qotd
Discord ID: 588205956039442452
34,778 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 62/140
| Next
read the turner diaries and das kapital
lo
read LIBER 333
Eh
(JOKE)
Liberal 333
Not much of a white supremacist
bc im not a cringe satanist
I just hate kikes
who doesnt lol
And american ni.ggers
333 noctulian rape homo galacticus
yes Im a fan
(or am I)
cute
Having a Mexican girlfriend as a white person is okay
333 homoe sex rape feet cutting initiation for tempel ov blood...
vro....
vindex anal rape...
Having a Turk girlfriend as a white person is okay
Vro....
tfw no jewish gf..
vindex anal rape ๐ณ ๐คค ๐คค
Wealth is cancer on the world
๐ณ
Destroy the wealth-hoarding class and break the chains of oppression
br!
Unregulated growth *is* cancer
And, like cancer, it consumes its host until death to both the cancer and the life it made ill
Lol
Bro I can get behind this
Good analogy
free marketers SUCK
No
Yes.
Classic
Yes.
the jews actual response to that accusation https://youtu.be/im6BAH3S-qg?t=361
Regarding QOTD...
**Hacker 4chan Anti-Communist Nazi MAGA fighters**
More like libertarian fascist
Uhh... I feel like killing myself after saying that
I'd go with lefticide party
Only one point - leftist politicide
Nothing else, just kill leftists
@everyone Daily Question ๐
- What is the ideal way to solve declining birth rates?
Mandatory rape
Mandatory rape [2]
Mandatory rape [3]
Ban abortion, and all contraception. That'll show them
stop importing other people
Discourage women from working, paid family leave, tax break for each child a family has, no income tax for having 4 or more children
We don't need to stop declining birth rates
It's a good thing
it's not like degenerates are gung-ho about having kids anyway. The hardest working baby-makers are conservative people
And are you ideologically serious about facism or just being facetious
Not you @Duxron Vynlet
Mandatory rape [4]
@Wendy And yet here is the blunt reality: There will notย be an American Dream to achieve if our nation as a whole doesnโt increase its birth rate.ย The American Dream requires, well, Americansโand families, too, are required.ย Yet sadly, according to aย recent reportย from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. birth rate has fallen to 1.72 children per woman, which is substantially below the replacement rate of 2.1 children. We are not blind: To keep America strong we need to keep American families strong and plentiful.ย
There are many reasons why the birth rate is falling. One factor is the increasing number of women joining the paid workforce, and the stagnation of wages for many over the last few decades has made working women a necessity for many families.ย Yet if women are working outside of the home, they must sometimes make a cruel tradeoff: their job versus their children.ย That is a hard dilemma, indeed.
Ban the media from promoting the "childfree" lifestyle that is threatening european and american birth rates
Hm
What we need is to keep the economy accelerating
No wtf
Yes
that doesnt have anything to do with it
Post scarcity
That way
Orson is right in a way
In a way, yes
@Orson Krennic DO you support contraception?
Most people dont raise families for economic reasons
if you give families more money sure
@ChillyWilly like in general?
Sure
Direct subsidies to families is a dumb idea
We need less taxation
Based
It's expensive to have a family nowadays
That could also work @Orson Krennic
Either social support or less taxation to families
Or more exemptions for families
Both would solve or alleviate this problem
*I'd say remove income tax altogether*
^
Implement the negative income tax Friedman proposed
And do away with our welfare programs so American families keep more of their money
But this will raise even more problems
No income tax if you have 4 or more children
This gives an incentive
Yeah, exemptions
Tariffs will replace income and property tax
That will also work, maksim
A lot of ways could increase birth rate
It worked like that forever before big business pushed for free trade
@Maksim Currently 1.80, and a decrease in population isnโt inherently bad.
Actually we don't
Wages have stagnated for the past few decades
We need to get rid of minimum wage
Income tax during the civil war doesnt count because Abraham Lincoln needed to pay for the killing of Americans
@Orson Krennic How would wages increase
Besides income tax, federal minimum wage is the worst economic policy of the 20tj century
Lower numbers means less unemployment and more money to go around.
@Maksim over time
You need to make it so that a father can work and provide for the family without the mother having to work @Orson Krennic
Wages will naturally increase
As costs of labor go down, eventually employers have an equilibrium wage
*tariffs and removing income+property tax will kickstart the economy*
A father should be able to work and buy a house, own 2 cars, and support a minium of 5 kids
Minimum wage only creates unemployment and inflation
I mean sure
@Maksim You just hate me because you know I have a compelling point and you donโt want to argue against it. Love you too. โค๏ธ
If that's what they want
@Orson Krennic I don't trust the free market to act in the best interest of the people instead of money
The free market is the people
The market is more democratic than any human government
Why would a free market willingly sacrafice profit for betterment of the people
It's direct democracy
You're implying democracy is a good thing
The free market is literally direct democracy
Yeah
You vote with your money
Nah. Market needs to be semi-regulated. An uncontrolled market grows uncontrollably until it collapses.
Regulation keeps it in line.
Bubbles
@DrRisen monopolies are created by government intervention
Oh God a free market libertarian
<:what:591451631590178846>
@Orson Krennic Monopolies are also destroyed by government intervention.
A.I Controlled central economy
Change my mind
*if we raised tariffs American manufactures would have incentives to give Americans jobs, yes prices may have a slight increase but I'd say its worth it if we are employing Americans and abolishing income tax plus property tax.*
That statement is erroneous lmao
If the government didn't create monopolies there wouldn't be a need to destroy them
AI is smarter than any human participant in a free market
Fag
Which is why the market will eventually collapse
Just look at wallstreet
Accelerationism
It's already controlled by AI
More Americans working means less money going to Mexico.
Wallstreet is a perfect example of why we should have an AI directed economy
*are you retarded*
AI can do so much better than any human
Manufacturing off-sourcing Isn't necessarily bad
@Orson Krennic kill yourself
It lowers the prices of goods
250% tarrifs or gtfo
The United States has a service based economy anyways
@Orson Krennic that's irrelevant
We don't need manufacturing
@Maksim AI is made by humans. Itโs variables are made by humans. Itโs formulae are made by humans. Any AI controller would only be a copy of its creators methods, not a perfect solution.
Lower prices at the cost of less jobs is not a worthy trade
*Wallstreet fucking proves that AI is a tool of the bourgeoisie and will fuck over small businesses*
Ok but how am I wrong?
@Maksim yes it is, because that means our workers can perform other jobs
Deepmind AI
No it's not
Yes it is
We haven't developed AGI
Self-programming doesnโt mean inherently good programming.
no we haven't
Self improving AI has not been developed
We already have AIs that program itself
Yes we do
Bots auto trading fucking ruins the market and screws over smaller investment firms that dont have the money for it
We've had self improving AI for half a decade already
Google and NASA created it several years ago
AI learning is done by trial and error. It will be more than willing to go down a completely insane path if itโs algorithms tell it to. AIs donโt take second opinions. AIs donโt second guess.
It's making the rich, richer and the poor, poorer
@DrRisen What AIs do is run billions of simulations with tint variables and see which one is the best
@Maksim Besides, the initial programming, the stuff allowing it to exist and self-modify always leads back to humans.
There's a difference in "machine learning" and AGI
So please explain to me in a non idealistic way, why AI will not be a tool of the bourgeoisie to fuck us @Maksim
National Bolshevism
Idealist, try again
No bro
^and thus the inner nazbol comes out
AI will destroy the economy
It's great
It will bring about the next stage of human evolution
We fix birthrates by first removing invaders, then all the women who cried about Abdul and Muhammad being deported will be harvested for their ovaries, genetic screening of eggs with mental defects will ensure better children. Afterwards we implant embryos in women who cannot have children. Boom, birthrate solved.
@Crazed Shotgun edgy
Ahahha
Edgy
Hahahahahaha
Why anarchocommunists should support AI controlled economies.
So funny
National Anarchism time
National Anarchism? How the fuck is that supposed to work?
A more serious answer would be to reimburse parents for having children. incentivize them to have kids.
^
Direct subsidies for families will obviously be abused
@DrRisen I'm not ancom
Lmao
@Crazed Shotgun That would just encourage immigration.
We will have crackheads multiplying like rabbits for money
You wanted birthrates up.
@Maksim false
Only applies to whites
@Crazed Shotgun That is unrealistic. Next.
You can't have a program that only applies to whites. It's bad optics. It'll never be allowed.
Stfu retard @Asdrubal
IQ then
National anarchism is the idea of economically mutualistic, politically meritocratic ethnostates
@Sandaledfungus4 denying whites use drugs is retarded
Post capitalism
Use MENSA as a template.
@Crazed Shotgun Still wouldnโt get past the SJWs in Congress. Try again,
Every race uses drugs @Asdrubal
>going through political channels
How well has that gone for the 2nd amendment?
Yeah he said that wouldnt be a problem if non whites didnt recieve family subsidies
@Crazed Shotgun Not well, because the SJWs blocked it. The government exists and until you find a realistic way to take it down it always will.
Deal with it.
Idk man
White put way more investment into their children then blacks
I'm just waiting for ww3 to wipe out the us gubment
The writing is on the wall for the global financial system @DrRisen
There's always talk of recessions
I've already explained this in <#587015719141507102>
With actual data
But the global economy won't crash any time soon
TBTF
*are you stupid*
No u
everyone said the same thing back in 08
*read the huge report I made in <#587015719141507102>*
It's retarded fearmongering
All we have to do is just wait it out for the singularity
Its data
That cant be ignored
@Asdrubal Finances are just made up numbers. If it collapsed weโd mutually agree to reset financial relations with each other and outlaw anyone who didnโt want to, then we would survive, the outlaws would collapse further, we would take over the outlaws, and the cycle would continue.
And just live in some hedonism
^
TBTF
Too big to fail
Same thing happened in 08 buddy
*god you are ignorant*
Government causes recessions and then tries to do a shitty job picking up after themselves
At the end of the day the financial institutions care marginally more about survival than profits. If they are about to die, they will attempt to survive. You talk like you think financial institutions have firmly held ideals and beliefs.
So you believe Deutsche bank will survive?
Also the Fed basically ensures that there cannot be a universal financial meltdown. Them and the FDIC
34,778 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 62/140
| Next