Yes

Was originally my grandpas name ya know

I have two beautiful blue eye blond haired girls. They motivate me to do whatever I can for their future. In Boston they are always a minority in daycare/school

green eyes > bloo eyes
fite me

My second interview is tonight. Is there more server access after that? Or do I have access to everything? Heard theres a meetup this weekend

Thank god nobody in my family or even extended family has mixed

Phew 😅

I have a few. Baby daddys do nothing or locked up

Although my big brother said that “race mixing is a great thing” or something during a “debate” and I asked him why his girlfriend was white

@⚡Clark⚡ Ask him, why is Mexico such a horrible place? Mexico is the result of Spaniards mixing with the Natives there

inb4 "poverty"

I'm cleaning up some language in here, ladies and gentlemen. A little tamer please 😃

or "it's not a s***hole"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koDNiMAb2Rw&feature=youtu.be?vq=hd720

@NITRODUBS what part of Ohio are you

Just think, “What would a chad do?”

need me wwcd bracelet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqwhiRgK1Ns?vq=hd720

@Smitty83 After your second interview you should get invited to your regional server

WHY:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uqSiA06TSE?vq=hd1080

My girlfriend sent me that

My God am I blessed

Gf?

Did they start issuing 'em? I didn't see anything in <#358430171583217664> ...

Tbh I want a Duterte statue in DC

Idk about gf Bolshevism lmao

Once the government takes down the other statues to browns, maybe.

GFBol Gang 😎

Nah. That actually sounds kinda degenerate...

Don’t let the government hand gf distribution. They can’t even handle the BMV

So, what, we should privatize it, so we end up with a GF Google...? 😩

Let's not pretend they wouldn't base gf distribution on some sort of "affirmative action" policy

LMAO

No same race relationships allowed

You’re lucky if you both even know the same language

State-mandated coal burning and oil drilling... 😑

"According to your tax bracket and unemployment status De'Quan, you're actually entitled to *three* girl friends. Just fill out this form in triplicate"

"Girl friend reform is a sorely neglected area of public policy. Redistribution should be focused on historically under privileged areas." - Congressman Wieselgoldensteinburg

Really, when you think about it, (monogamous) marriage was the original Sherman Antitrust Act 🤓

Divorce rate now days is appalling. How can we expect white people to have more children when many enter marriage with the idea that they get a do-over once they get bored?

This latest generation seems to be doing better...

The divorce rate is exaggerated

It’s not 50%, it’s about 30%

I suppose that's a lot better than I thought

They use those stats to scare people haha

Lol, I was scared. Probably inflated if a minority of people are serial divorcees

Yeah a lot of people get 2-3 marriages

My grandparents have been married 75 years. 96 and 94.

Sorry just wanted to post this pic of my bird he looks really cute

And my grandparents have been married 50 years I think

Lol

Wow, that's awesome.

Probably a dumb question, but when should I talk to my younger sister about this sort of stuff? She's going into seventh grade this year and is really intelligent for her age.

I guess my worry is that I'll be off at grad school the next couple years and she'll be dating a non-euro by the time I get back.

It's highly unlikely of course, but I just worry

https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/marriage-and-divorce-patterns-by-gender-race-and-educational-attainment.htm

By age 46, among those ever married 44.8% are divorced (at least once). Biggest bummer is that for racial categories whites are classified by what we're not, "non-black, non-Hispanic," thus lumping us in with jews, Arabs, Asians, etc.

That is for boomers, obviously, so roughly half of gen X and millennials grew up in broken homes

Also

My main question with that one ^ is how do they define "partners"? Is serial monogamy equated with a one-night stand? Because I'll bet outcomes vary depending on factors like that.

Imo serial monogamy is literally practice for divorce and thus the most dangerous romantic pattern to watch for.

I assume that whether it be monogamous, or Polyamorous, each contributing member would be one partner

I mean, either way it's degenerate to have more than one partner in general, and the goal should always be marriage 👍

Yea most of us fall short of that unfortunately. Even the good girls and guys are usually around 3 or 4 by the time they get married through dating alone.

I wish I had known this stuff as a kid to be honest

Person A enters marriage having had one sexual partner but 6 monogamous romantic relationships lasting 6 months or more each
Person B enters marriage with 6 sexual partners, one of whom was a monogamous relationship the rest of which were one one-night-stand per year for five years

One has practiced breaking up 6 times, the other only once. Different outcomes are almost guaranteed, no?

That’s interesting

There are at least 3 surveys done that show the more sexual partners the more likely the marriage is to fail, and the graph I have defines a stable marriage as only being together 5 years, which isn't long at all

So the serial dater is more likely to divorce than someone who has a bunch of hookups?

@William Russell that's my hypothesis, yes

Makes sense

But I'm sure there's a limit to it

The second person is most likely more intelligent honestly

The T-Swift hypothesis

Hookups could turn into cheating if there were too many before marriage, idk what the threshhold would be

I would assume that sexual promiscuity would have a difference than between purely emotional. non-sexual partners tbh, because the act of intercourse itself is a process that binds two people together. If someone dates 6 people and breaks up with them, and then marries up and has sex with That specific partner, it would be far more serious to that person.
in my opinion of course 👍

Like metaphorically binds?

*metaphysically

Possibly, but also on a biological level as well

We need more studies on this I want to know lol

In some cases the binding might be literal

Biologically I think it makes more sense for people to have multiple sex partners then marry rather than multiple serious relationships then marry. Just because of reproduction. This of course is in the context that everyone has had intercourse with multiple people before marriage. The long term relationships are more likely to lead to children before marriage or stepchildren from other partners

I've never seen evidence that intercourse binds beings biologically if conception does not occur. It's almost impossible to conceive on the first try too (though I'm not arguing in favor of hookups!).

And clearly it doesn't have to bind emotionally either

Conceiving on the first try goes with my point as well.

Is that actually true its harder to concieve the first time you have sex with someone?

Or am I being bamboozled

There are about 3 days per month a woman is fertile. It's a hard target to hit.

It takes 6 months on average to conceive when trying to do so, over age 25

It’s easier if you try every day 😬

*trying without natural family planning methods like temperature charting, etc

I realized when we started trying to get pregnant that I'd really been lied to as a kid in Christian school. The reasons they gave for abstaining were that guaranteed, one of three things would happen: 1. You'll get pregnant 2. You'll get an STD 3. You'll get your heart broken. Turns out, not so much. Better to give kids the truth.

I have 3 daughters with my wife. She got pregnant with the first on our honeymoon, which we took the day after we got married. The 2nd one, she got pregnant within just a couple weeks of me returning from a year in Iraq. The third, she got pregnant with during the week I was home for R&R in the middle of my year in Afghanistan. oooosh

...all 3 born between 2009 and 2012.

Lol her cycle was perfectly aligned with your military schedule eh?

I guess so lol

That same scenario happens a lot in the military, especially with frequent and multiple deployments. It's almost scary when you look at the statistics on how often it happens. Hospitals near military bases deliberately plan ahead 9 months after units return from deployment to ensure they have adequate staffing for the incoming surge of new babies

I wonder if women's bodies deliberately get in sync with their partners' presence when extended absences occur?

Would women anticipating mil members returns affect it

If you’re trying get big, do not go to planet fitness

It's been theorized that human biology does that sort of thing on purpose, and also there's religious theory behind it, too.