chat
Discord ID: 587015719141507102
85,659 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 112/343
| Next
No lights actually on the triangle ,it was stationary ,the sparkles was swirling around violently
Either in or out of it
Looked like coming out
Not no spaceship
If your thinking that
It gets weirder ...I found a red triangle in nasas video
With the same two white crescent dots to the right of it
Iss docking camera
Course not. I was thinking a drone or one of those miniature flame balloons. Perhaps a kite. Probably someone screwing around with something at night. Thatโs what Iโm thinking if it was stationary. That or itโs some sort of visual effect on clouds from someone shining a light on them.
Want to see the nasa one?
Camera might also be distorting it. Sure, why not.
One sec
Artificially increasing brightness in images can sometimes pick out visual flaws and intensify them.
There's a video of it
Here's some pics
Other occasions
Tell me I'm not going mad
Looks pretty different to me. Iโm guessing itโs either a man made satellite or space pollution. The coppery color gives me a feeling because it looks like MLI which tends to be used in spacecraft as insulators.
@DrRisen yeah I started to think all that ,it must be this or that ,but I been digging and I keep finding lots of symbolism that seems to tie in
That's just a tiny sample
@ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan The triangle and eye has been used in Greco-Roman culture for quite a while, I donโt think it has anything to do with ancient aliens.
Oh no no ,not ancient aliens
I don't believe in aliens
Also for reference on the space debris, this: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wPXCk85wMSQ
Why would they put a triangle shape up there though
Not a good shape
For a satellite
@ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan Do you know what the tip of a rocket tends to be shaped like?
@DrRisen like a tip ?
Yes, I get it, floating triangles show up in history once in a while. Given the vast amount of literature, architecture, and art that has been created throughout history it would be abnormal if there wasnโt.
OK ok triangular
Yeah.
Conical, from the side it looks triangular.
Yes
I think youโre just being a little overimaginative.
I would love to think so ,makes me paranoid tbh ,still can't explain what I seen myself though
And why it seems to tie in so much
Because people like seeing patterns. Itโs how we think as a being.
This drives me crazy literally ,every day I try find answers
Being curious and searching for answers is fine. Obsession is not. @ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan you might actually have a teensy bit of a mental problem.
I'm OK
I'm not stupid or nothing
Going crazy over floating triangles is not OK.
Lol
But if you seen what I see ...you would be curious too
Iโm not saying youโre stupid. I am saying that maybe you like many people just have a bit of a mental glitch. I have mental glitches too, Iโve got pretty strong ADHD.
I understand the atmosphere acts like a reflecting medium ,like the sun we see is a reflection ,I believe it was a reflection of something above us
Sure. Could be.
The sun we see is like a back-lit reflection
That sweeps around earth
Youโve lost me.
Can you see it behind the sun we see
That's the actual sun
During a eclipse
The sun we see in between is like a reflection of it
Don't ask me how
Notice how it's full too
When the sun is eclipsing behind
It's all very weird
I still donโt understand exactly what youโre trying to tell me.
So the atmosphere acts as a reflecting layer
Oh, wait.
So what I seen was probably a reflection from above
I think I get what youโre trying to say.,.
Like this?
That bottom crescent is just a lense flare ,ignore that ,the camera inverts the flare
The crescent behind the sun
That's the other way around
That's the actual sun being eclipsed in the background
Yeah, the sun is being eclipsed by a planet, Iโm not sure how this is any different from normal.
Many people have caught it
The moon supposedly
We don't see the moon though
Which I believe is because it's a reflection washed out by the sun's light
As it approaches
Wouldnโt that be the moon?
That's the actual real eclipse happening in the background
Ask yourself why is that a crescent shape and the sun is full?
That is during eclipse
Lots of people have caught it
I can show you more if you like
Youโre not visualizing this correctly.
I've seen videos of it
You can see the eclipse in the lense flare
Cus that's the size of the sun behind
That is the moon.
Yes that's the moon eclipsing the sun
Behind the sun we see
How is it behind the sun? It looks to be in front of it.
It's behind trust me
Ok but *why*
Core of earth above not below
????
OK ok
I suspect with good reason that the earth is concave ,inverted
I mean why does this image make you think the moon is behind the sun,
The sun and moon are reflections from a sun and moon behind
That sweeps around the inside of a concave earth
And why does this image demonstrate that theory?
If you compare videos at different locations it will help you understand ,there is displacement
Elaborate on the displacement bit.
The sun being a displaced reflection that sweeps around the inside of earth ,around a central core
Above us
Mainstream science will also tell you the sun is a displaced image at sunset and sunrise
Youโll need to show me a video of the supposed inconsistencies with the eclipse youโre trying to demonstrate.
Given that the image hasnโt proved to be enough.
The horizon and dome above us is a illusion
You canโt blame me for not trusting you blindly. If I did that I would be no better than someone blindly trusting mainstream science.
that's cool
Again. Thatโs a great theory, but I still donโt understand how the eclipse demonstrates proof of this theory.
Particularly this image alone.
Shows its a back lit reflection basically
I could get plenty more
Plenty people caught the same
That's why tell you not to look at the eclipse and to use solar filters, they don't want you to see what you shouldn't
Very clever
Again, you tell me this, but you havenโt actually demonstrated it.
@DrRisen that's my belief ,been researching a good few years now
Youโre welcome to believe it then.
OK, well thankyou for the talk ๐
๐บ
๐
๐
Sure man. By the way, if youโre saying something is โdriving you crazyโ it may be worth considering that you are slightly correct. @ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan
@DrRisen just after answers bro ,not normal what I seen
If you seen you would understand
Well thatโs the crux of the problem isnโt it? I havenโt.
Yeah but I can show you ,if you believe me ,but you won't because you wasn't there yourself
That's just human nature
Especially these days
I show some people and they tell me I made it all up and created it on a software programme lol
Yeah...cuckoo
Woo
Lift works but don't quite go to the top floor
Haha
Meh
Honestly Iโm just going to use Occamโs Razor here. The simplest explanation is usually the correct one. Either mainstream science is telling the truth as much as they can understand it, or thereโs a global conspiracy between every government and learning institution in the world to lie to people for no apparent reason.
Personally, I lean towards the truth explanation.
There's a reason
And that is?
Until we know the truth we won't be able to comprehend ..why
Gotta be a pretty good reason though ,I tell you that now
So no apparent reason then...
I have theories
A reason, but the reason is not apparent.
Just theories though
So you basically think the earth is a bubble and weโre on the inside?
That correct or am I misunderstanding?
All works the same
Just inverted
No difference
In anything
You can't look to the horizon to determine the shape of the earth
Question, couldnโt two people wanting to prove the government wrong shine a powerful laser from one continent to another and post it on YouTube for billions of views?
What will that prove ?and depends on distance
And light doesn't behave how we are told either
The whole heliocentric model is based on theories
That don't make sense
No proof of gravity being a pull from below ,no proof of spin ,no proof a molten core below
You may think you have
But in reality you haven't
So youโre telling me that light theory models are a lie and nobody has managed to point this out in a major laboratory, and all of the young inquiring minds of science are in on it?
@DrRisenthry can't even tell you whether light is a Particle or a wave ,they are denying a medium in which it is propagated through
Like, all the interns are somehow bribed to not point out that MIT experiments donโt work?
They work yes and no everyone is not in on it
Science is built on pre assumed or pre determined methodology
But the vast majority are..:
Which is why we are getting lead into a dead end
Dead end?
Is light a wave or a Particle?
Not entirely sure. Do I need to know?
What if there is a medium instead it's travelling through
Would that be totally insane ?
If you can prove it in consistently repeatable experiments I donโt see why that couldnโt be feasible,
Well before einstein and michealson morley botched interferometer experiment we all used to believe in a medium, nearly all famous philosophers and physicists and even inventors like the inventory of wireless telegraphy ,all believe in a medium ,yet science continues to push einsteins nonesense
Dayton miller spent 28 years proving there was a medium, for science to falsely dismissing his findings down to thermal gradients ,aka the shankland report
Michealson morley spent 5 months
And dismissed it
Wrongly
@ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan current theory seems to be working fine for modern scientists. If you disagree you should field your own experiments and prove the world wrong.
No they don't
Sorry but no
It's all theories and workarounds with no actual evidence
I've looked
Then why do so many accept it as valid?
Good question
When it comes to maths etc of globe ,you can just invert it
Distances ,map ,circumnavigation etc
Star trails
All the same
How would you know ?
How do YOU KNOW PERSONALLY? @DrRisen
Please if you have some ,give me some definitive proof
I'm open
I already told you that I donโt. @ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan
That's the problem
No proof
All theories
That can be attributed to other causes
No proof that I personally know, because I havenโt dedicated my life to the study of universal mechanics.
Nor have I
It's not a open shut case
I tried to prove a shape one way or the other ...not so easy
Made me end up thinking it could be concave with good reason imo
If you donโt know, and I donโt know, then why are you making a positive claim?
Flat earth is just a big distraction ,a psyops
That's what I suspect @DrRisen
Need proof
One way or the other
Not easy
You would think it would be
It's not
I suspect they are pushing flat earth on purpose as a distraction
To discredit those who second question
If you look into earth's shape ,you will be bombarded with flat earth stuff ,very hard to find real information on concave earth
Even though it makes WAY MORE SENSE
Google and youtube and media are working together
Mainstream and alternative
They own..EVERYTHING
No joke
Bye for now
@sandwitch The idea of being able to wipe ourselves out with nuclear weapons has proved an excellent deterrent. There hasnโt been a direct war between major global powers since 1945. Itโs all been relatively safe proxy wars.
Serious question, why are satanism and anti-ukranian sentiments the only automatic ban behaviors?
One of the owners is Ukrainian
^
And a hardcore christian
hold up
is this a right-wing server?
Insane
wack
@Deleted User lmao
the sad part is there are people who actually take that seirously
democrats are the real racists
i am a democrat
So what youโre saying is that you support the policies you listed? @Deleted User
@DrRisen i am posting ironically ffs
85,659 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 112/343
| Next