#cyberstrike (Discord ID: 359892798071373824) in Nice Respectable People Group, page 10
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
Listen for the term "This had been planned for a while"
SPLC admitting to displacement as a plan
@Deleted User So, I've come to something of a minor epiphany just over this past week, largely from reading the reactions to the SF banner drop. I'm not sure why it's taken me so long to figure it out, but these people use the term "white supremacy" to mean the desire to maintain the cultural and numerical dominance of whites in tradtionally white countries. Under this definition, we are, in fact, white supremacists. In fact, @Reinhard Wolff's interview with Brittany Pettibone, wherein he says we have an interest in maintaining a super-majority in the United States, counts as white supremacy. Under this definition, all of us, most normal people, most baby boomers, and all of our grandparents (and all of their grandparents), are white supremacists.
But... does it improve our image and chances of success if we adopt that name? People instantly think of violent skinheads.
@Joe-MN Well, I'm in the process of questioning that paradigm. The playbook says "deny being a white supremacist," which of course makes sense. But I was in a conversation yesterday where the term came up and I said "Well, the modern definition of white supremacy is whites wanting their culture and language to predominate in the United States, and that's something that our grandparents and everyone before them took for granted." The response to me was "Well that seems like a reasonable position."
This conversation was with a liberal white person.
This comes to the question of the viability of accepting the left’s terms, and the ability we may have as far as strength in narrative control to challenge those terms.
Aye. I know this topic to be one of older debate, but I don't think it's difficult, in response to "you're a white supremacist" to say "If you mean I want to maintain the European cultural character of the United States, I suppose I am."
Under this definition, the United States has always been white supremacist. Even the Kennedys and Linden Johnson were white supremacists, touting the Hart-Cellar Act as something that would "not change the demographics of the United States." (slight paraphrase there).
It also puts into context the black and Jewish criticisms of the United States. In the case of blacks, I'd say "Well, you're 13% of the country's population yet you want the entire country to bend to your culture and language."
Hm. Also if we get them to admit that white supremacy is super evil and that all of the founding fathers were white supremacists, then WHY ARE YOU HERE?
Like yeah I hate all of the founders of this country, but its nice there sooo.
Oosh, my old BUGS Swarm training wants me to push back on accepting enemy terminology, but you may have a point.
But Bob Whitaker is the reason everyone says "anti white" now.
Stick to the mantra!
refuse to use enemy terms
it's like fighting on terrain they've entrenched and prepared
make them fight on your terrain
Leftists think about these words all the time. They obsess over them. There's a reason they choose them so there's a reason we should avoid them.
Don't let them frame the narrative. Don't allow them to define the terms. Their use of the term is an attempt to present you in a negative light.
"Well, if being a Nazi just means X, then I guess I am a Nazi, by your definition. That seems reasonable." - This does not serve you well.
The term they are using has a negative and aggressive connotation, and is a "poison term", it's a negative denotation if supremacy is considered negatively.
Since you can't control how the external listener or reader approaches the term, you can't manage and frame the discussion properly.
Use a dialectic to dissect their ad hominem: "What do you mean by supremacist?" (they say you're ebil here) "Well, I've never said I wanted to do that, and our organization's charter doesn't say anything about doing that, and there's no reason I would want to do that, it doesn't make sense, you are smearing us without evidence."
Using the "If you say I'm X, then I proudly am X" is only used by provocetuers who want to sound witty.
In all honesty.
The narrative of a normie alligns with the narrative of the establishment we're against. It does us no good to affirm the narrative of the former because normies won't pick up on the irony we're implying.
Normies and the establishment are essentially a unified entity for the sake of analyzing optics strategies. You have to destroy the narrative before you can fend it off in witty ways. Divide the two portions of the establishment so there's an audience for the irony to begin with.
Audience is the most tantamount part in optics and appeal. People often forget that for the sake of riding ideological euphoria.
Have you established an audience? Then by all means, affirm you're a nazi, evil, white supremacist, etc. Then, people realize that the narrative is nonsence and are inclined to support you in humiliating whoever calls you that. Surefire way to garner support for even those watching online. Spectators see an audience and subconsciously assume who has the best argument and who holds the most moral ground by their group support.
That's how normies function. Via popular opinion. The gravity of what you say is thereby aleviated to a certain extent at that point.
For the same reason we don’t accept the DREAMER paradigm as legitimate because why the hell should we, I don’t believe accepting their definition of white supremacy is a good idea. Overton ain’t even close to far enough for us to consider that yet imo
Okay lads, I'm not saying we accept their definition of white supremacy or start calling ourselves white supremacists. I'm saying that a fair response to "You're a white supremacist" is "To the extent that you mean I wish to maintain the European cultural and political character of the United States, you're correct." I bring it up because that is, in fact, what they mean when they call us supremacists.
It's an easy follow up with "Because, if that's what you mean, every nation on earth is supremacist, and should be."
But this has probably gone long enough for discussion here and we should discuss anything further in <#358403210618339338>.
Smash that comments section 🅱ois
Is that supposed to be a name?
Oh wait, it's the city
"The truth, with a lowercase t, is that there isn’t much difference between the desires of humanity on the alt-right and the far-left, among Nazis, Jews or my knitting circle. The desire to be a participant in something greater than oneself is a formidable urge embedded within every human being, regardless of his or her religion, race or creed."
I mean, this is far more than any ((())) I've seen give us credit for.
https://www.makersupport.com/Patrick_Casey fellas lets make accounts on this site and follow Patrick. Boost his internet 🇨 lout
It takes 2 minutes and can be done anonymously
Tweet this to Tucker!
Check out @thetolerantman’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/thetolerantman/status/959541736161849346?s=09
>"You can't stop it"
I think we need to give more credit to the "turn it into a meme" technique. This is something that gets talked about a lot on TRS. Basically it's the idea that you can take a talking point that leftists use repeatedly and essentially turn it into a joke by refuting it and making fun of it over and over again consistently.
This is why they stopped calling us "NAZI NAZI NAZI" in debates.
This is why "But what is white?" is quickly being abandoned by leftists.
This is why cuckservatives can now be effectively brushed aside EFFECTIVELY with a "muh constitution" or "at least I still have the Constitution" macro.
In my opinion, all leftist name calling and argumentation should be turned into gay memes. The same way leftists won the public over by painting religious people and conservatives as embarassingly out of touch.
Calling us white supremacists should be made as socially weird as calling leftists "sinners". Make sense?
That video is monumental if the right people pick it up.
bantz them and make fun of them for acting hard about burning down a banner
Stunning and brave
>trust fund organization
I recall hearing that the local transport authorities took the banner down. If so how did it get into the hands of antifa? <:thinkplant:359034245777457173>
The article I found just quoted the cops as saying that it had been taken down, but they didn't know by whom.
More than one person thought that. Think it's an edit?
Changed it to not implicate the city?
I would have 0 surprise if antifa and SF government were full of the same people
Someone should try to find an archived link of that quote
Sadly I don't. I could also be mis remembering
I read all of the articles when they were first posted and none of them said the police took the banner down. They were all along the lines of "SFPD confirmed the sign was removed quickly"
I remember reading it was removed by Cal Trans. California transit authority I assume.
Find the link to that.
"Caltrans removed the sign mid-morning. It was not clear what agency, if any, would investigate the incident."
Thanks my dude
Interesting. Possible that the police didn't know caltrans did it.... but a state agency still passed it on to antifa.
Let's thank Todd Rokita for his tweet and let him know that we would like to see him put his beliefs into action in the official capacity of his office
Ya probably not the best of ideas, even joking, @Deleted User
Keep the link, anyway.
I can't edit, can only delete.
Word has it anons are already all over that.
Give us a boost, please!
The comments are already going well. Can we flyer near high schools? 😂
Thanks for red-pilling the students, school
The saddest thing is that the SJW squad seems to be 2/3 goy.
Let's make this the overwhelming top comment to this disgusting anti-white WaPo article.
If anybody remembers my comment about delegitimizing certain arguments and sayings by turning them into memes... As a case study, I'd like you all to pay close attention to what's happening to Sargon right now. We turned an entire man into a meme. It's over for him.
Yeah, but a black man playing Alexander Hamilton is completely okay
Also isn't Esmeralda half French? So technically a white girl or a gypsy would be appropriate.
There's a free speech panel at Ithaca College (same city as this high school) tomorrow evening. Protests are likely.
Duke is nearly irrelevant at this point
Haven't watched the video
he just deleted and reuploaded the video
to try to shake the dislikes
Isn't he Jewish? My Jewdar went off a few times when he showed his face
Just finished watching that stream,haven't watched Baked in ages, but was something to see Jared prove himself and how the black sounds like a major idiot,poor Jared Taylor,was something though...
Jared Taylor has been proving himself without falter for about 30 years
I love fishing for shitlibs in Tomi Lahren tweets. I make a simple "make me a sandwich" joke and now I'm dropping redpills on two catladies.
It’s a show about nothing
How do we know when it’s over
Like and retweet. Lets troll the F out liberal anti-heritage Mayor. https://twitter.com/ghostdancej83/status/962288665321000960
^^NM. They deleted it haha
Back at it. Please like the replies and retweet....https://twitter.com/HistoryCenterFL/status/962334745253294081
^^^Nm they deleted that too. Trolling them too good.
Orlando Rees... the memes are time traveling again....
Ok. Please like and retweet this....trolling hard here. https://twitter.com/ghostdancej83/status/962293554352619520
did you guys march in a parade?
Haha no. We don’t have that much chutzpah yet
Just noticed the baby on the left. Peak optics.
A cute little baby💗 no age discrimination here!
I sent them a tweet.
If you read the FB comments section, there are some vertebrates responding appropriately, only to be told that our time is coming. More proof that the people these cucks are trying to win over hate them.
Shall not censor
I might do that for a little while, actually
A lot of bullshit in the comments, redpill opportunities abound
I'll jump in the thread tonight and drop some redpills. In the meantime, everyone should upvote the thread for exposure, plus any constructive comments.
The anti-IQ comments are getting a pounding. Mostly re-enforcement work at this point.
I filled it up with some redpilling comments. Be sure to go through and upvote!
Idk if this has been posted yet
Just got an email for it.
He shared results so far.
I think I've done surveys at that site before. They just send you emails asking for money and I doubt the president sees the results or cares.
"The defendants — an array of neo-Nazis, *white identitarians* and old-line pro-Confederates — have ridiculed the charges as an act of “lawfare” maliciously intended to silence them and destroy them financially."
They're just going to call you white identitarians anyway.
That's the first time I've seen them use identitarians in an American context.
And in the NYT of all places! <:deye:359010025223618570>
@halfginger, Per 9 - External URLs, "Any links to enemy websites must be run through archive.is. This is not limited to explicitly antifa websites, but includes any media site hostile to our point of view. If in doubt, archive it. Websites that have been inappropriately directly linked will be deleted without warning."
I went ahead and deleted your post and replaced it with an archived version.
No worries. Already done. Good post.
Walgreens now transgender bathrooms ^^^
It says following target but every target I go to doesn’t have them
Just go in and act like you belong there.
A local target here had them and then switched it back to the "family" restroom. Which is what they were to begin with
Local CVS already has single stall bathrooms open to either gender. All they're going to do is slap a "gender neutral" sign up for signal points
Extremely woke bathroom facilities.
"Comedian, TV personality and Psychic."
Psychic? She missed that Trump thing big league.
Needs a face swap
Cheddar man face swap obviously
Swap in her face
A few days ago I posted a blog article with the idea to reverse the "wearing a diaper to own the libs" meme and people seemed to like it. Here's my first attempt at using it. Do your own and post them here! https://twitter.com/NorAdvocMovmnt/status/963544114661920768
If anyone is interested in helping build up the CR server being made feel free to pop in and check it out. Drop a link in your chapters groupme or groupchat if you want as well.
DO NOT have any overtly alt right usernames or profile pics
*"Why hello my fellow Republicans"*
It was made by a few IE guys to centralize young republicans into a discord where we have a presence
That's a good idea
Any "conservative" discord run by our guys is a good idea
So is it being presented as an unofficial College Republicans Discord?
technically unofficial but we want it to be nationwide nonetheless
we have some guys from IE who have connections working to promote it
I know the UWCR president
Should I get him and his guys in it?
Sure if you can
its a bit sleepy atm but thats why we need people in there to get it awake
Just popped in there. Put on my conservative hat again for the first time in a while. Basic bitch rhetoric here we come.
even the normies are hating on this tweet from the official Youtube twitter
I’ll get the link, my buddy sent it to me
That’s crazy if it is
It’s in the comments here, but it’s a screen cap in the comments
Find that Miami herald ladies twitter maybe ?
still funny though
how can you tell, i was about to share it
Yes, this is the guy @Deleted User https://twitter.com/MelGibsonFan3/status/963950970744000513
they look like the same person
yea only difference i see is the hair
def ugly latino
pre murder rampage, selfie filter and a cap, vs post killing spree no cap without selfie filter
"hes wearing a polo must be a white supreemist"
Some no name liar. First time I've seen white identity extremist as a term
hes not even white passing next to those two others lol
brown haired brown eyed white identity extremist nicolas de jesus cruz
It'd be laughable if it wasn't so sickening.
"Nicolas Cruz"... maybe. "Nicolas de Jesus Cruz"? No way in hell. Can't skate by on that one.
So is that report real? Is the guy a communist?
looks like that guy's real name is "marcel fontaine"
"made something out of nothing" Then why couldn't you do that in Mexico?
This beta cuck works at University of Chapel Hill North Carolina. Did he drive James Fields into fear creating the end result? https://youtu.be/kcFfz7TtPog
@Deleted User is this beaner saying thatAmerica was nothing before he got there?
I think he's just trying to have his movie monologue moment where the score starts playing in his head as he rambles about how brave he was.
In the face of stuff that didn't happen
How many "racist" people do you know who would tell someone "you're too brown to do X"
I can't think of many tbh, most Americans are polite
No one says that. It's their internalized shame
Pet peeve: get in someone's face with a camera and then say he assaulted you when he shoves you out of his way.
At what point do we bring out the military
jordan jereb has claimed that nick cruz, the school shooter, was a member of his organization
'the republic of florida'
a group that seeks to make Florida a white ethnostate
his interview is in the article^^^
@Sam Southern - TN Everyone I know is talking about that. Can't wait until I have to explain that he wasn't actually a WN, and then make up a plausible lie to explain how I know that
Lol I read that and my first thought was "Republic of Florida.. Literally who"
This post needs more upvotes
That page has 5.6 million followers
This israeli is advocating aborting more white babies because of school shooter. Please inform her shooter was jewish and mental illness is a genetic mental trait
Posting links would help in a cyberstrike.