My interpretation is likely the interpretation of the common man

I've never had anyone make that mistake before

You shouldn't use the intelligence of others as a crutch, rely on it when necessary

If someone doesn't know, they google intrinsic morality

Except, my version of the phrase is also valid

You clarfied what you meant, and I accepted that meaning

Sure, but that also means nothing at all in the context I used it, so to know more people will google it

Or they'd ask you for clarification

Because they don't assume you're without fault

Nor was I talking to you to begin with, why would your interpretation matter?

and / or possibly have a bad internet connection at the moment, ioi

Me and that person discuss this all the time, they knew what I'm talking about

You show up with zero context and assume you will have a good opinion

You clarified your point, I talked about I didn't read it that way, and how I took issue with the language

You then clarified that it was a term of art

And took issue when I tried to use the component words in other ways; morality intrinsic to the subject

I took issue because I already clarified the only use of the word, and you were trying to address *other* uses of it when that wasn't the argument

I wanted to address other uses because they were how I intended to make my point

Those points are immaterial to what was at hand

I believe there can be morality intrinsic to the subject, and I believe that language for describing them is permissible and proper.

Why is whether I can something the way I choose to say it immaterial?

That's just subjective morality, and has never been called "intrinsic", the argument is that existentialism necessitates subjectivism

Because that point right there is not relevant to the argument at hand

The point I wanted to make was primarily about intrinsic subjective morality and language usage solutions

Intrinsic subjective morality is distinct from non-intrinsic subjective morality

Like I said, irrelevant

To your end, not to mine.

If you want to start a separate debate then sure but I wanted Addie to respond

TBF, one goal of mine was to question why objective morality has value, and why objective morality is necessary to reject pedophillia

Well I gtg but I didn't claim that objective morality is necessary to reject pedophilia, I claimed there is nothing objectively wrong with it outside of societal norms set in place by people who were objective moralists if you are a subjective moralist.

Ah, I see the distinction "There is no *atheistic* argument against pedophilia because from a pure evolutionary perspective there is nothing wrong with it."

tbf that's pretty ambiguous to someone who hasn't read certain texts

Even if they wikipediad it or dictionaried it

I wasn't talking to those people

Yeah, but I'm one of those people and I read it

Okie, I'm out now though

ya, cya ❤

shut up LIBTARD

@Notso Explain

Please be ironic please be ironic

It's not ironic

He's a muslim apologist

Check his profile

He was trying to defend mohammad's marriage but then went into "all child rape isnt child rape if the parent consents"

Yikes

Wow i just looked through his post history and wow i must say wow thats a yikes from me sweetie wow just wow smh

damn ive seen at most a "it was different times bruh" but ive never seen someone go down that much of a rabbit hole

is god is always watching

then he is watching people have sex

LOL

Gross

god is the ultimate cuck

Fat people sex

since god is pure actuality, doesnt that mean that he is simultaneously the most cucked and the greatest cucker of all existance?

<:omegacat:615538084733386778>

> not understanding metaphysics

cuckd God

Ironic tranny

Hey now thats not nice

Ironic tranny

at least I don't believe in the burning bush of the goat herders

<:garfilf:606968189640769668>

<:libtard:557226511703343115>

Ah yes, you don't believe in what I have logically, and scientifically proven to be the truth.

you cant scientifically prove God

lmfao

Sure you can, Eucharistic miracles are a prime example

Tested in labs and have tons of eye witnesses

Our lady of Guadalajara and various apparitions (especially of Zeitoun) are valid as well, but Eucharistic miracles are the most valid

Scientifically speaking

Yea i don't believe in any of those

Why not?

Your "scientific" evidence is "omg some people saw ghosts"

Bruh

Do you know what the Eucharist is

They are physically tested in labs, and confirmed

I got like 5 minutes, so I'll respond all I can till then and I'll respond after that in about an hour.

Just a heads up

Yes, I know what the eucharist is

i was a catholic

Then how is that a relevant critique at all?

huh

ill tell you what

when you get back

we can talk more

Okie

i was a catholic now im a tranny

lgbt meeting has been moved to the rooftop

ruh oh

a muslim

I have a question

@----

***Why***

Lol

@---- Thought u were satanist

As in you told me you got banned from Pagan Pathway because of being Satanist instead of Pagan hence my confusion

@---- how is "paganism satanism"

^
Only a Christian deals in absolutes

I will do what I must

satanists cant be ns

based

based

*look how merciful Islam is*

I like how he said that

I swear Islam will spread wallahi

Hmmmm

cool i'm gonna go beat my wi-

oh yeah right

Share if you would beat your wife with your male followers

tfw no bf to beat me

<:sadcat:562563640239063040>

LaVey ( a satanist jew ) recommending SIEGE and a satanist book talking about infiltrating far-right groups

Satanism is literally just being edgy. Pretty much says it there.

Too bad the "extreme right" is either trad cat/orthodox or gaygan

The gaygans are atheist larpers anyways

pagans are larpers yes

MUH WHITE GODS

and who is not a cuck?

Oh boy..

Kanye west's new album, that's all I'm gunna say

Laveyan satanism is a fucking caricature

Never feel frustrated or insulted by pagans but instead laugh, for these people worship tree branches and cum drinkers

@Asdrubal cum drinkers?

Jesus and all apostles are jews

@CHEF BФYARDEE Odin drank cum

Hahahah what

Really?

yep

Where did you got that info

when ur straight

<:what:591451631590178846>

of course norse pagans are retarded

there is no evidence any of these gods are real

loki turned into a horse and got fucked

am i citing the marvelous norse paganism correctly?

Well you are only talking about the old norse paganism

And all religions are bullshit

We need it to give people hope and religion holds people from doing degenerate things

well it is also hard for me to perceive religions seriously, same as for you

i also tend to look at it from an utilitarian standpoint

i can not really comprehend the fact that modern pagans take their religion seriously

but let's not discard norse tales, they are fucking hilarious!)

@CHEF BФYARDEE what is "degenerate things"

@Riley Anything you say

aw come on

<:sadcat:562563640239063040>

don't be rude

Jews bad, Christian eh, muslims bad

Pagans good

True true

pagans are larp

That means that a thousand of years ago people just pretended to believe in god

about 90% of modern pagans are just agnostics on a larp

the other 10 are those slavs that still do it because they live in the middle of bumfuck nowhere

Catholics in Italy were idolizing negros as early as the 15th century, Like St. Benedict "The Moor" of Palmero

But negro worship goes back much further, even to the first century, where these two negro slaves were praised as martyrs

1st century was Apostolic Church that was Orthodox and Catholic

Yes

Basically if you are a racist Christian, you are a heretic

<:wtf:591182282648190986>

@Deleted User Wrong but ok

It's unhistorical

Completely unfounded

Luckily for you I'm not Catholic or Orthodox

Baptist Gang

If from the first century Christianity saw blacks as spiritual equivalents (combined with the fact that all souls have immeasurable value), then any racism is objectively wrong

Unless you literally deny all of Christian history and interpret the bible with your special snowflake definition.

Spiritual equalivancy

*spiritual*

Not in physical equalivancy

Not intelligence

The physical manifestations were downplayed and thought to be malleable

Spiritually, we are equal in the Lord

Because, the spirit is really all that mattered anyway

But not with regards to intelligence, physical equalivancy, etc

Spirit is all the matters at the end of the day (life) since we're only here on Earth temporarily

But if the physical doesn't matter, why does your point matter?

You edge on apathy

No, I just am not a Christian

It's easy to point out it's members contradictions

I actually have a life centered creed that is anti-thetical to Christian thought. It's the opposite of apathy

A non-believer has no right to criticize a believer of their beliefs

LOL

Only another believer has that right

As per scripture

Yea okay

>you don't believe in yeshua so I can't listen to your arguments

1 Corinthians 5:13 GNTD

**1 Corinthians 5:13 - Good News Translation (GNT)**

```Dust


<12-13> After all, it is none of my business to judge outsiders. God will judge them. But should you not judge the members of your own fellowship? As the scripture says, "Remove the evil person from your group."```

That's pretty pathetic you can't think about an argument because a book tells you not too.

Several biologists talk among themselves, debating about their research and theories.

Along comes a biologist-denier screaming and aching for attention. He tries to bring up arguments and points out things that don't exist.

The biologists are confused by the ranting denier, clearly he does not know scripture, does not know the things they do, does not know the complex and deep knowledge required to formulate complex opinions. The biologists ignore this lunatic.

Biologists don't have "scripture" and they would gladly defend their beliefs

If you don't you just look weak. Science is founded on the defense of a hypothesis. Religion is plain faith

Science is 100% faith based

Nothing is absolute in science

bruh

yea scientists don't have scripture

they have uh

data

and they come to conclusion based on this data

then they write it down

the difference is scientists have

***EVIDENCE!!!***

what evidence do religious people have @Maksim

@Riley Evidence dosent exist in science

Everything is faith based

Assumptions

<:bruh:587027169784496128>

The average person relys on faith that the supposed scientists are correct

Faith in authority

no, I have reason to believe that they are correct because

THEY CAN PROVE IT

lol

Can you?

How do you know their calculations are correct?

How do you know the theory behind those calculations are correct?

because we can test them

and we do

Have you tested every single scientific study yourself or personally observed every single one?

No? Then you rely on faith

I have not, and I don't need to. Like why is this hard for you to understand?

Then you rely on faith

no, I have confidence in their findings because I know they are peer reviewed

like fuck dude

Confidence

Faith

its not blind faith

like religion

You can not confirm for yourself their findings are correct

So it is 100% faith

<:facepalm:593615671208706068>

lets try this

what point

are you trying to make

Everything is faith-based

so if you want a scientist to prove his findings

Faith in government, science, religion, society, morals, etc

would you accept it if he said

"its true because i have faith its true"

For a scientist, I'd want to personally observe his research

so you don't accept faith based reaserch?

But I have faith that the scientist knows what he is doing