Nah

i always quote it

cause it's a very good show

@YourFundamentalTheorum there are many based scenes. I like his first homily to the cardinals ("the small door")

i like his little speech about tourists

i can't find it on goytube rn

https://youtu.be/qUU2iWxrH2M

🤔

That's awesome. I mean, yeah, it lends Prager some undue legitimacy, but Tucker still nets the greater benefit.

Yeet

I actually saw a pretty interesting take yesterday that essentially indicated that one of the primary contributing factors to the English Civil War was the decision of the Monarchy to restrict usury practices, so Cromwell was supported by the "money changers" in order to resist said initiative...

Cursed

Incidentally the only statue without random foreigners (other than me) poking around

Tucker on Prager U hahahaha 😂 👌

Rise and grind Idvntvtaevavs

We wuz kangz

We wuz kangz confirmed.

Man. I took a look at the comments section under the Axios birthright citizenship EO video, and despite its being a a hostile platform, we're still holding our own down there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0d21nQBY8o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZyqQn2Uoo8

Stefan going all DR3 in this.

Yeah, I'm starting to ease off on the anti-DR3/Diamond 'n Silk/Candace Owens/Kanye bit. Obviously, the red line has to be the Republican Party losing sight of who their base is, but there's definitely a strong case to be made for the idea that, even if just a few percentage points of blacks can be torn away from the Democratic Party, with nothing more than a PR effort, and no substantive policy change, then it would seem to be a strategically sound move, though obviously also a hazardous one, given the pseudo-religious desire of conservative Whites to find that one BASED black guy, and use that as a false justification for jettisoning the implicit demographic aspect of their platform.

Worth keeping in mind is that the Republicans don't necessarily have to win over blacks. They can also just muddy the waters and make blacks feel less impassioned against them, lowering turnout for the Dems.

Just now realized that VDare's doing their own video digest, similar to Mr. Taylor's videos for AmRen, but with more of a rough-around-the-edges, conservative-friendly Daily Caller vibe: https://www.youtube.com/user/VDAREVideo/videos

They really need to do something with that green screen, though. Must still be finding their stride.

Eh. On second thought, probably best only to share their stuff with socks. Still slightly too edgy for normie accounts (use of the word "mongrelized" to describe the current state of Brazil).

@Bjorn - MD If the GOP wants to appeal to blacks by taking advantage of their hatred of Hispanic immigrants, that's great, but DR3 only serves to reinforce the morality of the left

@TMatthews Agreed. It's definitely a tightrope walk...

@Danimal876 I have been doing door knocking and I'm seeing that a lot of independents are totally demoralized and won't vote. They don't have the brainpower to vote for Trump but they don't like what the Dems are doing with their extreme messages and tactics.

A few years ago voter turnout was low because the sides were not different. Now it is being decreased because the sides are too different. Dumb people disenfranchised and btfoooo

@TMatthews (...though, I think, if we were to consult Martin Sellner, he wouldn't even balk at DR3, because he sees "racism" as a word that can't and shouldn't be sanitized. He would join in condemning racism on one hand, with the caveat of defining it himself as engaging in slander or the initiation of force on the basis of identity-related enmity, or demonstrating a chauvinistic desire to govern those not of one's nation, while speaking of the need to emphasize and preserve the nation's ethno-cultural identity on the other.)

I'm a fan of that approach. The word "racism" is too widespread and will never go away. We have to bend it to our will.

Bahahaha! Was just listening to Mark Dice's latest video on Brian Stelter at CNN, and he described MSNBC as MSHIV 😂

@Bjorn - MD I'm not saying we identify with the word racist. I'm saying that we should reject the entire moral paradigm of it. The left has overused that term to the point where many conservatives no longer believe them when they say it. It's also very easy to show that "anti-racists" are anti-white

At a minimum, we should push for a narrower definition of it, rather than expanding it to include things like expecting blacks to vote democrat

Controversial opinion, Gab being de-platformed might not be a bad thing, necessarily. While to a degree I support Alt-tech, Gab's lax views on censorship have turned it into a bit of a cesspit.

That will continue to produce psychos like Bowers. I had a similiar opinion when the Daily Stormer was de-platformed. At the end of the day, sites like these are disturbing to the masses and off putting to the capable people we are trying to reach out to.

People tend to forget, that outside of IE and a few other sites and figures, the movement has a very large number of dysfunctional people who are a part of it. The less of a voice these people have the better of we'll all be. Corporate censorship maybe a blessing in disguise because so many fugures in the broader movement refuse to censor and control their followers.

@Virgil If Twitter hadn't deplatformed the right the way it has, there would be plenty of leftists pushing back on the right wing crazies. The fact that Gab is a right wing echo chamber is because of deplatforming and censorship.

Or at least they "could" push back against the crazies if they were still on the same platform.

@TMatthews I agree with ultimately wanting to get beyond the paradigm. It'd be nice if that word just glanced off, and was no longer even taken seriously, and things are heading in that direction, but in the meantime, we have to find ways to maneuver within the pocket we have right now.

Hopefully Gab getting censored helps the cause of free speech regulation online. I never used it. Echo chambers are useless. The reason to be on normie social media is to reach people who don't have ban-able opinions (yet)

@Bjorn - MD I do agree that we won't get beyond the word anytime soon, but it is so easy to dismiss it among conservatives by attacking the source as illegitimate. They hate the SPLC almost as much as we do

@TMatthews Gab was no where near an echo chamber dude.

@Virgil I hear where you're coming from in terms of Gab being an optics liability at the moment, but that's just because Twitter has yet to finally jump the shark. If and when that where to happen, and assuming Torba were to manage to keep it up, Gab would instantly fill out with better-adjusted people, who would fairly quickly acclimatize themselves to the freedom of the platform, simply muting the more egregious of the spergs, but the notion that the company should be responsible for curating anything beyond unambiguous, credible threats of violence is something that we should absolutely reject.

@NITRODUBS Tfw Israel is part of Western Civilization now. More like West *Asian* civilization...

@ExternalPepsi Not an echo chamber in the sense that everyone agrees on everything, but in the sense that is is primarily people who were either banned from twitter or supporters of those who were. It's overwhelmingly far right and overwhelmingly those who are more politically involved than average. Not a great place to spread our views

@TMatthews Right, but, as you alluded to earlier, even in the poisoning the well by calling into question the legitimacy of organizations like the SPLC, the underlying moral premise not only remains untouched, but is perhaps implicitly strengthened (i.e. "racism" is a thing, and is bad). It's dodgy...

@TMatthews Alright but It was still a good platform for discussion. People gotta go somewhere.

@Bjorn - MD At least that moves it towards a narrow definition of explicit hatred based on race. Such a definition is not problematic for us. What is problematic is the idea that any white identity politics is racist

@Bjorn - MD I see what you're saying but the problem is the lunatic fringe that is banned first, creates an off putting and to a degree toxic atmosphere that the more moderate and desirable people, who are banned from twitter at a later point, would want to steer clear of.

@TMatthews For sure, especially if we can manage to wedge in and reinforce a dichotamy between legally advocating for government policies that reflect and preserve the various aspects of national identity, and engaging in tactless speech or acts of violence as private citizens.

@Virgil Yeah. To be honest, I'm not sure what should be done in that regard. The platform has to be kept afloat for if and when it's needed, and, like you said, has to be in a state where it's perceived as actually being suited for purpose, but if Torba starts clamping down, it may prompt an exodus of users at a time when the its main source of revenue is subscription fees from Pro users and transaction fees from content creator contributions(?)...

The frame in which racist is a relevant word at all is the problem @TMatthews

Like yes we discriminate based on race qua race, that is "racism" to almost anyone

Not to say the label should be owned, just moved beyond

Feels good, man

Always a solid idea to try and get 'em on the back foot. Make 'em justify their BS.

It may well turn out that many people are most effectively redpilled by themselves, when they actually have to pronounce and contemplate, often for the first time, what they've been indoctrinated into.

To he normie who is too far gone racism can be anything as trivial as realizing that Blacks are good at football or basketball.

Trying to reframe it to “antiwhite racism” is lending too much creedence to the Left.

True, but that's a level of denial I'm not even ready to contemplate right now (about sports)...

Lol

I agree fully, I wouldn't suffix "anti white" with "racism"

@Ald Anti-White polices, animus or bigotry.

@Bjorn - MD Sounds like Gab has pidgeon holed itself into being the fringe twitter. I don't think it will be able to climb out of it, especially after Pittsburgh

Take a note out of Bowden's playbook and "step over it!"

@Virgil Could be. A re-branding may be in order. They already moved away from the 2016 Pepe/Kek aesthetic. It may end up being time for a new domain, name, logo, and color scheme altogether.

@Sam Anderson Exactly. Talking about "anti-white racism" just pushes the classical liberal "let's see everyone as individuals" nonsense. Saying that the so called anti-racists are anti-white and that the word is just a slur against white people is the way to go

It's wignat tier to own the word racist and can only lead to cuckoldry to try to prove "innocence" of racism

@Virgil Nah if Twitter keeps banning people, more people will go. A good portion of the site were Brazilians an I doubt they give a shit about any of that.

step *over* it

Damigo was right. The whole use the same terms from the Left against them is dumb. Its the same tactic people like David Duke have been using for decades to no avail. We need to stop trying to storm the moral highground of the Left and instead construct our own.

@Virgil And it already was the fringe Twitter. If allowing anybody to speak without being slienced is fringe.

@Sam Anderson @Ald Step over slave morality

Neechposting has arrived

💯 💯

It's like, ok the premise of the word is it's unjustified to judge by race. That's a hypothesis. Let's see if it's true looking at the facts

Because she was technically foreign, they interviewed a Swedish (European, hurr durr) girl about whether she felt "threatened" by our posters on campus. Of course, being Swedish (if I may slander my not-so-distant kin), she answered, "Yes." 😑

Stupid is as stupid does.

Swedes what's going on big guys

@Ald ...and man, while doing so, she achieved levels of uptalk that shouldn't even be possible...

We Swedes are big gae somtimes because we can be too nice. Castrating all of your violent criminals for 100 years will do that to your society.

She looks just like my great grandma from Stockholm

Sad!

@Sam Anderson What's Straya's excuse then? 🤔

Australians are known to be stridently ethnocentric

http://archive.is/PDpVC#selection-902.0-999.223

Probably the least bad Anglophones

Before you delete that archive, it's about the election.

Look at what this means for Arizona.

@ExternalPepsi Sometimes vigorous censorship is necessary even on alt tech sites. You do not want to have a small and loudmouth minority of dysfunctional mentally ill and evil people take over the platform by pushing out everybody else. Altright.com for instance, had this issue.

Could chalk it up to the Celtic admixture... <:nervous:359009898115104770>

"We’d like to mention that Project Veritas’ undercover investigation into Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill could be the reason she is now 2 points behind her opponent, Republican Josh Hawley in the Real Clear Politics poll average. Right as the undercover footage was released on October 16, McCaskill was trailing just under 1% point."

@Rabbidsith I dont think that violates our no gun posting thing. That rule is mostly for stopping “oh dude checkout my badass XYZ thingy!”

"After exposing the deceptive nature of Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskilland her campaign staff, who were concealing their Obamaesque liberal politics in hopes of attracting moderate voters, Project Veritas has done the same with Arizona Democratic Senate candidate Kyrsten Sinema." "It will remain to be seen if Sinema can survive the expose with the election right around the corner, but we suspect the news will likely kill her chance at bringing those who are only slightly red in the red state of Arizona into the blue.
As of October 30, Sinema is leading in Real Clear Politics poll average by .2%."

@Sam Anderson Alright. Good to hear.

@Virgil Lol I'm not sure who you're talking about but if you think speech is evil and the actions of one man speak for othera, you're being a liberal.

Styx is wearing a shirt today so it's already a good day

Keep in mind that .2% is well within the margin of error.

@Virgil Lol no one was pushing anybody off Gab dude. You're probably butthurt about wignats or something.

One reason the Left has done so well is that they are totally fine with lying to their base, and then moving further Left than them. Also their greater strength is accepting marginal gains, not everything has to be perfect. Trump is doing this. Imagine how many Ted Cruz Republicans would have been okay talking about ending birthright citizenship during the election. Not that many. Now that we are so polarized, I bet tons of them are onboard.

Last I heard a wave of MAGA boomers had taken over gab.

@ExternalPepsi we can talk without doing the "butthurt" thing here

that is, before it was shut down.

@Papa Pizzagate It was getting overrun.

But there was no censorship so we could just make them look like fools before they muted us.

Yeah .2% lead in these polls basically means even. These polls' sample sizes of 1000 give them about +/-3.16% margin of error

MAGA boomers on Gab getting in touch with some of the edgier WN types sounds like a bad idea tbh.

The perfect storm... <:nervous:359009898115104770>

Heimbachpedes.

For terrible optics...

@Sam Anderson It some ways it was good because the ones who want full on DR3 got rekt.

Openly saying they want to replace whites...nice.

Due to the sheer volume of Cantwell types yeah haha. @ExternalPepsi

@StevePines -WA Yeah, saw that. By all means, I hope they keep their foot on the gas...

🚗☁ 👌🏻

They don't want to replace whites, just white nationalism, and every white just happens to be a racist nationalist, don't look into it <:nervous:359009898115104770>

3 feet on the gas pedal boys. ACCELERATE!!!

@Bjorn - MD I think the Jews have collectively decided that throwing a fit is worth burning 300 years of work with Europeans. It is delicious

I've got 3 feet.

@StevePines -WA this one too.

Yeah I've seen that all over the place, it's disgusting

Hahaha we need a banner at the border that says "No, YOU can't"

In a way, Trump supporters are white nationalists. Not Capital W and Capital N. But they are Whites who love their country.

@Freiheit - CA in the form of full force of the military

@ExternalPepsi I was using Altright.com as an example of toxic people pushing good commentators and people off of a platform.

Well, and 4/10 quality content

Getting ready for work. Remember It's Okay To Be White.

Did they sacrifice a few to open up the borders with feelz? 🤔

@Sam Anderson what’s up? We need to get together soon.

Pro-Lie

Children of the Lie

@Logan Not to NAJALT, but to spare you the wrath of Ian (😂), while there are obviously groups of Jews who do collectively make massively far-reaching decisions that have affected, and continue to affect us detrimentally, we should probably try to be a bit more nuanced and precise in our analyses. While the vast majority of Jews are globalists, and their elites could be said to represent the "nucleus" of globalism, some Jews aren't globalists (...though I admittedly have yet to meet one who wasn't), and most globalists aren't Jews.

Which two religions openly have policies on lying to "others"? 🤔

@Nerv - VA yeah Im thinking about postering THE LIVING SHIT out of Richmond. Like coordinated how our WA bois did with Jacob.

Gotta wrap up some gay papers first tho. Speaking of which. Ughhh lets get this day started...

Havamal encourages lying to enemies as well @Asatru Artist - MD

L8r fellow College Republicans

As I'm sure you know

@Sam Anderson Later, brother in liberty!

@ExternalPepsi The actions of a few always reflect on the larger group as a whole. There is nothing liberal about it, it's just human nature. If god forbid somebody in IE did something violent, how would that not reflect on the organization as a whole?

@Ald Havamal also isn't an official "religious doctrine" like the Qur'an or the Talmud.

It's a collection of poems.

Yes

@Bjorn - MD we are seeing a mass exodus of Jews from the Republican party and the end of the kosher sandwich. The only ones left are NAXALT. The 80-20 Dem-Rep kosher sandwich is done and so are the donors.

But attributed to Odin for what that means

From a Christian scribe

@Logan One can only hope, but I have to say that, if it ends up working out that way, I'd be very surprised, because it would represent yet another YUGE strategic misstep.

If Christians really wanted to up their rhetorical game they would frame "pro-Choice" as "Pro-Death"

this ^

@Bjorn - MD it already has happened. The donors left.

The left is literally "Pro-Abortion" now, not just Pro-Choice.

Unfortunately, like every powerful institution, Catholicism and it's contemporaries have been subverted pretty hard.

Run There_are_too_many_people_anyway.exe

The new Pope proves that subversion pretty openly.

@Papa Pizzagate this is how small town Christians do frame it. Their politicians and pastors hold them back because every once in a while something-something abortion clinics.

@Logan Yeah, but I can't help but wait for the other shoe to drop...

There is a lot of room for a Christian leader to rise up and heat the rhetoric. I'm sure they are already out there getting followings.

@Logan You could be right, but I've yet to hear much of it. This is rhetoric that needs to be mainstreamed.

@Bjorn - MD I think they spent all ammunition. If you see the October surprises as unstable people who did commit crimes but were handled by J-intelligence agencies (look at the 1993 World Trade Center bombing wikipedia for an admitted high-profile example) then they have used up all their tricks and small-w small-n white nationalists collectively changed the channel to ESPN

Killing unborn children is morally fine but not drinking in college

<:usinnoodle:420778112226164736>

@Virgil Gab is a free speech social network not an organization. Should Facebook be shut down because people Livestream murders on it? You were literally shilling for censorship of "evil" people meaning the wignats that trigger you.

@Papa Pizzagate as a non-Christian I'm looking forward to Trump loosening restrictions on church participation in politics. I believe that was a pitch he made to Evangelicals in 2016

Is anyone else pro abortion? I suspect I’m well in the minority on that issue

Churches going into politics would flip the whole game. Would open it up to traditional European non-Christian religions as a political power @Asatru Artist - MD

I don't want to open up Islam to political power though...

Philosophically against for healthy babies excluding rape incest etc, tactically don't want to ban right now @Sherlock

So I'd rather not open that can of worms.

@Sherlock yeah, I understand the demographic argument, honestly but, uh...ngl bro. Killing babies is wrong and evil tbh.

Why the edit? Why you no like "Pagan/Heathen"? @Logan <:sad:366743316475281408>

@Asatru Artist - MD islam in America is kaput. Muslims are already packing their bags.

Islam had no real chance in America after 9/11

Tell that to Hamtrack, Dearbornistan, Minnesota...

@Asatru Artist - MD went in to capitalize Heathen but I never liked that word.

@Ald You do realize we have more Muslims in America now than we did before 9/11 right??

@Ald We allowed more net muslims into america POST 9/11 than it's entire history before.

It’s just that the women I’ve known who’ve gotten abortions.... I’m glad they did tbh bc their children would not likely have been any better

@Logan Heathen seems to be the preferred name for our people at this point.

I could care less which one I'm called tbh

@Asatru Artist - MD the bell cannot be unrung on mass immigration and refugee replacement.

I know, I mean in the minds of Americans

#NotAllMuslims #OrangeManBad

On net, abortions are probably very eugenic

They're still what, 1%?

1% too many

1% becomes 2% becomes 4%...

And I don’t just mean bc of blacks

"Bad" whites not procreating isn't bad either, yeah...

I don't care about the "muh population control" either, just that we don't need more sh*tty people in the world.

No matter their skin tone.

@Sherlock I understand the arguement, and I'm certainly not going to moralize and look down on you for your opinion on the topic, but there are more ethnical ways to achieve a less dysgenic society. It can, and should be done without killing babies.

Talking about eugenics too much looks a little "heartless bad guy", there are eugenic incentives that don't involve killing babies

@Sherlock Depends on how you approach the situation. I don’t believe the end goal is just only to raise iq since iq doesn’t account for everything

@Asatru Artist - MD Sad thing is, those used to be Polish towns before the Muslims moved in.

@Papa Pizzagate Like maybe...keeping legs shut? 🤔

@Asatru Artist - MD A good start!

@Virgil Yeah. 😢

The Polish were so tolerant that they allowed themselves to be replaced and politically outnumbered.

Incentivizing middle class births economically to offset lower class birthrates.

or at least keep pace.

@Asatru Artist - MD Alternatively, we can offer someone $1000 for every IQ point they are below average to get sterilized.

@Papa Pizzagate I’m in favor of any other methods as well, but lack the moral concern

Sterilization is also great

@Rabbidsith Do I get $1k for every IQ point above average? <:galaxybrain:366743669484683264>

@Sherlock Well, that's on you chief. Not gonna moralize here, but I think you'll find a great majority of white americans find themselves decidedly in the "killing babies is bad" camp.

Embracing it is a losing position.

@Asatru Artist - MD No. 2k in Scholarships.

>tfw scholarships to paint pretty pictures

@Asatru Artist - MD Art is important.

If you have higher quality people having kids at a rate at all higher than average that's eugenics. You don't need ghoulish forceful policies that most people will find repugnant and want to overthrow

Well stated

@Ald Indeed. You just need incentives.

issue is all our policies now stifle high IQ reproduction and massively accelerate low IQ reproduction <:sad:366743316475281408>

@Papa Pizzagate they should be educated about it’s social benefit

because the high IQ are paying for the low IQ babies...

White Americans in the midwest have embraced down-syndrome babies as a way of undermining abortion. Tolerance for ideas like sterilization and abortion is bretty low among Whites.

We don't have to become stereotypical nazis in order to affect better genetic health.

@Ald how are you gonna achieve that without some eugenic policies tho

Natural selection is harsh, and we have artificially short circuited it

@Sherlock We don't need things to be forceful.

@ExternalPepsi No, I've made my point in previous posts. Do you have an actual argument as to why wignats shouldn't be censored? I'm sure you've seen the damage people like that do to a platform

@Sherlock It's completely unneccessary. All that we have to do is instill low IQ populations with a pervasive anti-natalism.

Did anyone read AAs’ idea about artificially insiminating Asians? Once I got past thinking about how sad it was just in a personal level for him to be thinking about that, it actually seems like a good Idea, if someone had a lot of money.

@Sherlock Humans are not logical creatures. Showing someone a chart of social benefit won't convince them if they feel like a (frankly barbaric) practice is wrong.

The data might be there, but feelings don't care about your facts.

Pathos reigns supreme.

@Rabbidsith that sounds a heck of a lot easier said than done

@Virgil Simple. Freedom of speech is ultimately necessary. A stable society can't exist without it.

@Sherlock Not really.

@Sherlock All that you have to do is say "woohoo without consequences and you get $$$ for it!". The bad decision making skills and low time preference that low-IQ people have takes care of the rest.

It would be much easier to convince better off people to have more chikdren than the reverse

@Sherlock I disagree. Teaching the wealthy to have children is much more difficult.

There is an organization that pays people with crack addictions to get sterilized.

@Rabbidsith If you have institutional power, sure I agree. When you're part of a dissident movement, you have to be more careful. Because if you are not then you're giving the opposition ammunition against you.

@Rabbidsith people with low iq and low impulse control arent going to be rational enough to avoid sex for a little money. What they almost certainly will do is say “yeah sure thing gimme money” and then have ten kids

@Virgil If you are a part of a dissident movement, then you won't have the power necessary to censor.

@Sherlock this

@Sherlock That's why you give them the money *after* they agree to the procedure and have it done.

@Nerv - VA Anglin is a dreamer. Bringing science fiction into the realm of what could be politically possible is a good thing in general but I don't think he understands all the ways in which children need their mother. Maybe someday a robot could do all that but that day is far off.

@Virgil No one should be censored especially on a platform where ideas are supposed to compete. Advocating for censorship of people you deem "wignats" who are really not that far from you on the political spectrum is dumb as hell. Your point sucks and you deserve to be abuse by Twitter.

@Sherlock c'mon use that brain

@Rabbidsith Not society, but within the movement itself you do

@Rabbidsith those are exactly the sort of policies im advocating for lol

@Virgil Ah. Within a movement thought policing is always going to happen. However, it has to be done in moderation.

@Sherlock Fair enough. However, that's not forceful. Again, there's no need to force someone.

@ExternalPepsi Again other than vulgar name calling, do you have an actual well thought out argument?

I have to actually get a little work done here, let's remember to engage respectfully with one another, please.

I never said anything about forcing people, you did

@Virgil Do you?!

Um. What tf is this? Its like the YouTube message that RT is partially funded by Russia. But a wiki article on Jews.

@Virgil Muh wignats

CENSOR DEM