#general (Discord ID: 481597551272001546) in Nice Respectable People Group, page 207
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
Okay well NSM and TWP are actually like Neo Nazis soo
The group chat we made at work so we can talk shit about the owners
Boy Scouts of America (pre poz)
Okay yeah Black Isrealites
Students For Western Civilization
Asatru Folk Assembly
@Sam Anderson Yeah calling them black supremacists is openly mainstream
The National Bolshevist Party
(yes it's real)
did somebody say IE
never heard of it
Some frat called Iota Epsilon. They talk about fashion or something.
AEPi aka JewFrat
Here is their leader
Internet Explorer. It used to be a really popular browser back in the day.
half of that message didn't load
oh Ive heard of IE then! I think I know someone who had couture bridal design at their wedding
The Snapchat group I'm in with two girls I worked with
Kraut's Discord server
Students for a Democratic Society
Girls who think I'm an asshole cause I'm not as interested in them as they are in me
Jews with small noses
I think we’re good
The multiple personalities of Kanye West
The concept of Europe
wth are we naming off here?
We were naming off legal organizations with membership roles in the hope of contrasting the formatting of their "membership" section with that of our own
Soldiers of Odin
Most that were named did not have a membership section
Are we really not gonna contest the "neo nazi white supremacist" characterization in the first sentence of that article
B...b...but the ADL says so!
According to the white identity experts at the ADL
We are trying out best, it has been contested in the past
Listen if you're Jewish and concerned you're basically an expert
Keep in mind that Israel and other large organizations have people dedicated to shifting wiki articles in their direction
*fellow* white identity "experts"...
Pick one 😂
Sticking with this one post post ironically
Pretty interesting history of the Alt Right
(A Peter Sweden Avatar)
Sometimes on Twitter I think PS is Ian and get confused
Imagine if Jake Paul joined IE
I might change my avi on here to a DBZ character wearing fresh streetwear
I don’t think they’re hald
Are they? I thought they were 1/16 or something
Ah maybe. I knew partly. Enough for it to be listed on ethnicelebs.com
New profile pic
Oh there it is on the site too
anyone here ever read *against our better judgement*? is it a quality work?
apparently they're trying to get the death penalty for James Fields
thats an astounding over prosecution
Does he have the same lawyer as cantwell did? I hope not.
if they really go for that on the grounds that it was 1st degree murder I think he might get off
he committed manslaughter and fled the scene of an accident - I dont think you can get the death penalty for that
even though technically he never even struck heyer with his vehicle
This is all speculation, guys.
It wasn't even manslaughter
Manslaughter is when you kill someone due to reckless actions. He was chased by a guy with a gun, attacked by the crowd with a baseball bat, freaked out, and hit the break. It honestly could have happened to anyone.
it can probably be argued that it was because prosecution can probably argue that the accident induced enough stress for the heart attack - 'a situation was created by fields that heyer wouldnt have otherwise been in'
accelerating into a crowd is kind of reckless lol
It's easy to say that we would have been the cool level headed ones in that situation, but I think almost anyone would freak out if being chased with a gun and having your car attacked by a maniac with a baseball bat.
or crowbar or whatever
but maybe this isn't the place for such conversations
@Koba The official cause of death, used in court, is blunt force trauma to the chest.
that was admitted to court as evidence?
It was the conclusion that the medical examiner reached
Yea because they gave her CPR.
CPR will mess up ribs, this is full retard because the negligence of the medical personnel then could be argued to be a superseding factor
you guys think Bernie will run?
hes a mega cuck
maybe but he'll probably lose
The Democrats are literally retarded if they run Bernie
I could see even liberals refusing to vote for him since he could die in office
Nvrm the negligence of medical personnel is 'foreseeable' enough to not be a defense
I got scared when I saw this title at first
because I didn't notice the double negative
I really want him to run
Cool painting I saw in a museum today:
My ballot came. Should I just vote straight down the line Republican?
research the candidates
I usually vote straight republican non jewish
Good democrats will still vote on the side of the democrats the vast majority of the time
I'll read the voters pamphlet
Isn't the Republican candidate guaranteed to be better than the Democrat, though?
we should really be shooting for an 'aryan sandwhich' sort of phenomenon but i think itll be way more difficult to get white guys into the democratic party in white states
I guess not if they're strong neocons
I would vote straight down Republican for the institutional clout and because they’re beholden to the party
Rep and Dem are both garbage. Rep is only better in that Trump can, in theory, corral them into supporting his agenda.
I probably would have voted Bernie Sanders over John Kasich
If I hated both I wouldn't have voted.
"Consent of the governed." Voting is consent.
Better to vote for lesser of two evils tbh
Nah. Lesser evil is still evil, and what got us here.
Don't play the game.
if you want better candidates then get better candidates in
I voted for Trump because I actually believed in what he said, and I'll vote R on the 6th only because I want him to be able to forward his agenda, and to continue the general right wing cultural revolution.
Did that get us, here, though? If we consistently voted for the most far right candidate available, then the selection of candidates would have shifted right over time
Frog in the boiling water. Taking the thing that's the least bad compromise.
Don't like it.
Well... if you don't take what's least bad, then you get a higher chance of getting what's more bad
Better to take nothing. What would happen if everyone, or even a substantial portion of the population, just refused to vote? Refused to consent to be governed by any of the evils? I don't know, but it would have to be better than continuing to play a game set up so there's no way for us to win.
Morally, I refuse to choose evil.
Lesser or not.
What would happen? The elites would laugh at us, I guess
that's a pretty stupid position for a smart guy like you to take @sigruna14
In the short term.
@Deleted User So the elites, system, whatever, present two candidates, no meaningful difference between them, both slaves to interests who hate you, and they ask you to choose - think it's stupid to refuse to play the game at all?
Write ins are our equivalent of a vote of no confidence
"not playing the game" would be going anprim. removing yourself from society.
Whether or not you vote, you're still governed, still pay taxes, still "live in a society"
Might as well support incremental improvement, bu voting for the less bad option.
Let me ask you this. Did you even vote for Trump?
okay guys help me decide
But if my vote isn't going to actually change a damn thing, I'd rather not vote for evil, and have at least the satisfaction of knowing I didn't vote for evil. Then work to get a worthy candidate on the ballot, then vote for him, when it's actually worth doing and means something. Yeah, I voted for Trump because I thought he could actually do good.
In 2012 I voted third party.
This measure would charge pollution fees on sources of greenhouse gas pollutants and use the revenue to reduce pollution, promote clean energy, and address climate impacts, under oversight of a public board.
Based and redpilled, or cringe and bluepilled?
Your vote will change *something*, though, just not as much as you'd like
@Jacob It sounds good, but I don't trust our current government to do anything and would prefer them to have less power than more, so I'd probably vote no.
hard choice then
wait a second
Will it really? Would voting for Mitt Romney or John McCain really change anything? Or just maybe make it seem so in some illusory ways?
Voting yes = less money for corporations = less money for them to lobby for immigration
Romney or McCain? Probably not
Maybe even make it worse
hmmm the initiative is backed by the Latino Community Fund, though
Always follow the money...
the initiative exempts the largest polluters
"Six of the state's top 10 carbon admitters would be exempt"
Voting for the govt to "help" anything...
also, why write "six" as a word but "10" as a number?
it looks stupid
>just don't ~~goys~~ guys
Granted there are some really valid criticisms of republican democracy, but I think we have to engage and play with the paradigm that we've inherited.
there's an initiative to ban food and beverage taxes
To be clear I'm not saying don't ever vote, or don't vote for a candidate that you actually think will do some good. I'm just saying, if presented with two options that are both garbage, both going to hurt my people and my own interests, but maybe one will do it less - no thanks. When someone decent is on my ballot, hopefully thanks in part to my own efforts, I'll definitely vote for them.
and the "rebuttal" of the argument for the initiative says that it "reduces choice" for local communities
what a retarded argument
if I don't like a certain choice, wouldn't I *want* to "reduce choice"?
the Republican senate candidate opens her statement with "Our people"
In 2016 I voted straight Republican except for the House because my congressman was terrible on immigration and anti-Trump
She also managed to include her German and Norwegian ancestry in the statement
this is weird
I think she's fairly moderate Republican
literally opens it with "Our people deserve better"
sounds very identitarian
I guess she has no chance in WA, but I like the rhetoric
The Washington house of representatives was actually majority Republican until very recently
she's down by 14 points lol
ya she's not gonna win
The party in the White House always suffers in the midterms. It's a shame though. National republicans didn't even try to help Barletta in PA and he'd be a great senator
lol one of the state representative candidates brags in his statement about helping pass a bill to ban rental housing discrimination
I know who *not* to vote for
I'm doing a write in for the congressional candidate who didnt make it onto the ballot in my district because they were pro wall and anti sanctuary
I don't have time to research all these obscure state representative candidates
probably just gonna go down the line Republican
Just got another guy to apply, got confirmation while lifting. Peak IE
if you want better candidates you have 2 choices: (1) youre the better candidate (2) someone you know is. only way that happens is by joining your local GOP & putting in qualitative time
Who sounds better, Nathan Choi or Steve Gonzalez?
it's a nonpartisan position, so I can't just pick the Republican
Write in James Allsup
lmao ya I should just write in James Allsup for all the cucky Republicans
God, so many of these people are running unopposed
hence: better candidates: get your guys in
Maybe I'll run for PCO next election
At a local level, all you have to do to get a position is show up
I know for a fact that PCOs are chosen in election
But I guess if the position is vacant you can just show up and claim it?
thats bad advice: ***always*** spend qualitative time at your GOP don't just shoot for showing up
show up squared away: well dressed, looking good, etc. Don't blow your load all at once: be a normie GOP guy. Show enthusiasm and help out every chance you get.
the problem with a lot of positions that are full time is they pay shit
so if youre shooting to climb the political ladder youll need to do something on the side to supplement your income
this would be kinda hard to do when I don't have a car
see if you can carpool with someone or take the bus
I mean... ya I could probably take the bus, but it wastes a lot of time and I don't know if I want to be walking to the bus stop in my nice clothes
then get a car
I can't just poof a car into existence
I was dumb enough to fall for the university meme, so now I'm stuck being a poor college student for a few years
you can get a good old civic for 3-4k & insurance will be around 50-100 a month for basic bottom coverage
you wont be able to get a loan for that though or if you do the interest rate will be crazy high. usually loaning institutions really jam you up if youre getting an auto loan for less than 10k
ya if only I had 3-4k that I could withdraw without consequences
take the bus and save as much as you can in the meantime
My all time high in terms of how much money I had was around $18,000 lol
then crypto crashed
I think I just kinda ended up back where I started, so I'm not particularly bitter about it
@Koba Is it actually that easy to get a paid position? I was thinking of something unpaid like PCO
honestly Im not sure about that. I was looking at entry level GOP positions for PA and they usually start around 35-40k a year with decent benefits
state legislature here is about 90k a year plus benefits, but PA is the 3rd highest paying state legislature behind CA & NY I think
given the pay and how the party is mostly filled with 50+ Id say its probably easy to get a spot