qotd
Discord ID: 588205956039442452
34,778 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 65/140
| Next
And the north still has plenty of industry
Texas would be hard to beat but thatโs it
Actually the closest thing to confederate could be an independent Texas but even then
I doubt it
( Texas is very pro American but another confederacy would throw that all out the window)
Depends on who the military sides with. Nothing else even matters.
Virginia would go to the union this time
And yeah southern industry is nice
But once northern industrial capabilities are restarted
They are fucked
"If World War III were to occur between NATO and let's say BRICS who would win? Why?"
It doesn't work anymore like this. Such scenario would end life on earth due to nuclear capabilities. That's the reason some scholars claim that nuclear power is all that's keeping us from a WW3.
@Orw33 I think it's fair to say that NATO won the Cold War against the Comintern without it resorting to MAD...
NATO won because gorbachev was bored
@Master Yeet the question referred to "World War III", not Cold War, which is arguably still ongoing.
@Orw33 I knew the question referred to WW3, I was pointing out that nuclear weapons don't mean war between nuclear powers would instantly degenerate into MAD
the only states that need to exist for the US is the original 13
@Master Yeet if you think WW3 can happen without nuclear intervention, you're optimistic my friend.
@Orw33 WW3 couldn't be prevented by MAD any more than the Cold War was
@Master Yeet Please read the Wikipedia article I posted:
"In 1949, after the unleashing of nuclear weaponry at the end of WWII, physicist Albert Einstein suggested that any outcome of a possible WWIII would be so dire as to revert mankind back to the Stone Age. When asked by journalist Alfred Werner, what types of weapons Einstein believed World War III might be fought with, Einstein warned, "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones""
Indeed that is a famous quote - what of it?
@Master Yeet My nationalist friend, if you think that WW3 would prove anything other than human ignorance, you're deeply delusional.
Well, I certainly wouldn't *advocate* for WW3, but once again I would point back the the Cold War as an example of a global war between nuclear powers that was undertaken as a rational series of strategic decisions
yea and the only reason because it remained "rational" was because nobdy typed in the launch codes my dude
Indeed
As good a reason as any
@sandwitch Dixie Forever
@Fringes III Jesus was gay
o this is qotd
i thought it was general
lole
@everyone Question Of The Day:
5G networks; the future of Earth or a sign were going down a dark path? Why?
It's not as scawy as chemtrail retards make it out to be that's all
Just faster speeds
I will remain on 3G
If 3G doesn't hurt you neither does 4G or 5G
Just don't buy shitty phones with radiation levels that can kill small animals and you'll be safe
you mean my phone?
If people are so afraid of radiation they wouldn't be tanning themselves for two hours at a time
If people were afraid of radiation they would actually look into the radiaton levels of phones
Which affect you more than le epic Obama Marshall law 5G wireless vaccine brain chemtrail
Niggs 5Ghz wifi *is* equalivant to 5G
And we've had it for a while now
If your wireless wifi has a speed greater than 300mbps you have speeds within 5G range
And that hasn't caused cancer or small animals to die
iirc data centers are also a major source of electrical energy consumption. The change from 3g to 4g increased tens of times the energy needed to run 4g compared to running 3g. I imagine 5g will also create a huge increase in energy consumption.
@Riley shut the fuck up
@Fringes III lmao @ no proof of god
he is fake news
Fascists tend to struggle with homosexuality
How does Nazbol even work? Like you recognize class struggle and all but also blame it on ze jews or sth
?
Class Struggle has been the underpinning reason civilization cannot break from its cycle of growth, golden age, and downfall. Only when class struggle is fully realized within the national consciousness can the people free themselves and unite under the banner of their nation. Other nations must achieve this consciousness themselves, but gentle intellectual aid is acceptable. But installing puppet Governments and other such actions do not solve class struggle but simply just change *who* is the rich and powerful. @Gromp
So umm how do you do that?
There are a plethora of ways national consciousness of class struggle can be achieved, not all are good. Looking at the current state of the US, national consciousness among the middle and lower classes is slowly waking up towards this realisation. Partly manifested in the "Ok Boomer" trend young radicals see that the rich and often old abuse their nation for their own means.
So you want to use nationalism as a tool to achieve class consciousness?
Yes
The rich don't care about their nation
Only of profit
Fair nuff, why does it have to be nationalism in particular?
Nationalism is perhaps the most effective binding tool
The best for creating a unified identity
Socialism can only truely exist when capitalists everywhere are deposed
I don't oppose that
why would you be nationalist
Nationalism and Capitalism aren't compatible
Capitalism is inheritly globalist
Globalism is better for business
yes
So whats so appealing about nationalism that you make it that much of a core tenet?
I care about my culture
Above other cultures
but socialism is inherently internationalism
I will protect my culture before any others
bruh
muh culture
Yes saying muh culture will absolutely change my mind or contribute to a good conversation
Muh Internationalism
what culture are you even talking about
Ukrainian for me
So why are these things such a core tenet to you? Cuz historically you can very well have both as seen with Japan for example
Afk
Dark path
Boomers allowed degeneracy to take hold in the United States
Boomers were taught degeneracy. They did not invent it. All the civil rights leaders, all the feminists leaders, and all the cultural touchstones were born before the baby boom in 1946.
White people are destined to fall into "degeneracy" without some kind of war or genocide
No, they can be easily tricked due the lack of good education and their trusting nature.
Someone had to first teach them not to judge others then to accept the false reality as true.
So whites are just weak minded individuals
No they build strong cohesive societies that only work for people like them. Insert another foreign culture into that society and they don't do well.
Gay butt sex is apart of strong cohesive society is what you are saying
Gay butt sex sounds like Greek culture to me
In greece, specifically sparta
Sacred Band of Thebes was what I was thinking of.
@everyone Question Of The Day:
What are some of the best political books you've read? What's it about? What's it ideology?
Might is right
Individualist Anarchism
That book is good
But weird
So fuckn weird
Industrial society and its future (anti tech)
Unintended consequences (big government bad)
Most books from Gabriel Mรกrquez, hes a good author
I know they arent that political
But still good reads
Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance,
Right wing Populist book about European Heritiage, Current political struggles, immigration and more.
great book
I don't know if you would count this as a book of an explicitly political nature in the same vein as other ideological works
But *The Impeachment of Man* is perhaps one of the best books I've ever read.
Essentially it's a manifesto of Deep Ecology, if you want to call it that.
Isnt that literally an eco fascist book?
Just wondering
lel
Some might call it that, though I believe that any person who is seriously concerned with nature in general can learn from it even if they do not explicitly identify as a Fascist.
Mein kamf
You know what
Imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism, I.e. why succdems succ
imperialism man bad
Yes
Why Nations Fail
imagine reading
imagine not divining things through your dreams and hallucinations
@โญ โ Korovsky โ โญ Ted Kaczynskiโs books are better
SIEGE
read siege
read siege
seed reej
or this
The Prince by Machiavelli, it's an introduction to realist politics for those who don't know
An Open Letter to Open-Minded Progressives, it's a short blog style book that explains neo-reactionary thought, written by the NRx founder Curtis Yarvin
Read Orgins and Doctrine of Fascism
That or just read Blackshirts and reds lol
Liber is fucking weird
@everyone Questions Of The Day:
1) Is pornography bad for society? Why?
2) Laissez-faire or regulationism?
3) Should hate speech laws be enacted to protect minorities?
Cumbrains
Insightful
Check out Daniel Intraub (@philos314): https://twitter.com/philos314?s=09
This man is a product of the sexual revolution
Yeah, because you get used to jacking off to women on screen rather than getting a real women and also because itโs used to pacify your energy
I posted Daniel's address
But makism is a cuck who likes black cock in his white boypussy
I'll explain it in meme
With sources in them
Porn is evil
The sexual revolution was a mistake
Reminder that Isreal uses porn as a psychological weapon
Which says enough about it
The sexual revolution started in Europe
Muh fukin jews controllin the world man
In France @Asdrubal
Cope
I'd prolly false flag attack on some territory, or small island and go to war with Russia or Iran
Europeans are at fault for why the world is such a shit hole
I blame the French and the Eghnlightment @Asdrubal
^^^
Nah
It was more the entirety of europe
Then just France
To be fair they did do alot
It started in France and spread
Aka Napoleon
Helped spread them
In his conquests
And throw jews in the mix
It goes from bad to worse
Nah
*British empire intensifies *
You are being too forgiving
1) Yes, it teaches the brain to react to fast rewards, rather than to form and cherish a stable relationship. 2) Laissez-faire for (hopefully) obvious reasons. 3) No, after you can define "hate speech" that definition can be expanded upon and crush freedom because someone's feelings are hurt and can't take a joke or understand context
^
Laissez faire all the way
But there needs to be minimal rules
Very small backbone and cap limitations
So, modified laissez not true
If your true anything then you need to rethink your political stance
^^^
But at the same time dont be a centrist
Because then you are a buzzkill
CAT PISSER 2020 WHOOOOO
Centrists are the people who are no fun and only takes one drink and goes home
Yes smart man
Or women
I dont know anymore this day and age
It's too confusing
Russia: systematically intoxicating your population to keep them from addressing the problems around them(the model for the consumer dystopia of today)
Austria: sigmund Freud
France: self explanatory
Germany: class warfare and nihlism
Britain: again self explanatory
Swiss: jean piaget
Those who claim themselves to be what not God intended for them to be are degenerates
Believe in God all father for a path of common sense
@ChaosNatural fuck god
lol
i dont need your bronze age ramblings
๐
And. here. We. Go.
I have no issue with those who dont believe, ignorance is their own demise
and jesus was a pussy who couldnt even beat a couple of jews
Claim an informed mind instead of ignorance
once you guys can prove your imaginary friend is real, then we can talk about what is and is not degeneracy
ok?
I can only pray for His mercy upon you, lost one. You won't have mine
@ChaosNatural sorry, I grew up
i dont need imaginary friends anymore
there is no proof god is real
so i dont believe
The plank in your eye is apparent
We can agree to disagree
Belief in something without evidence is pretty much a delusion
you guys are delusional
eat my ass lol
And so is dysphoria
Or mutilating your body
dysphoria isnt belief in something without evidence
dysphoria is the desire to be the opposite sex
Once again Christians fail to understand scientific terms
typical
ok back to work
You do you
๐
goodbye christoids
<:garfilf:606968189640769668>
Goodbye femoid
Fun fact: gender dysphoria was classified as a mental disorder, but after pressure of Leftists and Progressives, it was removed
@ChaosNatural it still is you fucking ape <:xd:562563637781463046>
now prove god
God is everything in existence
He is matter
He is all
Just another name
To thank for existence of all
Violent but I'm sure at the time it got the point across
Cant do that now with PC culture can we hahahahahahaha
God *created* all and knows all, but I do not think he *is* all, I might need to review, but to claim so would be saying we all have some speck of God in us, when we don't, we have Adam's and Eve's, the original sinners.
But correct me otherwise
@Stahlgewittern cringe
It's not a common view for what I said
But it's an easy way to shut down blasphemers
Use their own logic against them
But at the same time dont use talmudic logic
The saying that he is all, heavily refers to the paradoxical of who created God. If he created all then he is all
It's a never ending cycle
For no one could create him but himself
For He is the Alpha and Omega, Beginning and End
yeah BABEY
@ChaosNatural ok prove he created
adam and eve never existed
there is no evidence supporting their existance
34,778 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 65/140
| Next