general_1
Discord ID: 321378710265659393
22,919 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 51/230
| Next
I think when the NSDAP burned books, it was mostly symbolic and many-if-not-most of the books burned were socially degenerate more than anything.
I actually think burning porn would be better optics than burning Marxist books
The problem is, porn is almost all digital now.
Nobody can really argue AGAINST burning porn, and it still follows our message
Its not for erasing it from the world. Its for sending a message
@Stanislav ฤajiฤ the point would be to get ppl to ask why we are doing it
Thats a great point. Time to hit the XXX store
I mean, people will be thinking, "These guys went through all the convenience stores seeking out copies of Hustler to burn?"
Is burning an Israeli flag too harsh?
People are more likely to ask why we are burning porn than a Marxist book.
Maybe we had the hustlers from when we were teenagers and now we are showing how we are rejecting porn
Burn women too because MGTOW <:pepe:321791202578006017>
>Keeping copies of Hustler from the dial-up era
degenerate.wav
I actually saw something similar to this when I went on a church Retreat as a teenager. it was a big conference and the pastor on stage asked people to come to the stage and give up their vices. I saw a lot of people bring pornographic images and throw them up on stage as a symbol of giving it up
Did the pastor quickly pick up all the pix and slip them into his pocket later?
WHy do you care what the Jews say?
Do you think that if you act super nice and polite they'll publish nice things about us?
Also, you don't buy the books from the publisher you burn, you acquire them in other ways or through a second hand store.
^
The only reason I need to "care about what the jews say" is because they influence our people to be against us
No they dont
Half priced books is implicitly white
They influence people who were never sympathetic towards us
If someone is swayed against us by a negative media story on one of our rallies, they were never an ally.
They influence people on the fence too
We need to make those people sympathetic towards us
Dude
No matter what we do in CVille it's going to be:
"NEO-NAZI WHITE SUPREMIST RICHARD SPENDER AND DAMINGO DO X"
But we can discredit it if its completely wrong
Yes I know they're going to be headlines like that but when you add stuff like "Nazis burn books because they're too dumb to read them" it doesn't help
Stop ๐๐ป Caring ๐๐ป About ๐๐ป The๐๐ป Opinion ๐๐ป Of ๐๐ป Your ๐๐ป Enemy
*Tactics*
Our "enemy" is the jew my dude
All whites are potential allies
Thats not true.
Yes it is
I've known ppl go from commie to natsoc
I think it was someone here who was explaining, its easier to convert a commie than a neocon
Without complicit whites, Jews wouldn't be a problem.
The far left just want to rebel and be the counterculture
They don't really care about their ideals lmao
You have a very warped understanding of the far left if you actually believe that
>attack people in the street for their ideals
>they don't really care
You're talking about people involved in a culture and following ideals that have been fine tuned for over 50 years here in the US and you think they don't actually care about them?
Yeah I personally think a lot of the thugs are punching Nazis to be rebellious, not because communism
Well you're wrong.
Agree to disagree. Not really something that can be argued out
Yeah, it can. You're objectively wrong.
You're trying to make the enemy appear to be less serious than they are. That's dangerous.
Rockwell said something to the effect of "The only people who really truly believe in anything in the world are the Nazis and the Communists. The rest will follow whoever wins."
The enemy isn't the far left. They're a tool of the enemy
@Fevs there are more people posting swastikas who fall into the category of just wanting to rebel than there are leftists.
The far left are one of our enemies.
The white race is in a state of civil war in a lot of ways.
The far left is a Jewish puppet
ffs
The "neoliberal" are a more direct threat than the communists
Like someone said before with out sympathetic whites, jews would have never gained power.
Who is fighting us in the streets?
I don't see an awful lot of NeoCons or NeoLibs out there
Who's paying them to fight us in the streets?
Nobody
The communists, who are a tool of the neoliberals
Communists are a tool of the Neoliberals?
Is that why the Radical LEft views the NeoLibs with the smae hatred and disdai nwe view NeoCons with?
@Fevs a lot of the lefts shocktroops aren't paid. There leadership is though.
I would actually say a lot of anarchists are fighting us in the streets
@Hand Banana I think we should prepare as if we expect 300 feral nogs to come fight us tbh
They call themselves anarchists, but they're communists.
The future of America and the White Race will be decided by probably 5-10% of the country fighting in the streets. The masses will fall in line with the winner.
The anarchists are still communists lmao
You've seen this time and time again
Agreed McCarthy
@kristall.night I agree with that
We (our local get together group) have a token injun who is former Antifa ๐คท๐ผโโ๏ธ some on the far dark side and still transition.
Anarchists and Communists of whatever flavor are the main enemy for us to overcome. Once we do that, we win.
NAXALT means nothing to me
I would rather appeal to 10 hard right guys who think a book burning looks rad than one feathernigger who might be swayed by a softer message.
Of course some of them do switch sides, but it's not because we're tiptoeing around worrying about optics
And no matter how moderate your message is and how hard you worry about optics the headlines and news coverage is the same.
That's not what I was saying.....lol he'd be happy to burn books.
@Hand Banana 5-10% fighting in the streets will decide the future of America. What % is out there now?
Less than 1%
^
Far less.
Ok, so wouldn't it be smart to recruit more to our team?
^
If you want people to fight in the streets, you don't attract them by being nice.
And how do we recruit more ppl?
By fighting, and inspiring others to do the same.
I never said "be nice"
Burning porn instead of books is being nice?
Why did you say we should burn porn instead of books again?
It's the reasoning behind it, @ManWithTheHand
Not the material to burn itself, but why you're avoiding Marxist literature
Because it sends a more powerful messages that more ppl can understand.
Thats not true
It's a matter of opinion
No, it's not.
What people do you think are going to help us win? People who are offended because we burn "gender studies and implicit white bias"?
22,919 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 51/230
| Next