Typically from people who didn’t read his novels.

People praise the socratic method as the cornerstone of Democracy, like bruh he was literally executed because he opposed Democracy

Yes, and a democratic method was utilized to determine whether he was to be executed or not, lmao.

He apparently lost by a small margin.

That’s mob rule, right there.

The trials were pretty interesting, Gregory B Sadler on YouTube has a great set of videos on Socrates

Yes. I read his speech.

To the crowd.

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

**-** What is your view on the rich/elite? Do they have a social responsibility, how much should the top bracket be taxed, are they simply superior and therefore rich?

kill them all

libtarded

@Jimmie Thicc Boi Gustav II Adolf is superior you cunt

Throughout history the higher echelons of society have been less susceptible to the evils of Bolshevism and more inclined to support a fascist movement

Although the corporate oligarchs of today are bad

If you above the median income you should taxed 25%

Below should be taxed 10%

depends on how they got rich

@Maksim execute the traitors who destroy our countrys for wealth

if its by being gay then tacks 100%
if its by being based then like 80-90% tacks

Definitely higher taxes on the 1%

Agreed with what @Honey Beanger states.

Regulate taxation of upper class more, and close the existing corporate tax loopholes.

Oh, I like that point

@Veraic did i fucking ask you to respond to me

@DotNerd If they’re of the highest echelons of society, they need to emulate the traditions, culture, and mannerisms the most efficiently to serve as examples in a hierarchical state.

<:sadpepe:591182526148771871> im sorry

Yes agreed @Enkrum

This precludes them from evading taxes and practicing usury.

90% income tax on top bracket

Eat the rich

I'd say 50% might be enough, but 90% sounds good too.

Development of a hierarchy within a state is inevitable, but stratification is avoidable.

Checks and balances rely in authority, so at least Democracy can lend a bit of power, but not really.

Brainwashed folk are common.

Then again, the current choices are an issue too

the rich donate $2 million out of their $30 billion net-worth to their own private charity and be like, "haha yeah I love the poor"

Yeah, tch

State enforced morality

Yes

I would love that

Then no more problems

state enforced anti gay?
why didnt i think of this befo

Hm..

I suppose the question would be what moralities.

le 10 commandments 👍

There can’t be evil rich niggas if it’s illegal to be immoral

Philosophy is full of them

oh geez, lol

Tru that

absolute christian morality under penalty of deathrape

https://tenor.com/view/shmoney-dance-shmoney-dance-free-bobby-shmurda-bobby-shmurda-gif-15410122

upvoted

Good deeds or die

downboated

👍 👍

👍 👍

👍

👍

👍

👍 👍

You guys got terrific ideas, though I disagree with some of your thinkings. Heck, a state imposed morality law would be cool tbh if done right.

state-mandated gay sex

Albeit tricky

<:pogU:537439906595733506>

Yes

no

State enforced morality might also fix our diversity issue

state-mandated race mixing?

sounds good

Hmmmm, didn't know that is an issue tho.

state enforced rape of fembois

<:hyperthink:591182142189338655>

jreg viewer? @Deli.v2

Mind you the problem is the hate going on.

@Spergerger like, when I'm bored

gay tbh

Just get rid of the immoral people and 90% of the brown population is gone

shuddup squigga

jreg is overrated and should be killed tbh

Daass RITTTEEEE

@Stahlgewittern

Yeah, I'm out of comments... good concepts, bad judgements, but you're on the right path.

Okay Nerd

state enforced Christian imperialism

Yeah rich people who build their wealth naturally and didnt inherit it are just superior

@Spergerger sounds good

state enforced gaming set

Does it have to be an L1A1?

Yes

Meh, alright.

Retards

Wearing chainlink hoodies

Furry Orthodox Nazi?

Supreme LARP

oh shid i didnt see the focks

hang on

lemme ficks

Can our flag just be a cross and nothing more?

Red Cross of Martyrdom maybe?

just the cross
yeh sure ig

Boring

Cooler flags

Too much

Simple flags

Positive Christianity

Looks the same:

Fake and Gay State run church

Blinging in gold while people suffer and only prayers

Cool didnt ask @DotNerd

Don't care if you did.

Then shut up queer

Don't need your permission.

**1 blocked message**

lol, eat my doodoo

**1 Blocked message**

**1 Blocked message**

Man, bunch of snowflakes.

@DotNerd lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1u5Z0GZ1WsE
based jues

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/648400331583258631/654374522903855104/peter_gets_eaten.gif

sexi

someone explain positive Christianity to me please. do they just follow the new testament or what?

its complete heresy @Milk Chugger

why?

https://youtu.be/8_3AJdVZcM4

Se inscreve

@Milk Chugger ``` In 1937, Hans Kerrl, the Nazi Minister for Church Affairs, explained that "Positive Christianity" was not "dependent upon the Apostle's Creed", nor was it dependent on "faith in Christ as the son of God", upon which Christianity relied, rather, it was represented by the Nazi Party: "The Führer is the herald of a new revelation", he said.[3] To accord with Nazi antisemitism, positive Christianity advocates also sought to deny the Semitic origins of Christ and the Bible. Based on such elements, positive Christianity separated itself from Nicene Christianity and as a result, it is considered apostate by all historically Trinitarian Christian churches, regardless of whether they are Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, or Protestant.```

"The Führer is the herald of a new revelation"

cool

Not cool

@Deli.v2 vore?

In this chat?

Unbelievable.

Banned.

vore

🤤

NOOOOO <:pink2:604871373869023242>

Positive Christianity was supposed to help bring in a new religious structure based upon purely european ideals

it was a temporary position

Temporary position for state worship

<:nolgbt:605971980210012178>

@everyone QOTD: What do you think of the result of the House vote on impeachment and how do you think it'll effect 2020, if at all

trump s gonna win anyway

lol

He's going to get more support

<:oh:603773792673595405>

I hope he goes broke

he will get his base activaated
which will probs be enough to win

Who *cares?*

If Trump stays, woo, more support for Israel and gun rights stripped away

If he goes, who is going to replace him?

Nobody good.

Lose-lose situation, it's just theatre to distract us.

I mean there's a correct answer here

It's helping him

@MinionFan#9160 why are you pinging me?

I'm angry

@Bruni

@MinionFan and?

drumpf

@𝕾𝖎𝖊𝖌𝖋𝖗𝖎𝖊𝖉, 𝕷𝖊𝖌𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖗 𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝕾𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊 drumpf

True

ja, hate this fucker

@𝕾𝖎𝖊𝖌𝖋𝖗𝖎𝖊𝖉, 𝕷𝖊𝖌𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖗 𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝕾𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊 hate who

The orange in the peach probably @Otto

jawohl

juden

juden sind abstoßend

Ja

Wir oder die Juden

@𝕾𝖎𝖊𝖌𝖋𝖗𝖎𝖊𝖉, 𝕷𝖊𝖌𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖗 𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝕾𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊

jah jah schnitzel ein krankenhaus

What

@everyone QOTD: What are your views on healthcare? Do you believe in a privatized system? Do you prefer medicare for all? If so, do you want a private option?

healthcare is cool

Medicare works wonderfully in Australia. If you proposed privatizing it, you'd get politically crucified.

Medicare for all

you cannot force people to provide healthcare

Why @TԋҽDυԃҽAႦιԃҽʂ

cause that's called slavery

How

[2]

putting the government in charge of healthcare is wasteful and dangerous

That doesn't explain how it's slavery though.

Even assuming what you said was true.

you cannot make it a law that someone has to provide you health care

Why not?

If slaves could choose to work on plantations and if they did work got 6 figures I would unironically be pro-slavery

No healthcare for minorities

im shocked you quickly become convinced of forced larbor just because "people wont get sick feefees"

I'm shocked you won't provide me a reason as to how it's slavery.

Second time repeating this—If slaves could choose to work on plantations and if they did work got 6 figures I would unironically be pro-slavery

one person makes it a law that another person gets free health care because "reasons"...who is to do that labor? and who pays for it?

The healthcare professionals and the government pays for it

at some point you are stealing from peoples pockets to pay for it

with what money?

money they stole from tax payers

Money taken from people

Not really. Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's.

that doesnt justify taxes and slavery

How is it slavery

You haven't established a premise as to how it's slavery.

if you dont understand basic economics im not sure we can have a discussion

Third time repeating this—If slaves could choose to work on plantations and if they did work got 6 figures I would unironically be pro-slavery

If you can't understand that what you're describing isn't even slavery, I'm not sure I even want to have a discussion.

My nigga I’m reading advanced economics

So you're aware, you need to be 13+ to use Discord.

Government is very inefficient with many things. The public and private mix that currently exists in the US is what drives up prices. Subsidized medicine with greedy individuals halts innovation and competition. The government should slowly begin to pull out of the sphere of healthcare and leave it to ambitious people to provide.

@ChillyWilly Or just make the whole thing public

Legalize Slavery

Private healthcare is stupidly worse.

The US has a worse healthcare system than Saudi Arabia.

Well if everyone gets medical care, that'd include you as well. Hypothetically, let's say a rich person suddenly becomes poor. Well tough shit you can't get healthcare and thus die when you get a heart attache and can't afford to pay. As an example.

@Stahlgewittern Thank you for your wonderful contribution to this discussion

On the other hand, there is evidence that without an incentive, laborers work less as they aren't being rewarded for their labor. In terms of a nationalized medical system, one could assume that it'd be of poorer quality.

You aren’t entitled to the product of someone else’s labor

Who dictates what is theirs?

But in terms of medical aid, what would you gain other than material wealth? You aren't building something that will be used, or for self advancement or enjoyment. You're just caring for another person. Now one could say that their life could impact yours, perhaps they are a firefighter who was injured. By saving their life you might end up being rescued from a fire in your house later on. But what do you directly gain from enacting such care is the question..

It’s not doctors literally working for free @kwit_dat_Stalin @GreyWolf

That’s why it costs a lot of money to implement

You mean taxes

Yes money acquired from taxes

It costs the rich money

Cope

The worship of money is the root of all evil.

Who cares if it means taxes.

Well personally I think everyone deserves a chance for care(except those who commit bodily harm on purpose, or get hurt doing the same thing multiple times, because at that point you really should just stop doing whatever that thing is..). But I also think that every worker deserves fair reward for their labor.

Rewarding the worker for their effort is fine but rampant individualism is what got us into this mess in the first place.

Hmmmm

healthcare is a public service

or should be

I am not even certain how do both private and public healthcare work. Even if we set aside the moral arguments for or against public healthcare, there is also the question of efficiency, innovation, and cost in the long term. @ChillyWilly

there are many effective, and ineffective version of public healthcare

An example in favor of a privatized system is in the sector of laser eye surgery. A few decades ago, it was incredibly expensive. The price for laser eye surgery has decreased by magnitudes. What used to be at least $20k when under the government's thumb has dropped to less than 25% of that after years of innovation and privatization.

just socializing it willy nilly won't make people suddenly healthier

For example, should we sacrifice efficiency for the sake of lowering the cost and increasing access to the public?

it should follow a system that is like on Germany.

^

@Louis XIV (aka 1685Violin) No

Germany's socialized healthcare is a good model

its probably the best example

@ChillyWilly An example against private is drugs

I dislike the British NHS but Iike the one used in Germany or Switzerland, minus the mandatory savings account and higher taxes.