@Deleted User

🆙 | **「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 leveled up!**

@Deleted User join me in vc or get ddosed

@Sasha dang i think my mic broke

@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 @Sasha @Buelli @Asphodel @chain @Rose🌹 Methode summons you

cant vc

Disappointing

dm me if its something important tho

@Deleted User is this a pro-iran server

Nah, the official platform of the server is anti-Iran

i can't be on an anti-iranian server

https://www.defense.gov/explore/story/Article/1783822/5-things-to-know-about-dods-new-policy-on-military-service-by-transgender-perso/

.p https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6qL3xPRtbc

I really like that meme

good one sasha

!

@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 Christmas is over so political debates are back in season

why are you guys entertaining this fucking idiot anyway

What have I joined in on

Anti-semite being anti-semetic

If he could demonstrate that like 50% of the people are jewish

It would probably be irrelevant anyway

But these dumb fucks never do it

Why do these people even care about banks

Why is the global banking system relevant

Because it's an easy and old narrative/trope

That you can dog whistle to normies at

I'm actually curious about the data behind bankers, tbh

I bet if we were to look at the gender breakdown of bankers we'd probably find that men are disproportionately represented as well

Because I've **literally heard the claim, 20+ times** never seen the data of what percentage's ethnicity

Probably, yes

There's a global male conspiracy

I mean... it's not a conspiracy. Since it's well known

We could break it down by a number of factors and we'd probably be able to find disproportionate influence of a bunch of different groups

It's not a problem

I just bring it up

over and over and over guys

If 30% of the population are gamers and 50% of the global elites are gamers, we could conclude that there's a global gamer conspiracy

He has fascist android as his name...

Did someone name change him?

I'm not a fascist 🤡 I just self assign my name as "Fascist Android"

Granted... I assign myself as Dumbass

I probably am dumbass <:Smug:643129431434461194>

He didn't self assign it

Oh, ok

This guy sounds shockingly like Ratpack

But I don't believe it is because... Ratpack would have to be larping

It fun @sydtko

I hate larpers

I don't think he's larping

🆙 | **Methode leveled up!**

He's just stupid and dishonest

Ye I changed his name

that's not what I mint

Jordan B Petersen's favorite flavor

https://external-preview.redd.it/EmmxwrcAknEZ6zHswv-ASYCYbQ3BgVe905HVmuJAdc0.jpg?auto=webp&s=6b3aad3408c225a04747ef7f55c87fe4eb3a6550

@SOLO :<

@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 There are some animals that have higher cognitive function to make faux maneuvers...
Monkeys, corvids, squirrels... (they'll fake hide their food)

right

So even animals *seem capable of lying*

If you think that's functionally equivalent

I think that is

Since that... demonstrates they understand other animals to some extent... and their desire to steal their food

methode i think is making a case for when the animal has language

I think they do...
There's a video you can sort of get at running around an AI program called DeepSqueak

So rats have a patterned chirp/calling

Birds, whales, dolphins

... a vocalization is already an abstract symbol

Chomsky's pretty exclusionary of language

@Deleted User If lack agency, must be exterminated

this ^ seems very problematic for ecological notions. Algae doesn't have agency (normatively) you probably shouldn't be eliminating algae and bacteria

what in the actual fuck

@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 What's the topic

poland is pretty not communist

this is emotivism as well

noncog and emotivism gang is just correct <:Smug:643129431434461194>

@Sasha It's called the embedding problem

Is vs as incoherent

@Sasha I don't agree to that

Linguistics do not determine reality... except feeding back on it by impacting our understanding of it

Which is why I'm a linguistic trivialist...
You can call X true of false, it changes nothing about X'ness. It changes your sense of X

Metaphysical trivialism... I might be less willing to jump on board

Since I could only explain that with the phenomenon is a output of the contradictory...
Or thing in itself is nothing. X + not X = object...
I am unwilling to commit to that. Since it's mere possibility

Propositions are non physical <:MonkaS:643820797605183488>

dualism is cringe

@Deleted User It's not a contradiction if it is the case there is a fact of the matter

So it's like saying ... I believe there's a galaxy a thousand light years away

There is a fact of the matter there

Despite not having a referent on hand...

So you're proper or correct in believing it

@LustrousMandrill A meinongian

If you can reference it, it necessarily exists, but not in the same sense

So you equivocating "exist" or "existence"

But I don't particularly care

@Deleted User do you believe there are physical properties but not not physical substances?

@Deleted User How do you know other things are non mental?

Substance is a red herring, the substance is irrelevant if you ask me

Can't know the thing-in-itself, no way to demonstrate things without relations, blah blah

Leads to you shouldn't speak about a substance... aside that there is something

You can call it neutral monism, an idea, physical (any semantic name, via nominalism)

I'm insanely triggered by the disbelief in ...
Holism or unity of all things though

You necessarily must make a trivial statement for axiom...
Like the law of identity

It's a trivial statement

For any and every X, X = X

So it seems like to excise the most semantics, it follows that you say
For any and every X, they are (semantic placeholder) [idea, physical...] yada yada

So that you maintain consistency

Physicalism = naturalism = etc

The laws of gravity is a name... it's a principle for another thing... a sense and understanding of things about the world... all of which is physical

A name is physical...

I am a very angry impatient individual

So there's no world where I extend charity to Solo past about ... 3 questions

And he didn't answer question 1

Jews overrepresented

@Deleted User There is some polling that implies women were happier about 30-40 years ago

But I don't want to link it for the idea that...
I don't want to provide evidence for someone I dislike and corroborate some of their claim

How anti-intellectual of you

It's not anti-intellectual per se. I have the article open on hand. I just don't know the intent / goal of this discourse

To shit on the nazi. Or to get get at truth (or truthlikeness)

Verisimilitude

I literally have the article open

I think the goal would depend on who you ask

Exactly

Which is the problem

As I don't know the goal/intent, I can't know if I should or should not post evidence of his claim

And I personally don't like helping people I don't like...

At face value, I dislike Solo

If someone asks a vague question like "ancestor" you can easily just face value answer "Africa"

Or "The ocean"

I just personally hate when leftists make themselves look bad by "shitting on nazis" without even pretending to care about genuinely trying to have a productive conversation

It's discord... I don't think there's really anything productive about it except personal entertainment...
And if I actually did things that were "productive" likely they would also be immoral

I don't see how anyone gains anything from this kind of discourse

Personal entertainment?

Anyhow. You seem like you do not like me withholding posts so https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Stevenson_ParadoxDecliningFemaleHappiness_Dec08.pdf

```The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness*```

Googleable

It's something that is assertible ... I just don't know if I particularly care about women's happiness
While having less economic freedom

40 years ago, women has less economic freedom

Huh, maybe having more choices and responsibilities really do make people less happy

I'd believe that... but I would prefer them have more choices... to a point

Time to embrace the third position

Third position ? Not valuing happiness or freedom... or valuing both? <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>

Well I meant within the framework of primarily valuing happiness

"Mass immigration" is probably ... something most people are against...
Maybe that means "increasing immigration"

But "Mass immigration" is already loaded

@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 You can be even more dishonest... and take the genetic meaning

lol

I know what that one means

A lot of people aren't educated on hermeneutics tbh...
I was raised Christian for a very long time and not aware

Depends on your denom

That would be a paradigm

I don't even know what denom I belonged to... technically

@Deleted User I don't feel like this gets anywhere... tbh...
You're basically setting a more eloquent strawman

Trying to pigeon hole him into a denomination

I'm actually trying to figure out which denom I was privately schooled in <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>

But I just don't give a rat's ass

I think the strategy at this point is more akin to a war of attrition than actually trying to get to any conclusions

I'm grossed out by listening to this

tbh

theism 😞

<:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>

@Sasha good one sasha

very funny

https://twitter.com/physorg_com/status/331876146113302528?s=21

One big family. Maybe we shouldn’t call it “race” for the people who have been convinced it *dont real*

I mean...
How is someone supposed to say someone's socially inept

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/speech-acts/ reading about this garbo again...
Honestly, this is why I hate philosophers. Too many unnecessary distinctions... This mother fucker literally uses a chemistry analogy

``` Illocutionary force and semantic content are often taken to be distinct from one another, not just in the way that your left and right hand are distinct, but rather by virtue of falling into different categories. Stenius 1967 elucidates this distinction, noting that in chemical parlance a radical is a group of atoms normally incapable of independent existence, whereas a functional group is the grouping of those atoms in a compound that is responsible for certain of that compound's properties. Analogously, it is often remarked that a Proposition is itself communicatively inert. For instance, merely expressing the Proposition that it is snowing is not to make a move in a “language game”. Rather, such a move is only made by putting forth a Proposition with an illocutionary force such as assertion, conjecture, command, etc. The chemical analogy gains further support from the fact that just as a chemist might isolate radicals held in common among various compounds, the student of language may isolate a common element held among ‘Is the door shut?’, ‘Shut the door!’, and ‘The door is shut’. This common element is the Proposition that the door is shut, queried in the first sentence, commanded to be made true in the second, and asserted in the third. According to the chemical analogy, then:

Illocutionary force : Propositional content :: functional group : radical ```

Pointless distinction, though... if you ask me... until there's a mismatch between the speech act and the the effect

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vM6pAQfaiU

@LustrousMandrill I never got a response back on my friendship application 😭

It's being processed

O

@Deleted User what am I?

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Death%20grip

Hot

Imagine not taking a tautological definition of physicalism 😴

Hempel's dilemma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_Emblem_Fates

@Marcdoof

@Hagar non agent is a stolen line

@Deleted User have you been in any gangs?

<:Feelsok:643818539454562304>

@Castore I feel like this question has racist implications

@LustrousMandrill racism as in a form of oppression ,institution or racism as in individual disregard or ill will?

Little bit from column A, little bit from column B

No @Castore

This is the definition I'm working with: the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
In this case, the racial characteristic in question is black people being in gangs

I'm culturally white

@LustrousMandrill it wasnt from columnb

morally unlucky

🤡 i was just joking the whole time

@Hagar Matthew 7:12

@Hagar John 13:34-35

@Hagar chad 42:0

@Marcdoof

Get in or die

@AusFox ok ok

@Marcdoof do it

@Marcdoof

ugh

i fucking hate this bitch

She’s a troll duh

HEY

is she really? idk man, she just seems dumb to me

<@&644177706367451163> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ykxcdp6-2kE

I'm actually a Godless alt, hagar

I'm Loki

wtf why are you muted?

nah jk I'm Godless

YOU'RE NOT INVITED!

I have myself muted because I'm in a really noisy place

Its shaun

https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/willpower-self-control.pdf

@Marcdoof

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iq-VhfVwqp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xPjsTyS4lY

@LustrousMandrill

There are songs about santa too,

@Deleted User

@Fondboy unmute shawn

jesus christ

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03280-012

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00047/full

just women has more data than sexim against men

Squad W

@Diogenes of Toronto Its called vetting btw

although "Manipulation firmware" sounds good too

yeah you are right vetting thats the word

<:bear:526164546671476738>

OH shit that describes is

@Diogenes of Toronto You're fucking chidi

Nice guy just like

I have a note on Hagar that says antisemite but idk why

Chidi

is hagar actually an antisemite?