Yeah which tweet?

He must have deleted it

owned

He retweeted this black degenerate who had just graduated and celebrated the fact he had 9 STDs, slept with 200+ women, had an assault/murder charge and some other sick stuff and then said he’s a Howard alum so God has a plan for all of us

Nick said “class act”

Taking the Lord’s name in vain

I used to have a habit of that but I kicked it

Feels good man

A good way to tell if someone takes their religion seriously is to see how they treat The Lords name

https://twitter.com/crashremastered/status/995064970600747013?s=21

I think I've realised that women ARE the problem

Trust women, get done in

RT

How the hell does one have 9 stds

Thats like

All of them

muh diq

that's how

Nigga u ded

Herpes + big HIV + syphilis = 1 dead boye

The fags have bolstered the aids cocktail industry to the point where you can live with super aids and still be alive as long as you take your HIV/AIDS/SUPER CANCER cocktail

Not to mention potential hepatitis

Yup. Live against god. Get your bugman bug. Be permanent slave to (((big pharma)))

Natural disaster? U ded

Extended civil unrest? U ded

Mutation of virus? U ded

Ban HIV medication

Fall of world order? U ded

Fags are an EXTREMELY protected class in the west

Society has made sodomites beyond reproach by nature itself at this point

"Buh muh jahb protection" "the geighs are persecuted in da weest"

It's because like a fag, the Jew is naturally effeminate. They have a shared culture in that way.

Bitch you hear people use mistreatment of gays as a call to war on fox news

The people who support and give in to the faggot worship are equally at fault with the people who push it

Gives me conniptions

We has to go to wars against the muzzie saudis cuz they no treats the homos rite

Tbh most mainstream right wingers oppose muslim immigration because "muh gays!"

Instead of any other valid reason

Or "my womens rights"

^

Yep

All they conserve is liberalism

Trotskyist s

Traditionalism and conservatism without the tradition and conservation of Christ and His Church is just the tradition and conservatism of what facilitated the issues we have today

"True freedom is working 16 hour days for the zog machine, goy! Don't forget to buy our latest products!"

If you have any right wing freinds who are pro gay show them the Pozitivity by mister metokur

That and anything by Common Filth

Tumblristas for those who dont have the time to sit through a podcast

I need to readup on more christianity but alot of the preached teachings of jesus are amazingly neoconservative in nature.

Read The Bible, read Aquinus

The Sam Hyde Brooklyn stand up is pretty red pilling too

And hilarious

It was pretty genius

Sam has a way with comedy

Redpills in here are almost useless imo. We dont meed redpills we need blackpills. And some who are down need whitepills

Fuck doods im going to sleep

Goodnight

I cant stay awake

Me also

Also, we need to stop using this slang, it trivializes the issues in my opinion

The meme terms do more harm than good

Oíche mhaith chairde

The Protestant work ethic and it's consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

Yes

@RetardO ExtremeO uwu

Ok so

I'm here

owo whats this

this place is dead

i wonder why

https://i.redd.it/srmqe6euqbx01.png

Because the frequent posters were rekt

Don't worry. I'm still here.

Just had a boomer tell me he is redpilled and doesn’t like the “tolerant left”

How long before you think he mentions Ben Shapiro and the intellectual dark web.

what is the intellectual dark web

wait till he brings up chemtrails

Who here knows about the aristotelian proof for god's existence?

Of course.

What about them?

Just wanted to understand it a little better

I'm researching aquinas' arguments because I'm an atheist

and I'm just looking for proof otherwise

What I'm having trouble with here

Same tbh

Even though it is high grade, even for most Thomists, Metaphysics ought to be a must-read for any apologist.

Is understanding why the "god" in a sustaining series of causes isn't also subject to an infinite regress

Like I understand that there's a difference between linear and hierarchical causes

But what gives the "unmoved mover"different qualities here

or why

The Angelic Doctor utilized Aristotelian proofs constantly. I'd really recommend getting into the foundations via Metaphysics. But, to get to your point, the primary issue that Aristotle posits depends also on the nature of substances, you know. Like the nature of the natural world via one that isn't natural and is not bound by natural law, but instead is the promulgator of said law.

So the fact that it exists outside of natural law is the reason it cannot itself be caused?

Well, Aristotle posited that as a first mover, in this case, God, He is outside "natural impulse" and is therefore good.

Unless of course even He is a secondary "mover" and someone was even above Him.

The primary aim to grasp is the necessity of the mover itself.

And just to clear up the jargon there, being outside "natural impulse" means that he is not subject to the law that everything must have a cause?

And i've heard people use the term "good" in theology but I'm not sure what it means in that context

grrrr stop having a complex discussion on theology christcucks!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leK2WkAHLYk

He is not subject, per se, as He was the cause itself. However, His acts as first mover is necessity for the secondary cause. In other words, without the movement, there would be no secondary cause.