traitourous

how dare you

lol

Gives royal assent like candy

Hahahahahaha

fuckin'

if there's any deviation from a perfect straight line at all

Pissed af

Lol gives me ptsd

then there's a small net force you absolute retard

if the force on top is an entire building, and the force below is the reaction, and the beam has been heated to 1500-odd degrees

it'll ***bend***

now if that's every single beam on three floors

there's gonna be ***a little bit*** of a problem

1500 or so odd degrees you say>

let me go fucking check for you, you faggot

https://navysustainability.dodlive.mil/files/2010/04/MIL-DTL-5624-REV-V.pdf

Jet fuel can't melt stupid cancerous conversations about 9/11.

Inb4 twin towers was built with plastic

Exhibit A. Spec describing temp at which standard jet fuel is capable of burning

"Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F"

lol. Discuss in voice chat so we can hear your autism.

oki so it was F not C

whatever

as well as number of BTUs such a fire is capable of expending

the point is that it's hot enough for the beams to be weakened

yes, correct. it is not

Wut

Even I know that's stupid

no more so than if there was a cat-3 hurriucane that day

Any fucking heat weakens metal

and the specs show it was designed to acoomidate cat-5 winds

i said hot enough, not "not enough" you nigger

Why don't we try to recreate it properly

i.e. on a windy day the top of such a building would see FAR more strain than any fire could every hope to provide

why don't we accept that intense heat weakens metal

FIRE

Why don't we let these two lovebirds fuck it out of each other.

DOESN'T CAUSE STRAIN

IT REDUCES THE STEEL'S TOLERANCE FOR STRAIN

strain is lateral loading

yea

please review your finite element analysis

there was lateral loading when the building leaned

Lol not even steel

static, not dynamic

fucking

Bet it was made like grenfell

building bends

so you are saying that the middle was the impact site?

load is uneven across beams

oh for fuck sake

U all are gay

the load is uniform

Stop being gay

Oh it's the nigger

there is more than one support tower

that's one beam you idiot

Monica gets it

No u

not the tower

Monica is a nigger?

Exhibit B. WTC building engineering drawings

every single beam on those floors experienced that as the building flexed

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html

Why is her pfp so wholesome?

John lennon said it best

Is she autistic?

It was taken on my birthday

Femcels are autistic

@TempleOfIron Mr TOI "I hate Women"

My fiancés aunt got me a stitch plushie and his mom took me out to frankie and bennys

I'm not racist I have a colour TV

It was a wholesome day

drawing 17.b clearly shows there are redundant support beams which were more than capable of supporting the entirity of the fire. those redunancies were no where near the explosion

Yeah she's autist

Pretty gay

@TempleOfIron but you are too

look at it

i was there

the building

i don't need to

falls over

Not a bad thing I Think autistic women are nicer

it ***bends***

negative

Bends?

it doesn't 'fall over' as it does absolutely no damage outside of the footprint specified in the drawings

You lookin for a bendy boi

it

rotates

it implodes. if it fell over, the physical and intact portions of the building would have crushed 10 city blocks

along a horizontal axis as it falls

I don't hate women I just wish they all died horrifically

dust is the result of an implosion

@TempleOfIron stay classy

gay faggit homo @TempleOfIron

Yea

hey, it's monica

<:tiptip:462282246695419934>

Lol nah I love women really I even said hello to one today

what are you doing in their rat invested chat

Im not saying the government didnt cause 9/11 but the planes definitely took them out

Felt good not wanting to punch her

No bombs

all that incel/mgtow rage

LMAO

look at it

it bends

Lemme draw a diagram

It rotates like it going to mars

Lol you don't know what a n incel is

it doesn't fall straight down lmao

Go back to incel tears soyboy

plans just aren't capable of doing such. 3000+ engineers that have built such buildings agree with that assesment and the building were DESIGNED to take the impact of SEVERAL DC-10s simltanously

several

they are

a DC-10 is a tuna boat compared to the 737

the building's support structure is the frame

so when part of the frame caves

If it was that Strom than even explosives wouldn't take it out.

the whole thing collapse

Tanya is based.

oy vey the incel/mgtow is gonna shootup a mall with all that rage @TempleOfIron

the jet fuel weakened the beams

the natural flexing combined with the fire weakening the steel as wel l as the massive impact causes catastrophic failure

"A white paper released on February 3, 1964 states that:,"
The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707—DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact."

they bent in on themselves

@LmaoMoni that's racist

I dont hate women but it sure is funny bringing the white Knight out of phaggot like you 2k lol

@TempleOfIron u mad af fagboi

well those investigations were flawed then weren't they

1964

they didn't account for the metal getting hot

I haven't murdered my gf yet

9/11

Wut

Yet

they're just talking about impact

^

the impact itself didn't do much at all

Doesnt metal expand when it gets hot?

@TempleOfIron calling the police right now

the impact which did indeed fail to topple the building

"In the mid-1990s British Steel and the Building Research Establishment performed a series of six experiments at Cardington to investigate the behavior of steel frame buildings. These experiments were conducted in a simulated, eight-story building. Secondary steel beams were not protected. Despite the temperature of the steel beams reaching 800-900° C (1,500-1,700° F) in three of the tests (well above the traditionally assumed critical temperature of 600° C (1,100° F), no collapse was observed in any of the six experiments)."

Do it

the buildings took a while to go down

good thing you live in the uk too

Police already know who I am

its gonna be real ez to find you

>eight story building

We have a history

>E I G H T S T O R Y

What about the natural gas in yhe buildings?

In 1779 a report found that it would take 5000 737s to take down the twin towers.

**fucking bernie over here putting 1 minute ads on my videos that are unskippable**

hey fellas I'm making a sad dad character for my next dnd game, anyone know any good sad songs for getting in the 'all my fuckin died' headspace?

man animal normally buildings have the support structure on the inside

without fire i nsulation making them far more vulerable to deformation effects

wtc were unique

the support structure is on the outside

insulation burns

@TempleOfIron ye i bet you were a molester before going full mgtow

@Memes, Good boy personally, im not a fan of doomer or edgy characters, so idk

@Spooky Melon fucking bernie XXX

Yes soyboy go ring the police because someone on the net says he hates the wymens lmao

good history temple

@Memes, Good boy or sad dad

my father developed buildings similar to the WTC

That's why I love winding phaggot up like you lol

if you say so; i am only arguing to illustrate how everyone that just dismisses evidence out of hand? might as well go work for TYT

thanks anyway IG

all about narratives

and belief

>evidence

>That's why I love winding phaggot up like you lol
bruh u mad

it's not very strong evidence

Is he like 10?

>a quote saying something we don't disagree with

wut you gonna do temple

Go play fortnite

we're refuting your argument

your evidence does not refute ours

Can you guys just chill tf out

you don't understand nor do you wish to examine the evidence that more EXPERTS in the field support than CLIMATE CHANGE

cancel your paypiggery and leave again if i hurt your feefees enough

I'm out enjoy the 9/11 gangbang everyone.

we did examine it

Its saturday crack a beer and unwind

i've talked to experts

my father for instance

they all agree

The only pig is you 2k 😂🐖

the heat weakened the outer structure

causing cascading failure and collapse

jokes on you faggit, unlike you i never gave money to sargoy

OINK OINK

oy, what is this 2K hatred?!

did you father ever do strength tests with JP-5?

again, the WTC had a unique superstructure

2K is gr8

That's cos you don't have money

<:tiptip:462282246695419934>

brownest of niggers

I donated to sargoy

Yikes monica

Manual breathing

were those tests done on standard buildings or ones like the WTC?

I stopped when patreon died

heat doesn't cause the almost total destruction of the building superstructer

it does

no it doesn't

there were no pieces left longer than 10m

because the superstructure is a skirt

Manual breathing

but the superstructure wasn't destroyed

and the skirt collapses when one part goes

it was ***weakened***

Mossad

@TempleOfIron was sargoys dick that good, that it turned you mgtowgay

in a structure with hundreds of trusses each over 100m long

yup

Yall are wired like 24/7 just relax boys

Fuck you 2k ringing the fbi now

Take a breather

DO IT FAGBOI

the way it's designed there are interdependencies in the structure

lol, 2K runs the FBI

collapse would see most of those items rain down on Wall St like the end of the world

Lol you just know he's like a 14 year old spotty incel

Youre scaring the boy

It's a cope

**BERNIE2020**

FEEL THE BERN

there would have been nothing left from battery park all the way up wall st

well no

these buildings are designed to fall into their own footprint

show me where and what says this

https://twitter.com/BrexitBetrayed/status/1172942169667231746

they're designed that way for demolition

https://twitter.com/LilithLovett/status/1172940648841826307

"The world of tomorrow is a world of empire" - Guy Verhofstadt