realpolitik
Discord ID: 402387580403974145
9,086 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 36/37
| Next
should we really shut it down guys
Yes, abortion is the work of satan. If you disagree go be a racist liberal somewhere else
ok
Abortion is a human sacrifice ritual; the most powerful known to exist. It was invented by eugenicists who traveled in elite circles of the occult to curry Satan's favor and gain his protection for their warmongering, usury, currency manipulation, and propaganda efforts to turn brothers against brothers on the eve of World War I.
Why is abortion such a powerful form of human sacrifice? Because it entails the killing of the most defenseless victims imaginable (the unborn) by the very persons most duty-bound to love them and protect them from harm: their own mothers and the doctors who minister to them. An added bonus (from an occult point of view) is the violation of the doctors' oaths to do no harm.
The ritualized murders that society euphemistically calls "abortions," or even more euphemistically "women's health," are furthermore carried out in a nonchalant and clinical manner in order to lessen the potential resistance to the slaughter. Perhaps worse, it's generally done to facilitate a woman's hedonistic apathy, laziness, and selfish desire for convenience. Killing your own child to save yourself the trouble of raising a boy or girl of your own flesh symbolically elevates the pleasure of 10 seconds of vaginal muscle contractions above the value of a lifetime of sentient experience that could otherwise be enjoyed by a living, breathing, conscious human being.
In short, Satanists who crave evil power love abortion because it perfectly symbolizes evil within cruelty within evil. It satanically inverts the very symbols of compassion and love (mothers and doctors) into cold, unfeeling and spiritually numbed executioners of the purest innocence.
So, the next time you see a woman in America screeching about her rights, or the ultimate euphemism: "reproductive justice," from the steps of a state capitol building, take a look into her empty pinwheel eyes and know what you're really looking at. This is not just a simple murderer.
what are miscarriages
Oof
miscarriage is natural death
are natural deaths caused by god, does god sit back and let natural death happen, or is god fighting to stop natural deaths
im not caught up on da lore
The Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away in equal measure
If U think miscarriages are the same as a mother murdering her child with intent you're a dummy
Natural deaths could be multiple things. 1. giveth and taketh away. 2. The Lord interfering in your life to help you. 3. Demons messing with your body to cause you to sin
does anyone have any data on at what stage in fetal development most abortions are done?
About 1-9 months in
lmao
This so sad can we sink Mediterranean NGO ships cry
https://youtu.be/EiIyyXL1Ct4
the one girl says she was born in italy
yet she still identifies more with stinkny boat people than italians
really makes you think
he has to be shit posting
39% white maybe that would've help with the demographic numbers
My country is so goddamned cucked https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/ucp-west-henday-soldiers-of-odin-photos-1.4858201
Bringing the NazBol meme to life. It has occurred to me that one aspect of the Soviet system that I think might have been successful is the soviets (workers councils) themselves. A council would be formed and a leader elected, who would go on to be a member of a higher council. I don't think this way of structuring things has been tried in any other context. It solves a number of problems though. In a democracy, I think there's a huge problem with the size of a consituency. If you want the attention of your representative, your individual vote matters little to them. Also, you can't be personally acquainted with them. I think this structure would work even better with a smaller council. Every effective organization is a hiearchy, and I think building up rather than out is the key to making it work. If you had a group of 5 to 10 people who chose a representative, I think the social cohesion would be high enough to keep that representative responsive. The process is iterative and exponential. Looking at organizations as fractals I think allows for a useful vector of analysis. The branching factor of a hierarchy might be used to compare unlike groups like how in statistics the z score allows you to compare the distributions of different datasets. I think there is a relationship between a smaller branching factor and the effectiveness of the organization. Compare an NGO with a military. An NGO involved perhaps two levels at the least, the executive board and the membership. In a military organization, the ratio is small as I've described. The NGO usually at best can collect donations and get low effort actions done, such as signing a petition. The military organization can get its members in shape and to undertake mortal peril.
I think the Soviet structure could have this benefit. I think if we formed small groups, elected leaders from them who formed groups, and iterated this process we could come up with something pretty spectacular.
The whole deal about that though is that with enough people you start to have larger hierarchies in order to keep the small group style cohesionโs and representatives responsible. What ends up happening is miscommunication and overwhelming as you get a large number of small groups with different needs and different places all going up to a smaller number of people as the you move the requests up the chain
I guess a fix to that could be more power lower down as to decongest requests
Also what really is NAZBol?
There's a Catholic term for that, basically make decisions at the lowest level cabable of making them.
Yeah that would be a solution to that
But I think there may be population restriction to that
I thought it was a dumb meme of National Bolsheviks. But I do think that this structure might work with different founding stock and a different ideology
Probably could, just not with the whole population. Good organization structure, military and police structure too.
But the general pop shouldnโt really need that
Possibly not. Might be a good quick way to spin up a political movement. I think some people on the alt right got to be in positions of power by being there first.
Some are no doubt talented
Yeah, I agree 100%
That would be great for the movement
Not to LARP but that was the Turner Diariesโ concept
Never read it
Bolshevim is retarded
I dunno if it's relevant to convo but idgag
To keep members from knowing everything it went through a lower chain
So low chain fulfilled minor stuff
And upper planned stuff
Yeah it is a dumb meme but I thought it would make a good hook
But no one knew everything
Nah itโs viable tbh
Thatโs why Boy Scouts do too to some extent
What would be a good name? Worth spinning up a server?
A good name for what? An organization for the movement?
Yeah, or this structure stripped of it's communist elements
Could just name it like a method. Like โchain methodโ or National Linking/bonds
Iโll think about it, worth making a server for I think
Fractal nationalism
^
Vectorial
3D Vectoral Calculus Nationalism
4D chess organization to own the libs
4D chess relativistic calculus
Alright itโs like midnight and Iโm tired as hell so Gn, Iโll think about it over the night
Night
My immigration policy? Shoot illegals over the wall with an initial velocity of 120 m/s, at an angle 45ยฐ to the x-axis. Find the maximum height and how long it takes for him to hit the ground
Absolute mad man
Subsidiarity was the word I was looking for
I farded and shidded
Its calld corporatism
We make fun of liberalists and all those other people but Sargon is speaking to the EU and interviewing Steve Bannon
Nobody cares
Who knew being a yes man got you places
Plant more trees
Help more bees
Save the seas
Shoot refugees
199 GOP 204 Dems
So GOP is doing better?
well yea
threres still like 30 toss ups tho
I googled "realpolitik" and apparently its origins are German not Swedish.
uh no shit lol
New link. If you're not a Fractal Nationalist what the frac are you doing?
https://discord.gg/gnb4PZ
>2 members
That's gonna be a no from me dog
It started yesterday
What exactly would you say you do here? What are your goals and how do you intend to achieve them? I'm offering a solution.
Me? I just listen to Nick's show and enjoy the shit posting in this server, my irl work is certainly not conducted over discord lol
I'm not living in the US but if I were I would have joined my local GOP and be working my way up the ranks after serving for 5-10 years in the military
And I can say that because that's essentially what I'm actually doing in another country
Fair enough. I have other activities as well, but I think this is a unique approach worth trying. If you're not interested there's no need to neg it.
What is it?
All you did was post a server with two members
Normanlord should people join the military for good optics and experience
There's more info higher up will repost
I just don't want to die for Israel
Essentially I think the soviets we're onto something organizationally. They had workers councils which elected members to higher councils. I think that this fractal hierarchical structure may be effective in a context with different founding stock and principles
OP
Bringing the NazBol meme to life. It has occurred to me that one aspect of the Soviet system that I think might have been successful is the soviets (workers councils) themselves. A council would be formed and a leader elected, who would go on to be a member of a higher council. I don't think this way of structuring things has been tried in any other context. It solves a number of problems though. In a democracy, I think there's a huge problem with the size of a consituency. If you want the attention of your representative, your individual vote matters little to them. Also, you can't be personally acquainted with them. I think this structure would work even better with a smaller council. Every effective organization is a hiearchy, and I think building up rather than out is the key to making it work. If you had a group of 5 to 10 people who chose a representative, I think the social cohesion would be high enough to keep that representative responsive. The process is iterative and exponential. Looking at organizations as fractals I think allows for a useful vector of analysis. The branching factor of a hierarchy might be used to compare unlike groups like how in statistics the z score allows you to compare the distributions of different datasets. I think there is a relationship between a smaller branching factor and the effectiveness of the organization. Compare an NGO with a military. An NGO involved perhaps two levels at the least, the executive board and the membership. In a military organization, the ratio is small as I've described. The NGO usually at best can collect donations and get low effort actions done, such as signing a petition. The military organization can get its members in shape and to undertake mortal peril.
I think the Soviet structure could have this benefit. I think if we formed small groups, elected leaders from them who formed groups, and iterated this process we could come up with something pretty spectacular.
@Hektor definitely worth it, it's peak optics in American politics tbh
Another point I have made is that some figures on the alt right rose to their positions of power by being the first ones there
Oh yeah I remember that
I told you it's corporatism
My understanding of that term is that it's when the government and industry rule cooperatively
But that's beside the point
Whatever you call it there's no right wing organization I'm aware of that has ever had that structure. I'm open to counter examples.
Specifically small sub dunbars number groups of people who elect their leaders iteratively into a functioning hierarchy
Well that structure, generally doesn't last long without reverting to essentially a system of dynastic succession
The GAA in Ireland is run like that
@NormanLord From your perspective
Where did the "Irish are not white meme" come from?
Not that there's anything wrong with dynastic succession but that's what it devolves into
Gimme a sec to reflect on that
I guess just as a general dehumanisation tactic
Tho from my recollection it started as a half joke towards the English at their attitude towards Ireland
The English could never understand why we refused their religion, language, culture, government etc for so long, it's funny in many ways after we gained independence the remnants of the British civil service in Ireland kept the processes killing Ireland ticking over
Emigration, shrinkage of Irish speaking areas, declining church attendance so on and so forth
I've never given it much credence tbh, even I couldn't tell the difference between Irish and Brits at a glance
Dugin believes it's to do with the projection of behavioural norms onto ethnic classification, meaning only the English can really ever be "white" per se
I'm pro dynastic succession. One of the only arguments I have against monarchy is the succession problem. This structure might allow the beneifts of monarchy with some responsiveness to lower levels
It looks good on paper but if it's in conjunction with capitalism the current state kf affairs would be the same, you can buy votes with bribes if need be when there's fewer people voting in the really important elections
The ultimate question is from where does the power derive
Who holds the purse and sword, and how to they hang onto them
In the simplest example, a gang lord, has property, industry and wealth of his own to pay for men of his own to execute his own will
In a democracy, the military is paid by the exchequer, which draws money from mass taxation, which is sold and repackaged by politicians to voters, and the media makes those politicians electable
So no power rests in the hands of politicians who aren't independently wealthy in a democracy
I think one of the benefits of this approach is that you can have a personal relationship. If you see ads telling you to vote out Joe but you know Joe personally you've got more information. Also it's harder for money to corrupt when it needs to influence many different elections to influence the top
If concentric circles of voting takes place, not to say it's a bad idea, it's not, and has many historical precedents, the issue you run up against is fracturing of the national power structure
If there's a centralised military there's a centralised government and centralised power
That might be more of a feature than a bug. Absolutist states replacing feudalism preceded liberalism by placing everything into one large pot that could be taken over by subversive elements
Well there's your answer
You're a reactionary
I am
Neoreactionary is the label I choose
So what you propose is a mechanism by which the goals associated with that can be achieved
Which is broadly speaking what Dugin writes about
So I'd recommend reading his works
I'll add it to the list
Another term for what I'm attempting might be democratic feudalism
Since the vassals can vote out their lieges. But I don't want that to be done by a simple majority. In practice if a Lord lost the support of his vassals he may not be a Lord for long, but this is a more bloodless way by having the support be formalized
I aprove too
I don't know a lot about what you were talking about but at a glance the idea of smaller groups electing a member to a higher position somewhat resembles how senators were elected before the 17th amendment when state legislatures would elect senators. Or am I misunderstanding? @BWMiller
That's somewhat to the point, but I'm thinking the groups would be much smaller and the hierarchy larger
Right, the state legislature was straight from the people still so it's not quite there. I'll look into it more
lol
Why'd you have to shid on em
Cringe and bluepilled
lol
too easy
Hello epic department
Despacito
Don is uber gay
Don is a boomer
They have different standards
coomer
oh my.....
A wh*toid subhuman was trying to """banter""" an alpha KARA BOGA demigod.
The perfidious, uncultured cum skinned individual asked:
"Hey nigger, do you know why the palm of your hands is white?"
"No. Tell me".
"Because you were on all fours when God threw paint at you!".
The whitoid laughed nervously as the black man remained stoic and impassible. When he stopped laughing, the muscular, pyramid builder African elite man asked:
"And you, white brother. Do you know why your ass crack is black?".
"N-no... Why?".
"Because I was fresh-painted when I ass raped you".
The white "man" turned red. He was speechless. He finally realised KARA BOGA would always be at a higher level of consciousness than him, a pig skinned homunculus. He returned to his house to find consolation in his wife's embracement.
But what he actually found was a KARA BOGA "painting" his wife's privates.
He killed himself later that day.
When you watch videos like this as a leftie in middle school you become afraid of government tyranny
When you watch videos like this as grown up based and redpilled fashy goy you become afraid the government will run out of people to power wash
Does anyone want to comment on the validity of this?
too big brain for me
Just look at the chart and tell me what you think
Hmmm
Gay?
tf is it supposed to mean
voting based on your hobbies?
or job?
You might look at it that way. Look at the axis labels though
Cultural Capital
Economic Capital
The man who came up with this is Bourdieu. I was wondering if anyone had any opinions on the Cultural-Social Capital theory
Thats retarded
And why?
I'm curious
I dont like it
haha
go on
I dont know why hiking is wherr it is
I don't subscribe to it btw
I like hiking
why wouldnt low cultural capitol be more likely to vote right
isnt that the situation in the US today
besides minorities
WHY IS HIKING IN THE TOP LEFT. I LIKE HIKING
It says Cultural Capital - right below votes right
so it is @BabySnaps
Economic capital + and cultural capital -
right below votes right
oh shit
i see
that actually makes some sense
WHY ARE THEY SAYING HIKING IS GAY
Dude, give it up on the hiking
its just an estimate
Explain please
as in, not concrete
if you hike recreationally you probably have high cultural capital is what its saying
not necessarily a bad thing
So im a smart nigga
I don't actually have the research paper that it came from
wish I did
now that i understand it i like it
grug no like things grug no seen before
Yeah, well I have yet to make my mind up on it. I need to read more into it. The theory is far from anything but a theory, however. And it was made by a frenchman.
Oh so its gay and retarded
<:dab:402362224527671306>
Yeah, well I'm not sure about. I've read research studies like these where they basically make a moral claim over society that is left leaning by the time the conclusion rolls around. I am not sure yet if that is what Bourdieu is doing in his study
Wish I had his paper
I can't seem to find it
wouldnt society be naturally right leaning under this theory - because most people have little cultural capital?
or does the economic side outweigh it
I guess it would depend on what he defines as Cultural and Economic Capital
and it seems like a theory that cant possibly apply to modern america because it cant account for racial dynamics
which skew things alot i think
From what I have read so far, people do seem to think it is outdated a bit
Ngl bro
Who cares
Most people are retarded
Look what channel you're in, bud
Yeh but still
People do care. I care at least. I doubt I'm alone
Ye but not the unwashed masses
Are you canadian?
No. American, of course
You?
Irish
How is it going over there?
Terribly
And compared to the UK? Same? Worse? Better?
Ireland has no right wing
All parties are basically the same
Yeah
I've heard
This aint it chief
I had no idea what "the red tsunami" meant until this happened.
kill the pale skins
@Dentistry i think the comment by redpill philosophy was a joke
Yeah RPP is a right wing acct I saw a lot of in 2016
The gay guy on the bottom is my favorite because he thinks native tribes can just get along when they were fighting over land before America was even a nation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP_0uacwesQ
IVE HAD ENOUGH OF YOU RIGHT WING TROLLS CALLING ME AN NPC!!!!!!!!
Anyone know how to keep making twitter accounts that donโt get insta shaohโd without a phone#?
i used an app from the iphone app store
it's from google
Pay some third worlder on reddit
Hmmm what's that I see?
9,086 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 36/37
| Next