Nice to see you, me.

Did Wirus invade us yet

my last pp was from the diablo 4 trailer

which is self-refuting as you say the word "theory"

hence its really unclear whether is any truth at all

Wirussian Invasion from China

you don't accept it

When the Jooze have connected every corner of the Earth together

Are we ever safe from the Wirusses

hypo, hypo

https://youtu.be/FOAeJXsm5es

this was the only time i heard an anarchist arguing for something

and it sounded fucking retarded to me

Adam Kokesh is a Jew

Psyop to discredit libertarianism

andy kokesh is a middling iq tribesman

The Libertarian Party is a disgrace full of Jews and glows

always the pointless debates ...
can't just one guy explain his point of view and the other asks his stupid questions for clarity?

Well libertarianism is relativistic and lacking standards in any form, so i dont know how he can discredit it but

It isnt relativistic

the standards come from the economic agents

liberty is relativistic in nature

and property owners themselves

it's arbitrary

No

like any fucking theory you can come up with

License is relativistic

now make an actual argument

It being relativistic doesn't make it arbitrary

We assume humans do better with as little monopoly restraints as possible

but it makes it chaotic in nature

The Market tends to be chaotic

Ordered Chaos

But the chaos is mostly present during recalibration periods

Which are necessary to keep things running smoothly

Too much order gives stagnation

did jf cbs interview come out yet?

Chaos seems to be the many seemingly many different directions that economic agents take, being confusing for the central planner. Why aren't they all take the exact same direction, the direction I want them to take

Nope

Its coming in a few weeks

Maybe 2 months kek

There is no standards for the common good, Its basically today's society there is really no difference

no. maybe in a couple months, if ever @Henry’s come to see us!

Nope

dang

Our society has common good principles

They're just bad

The common good of our society is

Equality

Diversity

Tolerance

You cant have common good if you believe that people should be doing only things that benefit them as individuals

How more we get of these, and their assorted policies, how better for all of us

But we dont believe that

thats the basis of liberty pretty much

We for example believe companies should hire blacks or whamens even if its better for them not to

It doesnt benefit those who run the company

and that is a lack of standards

but it does benefit the BLACKS and WHAMENS

no

that is standards

but the standards are bad

They operate on the wrong premises

bad standards indeed

which is again

the idea that more equality, diversity, tolerance etc is better for the common good

there is no basis

It must be understood that they try to convince even whites that its good for them that they get replaced

And the more stupid of the lunatics probably believe it too kek

Ur privilege is bad for you, makes you bad

If you believe Its better for them not hire blacks and wahmen

More ungood

In a free order

than thats a universal standard

If you dont wanna hire blacks and women, nobody can force you

how can you have that with liberty

You set the standards

Within the limits of your domain aka property

And as adjacent properties influence each other, we will notice standards effecting the standards of others

then there is no standards for a common good, Its the standards for you. Egoism at its core pretty much and no reason to care about race or the nation or anything for that matter

Theres reasons to care about race or the nation

even if for your own good

like idk, you dont wanna live in a Detroit

Its not like its good for us individuals that our race is destroyed

https://twitter.com/ryangirdusky/status/1220353897736347648?s=21

South African individual whites arent doing well

If they affect the standards of others there is no liberty because you are bound by the standards of others

There are people who dont care about their race

Not bound necessarily

They will get wiped out than lol

If not caring about your race is bad

for you

@Hector do you play videojuegos?

They can fuck anybody and still count it as continuation of their lineage

Heres the thing, I care about race. That being said, I don’t support being unethical

Possibly

They can fuck themselves over

And we can say

Race traitors arent allowed in our property

shoo

Hoppe predicts that cosmopolitan communities will probably self-implode pretty quick

Lmao. Why are you talking about that and not the construction of a state that will aid you in it?

If they survive long enough they will simply super segregate

The state is a powerful tool and its mandatory

@Nerthulas Do I play video games, not really. Maybe, if I am stress or procrastinating, i will play a flash game or two.

But typically, reading or watching debates is my favorite pass time.

The state will eventually betray us

Okay lolbert

We wont stay in control of the state

I used to be an ancap

I do want to become a competent writer one day though.

We lost the state in every country

Every single one of our states we lost

those sound boring wtf

And its threatening our destruction

And they will not allow ancapistan to exist

Its not they

Its the people

Plus, if it takes 300-400 years to subvert a continent, then that is good

With liberty

Civilizational cycles can be reset

it will take forever

No it won’t

Theres no central entity to take over

It takes 300-400 years to take the core of your civilization, the state

You seriously think China won’t nuke you and steal your unclaimed land?

If a people have a will to secede and fight, they have the will to fight and take it back

What about dont have 1 core that gets taken over and you fall

Ancaps still have to fight

Lol

There is no alternative to fighting

@Nerthulas most people would describe me as vanilla. I do like to shop and do some social events too. But shopping and eating out requires money, which I do not have a lot of. I enjoy grabbing a cup of coffee and walking with a colleague around my city.

Amerimutts have far too much weaponry to allow ching chongs to do anything

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=treFuVR5x30

Also

if china ever makes a move towards the west

Only reason China is a menace

it will be for annihilation

JF should invite this guest of Rekieta Law to talk about Male abuse

not conquest

This guy

married a crazy

The thing is, I want a state to force my ideals on people

is because Jews took over the state and started doing deals

pumped two kids that weren't his

and he had to pay child support

Look

If people dont want to accept your ideals

it wont work

Why would you not force others to live in your society?

if my society is so great

why do I need to force them to

because like you , people would rather not fight

Are we forcing invaders to invade our countries? no because they are great

but fighting is needed at some point

No

yes

We will fight to maintain our privileges

you will not be left alone

Its necessary

all I want is a state the doesn’t incentivize destructive behavior

Well we know

so either you rule or are ruled

duhh why ya think we want heavy weapons

Private individuals can assemble armies more efficient than central tards can

mekel kasanova? @❀Rare Birb❀

the state is probably more necessary at higher population density

if you think you can fight against states for ancap independence, you can also fight for any other kind of independence. ancap isn't a revolutionary advantage in any way

Central tards just have more resources to parasite

Sure

Art, I live a minority white town, but we have nice things still, like a nice art museum. I would like to take a girl there one day. What do you do? @Nerthulas

Ancap may not even work with anyone but lets say Whites

The case must be made to each people, what will work best

idk i mostly sleep

Whites have until recently progressed towards more decentralization and more liberty

Last week, I walked 5 miles to my library, went to Whataburger and got a iced tea, then back.

This trend has been reversed

It began with the American and French Revolutions

Fact is Feudalism is more decentralized than these Federal entities are

it hasn't been liberty qua liberty, the kind of sovereignty that the founding fathers and stock have idealized isn't "everyone does whatever they want lamo"

I do feel quite lonely sometimes. I can't wait to finish getting my degree, so I can start making money and start seeing women seriously.

i live in suburbia but I like spending time at the ranch

The Founding Fathers wanted to protect liberty

they label it as such for, well, propaganda purposes but really the intent is to have standing militias in every state forcing eachother to pay the costs for rule

with an entity

that has every tool and incentive to destroy said liberty

and with frens, usually with frens I will play games

Thats the contradiction of liberalism

sovereingty (every man a sheriff and contributing to mutual defense) and not liberty (you're free to contribute or not)

board games or pc games or bowling or bocce or something

My best friend moved recently. : ( He was an IT major with a minor in physics. We could talk for hours.

Well everyone is sovereign under liberty

@Str3tch uh

nope

the guest

Yes

wait I'll give you the timestamp of the video

@Chawosaurian the problem comes of having standards in general. Liberty implies that you should be doing anything as you please, including infringing on others property. Sure you might say thats not how it works, but thats the basis of conflict. If Im not allow to go inside any place I want then I dont really have liberty. It automatically becomes authorative. Also there is a problem of ownership as a whole, what dictates that my land is my own? Nothing, because I set those standards. So if someone comes and kills me if there is no state or monolopoly and my right of life is infringed with the will of someone else. There are no standards in this system, unlike say mornarchy of fascism which give out a common GOOD standard for everyone to follow

I don't usually talk with my friends about their academics

No

if you do not exert force and contribute to mutual defense (or, personal defense even), you're not sovereign in any way

Liberty does not include infringing other peoples property

you're living at the license of those who may kill you if they wish

ok

That type of liberty is self-contradictory

well it does include denying others the possibility of killing you

Its not

Theres still authority in a way

My friend and I almost never talk about academics. We talk about our hobbies. We like reading together and reading things together.

but its not through central monopolist

it is not about your liberty ***to***
it is about our liberty to say ***fuck off***

We would try to learn to cook sometimes. XD

https://youtu.be/treFuVR5x30?t=5037 @Str3tch

the owner of each property, is the authority there

start watching at 1:23:57

reading together...? what does that mean?

the only thing society can reasonably provide are defensive rights

thnx birb

it's not contradictory. look. people need defense. people coalesce and delegate defense to one another. these groups are the sovereign. they confer liberty to all.

Like, we would go to the library and just read in each other's presence.

Until then its ok

The founding material is all addressed to sovereign men

🏳️‍🌈

if im not allowed to do w/e i want there is no personal standards, no liberty or anything at all

The thing is the jump

it's not to women, children, underclassed

it becomes okay some people band together to protect everyone

but than

a jump is made

>being in the presence of another male

they make sure that nobody else can do that same function

L O L

Nobody else can protect

well, you're free to become sovereign, all you have to do is demonstrate ability and contribute-to, mutual defense

Thats fine

until then you're not

you're living under license

either you're a peer in sovereignty and thus sovereign yourself or you're not

Hmm

Some things I do with my other friends is just drive to the store and window shop. But I don't feel close to anyone irl right now outside my immediate family. I mainly just look around.

So liberty allows it but doesn't mean someone will be sovereign

yeah.

One can decide just to live under others

Just get outside the house, you know. Say hi to people.

you can. and that's fine

Not everyone is really made for leadership

or you cannot and that's wrong

true to guilt by association btw Hoppe is just another Juden Peterson

We hope that this automaticaly selects for the best leaders