Ye and you don't sound like an all knowing twaat uksio lol

nope. i have see that alot though; people grow up without any money and are convinced that the 'goal' is the acquistion of that money and that goal will make problems go away and it all worth while

Shit the new Berserk chapter is hitting me hard...fuck im gonna cry...this shit is too sad

capital is simply a MEANS....not an end

so.. what is the end?

it is

The end.
*fin*

Money solve some issues, but not all of them

The point is to have a good time

Not even the majority of them. Just the most important survival and luxury issues

No the point is to have your enemies driven before you...

Life sucks when you just let it happen to you

the'issue' comes from the inability to set the proper goal in the first place

https://twitter.com/BenjaminEnfield/status/1165766755043749889?s=19


I know this is bs, but I want a global extinction party

and then hyper-focusing on the means

Can we party at the end of the world

we did it

https://i.imgur.com/3jdCVG3.jpg

Between a Scot and a pollaack any excuse is good to get hammered Jack

We fucked up the climate beyond return

welll, models say 3 yr window of no ice in the artic

My goal is to explode the planet TBH

certainly not good

By the time the planet is properly fucked I'll be dead lmao

Russia is a happy camper

Gen z has a fitting title

I mean literally explode the planet

whats that pic? winter vs summer?

They can now use the northern ocean to transport goods

Probably lmao

doubtful, jack. ever have a cold drink with ice in it sitting by the pool?

hey @JackH670 , you know that one chick who made the goofy ass songs for queer kids or w/e

the one that got railed on

Yes

guess what?

She's a pedo

Prison?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXxwvkb19ko they were demonitized and now they're upsetti

as long as there is a tiny bit of ice in your drink, it warms VERY slowly

Oh yeah they're suing google lmao

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

but the moment all the ice is gone, the rate increases ^10

Tbf fair play to them

Who cares about 200 years from now

they're still absolute fucking jokes though

the RATE

True

If I achieve my goal it will be gone in 25

did you pass math class?

Britain's last PM sounds great to me

what is a 'rate' in terms of extrapolation?

On one hand I am diligently not-doing the stuff that makes pollution worse
On the other hand my contribution is worthless when Apple throws away used lithium in the ocean because asia has no laws against it

what is 'an increased rate' look like?

mmmmmmmmmmetal https://twitter.com/klara_sjo/status/1166421468890222594?s=20

one is a line, the other is an exponetial

And apple has the gall to say that it is I that should pay an environmental tax for existing

I don't care about climate change, if anything it will give me access to more material to explode the world

projecting linearly based on the CURRENT rate is just not understandng basic math

Yeah it's going to go even faster lmao

well, at least we will have confirmation or no

"going to get faster" meanwhile an equal exponential increase in water surface area, and as such atmospheric water

@NinjaQuick exploding the world?

Yes

is that your goal?

Yes

if all the ice is gone and the rise doesn't becomes exponential, we will know the models are definitefly wrong

I like this goal

why?

Because I am curious how it would look

It's not just about water levels though

It isn't

it's not about the amount of water; it's about the thermal load of the water

where are you going to watch from?

It isn't either

Presumably space

you dont think you will cease to function when she blows?

@JackH670 hahahahahahahaahahahahahah

The big thing is biodiversity being ravaged lmao

I think that when she blows I will be fairly alone

meh, we cares

we eat it

lol a girl is mad at a boy outside because his car has no "middle seatbelt" and she ain't getting in his car without it
(there are 5 of the youngins there)

But, the point is to encourage all mankind to develop interstellar travel

OH MY LORD

**right fucking afterwards i got a dailywire ad**

a sort of: the world will end when I will have it end, best get going

on the vid

ah, yeah; futurism is far more likely to be dystopia

I think you are retarded and should see a doctorb

i mean we are more likely to go backwards

but yeah mostly I want to see it exploded

Anything bad that can happen, will happen

we only survived and progressed because we never took our eye off the ball

I'll put my eye on your balls

if you believe something inevitable, you'll screw the pooch

the heat death of the universe is inevitable

checkmate

If the earth die you die, it doesn't matter if you are "in space" fuck me dead what the FUCK hAVE THEY BEEN TEAFHING YOU KIDS?!

and that's what 90% of people beleive about the future; development is inevitable and a fall into a dark age isn't possible

you know what's inevitable?

Yes, I presume that if the earth is gone my life will be at best 30 days remaining.

Citation needed

Life

^

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/565279334936477706/615988285852090378/69349976_10156287888841821_8796127317521858560_o.png?width=790&height=523

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

but that's still 30 days longer than the rest of everyone.

Life will survive on earth until the earth is properly gone, we might not be though

^ truth

holy shit balls batman

Nah

We'll outlive the Earth

well i assume tardigrades will continue no matter what

Where are you from kid? America?

but i don't much care about just any life if it can't rememebr us

Nothing is static, everything is evolving, everything is falling apart.
This is your life, good to the last drop, does not get any better than this.
This is your life and it is ending one minute at a time.

so can't really say I care

^

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/Y18nZc1dnTHLuuj2dYrt7Mjc8YwyjQc9r1ID9dWYl8M/https/media.discordapp.net/attachments/300680337145724932/615800647962329088/ekjzbmlepxf21.png?width=425&height=588

choose your legacy while you can

Well extremophiles are always going to survive

We'll outlive earth if we actually show some effort towards doing so. We don't seem to concerned about it at the moment.

caring is irrelevant

But yeah, my goal is to explode earth

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/452219191580295168/615949880237490178/image0.jpg

If I die in the process, well, consider it a price

But I do want to see it happen.

that's that 'bored' thing; since when does what you care about dictate reality?

Extremophiles have lower survival chance than humans

In the long run

Actually, well

lol no

We'll prob give em a piggy back ride

Lmao get fucked extremophiles

We can fuck up the climate to screw over 99% of life

humans also have a greater risk of taking everything with them when they die

nigga the fuck is an extremophile

Being able to move in space makes us have the highest chance of survival

By far

But we can't eradicate it without some other cosmic cataclysm

Something that can live in extreme conditions

killing all humans might mean sterilizing the planet

otherwise, the human virus will find a way

killing all humans makes killing all humans pointless

not a matter of caring

Basically microorganisms that can live in extreme salinity, extreme heat/cold, extreme acidity/alkalinity

That pish

Maybe we are the disease in the eyes of the higher life forms

A mold on the surface

You DARE summon me @JackH670

meh, maybe; maybe not; point is as we progress we get tougher to kill

I did

at least tougher to exterminate

Taste oblivion

unless we do it ourselves

lol

And ironically will exterminate ourselves

@Sir Winn Kill yourself

Imagine if that is the curse of sentience: life just offs itself on that phase

so as long as there is a place for extremophiles ot survive, we will try to make that place somewhere to survive

Nah dawf

Yeah but we aint extremophiles

Even nuclear winter cant kill humans

Yes we are

no, but we don' t tend to be selective with our destruction

We just use technology 😄

Nigga, nuclear winter never happened yet

we tend to x1000 what is required

Especially china

Eh

Nuclear winter probably would just kill us

Nope

Climate is just gonna get more extreme

Just a lot of us

very true; no clue what a cascase of nuclear detonations and then successive melt downs would do

But things will be fine.

And also

It's romanticised as survivable but a mass extinction = humans gone

you could detonate all nukes

Total detonation of the nuclear stockpile

Nothing would happen

I found it funny when a chinese village was petitioning UN to clean up the river that they polluted beyond drinkability

Wont result in total nuclear winter anyways

Nuclear winter is the product of ash

Figgle niggle

i disagree strongly

It was funny for a while, then it got sad

won't take but a fraction of the world arsenal

We dont have *nearly* enough nukes to fuck the entire planet

If all the city targets of nukes went up in smoke, you'd get a nuclear winter

Radiation does not have the effect of causing a winter

a single exchange between two powerswith the current deforestation trends could corrupt the food chain

nuclear radiation from weapons is nowhere near enough to cause trouble

We used to have enough nukes, then we decided it was probably a bad idea

Imagine demanding that sanitary services clan up your toilet where you tried to flush a shitstained blanket
That's china in a nutshell

No

We never did

no what?

we are not voices in your head

It could take a thousand times more nukes than we ever had, still wouldn't in themselves trigger a nuclear winter *unless* they are all hitting burnable material.

We would need around 100x the nuclear stockpile to kill 99.99% of humans

it's not just about detonations

I know

I'm gonna need a citation for this

If you wanted the shortest-term planet-fucking, sure.

it's about the systems abilty to recover

Busy_later

This sounds like fallout rp material

Werkom to china, laowai skum
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/15/wild-chinese-sturgeon-on-brink-of-extinction-in-polluted-yangtze#img-1

You don't need x amount of explosions.

weaker system = less nukes required

you just need lots of fire and ash.

^^

Yup

Remember, lads, it's not 12 years, it's 8 months left before global warming murders us all <:smugon:512048583806025739>

The Yangtze is more polluted than every river in Europe iirc

the nukes do little damange aside from throwing dirt into the air

a million nukes hitting the same spot won't cause a nuclear winter

you got into the bleach as a kid didn't you

that is why nukes are set to go over just over the ground

no

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-48964736

it is the dust and blast wave that does the real damage

<:smugon:512048583806025739>

Certain geographies are largely unaffected by ash in the air

Do y'all understand the concept of the nuke

You ate the toothpaste?

yup

nukes are detonated at an altitude based on the energetic mass expansion of the nucleic bonds in the fuel.

I never ate toothpaste

incorrect; i'll get the data

remember reading the JTAC report

>> when you realise that one volcano can negate global warming in just one year

Nukes are pretty fucking weak in the grand scale of things

When you realize thay 1 volcano can outdo a shitton of nukes

How to solve global warming and the problem called 'America'

Blow up Yellowstone

When it comes to short-term destruction, they're pretty impressive weapons that humans have created

an 'air blast' is a typical military deployment of a nuclear weapon that yields the most damage per kiloton/warhead

If you'd nuke the sun it would not even register on any devices

No shit lmao

China and India are the biggest causes of climate changes

Ironically, GHG can do more damage than nukes

And they're not going to change shit

Kind of hard to compete with a self-sustaining nuclear furnace

as we have seen, a nuclear detonation in space does little aside from EM effects

SUn is itself an ongoing nuke

Just a fusion nuke