qotd
Discord ID: 588205956039442452
34,778 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 66/140
| Next
there is actually evidence agains the story in genesis
Who were the first people to come into existence then
They are just names given
we can get into evolution later
ill talk about endogenous retroviral DNA
Evolution isnt valid to the conversation. Completely separate loose ends
Atheists when they say their grandpa is a monkey
Another smart man of true knowledge
Thank you brother
Youโre welcome brother
@Cat the Sink Pisser when i gwt home we can talk about why your wrong about literally everything
Hmmm yes
Prepare to get lectured by a tranny
about why youโre the retarded one
prolly a 12 yo tbh
Who thinks he's way smarter than everyone because he read quotes from Charles Darwin and Karl Marx
and thinks he's atheist
when they're just lost
Look at Venezuela a rough decade ago was vibin at all numbers, now due to socialism it's at the lowest of the barrel
Then they say: "oh that wasnt real socialism"
Go create your own nation buddy and try it out your way
Venezuela *still* has HUGE reserves of untapped oil, enough to maybe be an exporter, but due to the socialist policies, there is no incentive to pump it.
When everyone earns the same for any labor why work when I can literally sleep and earn a wage
It encourages being lazy
Christians are always the retarded ones
Zzooooooom
Would you say the same to our Middle Eastern counter-parts? Or is it your only goal to target and ridicule the followers of the Bible?
Fuck Muslims
why would I defend the tusken raiders?
Muslims are more respectable than talmudic jews
i deal with Christians more tho
They do not think jesus is a criminal
i cant wait to hear the laughable arguments for the existence of god
o i hope you guys are young earth creationists too
that makes it even better
If you think your angering God your humoring him
Are you here for reasonable discourse, or is it your only goal to mock us, much the way the Romans had
ill get into the discourse later
im about to get off work
@ChaosNatural are you a YE creationist?
its been way too long since ive beat the shit out of one of those guys
Humor me
in like 30 minutes
we got a lot to cover!
The Roman's had smarter queries
I'll be on
But no mic
o im gonna be typing
ill teach you all about carbon dating, Endogenous retroviuses, and a few other things
ok for real this time brb
It'll be a date then, should be fun. A day without learning is a day not lived.
Date with femoid
Fuck negroids and white people
Blackpilled arent you?
Nah
It is passed 30 minutes
Atheist consents to defeat
Lol
LOLOLo!!!!
Lol
@every1 what iS Rick SING????๐ ๐ ๐ https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/270003347568721922/645586350233616394/20191117_152540.jpg
@everyone Question Of The Day:
"Designer Babies" as they've been dubbed are essentially genetically modified babies who are edited and morphed at birth to have increased intelligence/certain looks, etc. If it became more widespread would you support it?
@sandwitch what is Rick sing?
Uhhhh
Yeah
Hm
Yes
No we need retarded people so i can feel better about myself
^
^
We need retards bro
Hell no, thatโs opening Pandoraโs box, governments, corporations or even AI could do some shady shit
I'm not saying I support it lmfao
More retards
Now
Would not support
Its aryan build a bear
How about we use it to make more retards and we can play irl total war by commanding retards into battle
Sounds like a fun game to me
I got the wheelchairs
You get the paraplegics
Like I'm 100% against it in any capacity. For example; possible detrimental side effects (mental and physical) and itll divide us into normal humans and the smart ones
Like it's one slippery fucking slope
The government is definitely not going to use it to make everybody outside of their cliche extremely stupid.
What if black man wants pure black child
What then
That would be an abuse of their power and they've never been known for that before.
โก
Then he gets a black child @Cat the Sink Pisser
Yeah baybee
๐
Like no shit <:sniff:591452013682753536> <:sniff:591452013682753536>
But wouldnt people feel like not giving the black man shit versus if white man wanted aryan?
<:what:591451631590178846>
What drugs are you on and can I have some?
@sandwitch I'm against it for not only it is immoral but at the same time, it is extremely dangerous. We don't even know the side effects and it only leads to even more inequality than what human nature already allows.
Indeed
>genetically modified babies
>blacks now have an average IQ
Lmao
Genetically-engineered privately-contracted Loli death squads
<:ayy:591181633105952788>
This guy gets it
While genetic modification of children to be perfect could be a great boon if used for the good of humanity, I simply donโt trust the corporations or the government enough to believe they wonโt turn it into a perversion.
Any gen tech thatโs not used to create cat girls shouldnโt be used
No
Designers babies removes any kind of biological individuality
You'll just get people doing the equivalent of what people naming there kids "Uniqua" or dumb stuff like that but with genes
o i fell asleep
i forgot i was gonna talk to that guy
@everyone Question Of The Day:
Laissez-faire economy or a heavily regulated one? Why?
Heavily regulated
Revolt against the false dichotomy ๐ฆ
Heavily Regulated
Teddy Roosevelt knew best
TR progressivism > Modern Progressivism
Break up Google
Who cares we should be talking about culture not this neo lib bs
Don't demonize the working class
To be a progressive, you must abhor social liberalism
Its the most cosmopolitan thing out there
TR/Huey Long progressivism and modern progressivism came from arguably two completely different traditions
Iโd prefer semi-regulated, but if I had to chose Iโd rather have heavy regulation than none at all. @sandwitch
heavily regulated
because laissez-faire allowed globalisation to pervert the west to what it is today
^Heavily regulated
Laissez faire capitalism is un-nationalist
Make the Working Class Great Again
Laissez faire is gay
No more markets
Heavy regulated.
Because it's **HEAVY**
False dichotomy.
Total planned economy.
@everyone Daily Question ๐
**-** What is your view on climate change? Is it completely real, overblown, not man-made, completely fake, a good thing, etc etc? What evidence do you have for your specific stance?
human and naturally caused, climate activists are retarded
who would think it's a good thing?
^What Triskelion said
Nihilists
^losers
We need another flood
Some people think humanity is retarded and should die anyways so bring on global warming nature will survive anyways
Imo I think climate change is a fact, but it's overblown
I understand why it's overblown, to catch people's attention - but this actually turns more people away from it
I want shit to turn out into snow piercer
Not man made.
Man made is real. It wonโt kill everyone, but it will make life more difficult.
n
i
c
e
Pollution is the real problem, not climate change
People will adapt to changing climate
climate change will convince the people to abolish the state
also it doesn't exist because yesterday it snowed
did you know that if you put more energy in a system than you let out
the system heats up?
and that CO2 is an insulating gas?
WOOOOOOOAAAAH
wacky isnt it?
>doesn't think climate change is real
>brown and black people flood your country in not the hundreds of thousands but literally millions because you didnt give a shit
Energy is conserved
thanks for telling us the first law of thermodynamics
something pretty much everyone knows
You're welcome
Thanks addie
You are very smart
<:bigbrain:562563647302533135>
@everyone Daily Question ๐
- Is capitalism a threat to nationalism/culture? What is your general view on capitalism?
Yes.
Yes its gay
No, but the Jews have infected it
I am in support of capitalism.
Muh jews
Unrestricted Capitalism is a threat to nationalism.
Capitalism can't be restricted
Accelerate
Accelerate
And more
Tbh, fuck it
But Capitalism as a whole is a good thing that when properly implemented builds a perfect society, especially when working in tandem with Nationalism.
Mercantilism FTW
Capatalism is the best -ism, anyone who thinks different is lazy and selfish
You cannot be a Capitalist and a Nationalist is my stance.
Man cannot serve two masters.
"Markets are part of the infrastructure โits immanent intelligence โ and thus entirely indissociable from the forces of production. It makes no more sense to try to rescue the economy from capital by demarketiz- ation than it does to liberate the proletarian from false consciousness by decortication. In neither case would one be left with anything except a radically dysfunctional wreck, terminally shut-down hardware. Machinic revolution must therefore go in the opposite direction to socialistic regu- lation; pressing towards ever more uninhibited marketization of the pro- cesses that are tearing down the social field, 'still further' with 'the movement of the market, of decoding and deterritorialization' and 'one can never go far enough in the direction of deterritorialization: you
14
haven't seen anything yet'" - Nick Land
Just because you say that doesnโt make it correct. @โญ โ Korovsky โ โญ
Look up the American School. It gave us 200 years of prosperity
Neo Mercantilism built America
@Attika i must have Alzheimer's cause ion remember asking
Not capitalism
Only proto-capitalism has ever been critiqued
We don't need less capitalism, we need more of it
^
<:Chad:591182354270257170>
Deterritorialization is inevitable, capitalism is more than just a mode of production, it's the objectification of the human desire
But just because itโs human desire doesnโt mean itโs good for the society.
Good is a point of view
Sex is a human desire, but there should be societal rules and guidelines for it.
Being a slut is a shame, as it should be.
From the point of view that 'good' is to be interpreted as the 'common good' as opposed to individual good.
Same with homosexuality.
But can the "common good" be objectively described?
It's an opinion
@Maksim *sigh* yeah. Donโt remind me of the collapse of our morals in our societies.
The collapse of old morals is inevitable
A certain policy might be 'good' for a select few individuals, but not for the majority of citizens who have to live with its results.
It's the contradiction of neoliberalism
Old Morals are good.
Our society wants to expand infinitely upon itself without ever changing
They keep the society turning.
It's paradoxical
Old morals are good but they should be implemented into a futurist framework.
The current route our society is going is not good.
Why not?
Itโs not sustainable.
As progress continues, society will be swept away by the technological singularity, which will allow humanity to enter its next phase of evolution
So basically we will ascend?
The industrial revolution and its consequences.....
^
The industrial revolution was inevitable
Capitalism is too nationalist/cultural
Really?
We must abolish capitalism along with the state, and enter a true anprim society
Progress is an unstoppable juggernaut
The state cannot be abolished
^
It can
'Progress' is as subjective as 'good.'
Its sad but traditional ways of life will not win
Anprims are the epitome of idiocy.
And we must also abolish technology
Get off of discord
If we're to believe that there is no such objective thing as 'good', then 'progress' is just as moot a talking point.
It's part of the human security system
Go back to our roots, living in caves
Discord is technology moron.
So what?
@GlobalDelete Then stop using Discord
Youโre violating youโre own code.
Why would I lol
Bro "get back to our roots"
This troll lmao
Basically what we are saying is...โyou first.โ @GlobalDelete
34,778 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 66/140
| Next