cyberstrike
Discord ID: 359892798071373824
6,339 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 23/64
| Next
We need a better shape
It's literally everywhere.
Don't worry guys I'm making a new badge
Dragon's eye shaped badge made of bitcoin
That works too
@Steve - NJ incredible
I gotta be honest, it's not *that* funny, but the handle "liberty dankmeme" really cracks me up.
Lorenzo Pennypacker sounds like a well-rounded citizen
I've had the Lorenzo Pennypacker handle for five years or so haha
Can one of you with twitter clout just link this dude an article on the Holodomore? I'd do it myself but Jack personally shoah'd me forever off twitter. https://twitter.com/polak815/status/958478357968097280?s=17
really...
What's more effective getting RTs to a single tweet like this, or spamming replys on his tweets?
@Jeb! Nationalism - MD probably try to get someone with a good amount of clout to tweet about it or retweet you. Someone more benign like 'battlebeagle", "framegameradio" or maybe "Mr. Frexit" (though he's pretty explicit)
@Deleted User I'm going to try and DM battle beagle
We should absolutely begin a grassroots effort to get Taylor on Joe Rogan
And Patrick in Tucker!
I second that
Battle Beagles DMs don't appear to be open but I just tweeted at him
Does no one in leadership here in IE have a direct line to these major accounts? That's something that we need to change.
A coalition of the tweeting
yas beagle RT me
Nathan certainly used to. In addition, alot of these guys are mutuals with our main account.
I will talk to Patrick about getting something going on that front.
Mr. Frexit is IE right?
I don't think so, but he is a friend. I can reach out to him.
But I need to know the plan when you guys are looking to move on something
I can't offer anything except the idea here, I don't have any contacts. Just build up formal relationships with bigger accounts (jazzhands, jburton express) where we tell them that we produce the content irl and we'd like them to help us push it on the internet now and then, no hard feelings if they pass on some of it. Then hopefully use those contacts to build relations with truly big accounts (ann coulter, msm journalists) to maximize our reach.
https://qz.com/1176355/how-richard-spencer-and-the-alt-right-are-adopting-left-wing-language-to-recruit-leftie-men/ Thought i might share this here instead maybe? Although they screwed up with old info of Moseley, you can see what tjey say about rebranding,etc..
Please vote in this. It's not in the screenshot, but below is voting options. https://twitter.com/LSeabrookWFTV/status/958813320760496129
You should include a link.
@Deleted User you're gonna have to link us bro
actually nevermind. This one was easy to find
@Deleted User Thanks man. I should thought of that.
No worries ๐๐ป
Iโm wondering if we should only post to r/t_D when itโs nighttime in Israel. @_AltRight_Anew -AZ
The sun never sets on the IDF empire
Oy
@Matthias from way too much reddit posting over the years, I found that the rightwing vs leftwing ratio is most favorable to posts made between 7 and 10am EST. The most hostile times are afternoon to 4am EST.
Hit everything on there
Will posting happy merchants get you a ban from twitter? Asking for a friend.
@Felden - CO probably not, but I don't see much of a benefit to doing so.
Thereโs no use in even engaging with the jew. Aside from the lawls.
I deleted the memes. It would be nice to keep an account longer than a month.
Listen for the term "This had been planned for a while"
SPLC admitting to displacement as a plan
@Deleted User So, I've come to something of a minor epiphany just over this past week, largely from reading the reactions to the SF banner drop. I'm not sure why it's taken me so long to figure it out, but these people use the term "white supremacy" to mean the desire to maintain the cultural and numerical dominance of whites in tradtionally white countries. Under this definition, we are, in fact, white supremacists. In fact, @Reinhard Wolff's interview with Brittany Pettibone, wherein he says we have an interest in maintaining a super-majority in the United States, counts as white supremacy. Under this definition, all of us, most normal people, most baby boomers, and all of our grandparents (and all of their grandparents), are white supremacists.
But... does it improve our image and chances of success if we adopt that name? People instantly think of violent skinheads.
@Joe-MN Well, I'm in the process of questioning that paradigm. The playbook says "deny being a white supremacist," which of course makes sense. But I was in a conversation yesterday where the term came up and I said "Well, the modern definition of white supremacy is whites wanting their culture and language to predominate in the United States, and that's something that our grandparents and everyone before them took for granted." The response to me was "Well that seems like a reasonable position."
This conversation was with a liberal white person.
This comes to the question of the viability of accepting the leftโs terms, and the ability we may have as far as strength in narrative control to challenge those terms.
Aye. I know this topic to be one of older debate, but I don't think it's difficult, in response to "you're a white supremacist" to say "If you mean I want to maintain the European cultural character of the United States, I suppose I am."
Under this definition, the United States has always been white supremacist. Even the Kennedys and Linden Johnson were white supremacists, touting the Hart-Cellar Act as something that would "not change the demographics of the United States." (slight paraphrase there).
It also puts into context the black and Jewish criticisms of the United States. In the case of blacks, I'd say "Well, you're 13% of the country's population yet you want the entire country to bend to your culture and language."
Hm. Also if we get them to admit that white supremacy is super evil and that all of the founding fathers were white supremacists, then WHY ARE YOU HERE?
Like yeah I hate all of the founders of this country, but its nice there sooo.
( @sigruna14 hopefully this convo has utility for cyberstriking). @Sam Anderson it's also handy for talking to boomers. "Well you grew up in a white supremacist time. You just didn't know it because it's all there was and you took it for granted."
Oosh, my old BUGS Swarm training wants me to push back on accepting enemy terminology, but you may have a point.
But Bob Whitaker is the reason everyone says "anti white" now.
Stick to the mantra!
refuse to use enemy terms
it's like fighting on terrain they've entrenched and prepared
make them fight on your terrain
Leftists think about these words all the time. They obsess over them. There's a reason they choose them so there's a reason we should avoid them.
Don't let them frame the narrative. Don't allow them to define the terms. Their use of the term is an attempt to present you in a negative light.
"Well, if being a Nazi just means X, then I guess I am a Nazi, by your definition. That seems reasonable." - This does not serve you well.
The term they are using has a negative and aggressive connotation, and is a "poison term", it's a negative denotation if supremacy is considered negatively.
Since you can't control how the external listener or reader approaches the term, you can't manage and frame the discussion properly.
Use a dialectic to dissect their ad hominem: "What do you mean by supremacist?" (they say you're ebil here) "Well, I've never said I wanted to do that, and our organization's charter doesn't say anything about doing that, and there's no reason I would want to do that, it doesn't make sense, you are smearing us without evidence."
Using the "If you say I'm X, then I proudly am X" is only used by provocetuers who want to sound witty.
In all honesty.
The narrative of a normie alligns with the narrative of the establishment we're against. It does us no good to affirm the narrative of the former because normies won't pick up on the irony we're implying.
Normies and the establishment are essentially a unified entity for the sake of analyzing optics strategies. You have to destroy the narrative before you can fend it off in witty ways. Divide the two portions of the establishment so there's an audience for the irony to begin with.
Audience is the most tantamount part in optics and appeal. People often forget that for the sake of riding ideological euphoria.
Have you established an audience? Then by all means, affirm you're a nazi, evil, white supremacist, etc. Then, people realize that the narrative is nonsence and are inclined to support you in humiliating whoever calls you that. Surefire way to garner support for even those watching online. Spectators see an audience and subconsciously assume who has the best argument and who holds the most moral ground by their group support.
That's how normies function. Via popular opinion. The gravity of what you say is thereby aleviated to a certain extent at that point.
For the same reason we donโt accept the DREAMER paradigm as legitimate because why the hell should we, I donโt believe accepting their definition of white supremacy is a good idea. Overton ainโt even close to far enough for us to consider that yet imo
Okay lads, I'm not saying we accept their definition of white supremacy or start calling ourselves white supremacists. I'm saying that a fair response to "You're a white supremacist" is "To the extent that you mean I wish to maintain the European cultural and political character of the United States, you're correct." I bring it up because that is, in fact, what they mean when they call us supremacists.
It's an easy follow up with "Because, if that's what you mean, every nation on earth is supremacist, and should be."
But this has probably gone long enough for discussion here and we should discuss anything further in <#358403210618339338>.
Smash that comments section ๐ ฑois
"Eugene Antifa"
Is that supposed to be a name?
Oh wait, it's the city
"The truth, with a lowercase t, is that there isnโt much difference between the desires of humanity on the alt-right and the far-left, among Nazis, Jews or my knitting circle. The desire to be a participant in something greater than oneself is a formidable urge embedded within every human being, regardless of his or her religion, race or creed."
I mean, this is far more than any ((())) I've seen give us credit for.
https://www.makersupport.com/Patrick_Casey fellas lets make accounts on this site and follow Patrick. Boost his internet ๐จ lout
It takes 2 minutes and can be done anonymously
Tweet this to Tucker!
Check out @thetolerantmanโs Tweet: https://twitter.com/thetolerantman/status/959541736161849346?s=09
>"You can't stop it"
I think we need to give more credit to the "turn it into a meme" technique. This is something that gets talked about a lot on TRS. Basically it's the idea that you can take a talking point that leftists use repeatedly and essentially turn it into a joke by refuting it and making fun of it over and over again consistently.
This is why they stopped calling us "NAZI NAZI NAZI" in debates.
This is why "But what is white?" is quickly being abandoned by leftists.
This is why cuckservatives can now be effectively brushed aside EFFECTIVELY with a "muh constitution" or "at least I still have the Constitution" macro.
In my opinion, all leftist name calling and argumentation should be turned into gay memes. The same way leftists won the public over by painting religious people and conservatives as embarassingly out of touch.
6,339 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 23/64
| Next