chat

Discord ID: 228754920050786315


1,464,256 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 219/5858 | Next

2016-11-12 12:24:42 UTC

This petition going around to have the electoral college to honor the popular vote... I guess I support it. That does sound more fair.

2016-11-12 12:24:46 UTC

HOWEVER.

2016-11-12 12:25:20 UTC

My gut instinct is telling me most of the people who signed it (and it's something like 4 million now) are people who refused to vote in the first place.

2016-11-12 12:26:22 UTC

^

2016-11-12 12:26:25 UTC

Honestly no-show voters had more of an affect on this election than third party voters.

2016-11-12 12:26:49 UTC

And you can be assured they're the one that will whine the loudest when it doesn't go their way.

2016-11-12 12:27:18 UTC

And I'm like "Bitch, I agree with you, but you lost all right to complain about it when you refused to show up to vote in the first place."

2016-11-12 12:31:21 UTC

Even if I don't like your choice, I can still respect you bothered to bring your ass over to the voting booth if you went third party.

2016-11-12 12:32:40 UTC

And honestly it didn't make a difference this election. Not enough voted for the liberal third party to make a difference and the conservative third party isn't as broken up about Trump because he's closer to them than Clinton.

2016-11-12 12:33:12 UTC

The Johnson voters were enough to turn it to clinton but almost all of them would have went Trump before Clinton anyday.

2016-11-12 12:35:57 UTC

<#231946987585404930>

2016-11-12 12:38:44 UTC

I know but this was to good to pass

2016-11-12 13:15:14 UTC

Finally saw @Repzion 's Laci video.

2016-11-12 13:15:27 UTC

God she's such a cunt who lacks any self awareness.

2016-11-12 13:22:25 UTC

She's such a caricature. Especially since she goes from "love and understanding" to "Fuck you, white people".

2016-11-12 13:29:58 UTC

Gday guys

2016-11-12 13:30:28 UTC

yeah lacis not the sharpest tool in the shed aye

2016-11-12 13:33:11 UTC

Why can't she be a lovable cunt? Like Bearing?

2016-11-12 13:37:32 UTC

not sure, she works for mtv, so I guess thats a starting point as to why

2016-11-12 13:49:52 UTC

It seems the phrase "red pill" is catching on lately

2016-11-12 14:07:02 UTC

Obama: You may have defeated Hillary, Trump. But I will simply impose martial law and refuse to leave the White House! Goodbye, forever!

Obama attempts to take back the White House only to be struck by Trump's toupee

Trump: This is the power of straight white males! They sent my hairpiece flying all the way out here to D.C.! Now, Obama, your next line is "Was this part of your plan all along, Trump?"

Obama: Was this-!?

This momentary distraction was what assured Donald Trump's victory. Negative approval ratings that the Liberal media could have glossed over were exposed and sent Obama flying.

Obama: GUAAAH! Was this part of your plan all along, Trump!?

Trump: Of course! I'm a brilliant businessman and I planned all of this perfectly from the beginning! (Thinking) No, even I didn't think I'd win this election. But I'll say anything to piss him off.

The power of straight white males was more than Obama could overcome and managed to expose his true Birth Certificate! They did not have enough power to vote him out of the White House four years earlier - but they could banish him outside of the United States of America!

Obama: Sombreros! How is this possible!?

Forced out of the country, his true birth certificate exposed, Obama was sent to Mexico with the rest of the illegal immigrants. Without the Liberal media to constantly sustain him, Obama eventually stopped thinking.

2016-11-12 14:07:42 UTC

oops, forgot my name wasn't changed in this server

2016-11-12 14:21:20 UTC

Lmao

2016-11-12 14:21:38 UTC

Norwegian massmedia is calling Trumps' cabinet and staff "straight outta hell"

2016-11-12 14:22:18 UTC

Or rather, "taken straight out of a horror movie"

2016-11-12 15:31:56 UTC

I blame California

2016-11-12 15:32:04 UTC

This doesn't happen with any other country

2016-11-12 15:32:09 UTC

And Hollywood is to blame

2016-11-12 15:32:10 UTC

*nods*

2016-11-12 15:38:22 UTC

Hello

2016-11-12 15:40:00 UTC

The establishment can go fuck itself

2016-11-12 15:40:26 UTC

It's completely lost touch with the real world and the people they are supposed to represent, protect and serve

2016-11-12 16:43:09 UTC

^

2016-11-12 16:47:55 UTC

I am happy most of Americans agree on that part at least. It means their days are numbered.

2016-11-12 16:48:27 UTC

Indeed

2016-11-12 16:48:57 UTC

I love how people take one quick look at my FB profile and quite literally judge by the cover of the book not to debate me

2016-11-12 16:49:13 UTC

Because I "won't listen to their arguments"

2016-11-12 16:49:26 UTC

Well, if you actually have some I am willing to listen

2016-11-12 17:05:23 UTC

```
Millennials.
They may not yet be the present, but theyโ€™re certainly the future. These young, uninitiated minds will someday soon become our politicians, doctors, scientists, chefs, television producers, fashion designers, manufacturers, and, one would hope, the new proponents of liberty. But are they ready for it?
Time after time, particularly on college campuses, millennials have proven to be little more than entitled, spoiled, anti-intellectual brats who place far too much emphasis on feelings and nowhere near enough emphasis on critical thinking. To the millennial, words are cause for the creation of safe spaces, alternative ideas must be stifled, and anything they perceive to be a microaggression is enough to send them spiraling into a state of mental distress.
Itโ€™s time millennials understood these 7 harsh realities of life so we donโ€™t end up with a generation of gutless adult babies running the show.
```

2016-11-12 17:05:44 UTC

This... was posted by an irate, hardcore conservative baby-boomer on my FB feed.

2016-11-12 17:05:54 UTC

I don't 100% disagree with the sentiment of course.

2016-11-12 17:06:07 UTC

But I find it immensely hypocrtiical from who it is coming from.

2016-11-12 17:06:49 UTC

Millenials are people who were porn after 2000 right

2016-11-12 17:06:55 UTC

The babyboomers are an even more entitled generation. And is actually the most entitled, most senstive, whinest and most adult babyish generation we've ever had.

2016-11-12 17:07:12 UTC

Fuck i meant born

2016-11-12 17:07:28 UTC

I think it's more about anyone born from the late 80s to today. Anyone who was not yet a full teen by the 2000s.

2016-11-12 17:08:40 UTC

The center paragraph there is 100% correct.

2016-11-12 17:08:54 UTC

The last one just makes me laugh at how hypocritical it is given that it's coming from a boomer.

2016-11-12 17:10:15 UTC

You know, maybe it's because I'm not a US citizen, but I'm not even worried about his cabinet.

2016-11-12 17:10:46 UTC

There's some safeguards in place to make sure things don't get out of hand. Like, idk, *the American people*?

2016-11-12 17:11:16 UTC

It's not the doomsday scenario it's been made out to be. Their number one priority is going to be helping corporations get richer. Not attack everyone else that's bene feared.

2016-11-12 17:11:40 UTC

No matter what they've done in the past to do that at state levels or as ridiculous campaign promises to trick moronic voters.

2016-11-12 17:11:45 UTC

You mean... the same thing Clinton's cabinet would do?

2016-11-12 17:11:51 UTC

Same damn thing.

2016-11-12 17:12:01 UTC

The election is a farce.

2016-11-12 17:12:18 UTC

I'd like to be a little more optimistic

2016-11-12 17:12:24 UTC

All the choice we get is what color our pile of shit is. they'll do the exact same damn thing either way.

2016-11-12 17:12:57 UTC

My optimism comes from how the states, as in the state level politics and not federal, are starting to push for campaign finance reform that will push money out of politics.

2016-11-12 17:13:18 UTC

In that election, two more states, mine included, voted to ban money from local state elections.

2016-11-12 17:13:58 UTC

I mean think of the message this election has sent to the establishment.

2016-11-12 17:14:28 UTC

I consider that part of the same thing. They think that money is all they need to get their way and we sent them two messages that that's not enough anymore.

2016-11-12 17:14:40 UTC

People are smarter than the establishment gives them credit for and if they don't watch out, in four years people will just vote Kanye West into office just to spite them.

2016-11-12 17:14:52 UTC

y

2016-11-12 17:14:54 UTC

pls no

2016-11-12 17:15:04 UTC

not Kanye

2016-11-12 17:15:13 UTC

President Gay Fish

2016-11-12 17:15:29 UTC

#GayFish2020

2016-11-12 17:15:30 UTC

I support Vermin Supreme and his free pony platform

2016-11-12 17:15:45 UTC

Fishsticks

2016-11-12 17:16:29 UTC

Does me being not straight, or even cis, make it more okay to make gay jokes at people's expense? ๐Ÿ˜„

2016-11-12 17:16:34 UTC

Speaking of Gay Fish, this week's south park episode was pretty meh.

2016-11-12 17:16:50 UTC

Fuck people getting butthurt over gay jokes.

2016-11-12 17:16:55 UTC

Everyone should be able to be joked about.

2016-11-12 17:17:07 UTC

well they had to make it at the last second. They expected Hillary to win and when she didn't they had to throw something else together very quickly.

2016-11-12 17:17:21 UTC

So you shouldn't have expected a high quality episode.

2016-11-12 17:17:25 UTC

The next ones will be better.

2016-11-12 17:17:40 UTC

I actually predicted this. I was keeping my fingers crossed, but I was really hoping the hidden voters would come through.

2016-11-12 17:17:42 UTC

Which they totally did.

2016-11-12 17:17:51 UTC

honestly, me and my friends talk mad shit about each other in any way possible, race, religion, politics. It's just us messing around. We should be able to joke about anything

2016-11-12 17:18:07 UTC

Actually they didn't. Less people voted republican in the last four elections.

2016-11-12 17:18:24 UTC

Trump won because most of the people who regularly voted Democrat just didn't show up.

2016-11-12 17:18:30 UTC

Which you can still say is the same thing.

2016-11-12 17:18:41 UTC

They wouldn't support someone they knew stood for the establishment.

2016-11-12 17:18:44 UTC

It's the same thing in a different way

2016-11-12 17:18:56 UTC

Trump Saltmining Inc.

2016-11-12 17:19:01 UTC

lol

2016-11-12 17:19:06 UTC

I love how smug Sargon is being.

2016-11-12 17:19:11 UTC

The salt market is booming guys

2016-11-12 17:19:13 UTC

He totally deserves this though

2016-11-12 17:19:15 UTC

salt stocks plummet as the market floods

2016-11-12 17:19:16 UTC

He does

2016-11-12 17:19:46 UTC

The only problem with not voting at all versus voting for Trump in protest is that the Republicans won all the majorities in the swing states and in the federal congress.

2016-11-12 17:19:54 UTC

Tumblr, as always when republicans do anything, is a fucking salt castle sitting on top of a salt mine the size of the planet

2016-11-12 17:20:01 UTC

And while Hillary was a piece of shit, most of the Democrat party isn't as corrupt as her.

2016-11-12 17:20:02 UTC

It's my strong belief that everyone should vote the way they feel like voting.

2016-11-12 17:20:05 UTC

Though they are still very bad.

2016-11-12 17:20:12 UTC

I also don't believe that third party votes are wasted

2016-11-12 17:20:34 UTC

I also don't think nonvoters are betraying anyone.

2016-11-12 17:20:40 UTC

Or third party voters for that matter

2016-11-12 17:20:44 UTC

third party votes are just fine, I honestly encourage it, just sucks that third party gets so little exposure

2016-11-12 17:21:04 UTC

The only third party candidate that got any notable amount of votes was the one polticially closest to Trump so the people who voted for him are not that broken up as they'd have despised Hillary for more than just being establishment.

2016-11-12 17:21:20 UTC

The whole "Those who voted for third party actually voted for trump" do not seem to understand how voting works.

2016-11-12 17:21:29 UTC

A third party votes means you don't want *either* of them to win.

2016-11-12 17:21:36 UTC

But I guess those libtards do not seem to understand this.

2016-11-12 17:21:53 UTC

TECHNICALLY SPEAKING, most of the people who voted third party actually voted against trump because he was their closest preferred candidate.

2016-11-12 17:22:02 UTC

If you follow that line of reasoning to its conclusion that is.

2016-11-12 17:22:34 UTC

In any case it makes no sense to complain to them.

2016-11-12 17:22:46 UTC

If you gotta complain to anyone, complain to peope who refused to vote at all.

2016-11-12 17:22:58 UTC

some people don't want to support Hillary, but can't subscribe to Trump's ideas so they vote third party, this is also true of the reversed situation

2016-11-12 17:23:08 UTC

I don't think that's proper either.

2016-11-12 17:23:13 UTC

Not voting is your right.

2016-11-12 17:23:31 UTC

and not voting is its own protest in a way

2016-11-12 17:23:40 UTC

I am not sure Trump HAS any ideas. He certainly didn't expect to win. And he seemed to say whatever the hell he thought would get him votes with no actual idea how he was ever going to do it.

2016-11-12 17:23:57 UTC

I would like to give him more credit than that.

2016-11-12 17:24:03 UTC

All the fake stories like the gay guy who got beat and bloodied are pissing me off

2016-11-12 17:24:05 UTC

if you read through his policies you will find that there is subtance to them

2016-11-12 17:24:37 UTC

he couldn't get to president-elect without legit ideas

2016-11-12 17:24:45 UTC

^

2016-11-12 17:24:50 UTC

His more recent proposal had some zany ideas but most of them actually were more in line with Bernie's policies than Clintons or any other GOP candidate.

2016-11-12 17:25:15 UTC

I think the SJW's who scream "Muh racist whites" fail to realize that without the white vote Obama wouldn't have won

2016-11-12 17:25:18 UTC

Like rejecting the TPP, which would be disasterous for the country.

2016-11-12 17:25:18 UTC

I think his plan to bring outsourced jobs back to the US sounds extremely plausible. The only problem is whether or not congress will let him do it.

2016-11-12 17:25:34 UTC

well yeah, Trump probably ran republican for maximum coverage, he liklely could have ran independant, just like Bernie probably could have

2016-11-12 17:25:35 UTC

Rejecting the TPP... would be... disastrous?

2016-11-12 17:25:44 UTC

TPP is cancer

2016-11-12 17:25:45 UTC

No, accepting it would be.

2016-11-12 17:25:47 UTC

The TPP would be disastrous for **everyone**

2016-11-12 17:25:49 UTC

needs to be thrown out

2016-11-12 17:26:01 UTC

CLinton would have accepted it in a heartbeat because her corporate masters told her to.

2016-11-12 17:26:21 UTC

I'm not sure what miracle caused the TPP to be delayed for so long.

2016-11-12 17:26:26 UTC

Obama was in favor of it.

2016-11-12 17:26:39 UTC

*Thankfully*, rejecting the TPP is a power the POTUS actually does have.

2016-11-12 17:26:57 UTC

If it passed we could say goodbye to freedom of speech. That'd be gone. then and there.

2016-11-12 17:27:19 UTC

The TPP would basically be the start of the world of Shadowrun lol

2016-11-12 17:27:21 UTC

I'm surprised SJWs fought it. It had everything they wanted. Controlling what people say is a wet dream of theirs.

2016-11-12 17:27:32 UTC

you know what would be amazing is if Farage took some sort of position advising Trump, or was at least involved in US politics more

2016-11-12 17:27:50 UTC

SJWs are a lot of things but they are not pro-establishment

2016-11-12 17:28:28 UTC

and another good thing is that the morning after the election Putin was already talking about fixing relations with Russia

2016-11-12 17:28:34 UTC

and the US

2016-11-12 17:29:24 UTC

What is tpp?

2016-11-12 17:29:29 UTC

It's cancer

2016-11-12 17:29:30 UTC

I am not American so I don't know

2016-11-12 17:29:32 UTC

Trans Pacific Partnership.

2016-11-12 17:29:36 UTC

Do you know TTIP?

2016-11-12 17:29:37 UTC

Ah

2016-11-12 17:29:40 UTC

It's the same thing.

2016-11-12 17:29:43 UTC

Yea

2016-11-12 17:29:53 UTC

It was an international agreement that would have given multinational corporations direct control over the internet.

2016-11-12 17:29:56 UTC

Abbreviation threw me off

2016-11-12 17:30:04 UTC

Yeah no

2016-11-12 17:30:04 UTC

Allowing them to censor people.

2016-11-12 17:30:10 UTC

I know

2016-11-12 17:30:12 UTC

What @Emma said, among other things.

2016-11-12 17:30:15 UTC

well, ICANN is already a thing

2016-11-12 17:30:19 UTC

Like literal cancer.

2016-11-12 17:30:32 UTC

I am going fucking hack fucking everything if that happens

2016-11-12 17:30:41 UTC

it's not in our hands anymore, the internet that is

2016-11-12 17:30:44 UTC

Like the free speech thing just barely scratches the surface of how bad the TPP is.

2016-11-12 17:30:51 UTC

I know

2016-11-12 17:30:58 UTC

You know how badly YouTube handles copyright? And now it gets so badly abused?

2016-11-12 17:31:05 UTC

Yes

2016-11-12 17:31:13 UTC

It'd be like that. Only worse. And on the entire internet. Not just YouTube.

2016-11-12 17:31:42 UTC

I know

2016-11-12 17:31:44 UTC

Terrible

2016-11-12 17:32:24 UTC

It's worse though. It allows for a special international court where multinationals can file criminal charges against anyone regardless of where they live.

2016-11-12 17:32:45 UTC

You can literally go to jail and there's nothing your country's government can do about it to intervene.

2016-11-12 17:32:45 UTC

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN, /หˆaษชkรฆn/ eye-kan) is a nonprofit organization that is responsible for coordinating the maintenance and procedures of several databases related to the namespaces of the Internet, ensuring the network's stable and secure operation.[1] ICANN performs the actual technical maintenance work of the central Internet address pools and DNS root zone registries pursuant to the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) function contract. The contract regarding the IANA stewardship functions between ICANN and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) of the United States Department of Commerce ended on October 1, 2016, formally transitioning the functions to the global multi-stakeholder community.

2016-11-12 17:33:08 UTC

so yeah, this was already a thing, it's out of the US's hands now

2016-11-12 17:33:12 UTC

Regulation of the internet in any way shape and form is bad

2016-11-12 17:33:25 UTC

I don't think people are quite right about how terrible ICANN is.

2016-11-12 17:33:28 UTC

thanks Obummer

2016-11-12 17:33:40 UTC

They don't actually regulate the internet. They just keep the registry.

2016-11-12 17:33:41 UTC

Leave it to individual ISP's and websites to self regulate

2016-11-12 17:34:19 UTC

^that sounds bad too

2016-11-12 17:34:22 UTC

The worst they can do is make your website mysteriously disappear. And I don't think they can do that without significant backlash.

2016-11-12 17:34:57 UTC

the fact that they can do so is the problem

2016-11-12 17:35:35 UTC

So could the US government back when they had it. But they didn't.

2016-11-12 17:35:42 UTC

ICANN's primary principles of operation have been described as helping preserve the operational stability of the Internet

2016-11-12 17:36:13 UTC

yes, but with an international board this could create issues that wouldn't occur with it under our ownership

2016-11-12 17:36:21 UTC

You know, from a non-US citizen do you have any idea how crazy the idea is that one country controls the internet's register?

2016-11-12 17:36:47 UTC

that may seem bad, but we're a country that at its roots values free speech

2016-11-12 17:37:02 UTC

Your people may be, I don't think your government cares much for it.

2016-11-12 17:37:06 UTC

unlike other nations that censor their citizens and their use of the internet

2016-11-12 17:37:20 UTC

I don't think anyone in the western world does these things except maybe Germany.

2016-11-12 17:37:48 UTC

but it's not just countries from the western world that control this international board

2016-11-12 17:38:00 UTC

Besides, this ICANN is not a country and therefore has no citizens to censor.

2016-11-12 17:38:16 UTC

It's not just China that controls the board either.

2016-11-12 17:38:24 UTC

it can effect everyone's use of the internet though

2016-11-12 17:38:39 UTC

and it's not only China that's on that board

2016-11-12 17:38:54 UTC

Well, it's been this way for a while and we're still talking about how shit North Korea is.

2016-11-12 17:39:00 UTC

So I don't think I need to be worried.

2016-11-12 17:39:05 UTC

middle eastern countries, China, Russia and others are a part of it

2016-11-12 17:39:42 UTC

it may not be a crazy important issue, but the worry over the situation is still kinda there for me and others

2016-11-12 17:39:49 UTC

I know all these things you're telling me but I see no cause for concern.

2016-11-12 17:40:05 UTC

Canada censors its citizens. Anything that is considered "hate speech" in person or on the internet, meaning anything SJWs don't like, is a felony in Canada and people have been convicted on it many times.

2016-11-12 17:40:57 UTC

the US's free speech and freedom of expression is enshrined in law, that's why it was preferable to have it privately owned by them

2016-11-12 17:41:22 UTC

in my opinion anyway

2016-11-12 17:41:33 UTC

As much as the rest of the world makes fun of the US, the rest of the world is living in the dark ages when it comes to free speech.

2016-11-12 17:41:58 UTC

yo can i get a link to the clip at the beggining repzion's "re:trumpocalypse" video?

2016-11-12 17:42:20 UTC

It's not that far back in the log in the NSFW channel.

2016-11-12 17:42:25 UTC

thanks

2016-11-12 17:42:30 UTC

Scroll up.

2016-11-12 17:42:41 UTC

๐Ÿ‘ got it ty

2016-11-12 17:44:02 UTC

Uhhh, Canada can arrest people for hate speech even if *no one* could control the internet.

2016-11-12 17:44:11 UTC

That's not related to who controls the DNS registry

2016-11-12 17:44:21 UTC

I know.

2016-11-12 17:44:28 UTC

I was mentioning it because they ALREADY have been doing it.

2016-11-12 17:44:32 UTC

Oh and on that note, no one can *truly* control the internet.

2016-11-12 17:44:46 UTC

Not that they won't stop trying to control it.

2016-11-12 17:44:50 UTC

You know what happens when people start going totalitarian on the world wide web?

2016-11-12 17:44:59 UTC

People just move on to the deep web.

2016-11-12 17:45:30 UTC

And that's where their control ends, really

2016-11-12 17:45:39 UTC

it's not a problem you can get around unless you know about these things though

2016-11-12 17:45:57 UTC

like an average user of the internet would know nothing about the deep web

2016-11-12 17:47:15 UTC

I wouldn't underestimate the power of mouth to mouth communication

2016-11-12 17:48:06 UTC

I suppose so

2016-11-12 17:48:29 UTC

Going totalitarian on the entire internet will be a terrible mistake for the ones trying it.

2016-11-12 17:48:44 UTC

They're the ones who will suffer for it.

2016-11-12 17:49:10 UTC

yeah, but a generation that was born into that sort of thing wouldn't realize that it's not normal

2016-11-12 17:49:21 UTC

I've never credited the people who try to do this with any abundence of intellectual capacity.

2016-11-12 17:49:38 UTC

but I doubt anyone would suddenly forget what a free internet was like or not talk about it

2016-11-12 17:49:47 UTC

SJWs don't seem to get that their attempts to censor people is what's killing their movement.

2016-11-12 17:50:11 UTC

The point is, even if someone did try something, it wouldn't work out for them.

2016-11-12 17:50:11 UTC

Censorship is a self-defeating action and those who do it are always too stubborn and stupid to understand that.

2016-11-12 17:50:16 UTC

maybe they'll just peter out from in fighting eventually to see who has the most oppression points

2016-11-12 17:50:24 UTC

The internet is the most people-empowering thing that exists in this world.

2016-11-12 17:50:30 UTC

It's impossible to control.

2016-11-12 17:50:44 UTC

you can control someone's access to it though

2016-11-12 17:50:49 UTC

or access to parts of it

2016-11-12 17:51:10 UTC

unless they learn of a workaround from an outside source

2016-11-12 17:51:29 UTC

Its power to affect society is why people try to control it. They, rightly, see it as a threat to their power.

2016-11-12 17:51:32 UTC

I don't think people are so unresourceful to not find it.

2016-11-12 17:51:58 UTC

Google can find shit tons of things that government doesn't even think about.

2016-11-12 17:52:20 UTC

but do people have access to google?

2016-11-12 17:52:31 UTC

or government regulated search engines

2016-11-12 17:53:00 UTC

You think google will accept its users becoming unable to access it?

2016-11-12 17:53:34 UTC

well if a government blocks access, as I'm sure they do and have done then what is google gonna do?

2016-11-12 17:53:40 UTC

How about Islamic countries banning all criticism on Islam...

2016-11-12 17:53:43 UTC

The internet user is google's life blood. They can't just let them go.

2016-11-12 17:53:55 UTC

they don't let them go, they never get them

2016-11-12 17:54:19 UTC

Governments already block access to sites regardless of whether or not the US controls the DNS registry

2016-11-12 17:54:40 UTC

I know, but it could be done across the board in this case

2016-11-12 17:54:50 UTC

not just in a localized area or country

2016-11-12 17:55:06 UTC

I don't know, all the logistics involved seem incredibly impractical.

2016-11-12 17:55:38 UTC

it does seem impractical, but if they make small changes over time then whose to say they couldn't acomplish such a thing?

2016-11-12 17:55:51 UTC

You know who notices small changes?

2016-11-12 17:55:54 UTC

Our Google, who art in cyberspace,
Hallowed be thy domain.
Thy search to come,
Thy results be done,
On 127.0.0.1 as it is in the Googleplex.
Give us this day our daily searches,
And forgive us our spam,
As we forgive those who spam against us.
And lead us not into temptation,
But deliver us from Microsoft.
For thine is the search engine,
And the power,
And the glory,
Forever and ever.
Amen.

2016-11-12 17:55:56 UTC

especially with google jigsaw and the censor ship of "hateful" language

2016-11-12 17:55:57 UTC

Regular people who use the internet. XD

1,464,256 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 219/5858 | Next