I'm going to be honest and say I am having trouble with keeping up with the reading. Not sure if we got away from the 50 pgs/week or what but I am way behind

We did, because 50 a week was *way* too short. It was like 10 minutes a day.

And I'm not even a fast reader.

I tried to find some Nicholas Wade books at the library but they only got his one on genetics not the race stuff. Is his work good in general and worth reading?

Probably, but it might not be what you're looking for

My library has zero decent books on relevant subjects

No De Benoist, no Faye, no Evola. There's not even many normie cuckservative works

Lame

Thought you guys would get a laugh out of this. This is how I read controversial literature in public areas.

Wayyy behind too

But been bit preoccupied with events,sorry

If anyone is behind, that is totally fine. You can just start White Identity with us in February. But please finish Why We Fight in your spare time! It's so good!

That's brilliant

I wonder if there's a place you can buy book sleeves

@CarletonJ that’s brilliant and funny but also a sad state of affairs.

>reading the section on Regional Segregation
>gets to the part on California
>”now the group will know of our struggle”

Lol,sadly yes...

Has anyone read any Julius Evola? I just ordered two of his books and wanted to know what people thought of him.

I like his work a lot @Hessian. Faye has a decent critique of traditionalism to keep in mind when you read, though. Don't get bogged down in the intellectualization of antiquity and tradition; tradition is something living and breathing, not something to be analyzed like a museum piece that's dead and gone.
Evola has very fascinating writing, but just make sure to read it as a supplement to (meta)political work.

Arktos, I think, published an English translation of his Handbook for Right-wing Youth, which is really easy to get into compared to stuff like Revolt Against the Modern World. Regardless of where you start, I'd definitely recommend the Handbook as well @Hessian

I ordered, “Revolt against the modern world” and “metaphysics of war.”

I'm part of the way through revolt, it's very good. When I first started it I hadn't read any nationalist literature at all so I had a bit of a hard time with it, but it's a pretty damn good read

And I will keep your advice on wind while reading.

Evola's Platonic metaphysics are problematic for me and should be as such for anyone else who calls themselves a "race realist." Evola rejects biological race for a more metaphysical idea. And yet, my problem with Neo-Platonism expands further. Nietzsche's critique (in *Beyond Good and Evil*) of Platonism is spot on. Everything for them is about rejecting the material world; this becomes masturbatory and delusional if taken to its extreme conclusion, in which the person is alienated from his/her body and all realpolitik.

Also, Faye is absolutely right that Evola constructs a false dilemma between tradition and modernity. Tradition is a principle and out of time, but modernity is a historical period. It behooves us, then, to synthesize these concepts as Faye does in Archeofuturism.

All that said, Evola is still useful. His emphasis on tradition, order, and transcendence is the start of an important discourse for modern minds. And yet, like Plato, you should read him with a healthy degree of criticism.

@William_1994 - WA on the metaphysical front, I have recently begun to wonder if different races and species attract souls from different sources. Some say that DNA is shaped like a receptor, and if it is in fact a receptor, who knows what variety of signals it is capable of receiving. Just a random thought.

@Benjamin Matthew-MI Welcome to the ILC server! Feel free to join us tomorrow night for our last discussion on Why We Fight. I believe we are getting together at 8 EST

Sounds good. Thank you.

I find Evola frustrating af, precisely because of what @William_1994 - WA said above.

Just sharing a video I hadn't seen before. It's D. Duke addressing Faye at Amren 2006. Faye responds. Gives some insight to Faye's take on the JQ, which we discussed. https://youtu.be/RELmEPUy6lQ ... also linked are Amren's and Duke's responses to the discussion.

Didn't intend for screenshot preview. If I should have linked that differently, please let me know.

Ya good, bruv

IE tech support hours

Meredith Brace of San Diego, California, believed in integration. She lived in
a white area, but the neighborhood school, Harding Elementary, was 90 percent
Hispanic. She thought whites should go to Harding rather than escape to a white
school. Even before her son was old enough to enroll, she joined the Harding
PTA, raised money for Harding, and went door-to-door to promote it to white
neighbors. After her son began to attend, she became president of the PTA, and
set up after-school art and theater classes to bring whites and Hispanics together.
They were disbanded because so few people took part.
She kept her son at Harding for three years before finally giving up. “[W]e
have nothing in common [with Hispanics],” she said. “Every time my husband
and I would go over for an event, my husband would feel like it was his first
time. We haven’t made any friends.” Her son made no friends either. “He hasn’t
been invited to a birthday party,” she explained. “There is absolutely no after-
school interaction. For his birthday, he invited four of his classmates. Only one
came.

F

F

@Deleted User That's really cool, man. Do you often attend meetings like that?

Polish do that too, my ex who was polish told me to never say to her parents that I had some Ukrainian.

@DeusVolk Interesting. Was she second or third generation?

Second. Both parents were full blooded polish.

Hung out with other Polish, went to Polish church, etc

I hear him

@DeusVolk Nothing wrong with that.

white culture is difficult for people to grasp in America because it is the dominant culture (still) and so it's just "normal".

Mrs. Brace joined her neighbors and transferred her son to Hope Elementary
School, which was still 73 percent white. As one white parent explained, “[I]f
half of [the neighborhood] is going in that direction, maybe we can carpool.”1
It is lunch time at the Westerly Hills Elementary School in Charlotte, North
Carolina. Black and white children sit next to each other in what seems to be
complete disregard for race. The school appears to have passed what educators
call the “lunchroom litmus test,” of whether children make friends across racial
lines. But the test is rigged. The children have assigned seats; that is the only
way to get blacks and whites to eat together.

@SamanthaM I agree. It was just strange to see it coming from poz Southern California.

>ethnic identity

@Deleted User I can hear you now, so keep doing whatever you just did

I went to a high school that was 95% white 👌🏼

@Daniel Turch Lucky you!

just googled the demographics, 97% white

What a shame

rural kentucky 👌🏼

@John O - Libertarian meetings?

Any political meeting

Yes

I go to this club's meetings weekly.

Dude, you're a really high energy guy. Keep it up, bro

@SamanthaM The Jewish Generation?

Generation J?

@Deleted User That's the Libertarian group? What was the name again?

@John O - Lol, great name for the X-ers

i think a large part of it is an attraction to exoticism

That too

they are different, and thus more attractive as a result

That could be true, and is pushed by the MSM all the time.

^

Discussing the benefits of mixing

the word is weeb trash

During the civil rights era, churches made a passionate, moral case for
integration. Have they practiced what they preached? Churches are not governed
by the same civil rights laws as schools and employers. This explains why they
are some of the most segregated institutions in America. According to one study,
nearly 95 percent of churches have congregations that are at least 80 percent one
race or ethnic group.143 In a school or neighborhood, this would be considered
hyper-segregation.
Churches have tried to fight this tendency, mostly without success. In 1965,
New Covenant Presbyterian Church was the first church in Miami established
specifically to encourage integration. It prompted glowing news stories about its
integrated congregation, choir, and administration. By 2006, it had only one
white member.144
Fred Caldwell, bishop of Greenwood Acres Full Gospel Baptist Church in
Shreveport, Louisiana, got so tired of seeing only black faces in his congregation
of 5,000 that he started paying whites to show up for services: $5.00 a hour on
Sundays and $10.00 on Thursday evenings. “God wants a rainbow in his
church,” he explained.

I often watch the mangoos

i have been to a black church

it was profoundly uncomfortable

Yeah man. I grew up Irish Catholic. I don't like that shit

roman catholic here

I meant Irish Roman Catholic

🤔

Like Roman Catholic

But everybody was Irish

black churches are just intolerably unstructured

and loud

much like the negro

In the NE, different European groups practice Roman Catholicism slightly differently

we're all catholic as far as im concerned

@SamanthaM Young Americans for Freedom

@Daniel Turch Definitely true.

Fucking @Praetorian coming in hot

Episcopals are cucks @Deleted User

@Daniel Turch I went to Episcopal church everyday.

sorry bro

let me see the stats on that

Every Sunday. Sorry

I didn't like it though

let me see the stats on catholic racemixing

^^^

*citation needed*

the catholic church on my campus prays for refugees every mass 🙄