general
Discord ID: 228313705669066752
240,419 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 60/962
| Next
I think religion is that compelling...
You only need evidence to prove positive claims, not to disprove them
biological.....concesious............its the same thing
I think the desire to believe in something greater is ingrained in humanity. Thats why Nietzsche said that with the death of god, humanity needs to find it's own purpose
*instict
consciousness is not the same as instinct
I belive its ingrained in humans because the birds believe in the rain god....
what makes you think the birds believe in the rain god?
but how do you know the birds believe in a rain god
perhaps is the god of harvest?
i dont know it
again
rain = worms = food
where does god come into that
maybe birds just believe in rain
lol
again, are birds even capable of believing
sorry, trying to flesh this out for myself
how can we prove that birds know the rain is what causes the worms to rise?
...thanks for being cool through the process >.<
maybe they just take advantage of the situation
or maybe they just learned to associate the rain with there being more worms
Im going to say the bird's parents were taught how to follow rains....
yeah and there is no need for belief for that to be true
there is no evidence that birds teach each other things
bird parents do not teach a fledgling to fly
wait don't hunting dogs teach their young how to hunt?
& due to a lack of a language to properly literate the conecpt, it isconcived as a religious rule.........not so much we do this because there are worms, but because we do this because my ancestors did it.....
Birds dont have a concept of behavior
they know parents, self, children, and others
knowledge is not passed down
it is through the flock
but the flock does not teach
the flock is there for instinctual reasons
ofc not the same way we pass down
ya, i see religion in that
I dunno, maybe there are natural learned behaviors but where does religion come into play what so ever?
they are performing rituals they dont understand for a greater good
religion requires belief in a god or gods, there is no way to prove that birds believe in a god or gods, let alone if they can even conceptualize what a god is
Well no, they are learning behaviors because they see what works, and the greatest good to them is what ever keeps them alive
eric your starting to get it
the greatest good = religion
I didn't say that
i did
I don't follow that logic
religion = prrof of concept?
?
belief in a greatest good could be considered religion
but that requires belief
but you can't even say that there is belief
pna get it!
so what do you think, am i crazy.???
im not talking about birds
anyways, great convo guys, thanks for entertaining me ๐
with people sure, but with instinctive animals no way
again, religion and belief are purly human conceptions
JPB?
Heirichys are present in lobsters?
but heirarchies aren't beliefs
heirarchies are social status
and social species have been around for millenia
^
you cannot say there are heriarchies in sponges
there are hierarchies in religion, there's no religion in hierarchies
heirarchies require a belief.....something is better than something else.....
no they don't
no heriarchies do not require belief
'splain
hierarchies are just a way of ranking one thing as better than another, but you don't need belief for that
you are a small wolf, there are other wolves but they are all larger
therefore you are bottom wolf
no belief necessary
Eric - you contradicted yourself......you need to believe one thing is better than the other.....
there is no belief behind knowing one is better than another
ahhh but the female wolf has to choose who to mate with
you don't "believe" it, you just behave within the constructs of the hierarchy
there is a belif there
how about a 200m race
5 people run it and they all come in different places
this is a heirarchy
you have to be capable of complex thought to be capable of belief
is it the silkiest coat.........the biggst? the stealthiest.........but thats what makes us different.....the values we choose
animals dont necessarily choose
but lobsters don't choose those values, they just naturally behave within that structure
they instinctually go for whoever is at the top of the heirarchy
foxes choose looks over pack benifits, husky's choose thick coats......
the lobster isn't thinking "i'm gonna mate with the biggest lobster," it's just naturally and instinctively choosing to mate with whatever has the greatest chance for successful procreation
hyenas choose jaw strenghth over running!
boom
but those thick coats aren't chosen because they believe anything, they just choose them because they instinctively are attracted to thicker coats
hyenas dont need to run
they rely on packs and strong jaws to get a kill
hyenas are instinctively attracted to hyenas with tougher jaws, no belief required
there is a reason hyenas have 10x the jaw strenght, but run slower than most dog species
because of evolution
it would be like saying cheetahs choose speed over strength
they don't choose those things, it just happens that the ones that survived the game of life had those qualities
because momma hyena didnt run & grandpa neither,,,,,,
they dont choose it, it's the attribute they find most appealing
or the attribute that keeps them alive
exactly & those are religion
no because there is no belief behind it
are you famuilar w/ malaria?
mal = bad, aria = air
bad air
thats etomology
we still diagnose ppl w/ 'bad air'
so what?
i fail to see the connection
because when malria came into common knowedge, that was the best way to describe it
and?
what does that have to do with religion?
its not bad air
and a jellyfish isn't actually a fish
you are arguing semantics
its bacteria/virus within the moist air cauing illness
is it not a religios belif that if you muck through the swamp you will fall victim the the bad air?
no
same idea....
no?
no its not
religion is an action you perform without fully understanding why
jelly fish is actually jelly
no its not
there are devils in the swamp?
that's a symptom of religion, not a factor of it
religion is the belief in gods or god
*demons?
yeah, and people are capable of believing in things like that, animals are not
if an animal falls ill, does it believe demons have infected it?
I disagree, the bird has the same thought.......the demons have poisioned the lake....
birds dont think
evidence?
bids think because choice
the statement that birds believe in the supernatural is an extraordinary claim that has to be proven
no they dont
birds do not think
they act on instinct
eric....fair enough, just expressing opins here, & not hard fafts
a bird doesn't go, I'm going to wake up in the morning and sing, then I'll get some food and sing some more
but those opinions should be based in fact
*why my keyboard getting smaller >.<
fair enough
have you been drinking?
im looking for input more than proving myself right
i have
I hate alcohol lol
....just cracked #4
New Belgium trple
honestly you guys have beenb great
๐
all discussion, no hate
that's because we're all conservatives who don't yell at each other xD
wait, who said anything about being conservative
I just assumed
ya...wai....wha
maybe not then lol
im nt a commie.....if that makes me conservtive
I'm a purple haired SJW that identifies as a toaster and youve just triggered me
Oh, speaking of which who has seen Sh0e's new video
it's amazing
meh, not a shoe fan
she talks about the feminists who believe being straight is a choice
i stopped watching her and armoured back in the whole candid debaucle
that wasn't nearly enough reason for me to stop
candid debaucle? please do tell
basically candid paid them to do sponsorships
shappy, ruby, pooly, Jordainy
but it turned out candid has been doing some really shady shit
shoe's mom is hot
there was a social media app that was all about free speech and they gave paid sponsorships to those who would talk good things
oh
turns out candid was censoring and stuff
i memeber
but armoured and shoe defended it
candid is a company?
candid is no more i think
yeah but they just didn't do enough research and they apologized for it later so whatever
yeah it died
I had been losing interest in Armoured at the time anyway
and I didn't care for shoe to begin with, although I love her patriarchy skit with the Trump mask
I love them all lol
Not a big fan of TJ Kirk though
I was when I was in high school
I have a friend who looks exactly like him
lmao poor guy ๐
lol he's a gun loving texan so very different
i dont have much animosity for TJ though
a lot of channels I just grew out of
I didn't like how TJ was basically cynical about everything
TJ red pilled my on micro penises
TJ vs Tommy was epic >.<
didn't see that
more like DP vs Tommy
I remember when TJ did a live stream and one of his friends cut his hand deep enough they had to call the police
Dam
ya know nothing like bananna clips to spuce up a vid >.<
ambulance
hot oil clip
also, looks like the big man is online
I called in yesterday
yeah? I think i may have missed your call
I came in late
I only watch, matt is cool, blonde is psycho >.<
Yeah my call was somewhat early on
speaking of yesterday, where can i find yesterdays stream?
blonde is hilarious
Blonde read one of my jokes
I think he deletes them after
the call-in stream isn't put on youtube
oh
I wish lol
but you can watch all the streams on other streaming sites
oh well
google play, soundcloud, stitcher
What if Matt is watching our conversation right now
like the NSA
good
notice me senpai
MATT AND I ONCE MADE LOVE
notice me Matt, I'm naked
great you scared him off
but not me ๐
maybe everyone in the discord is watching our conversation
Matt and I once made love in the recording studio. He can really get his mouth on that microphone if you know what I mean
well shite, maybe more than blonde will mispronounce my username
I did my first superchat on sunday and blonde struggled
why aren't nicknames allowed on the server?
dunno
someone needs to change their name to Poon
maybe everyone should
Poonkotus
I feel like most people here are liberal
How the left claimed the word liberal when they have a track record of regulating everything is beyond me
Classical liberals.
I mean
No
Just liberals
Classical conservative would just be a fundamentalist no?
Classical liberals as in for liberty.
I understand
But that's literally liberal
I was a democrat in the 90s under clinton. In voice only because I wasn't old enough to vote, but I remember being a full on anarchist, and told that it was the ideals of my party to have the government leave me the hell alone
back then the churchy republicans where the finger wagglers that insisted what you should and shouldn't do. That's where the term Liberal came from
The socialists were always in the Democrat wing, but they were a fringe voice up until Barack rose to power. But when the Democrats turned full on authoritarian, the term "Liberal" was co-opted into the lexicon
I understand the historical context
But they just changed
They clearly aren't liberal anymore
I was dumb enough to vote for Obama. Now Iโm reformed.
240,419 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 60/962
| Next