general
Discord ID: 634367565304561675
1,011,369 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 60/4046
| Next
you said you were done
it is not someone else's private property
cring
@Nerthulas I can be
A city is not private property lol wut
he bought the land and built the building himself
no, it isn't
@Fénius Farsaid im done if you give me an actual argument you utter bafoon
@Nerthulas Why can't a community be property?
okay, so you just don't know what a dry county is
@Fénius Farsaid otherwise im calling you out
No my friend, I meant that the statement itself that you were done is unepic cring
the county is not the property of the county government
Calling me out for what
@Nerthulas Erm, no, we're referring to dry towns. Not counties.
We should burn the U.N. headquarters in new York
Honest I think weaboo is either retarded or just fucking with us at this point
no, we're not, and its the same principle
and the same mechanism
@Fénius Farsaid for calling me cringe. fuck it im done
Why can't towns be privately owned?
you did a cring
maximizing freedom is good, but not over the survival, thriving and improvement of a people
the city is not the property of the city government
These towns are not privately owned
@Fénius Farsaid im drunk and i still need to work out
it's not like we all don't do crings
work out then
some more than others
They *could* be. @Leaf
they aren't
more important than discussing what is and is not cring on discord
You still haven't explained how the incredibly effective policies implemented by federal government institutions were ineffective
@Fénius Farsaid nothing is more important than that
@Nerthulas#712 Well, they could be, and function the same.
and now for some reason you're telling me towns could be private property, which is so irrelevant
you function through a cuck based axiom, free your mind
well, they aren't
and I was talking about what exists
you know
in the real world
demand power for the individual and don't serve the ideology
Are you talking to me or weeb kid? @vicmaxim
Can you explain what the lack of effectiveness in the examples I just listed were? @Weaboo Kempeitai
the question was: are dry towns and counties (proper) voluntary societies?
everyone damn it
the answer is no
I don't have an ideology anyway
that's all
@Nerthulas There are privately owned towns and communities, and mutual arrangements that are also permitted. They're voluntary.
This is not what is being described
It is.
This hypothetical is unimportant
There isn't zero reason why a town can't self-govern.
we were talking about dry towns and counties in the US and Canada
No, what is being described is government owned municipalities effectively prohibiting substances
only a town
not a city
I'm going to bed, this kid is too retarded
when I said 'dry county'
Towns absolutely can be contractual, and prohibit alcohol.
nighty nighty folks
or 'dry town' I meant really existing ones
@Nerthulas Bro we're talking about towns not counties
weaboo undefeated
```
There's a time and place for anime. The time is now. The place is here.
-Gamestop Dorito```
you don't know what you're talking about
I'm saying a town can be privately owned and function the same.
at all
Lmao
Just saying no over and over again and changing the subject is not winning
that isn't even the conversation
They exist literally, voluntary mutual arrangements that prohibit alcohol.
you decided to have a completely separate conversation
when he said 'dry towns'
he meant really existing ones in his country
its a term
Yes
what it describes is a town with a prohibition on the books against alcohol
Yes
You're referring to counties, not towns
Big difference
Towns can be voluntary and mutual.
here you can read about it
no, they can't
they really can't
'dry town' doesn't mean what you think it means
Any contractual obligation made of its members are voluntary in-term.
it doesn't mean a town where there isn't any alcohol
listen
it doesn't mean what you think it means
it does not mean a town where there isn't any alcohol
it means a town with a prohibition on the books of the municipal code against alcohol
They don't permit the sale of alcohol, yes.
Dosen't matter.
Such an arrangement can be voluntary and contractual.
Why couldn't it be?
that is a law, formed by a democratically elected city or town council, backed by state force
You enter sombody's tenant property and agree to a set of terms so long as you're there.
'could be, couldn't be'
talking about what is
not what could be
But there are towns are ran mutually.
they ***are not*** voluntary
You can't say otherwise.
they aren't called dry towns, dude
a dry town is one with laws against alcohol
They can be dry towns
Okay
So,
maybe you don't know becuase you're european
The initial premise was "prohibition is ineffective."
In Germany, from 1933 to 1939, prohibition on the consumption and sale of tobacco saw the majority of the country's tobacco advertisers, distributors and manufacturers close down, daily consumption of tobacco among the adult population reduce by 25% and among minors almost entirely.
In Canada, from 1920 to 1925, prohibition on the consumption and sale of alcohol saw three quarters of all alcohol breweries close down and decreases by 66% each in cross-border alcohol smuggling, public intoxication and related criminal offences.
To the present day, hundreds of municipal governments maintain prohibitions on the use, manufacture and sale of alcohol within their boundaries and have reduced the consumption of it by 100%.
how the term is used
Then the goal post was shifted to "it could be voluntary."
Which is very irrelevant
if its mutual, it is by definition not a dry town
Okay fine
okay
That's extremely pedantic
yes, you were being extremely pedantic
It's funny how, you know, making a substance *illegal* makes it, well, less used by the population!
A mutual arrangement that prohibits the sale of alcohol isn't a dry town because the government isn't involved?
correct
it is not listed as such on any govt. records
it is not in any law codes
and the ones that Beady was referring to
were actual dry towns
aka, not hypothetical voluntary dry towns
@Leaf War on Drugs has wasted billions, used to justify invasions of foreign counties, destruction of property and illegal coups. Yet, hasn't halted the sale of transport of drugs into the United States.
Furthermore, America's foreign policy often involved supporting orgs that move drugs into the states, such as the Sicilian mob and the Contras.
I'll do more research soon but its late and I'm tired.
it's all a red herring
they take your money anyway
whether they enforce drug laws or not
* * * politicians
once again, you pretend that someone supports American policy
criminals*
its particularly funny considering that you're talking to beady
I mean, I can respect that beady opposes current forms of prohibition, like the use of private prisons, and prison for dealers in general.
@Weaboo Kempeitai do not forget "fast and furious" under Eric Holder
gave military grade weapons to cartel member
But how can you support prohibition without supporting an aggressive foreign policy? @Nerthulas
What is being compared is actual prohibition policies to the U.S. funding of cartels
because those aren't the same thing
Or you are using the financial support of drug traffickers to prove prohibition is ineffective
It's not prohibition, the U.S. government is funding cartels not suppressing them
I mean, the governments they fund and support take the extreme measures you advocate. @Leaf
'how can you support X without supporting Y?'
because I don't
Chile executed dealers, they all migrated to Mexico.
So it was effective
It wasn't, they were still making product, and smuggled it across the border with ease.
Including to Chile
snuggled
🤗
<:steflol:561214382181318656>
snuggled is better tbh
Ima sleep
Rly
In my cocaine bed
Snuggly
<:mlady:389497741769703424>
Weaboo and lsolace be like:
I'm gonna go to bed...
ok I'm going to bed
for real this time I'm going to bed
The government of one country cannot prohibit anything in another country
It's like saying Japan effectively prohibited drug trafficking but drug trafficking still existed in China so it didn't work
@Nerthulas I wonder where Isolace went...
I think this question was utterly ridiculous tbh
Mexico is not Chile's jurisdiction, it worked within Chile's jurisdiction, or more succinctly, it worked
On that note pls no more tag I need sleep as well
ok gn
Go to bed libtard
its only 9:30 for me
That's a good time to go to bed
<:wojack:396042478530330624>
I'm only an hour ahead of you lol
These guys should get together with those hasidic jews also dancing to EDM
Kurds = Turds
kurds are closely related to jews
must explain why they need to be taken over
and left without a state...they deserve it
kurds are not turks!!!
There was also a study done on how close genetically paletinians are to israelis
Kurds = Jews = Turks
That's what I gathered from chat
jerks?
thats all there is to them
cacasus, nomadic and divergent persian
Black or monkey donut ?
Daily cardio, I say let them
It monkey it’s not racist
But so hard to tell
If I started a petition to make it legal in all 50 US states, or at least a few of them, for people to choose cryonic preservation without the requirement of legal death, would you guys sign it?
I dont think most people would even know what it is except people in this server
Give it a few years
It will likely become as popular a topic as euthanasia
has it worked so far?
Wait what happened to JF's show mid stream?
Cryonics has worked for non-human mammalians, with much of the testing being done on rats, and there is no logical reason as to why it would not work for humans.
JF got taken out
his role in Epstein suicide has been found out
JF was the one who caused Epstein's heart to stop
Hammering on jew krauss for 30 min finally tripped the IDF algo?
he administered a lethal dose using an Ice gun
"We believe that revival is a real possibility because:
1. Many biological specimens have been cryopreserved, stored at liquid nitrogen temperature where all decay ceases, and revived; these include whole insects, vinegar eels, many types of human tissue including brain tissue, human embryos which have later grown into healthy children, and a few small mammalian organs. Increasingly more cells, organs and tissues are being reversibly cryopreserved.
2. The repair capabilities of molecular biology and nanotechnology increasingly point to a future technology that can repair damage due to aging, disease and cryonic suspension.
Current progress in stem cell tissue regeneration, 3D biological printers and other advanced technologies convinces many experts that we might be able to revive people in a healthy and youthful state when these technologies mature."
@Fénius Farsaid cure to baldness when?
lol
If they can reverse aging in, say, 15 years, I bet they can also reverse balding
I am curious about the idea of genetic modification of living humans
If it is as feasible as the modification of human embryos
jf received a copyright warning midstream for watching a lawrence krause interview from youtube. once he stopped playing the vid, the bot went away, and the stream resumed
but he took down the vid as a precaution
@Nerthulas is this for real
yes
uh oh
so now they are going to check if people are in a relationship
if they are not...boom! fired
company GFs - duh
no, it's up to the bosses and CEOs to hire "sex relief therapists" for the incels
I doubt it
ellen k pao should just blow everyone
it would be easier to just let go of them
fire them
more loosely referred to as "HR"
Director of Blowjob Relations
golly what are we going to do with all the super focused high IQ virgins, better fire them
fucking fembrain
I did not know this before
cause you know gotta keep everything inclusive
i've been actually watching this british tv show on youtube......
*The Great Model Train Challenge* 😄
where teams of builders have to make model train setups around a chosen theme
and get graded on functionality, creativity, etc
and one team had not 1, not 2, but 3 trannies on the team
1,011,369 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 60/4046
| Next