct, *which I doubt it is,* this only serves as evidence that this systemwas embraced by the single greatest opponent of Communism in history!
*identity
a bourgeois tool it is
nothing more, nothing less
sure
I'll agree
but that wasn't it's intention
no connection to the revolutionary Marxist movement ๐ glad we cleared this up, and confirmed the theory is horseshit ๐
bye
ciao
just call them what they are
hedonists
i should've been studying all this while
cultural hedonism is the best descriptor
**confirmed**
***deb8 me***
not even cultural
just
hedonism
pure hedonism
hedonists have always existed, never as organized and determined to take down the rest of the society with them
Slaneesh spawn?
SARGON NEED MORE DOPAMINE
man some of these people work hard, these SJWs knocking on doors, standing in the sun, working in academia, putting in the hours
I'm not sure all of them are hedonists in the way like ppl think of it
hedonism is a tool to a means
I must hand it to these fuckers though that they've managed to entirely co-opt the leftist movement in the West. Which, I suspect, was the original intention. I mean it has certainly served the elites well that there's no genuine Marxist mass movement ๐ค
they just use pleasure and individualism to justify their wants
@Xinyue *in your opinion*
Few things weren't working for Marxists....the dialectical approach of classes wasn't connecting, and the cold war was active....so they switched tactics and used different names
they dont actually want to help people, they want the fame and rewards of helping people
Adorno's F-Scale is classic - you just dont know yet
Can I post a PDF here?
it has served the elites well tho, y'all are useful pawns ๐
well not the Marxists here i think
@AdorableStormtrooper in my opinion? there's objectively no connection between the writings of Marx and Engels and the ideology of these people. none. they took over, and this is actually the origin of the term *"New Left"* - juxtaposed against the *"Old Left"*, the left of marxian thinking
yes
<#507036888205623296> @RealBullWhip
ok
New Left were all Marxists who became PoMo
PoMo is a tool to a means
lmao fucking cultural Marxists trying to classify fascism
and in process stopped being Marxists
I ignore all of those fucks because their academic sophistry is pure circlejerking and none of it has any value.
Postmodernism and Marxism are irreconcilable
and the two usually dislike each other
They're not intellectually honest, but i guess this data you cannot comprehend
uHhHHHh fascism is when u mean and masculine >>>:(((
All of Frankfurt School thought on fascism.
Reworded a million ways.
PoMo and Marxism are irreconcilable
they are truly irreconcilable yes
but they only use PoMo as it serves them to the end goal
there's an underlying marxism
they're disingenuous intellectuals
can you identify this mysterious, "underlying marxism"?
and "muh eguality" is not sufficient quantification
The entire basis of the academic left post-WWII was based off of cultural Marxist ideas cultivated in the 20's and 30's which rejected Soviet authoritarianism and democratic socialism in favor of an intersectional anti-authority alliance.
the equation u identified with the base structure and superstructure, or that Marx did, they pretty much saw it as not a one way street, the New Left was a Psychoanalytical movement too, they saw it as a Relationship @Xinyue
It's a Hegelian/Marxist dialectic and it's documented history.
There is nothing conspiratorial about it.
They've infected academia ever since they came over on their banana boats during and after WWII.
Posted
They think they can effect Material conditions based on how they can influence culture and morals of the ppl(goal being communism). It is derived from Marx, i guess you can claim it's a different movement..? @Xinyue
Lol what ? It has more in common with nietzchean thought than marxism(ie fouccalt)
What the fuck?
What does it have in common with Nietzsche?
?
I'm curious about your hot take on this.
And no, it's absolutely ripping the Hegelian/Marxist dialectic.
To say it has "more" in common with Nietzsche than Hegel or Marx is pretty laughable.
I've seen some qoute from fouccalt about how he rejected old marxism for nietzche or something,i need to find it
You saw some quote from Foucault?
> They think they can effect Material conditions based on how they can influence culture and morals of the ppl
literally anti-Marxist
I don't think you've read Nietzsche, Marx, or Hegel.
You poor sweet summer child.
Marx claimed the world specifically doesn't work like this
the entire thrust of Marx's and Engels' theory is that culture is downstream from material conditions
and cannot be any other way
@Xinyue read my previous comment
```the equation u identified with the base structure and superstructure, or that Marx did, they pretty much saw it as not a one way street, the New Left was a Psychoanalytical movement too, they saw it as a Relationship @Xinyue ```
so its not Marxism and cannot ever be considered a tool or expansion of Marxism because its divorced from the *foundational premise* of Marxism
plain and simple
Nietzsche's whole thing was about rejecting religious values which had sustained society until the Enlightenment in favor of the self-made man who creates his own meanings and morals. This is completely antithetical to the Hegelian/Marxist dialectic which blames misfortune on material conditions.
You have no idea what you're talking about buckeroo.
@Xinyue but u disagreed with when I said that both ancaps and commies look at culture and human interaction as downstream of market forces and here u are confirming it
not market forces
Cool story peterson
*material conditions*
It is an outgrowth of Marxists Thought
entirely different things
>material conditions
material conditions are
a) resources
b) technology level
c) the environment in general, nature factors etc
>not market
these are not "market forces"
basically market
....no
its not market at all
yes
don't fucking deny it
the material world is not "market"
Yeah I agree it isn't very Marxist, I think it's much more Hegelian. But you're shitting yourself if you don't think the original members of the Frankfurt School weren't open Marxists who saw their revisionism as an antidote to both Soviet authoritarianism and democratic socialism.
Like an actual fucktard.
what a bizarre reading
not even ancaps have hot takes like this
I was not expecting to open this chat and be exposed to a bunch of mental midgetry of this caliber.
ancaps have an universal theory where everything is boiled down to a transaction
Lord make me chaste but not yet.
Stop copying otter you pleb
I am allowed to copy Otter if you're being a fucking knuckledragger.
dude, material conditions refer to the material and technical foundations that men are born into - what technology level a given society has, what chemicals and materials are present in the environment, i.e *the degrees of freedom and limits to development potential inherent in the physical world*
this is not market
ffs
which again is driven by market and economy
Marx was a materialist cuck
๐น when u mental midget
the universe is driven by market?
wew lad
wild
talking about society here bud
stop being mean guys ๐คง
Marx spoke about the objective, material world *in general*
Lame, otter always uses the "moo" emoji. Step your game up
his materialism was ontological
play nice
>transaction
Exactly, market exists between individuals. There is no market in material in and of itself
and the individual's relationship with the objective, external world of material phenomena
Why are you comparing me to Otter? you seem weirdly fixated on that. It just seems like a scapegoat for being a fucking idiot tbqh fam
like there exists an actual philosophy that underlies Marxian economics
marx actually just made ideology that is basically satanism to christianity
now now
no fighting
Xinyue actually seems like he knows what he's talking about.
But I think you were an asshole birth.
Xinu is a Beast
Shame He's a Race Mixing Degenerate
Because you retards always argued back and forth, i'm not a idiot brah
im not an idiot brah <:brainlet:508484031625691156>
pls respect me
Eithee step up your shitty otter play or shut up
Simple as that
*S e v e r a l p e o p l e a r e t y p i n g*
Put some effort in it
You said things that were wrong, I called them out as wrong, I explained why they were wrong, and then I called you an idiot.
reminder otter was kicked for being a fag
There's no effort into it if you're demonstrably a fucktard.
market
is a spook
It just comes naturally.
@Bird Wizard and desert left for being a literal fag
You didn't explain shit, you just said i didn't read marx or nietzche....
I explained why Nietzsche is incompatible with the Hegelian dialectic.
@Xinyue Can we atleast agree that a Neo Pagan Nationalist Society with Your Economics will be the Best Society ever?
And you couldn't even bring me your Foucault quote.
Where is it?
Otter is banned
And why is it relevant to the foundational intellectualism of the 30's?
Still looking for it
Was Foucault a time traveler?
who tf otter
It's taking longer than i expected
You can't even spell his fucking name correctly.
You're a retard.
>he doenst know who otter is
pretender
FAKE ADORABLE
K bigbrain
STOP CALLING EACH OTHER ALL KINDS OF RETARDS AND IDIOTS n SHIT
I would love for you to just say a single similarity between Nietzschean thought and the Frankfurt School.
Just one please.
I'll wait.
Reminder that Foucault was decades after the foundation of the Frankfurt School.
So you still haven't rectified if he was a time traveler or not.
Nietzhe and Frankfurtians had one nose each
there
Zizek I think actually made a comparison between those two at one point. I know that Pierre Tru-Dank at one point compared the postmodernists and the nietzcheans
I can go find the vid if you like
The communist revolution was just a way for jews to take over Russia anywya
Respectable comparison, Stormtrooper.
So thats what they did to the USA with CUltural Marxism
Jews use Marxism as a tool to subdue useful "true believers"
Postmodernism is about rejection of meaning as explained away by metanarratives and Nietzsche is about rejection of meaning in favor of making your own.
That's superficial similarity at best.
> the communist revolution was just a way for jews to take over Russia anywya
literally untrue, considering the revolutions of 1918-1919 were wide-reaching and included entirely non-Jewish led revolts such as the Finnish Revolution that had grand total of 0 jewish leaders
Cultural Marxism, the same
but right-wingers are gonna right-wing
Nope
Do you know Trotsky ?
Finnish Revolution had 100% Finnish leadership
@Xinyue they fooled ya, idiots
some swedes were in there too
but no Jews
Judeo-Bolshevism is quite a meme.
not many Chinese jewish communist leaders either lmao
101,748 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 21/407
| Next