This one gave me a laugh https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/desantis-says-florida-voters-would-monkey-this-up-if-they-elect-gill

Alex Jones is playing Xurious now

Hahaha

I would Love to see Alex Jones have Patrick on his show 😃

I have a normie right-leaning friend who got woke by accidentally discovering synthwave

Same @V.Balboa - PA

Everyone who's anyone that matters has been on AJ

Yeah, all the org's are going to emulate IE's MO, but they'll always have a dash of sperg to them (not that that's bad)

DSBC and PF will always do the skull face mask type of stuff is what I mean..

can someone give me a quick rundown on PF? are they more the 1.0 type, or what?

I assume we’re talking about Patriot Front

Used to be Vanguard America, then the James Fields incident happened

They're about a 1.7 on the scale, lol

Their discipline wavers, sometimes they do good things, sometimes they bring unnecessary heat upon themselves

I thought Fields was LotS, shows what I know.

Rememeber: AIPAC is ghey

When fields went to UTR 1, the then Vanguard gave him a shield, etc

So it tainted VA and they had to become PF

gotta keep the kosher sandwich together nnnguy

AIPAC is the hornet's nest

I'd say Wasp's nest, but they hate WASPs

*ayooo*

Yeah PF does some stuff right. They have good imagery, their guys are often in shape. But they’re also spergy and explicitly fascist. Also one of their members was raided by the FBI for stockpiling illegal weapons

Like people thought he was a school shooter and they were right

With such lax gun laws, it's actually difficult to accomplish that, glad the bozo is gone from them

Owning illegal firearms is really stupid and you'd have to be a real fool to do so.

Back to the other subject before the Mods get us (no bully), I don't even really criticize these other groups anymore, just support them when they do good

It's such a waste to spend energy being negative on the people who aren't our opponents

Better to direct that energy outward

I feel like the broader alternative right (lowercase A, lowercase R) could benefit from every group finding its lane and doing good there

It's becoming that way, or at least feels like it

the real fringe will fade away and the responsible people won’t fight each other by accident

Or we'll be normalized and the cringe among us will become the fringe

We need to do a Citizen Only Dinner for the homeless.

Or needy...proof of citizenship required.

@Freiheit - CA We'd probably need to be a bit more discerning than that. Most of the "citizens" who showed up probably wouldn't exactly be our crowd...

That's the point

pick a location that’s mostly our crowd?

We do more for them already than blacks and browns

We can actually demonstrate it.

I’d be more concerned that homeless people often don’t have proper ID even if they’re good people and citizens

We can give them a citizenship test.

Lol

or a citizenship test with our preferred criteria lol

Here's my issues with this:
Churches already do this and the left hates them.
We'd get a propaganda boost until they point out we only did it for citizens and then we'd lose the soft hearts of the people who it would've worked on.
Basically, no gain but effort, time, energy, and dollars lost

is it the normal churches or the rainbow flag churches that do it more?

Trash pick ups, painting over grafitti--that's the stuff we win on in this department

I would guess the former

My church is hardcore Right wing and they feed the homeless

nice

Pozzed churches are actually hard to find in my experience, just not enough to call it only a meme

ehhh.. go to wealthy suburban areas and you’ll see a good number of them

Look how many churches there are, though.

that’s trhe

*true

400 in a small city, the 5 awful ones get the lefty press coverage

It's the same with college protests

good point. also if the intent is to help the homeless, handing stuff out could be good too

The left owns the media, they dictate the portrayal

blankets, water, survival essentials

with tasteful dragon eye logos of course

It's not so much that the left owns the media as it is that the people who own the left also own the media (as well as the kosher right).

Same difference, no?

a bit different. “the left owns the media” implies we can take it back from the left

when in fact you’d have to win it back from the *powers that be*

I'm kinda splitting hairs, yeah, but my point is that the media and the left actually have very little agency of their own. They're just instruments.

They're *all* the left. It's as much as I can put without always saying "Jews"

...and you can't *take* someone else's media. All you can do is displace them by undermining their narratives in order to better resonate with your target audience.

for the record, I never said anything about taking it back from the left..

We have to replace it all

somewhat related: we need an identitarian version of PragerU and all those conservative talking point generators

But, they literally *own* the media. Like, it's their company.

That's what I mean.

ah ok

It's their company and they direct the news

@Flint Agreed.

Btw, I'm not going after you or anything, lol. Just being a semantics sperg...

They manufacture consent and dissent with their institution they legally own.

So if one lesbian bishop becomes the head of a church, they have the power to multiply the news to the whole nation. We don't get to do that with those who stand fast.

That's the raison d'etre of any media organization. They don't exist to inform, but to mold opinion. There's no such thing as an objective media organization. They're inherently as biased and agenda-driven as the people who comprise them inevitably are. It's much more useful to look at every single media outfit as a PR operation for the people who own them.

The church, like white people in the US (because it's the same people) lack the will to fight and defend themselves. So the problem is the same.

Want to know how whites are doing in the US? Look at how the churches are doing.

-corruption in leadership

-monetary fraud

-wasteful spending

-weak, easily conquered, spineless people

-infiltrated and filled with subversives

also, just like the left can take one freak and amplify them, they can take one normal person who speaks up and destroy them. so for our side, it would take a large number of influential people to present a unified front

and that’s difficult

The commies are right about one thing: *the material conditions*.
Whites can and will win, the moment they decide they have to fight, but their material conditions are too lavish right now.

The Prager U and CRTV types are buying tons pf Youtube ads. Especially for right leaning content. Basically any monetized James Allsup video has a Prager U ad.

Why would Joe six pack with his comfy chair, beer, and football--or--Johnny bigbux, with his 401k, business, and late model car, give it up???

Whites lack the will to sacrifice time and money on a cause that almost no other whites will join them in.

Thus, IE is trying to galvanize white racial concioussness

it’s a shame because it’s a good model (the 3-5 minute policy clip) but it’s being wasted on muh taxes and muh Israel

*That is our struggle: to get whites to struggle*

Which is embarrassing and shameful, but that's what we're dealing with.

Tucker Carlson would be awesome for right-wing info clips

@Sam Anderson That's surprising to hear, I thought Prager hated all forms of white identity politics