Pretty much

The left: "We love diversity but the less whites there is, the better. We accept, love and include all people, except whites. Loving your identity, heritage and culture is wonderful.. unless you're white"

I don't get it..
Diversity in their eyes is everyone being brown or black
.. as if having a monoculture = diversity

Just told my dad about IE and he seemed pretty hesitant but ok with it, he still hates republicans because they don't care about the middle class etc. But he does realize some, at least basic talking points, ie police brutality against blacks is blown out, don't separate families at the border send them all back, why is black pride ok but not white pride and a few others

Technically IE is pro-diversity.... lol. The left wants to eradicate whites and "whiteness" while IE wants everyone to exist as they are.

I'm not pro-diversity

I mean, I'll accept it existing as long as I don't have to deal with it

We're pro-GLOBAL diversity<:4dchess:439923932062154782>

I want all races to exist, including Americans/Europeans. America is a European country and should remain that way. Every non-european race is doing well and has their own entire continent with billions of people, but the left wants to wipe out whites completely

Diversity is our Strength lads

Yeah, we want all cultures to exist, not some globohomo monoculture...

Lol

Exactly

Existing separately, not in some globohomo monoculture

The "what about white people" points he's pretty much always said since I was little and I'm hoping I can turn him at least a little by showing him the left straight up hates white people for being white

Your dad will see the light

It is harder for older middle-aged people to see things like we do because they have lived in a totally different time. The younger generation totally sees what's happening to people of European descent on a global scale.

Altruism is our problem, boys.

*non-in group altruism

He did say white people have put their trust in some people we shouldn't have though lmao I didn't ask him what he meant by that but it'd be pretty funny if he meant (((people we shouldn't have)))

>whitewashing classical arts
dude classical arts and marble statues are white tf does that article even mean

Stop existing. That's pretty much it.

yo there are microscopic remnants of paint man, check your privilege

I think Americans are similar to the Boers and Rhodesians in that they are of European descent but are in essence a sub-group.

They were painted at once point so they weren’t white nazis btfo

also the mention of hate mail to these "historians" from the """alt-right""" was laughable

I’ll take things that never happened for 200 Alex

I'm gonna link my dad the IE site because I haven't actually told him the name yet, but I gurantee he'll google it himself and he'll see the wiki page and the SPLC page, what should I show him, besides the IE site of course, that shows those are slanderous

https://www.counter-currents.com/2016/10/american-ethnic-identity/

Meh. Maybe we aren't an ethnos unto ourselves, but rather, just a Germanic nation. It's hard to say, because there aren't many examples of separate nations (not countries, but nations) sharing the same language.

I need to do some reading... 😑

Are we really pro global diversity, or are we neutral to it, though?

I don't wish harm towards other races, but I wouldn't mind living in a white world

Lol

The way Taylor puts his "pro-diversity" view is a smart way to put it when someone says you're anti-diversity to attack you

Ya I get that it could be useful as a talking point

You wouldn't mind living in a white world?

But the Japaneseee

Unless they're honorary whites

eh

I mean, I like them, but we could do fine on our own

The Japs can be fine and respectful trade partners. A good counterbalance against China

RISE AND SHINE KINGS
LETS GRAB THIS MFIN BREAD

An a white world is impossible barring some sort of plague that we alone are immune to. There's not much sense in talking about it. Even suggesting that it is ideal comes with some bad optics connotations. We're pro-white, not anti-nonwhite. We want to secure our existence, not abolish others

I know

But you're kinda missing my point

The only reason I'd interfere in other race's affairs is to protect the environment because that affects all of us

I suppose even in hypotheticals, it might not be good of which to speak.

I'm just saying that I not "pro" global diversity, I'm just neutral to it

@TMatthews "Awfully nice country ya got there. Be a shame if we had to take it, because you won't stop polluting..." 😏

I just don't see why we should lie to ourselves and say that we need other groups to survive. Sure, I support their self-determination, I have no desire to get rid of them, but I don't care if they preserve themselves or not.

"You can't feed yourselves. We can, but you only get aid if you cut pollution and lower your birthrate." Honestly we should do that now. Even liberals like Macron know it's an issue

If the world only consisted of white identities, tribalism would still be a thing and we'd inevitably breed apart more

but even then, a world of 100avg iq is better than 70avg iq

Tribalism would be less of a thing

not for long

Yes, for long, lol

but then again, our travel mobility kind of makes it easier

Maybe until we divergently evolve into separate groups after thousands of years

We should enact policies to encourage positive eugenics. I'd like special benefits for high IQ whites to have kids in a hypothetical future

White Earth 2025, lol.

White Moon 2030

Brown Moon 2025

White ExoPlanet 2050

In either case, I'm not saying we should try to create a white world or whatever, I'm just saying that I'd be lying to myself if I said I'm pro global diversity. I'm not pro, I'm just neutral.

Look, if you guys are genuinely pro global diversity, you should be going out of your way to fix Japanese birth rates

I think Japan's birthrate is a problem, but I wouldn't try to fix it until every problem whites face is fixed first. Ultimately, it's their job to save themselves

If you're pro global diversity than it's your job, too

If Japan was about to accept immigration, I would actually be totally in favor of warning them about and trying to convince them not to do it. But that's not because I'm pro global diversity, it's just because I don't want them to suffer.

...and because we may one day find ourselves being allies.

Sure, but, again, that's not because I'm pro global diversity

Agreed. Wasn't contradicting you; just tacking on another reason.

I am pro messing around with Africa. Too many of them and with climate change making parts of Africa uninhabitable might seriously mess up Europe

Any intelligent person, even liberals, recognize that Africa’s population and rapid growth are a big problem

I'd say the average person has no idea about it

<:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:nervous:359009898115104770>

When they think of Africa they think of starving kids and world hunger

Republicans are inching closer...

I find it amazing that polls change so much

Do people really change their political beliefs weekly?

👀 👀 👀 👀 👀

I don't get how someone can intend to vote Republican one week, Democrat next week, and then Republican again

not necessarily but support comes with certain actions

Nate Silver announced his odds, he things Dems have 86% chance to take the house

It's confusing because when you talk to people in real life, it seems to be really hard to change someone's belief. But, according to these polls, people wake up, join Antifa, quit, and join IE by lunch

For the past week PredictIt has had it at 66%

I still don't know how Nate Silver comes up with the numbers he does

I'm no mean statistics guy, but his numbers don't seem to be based on anything

@Salo Saloson he has homemade mathematical models, they basically plug in polling data, demographics, how the place voted last time, into some kind of model that spits out his probabilities.

The models in theory are tested on data from prior elections

... I don't know how much faith I have in his models

historically democrats will rule the house

but I think it's around none

also historically republicans would've won the last election

The polls don't vary that much. It's a small share of the population that starts undecided and shrinks as the campaign goes on. Also, much of who wins is decided by the base's turnout, not swing voters

>tfw state doesn’t have early voting

Mad

@Procella Eques Let's hope the Trump phenomenon continues and he glitches the system once again...

Flying back from England the day before the election to go smash that vote in

No excuses fam

I'm getting my early vote in sometime this week