#presidential (Discord ID: 438831543415209995) in #FedsShallRiseAgain!, page 1


81 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/1

2018-07-16 21:57:43 UTC

Spoiler alert: Yankee wins

2018-07-16 21:59:32 UTC

All hail Eternal President Yankee!

2018-07-16 22:00:08 UTC

Watch as there’s endless federalist presidencies

2018-07-16 22:00:24 UTC

The memes never end

2018-07-16 22:02:29 UTC

Yankee vs Pericles vs Lumine calling it

2018-08-27 05:59:09 UTC

When hope is gone...
Undo this lock...
And send me forth...
...on a moonlit walk.

2018-08-27 05:59:25 UTC

Release restraint level......


Zero.

2018-08-30 03:12:24 UTC

118AZ's campaign thread is off to a great start

2018-08-30 03:28:29 UTC

Alliance is caput

2018-08-30 03:36:27 UTC

Alliance is probably smaller than Labor at this point

2018-08-30 04:39:53 UTC

Lolumine and his fake news

2018-10-19 20:26:30 UTC

@Deleted User How to vote halp

2018-10-19 20:26:40 UTC

I'm in the South

2018-10-19 20:26:44 UTC

Ok

2018-10-19 20:26:56 UTC

So there are two ballots you can fill out

2018-10-19 20:27:13 UTC

One for President-Yankee

2018-10-19 20:27:21 UTC

With House as well

2018-10-19 20:27:32 UTC

Please vote for me 1st

2018-10-19 20:27:45 UTC

And then vote in the Southern ballot

2018-10-19 20:27:51 UTC

Okay

2018-10-19 20:27:58 UTC

Is there a link?

2018-10-19 20:28:06 UTC

To the thread

2018-10-19 20:28:16 UTC

Thanks

2018-10-19 20:58:28 UTC
2018-11-23 02:43:51 UTC

hey

2018-11-23 02:43:59 UTC

if y'all need a running mate

2018-11-23 02:44:08 UTC

and need a last resort

2018-11-23 02:44:11 UTC

hmu

2019-01-04 05:17:43 UTC

some useless information for y'all: Here are the results of the post-reset presidential elections if Atlasia used the current electoral college:

2019-01-04 05:17:45 UTC

Leinad v Truman: 385-153
Yankee v Blair R1: 329-197-12
Yankee v Blair R2: 311-227
Yankee v Blair Runoff: 298-240
DFW v NeverAgain R1: 327-201-10
DFW v NeverAgain R2: 339-199
DFW v Clyde: 478-48-12
fhtagn v Lumine v Truman R1: 316-157-59-6
fhtagn v Lumine v Truman R2: 316-163-59
fhtagn v Pericles v Spiral R1/R2: 206-180-149-3
fhtagn v Pericles v Spiral R3: 206-183-149
fhtagn v Pericles v Spiral R4: 261-183-94
fhtagn v Pericles v Spiral R5: 294-244
Yankee v Lumine v Ninja R1: 383-95-57-3
Yankee v Lumine v Ninja R2: 379-99-57-3
Yankee v Lumine v Ninja R3: 353-99-86
WB v Yankee: 289-249

2019-01-04 05:19:30 UTC

Ooooh

2019-01-04 05:21:58 UTC

also, fun fact, I haven't finished making maps for the House elections that I missed (Feb 2018 thru Oct 2018) but for all of the other ones going back to December 2016, the electoral college correctly predicts the winner of the HPV

2019-01-04 05:22:04 UTC

October 2017 371-157-10 Fed
August 2017 277-261 Labor
June 2017 397-135-6 Fed
April 2017 292-229-17 Fed
February 2017 271-261-6 Fed
December 2016 271-267 Labor

2019-01-04 05:22:28 UTC

even for races where the HPV was won by <5 votes

2019-01-04 05:23:00 UTC

It's interesting how the maps line up

2019-01-04 05:23:09 UTC

With the winners each time

2019-01-05 22:48:58 UTC

I made a campaign logo for yt

2019-01-05 22:54:09 UTC

It includes my name under his and has a slogan I came up with myself (Let's Fix Atlasia), but both can easily be changed

2019-01-09 06:06:37 UTC

Question: If I'm making maps for the December 2017 through August 2018 House elections, for which elections is it appropriate to refer to Peace/Labor/PUP as a 'leftist coalition' for map-shading purposes?

2019-01-09 06:09:05 UTC

Yeah

2019-01-09 06:09:26 UTC

For all of them

2019-01-09 06:09:46 UTC

Except Dec 2017 when PUP wasnt formed yet

2019-01-09 06:09:57 UTC

And it was just Labor+Peace

2019-01-09 06:10:02 UTC

Winning two seats

2019-01-09 06:10:50 UTC

alright so that means leftists won Fremont in Dec 2017

2019-01-09 06:12:31 UTC

I think so

2019-01-10 05:25:10 UTC

so who was part of the Fed coalition in April 2018?

2019-01-10 05:25:34 UTC

politicalmasta, Yankee, Sestak, Leinad and RFayette?

2019-01-10 05:28:39 UTC

Sestak ran as Mario

2019-01-10 05:28:46 UTC

Pmasta was Peace

2019-01-10 05:28:56 UTC

And Jimmy was Alliance

2019-01-10 05:29:07 UTC

ik

2019-01-10 05:29:18 UTC

but most of their votes were from Feds

2019-01-10 05:29:23 UTC

asking for map-coloring purposes

2019-01-10 05:29:29 UTC

Well that election was complicated

2019-01-10 05:30:13 UTC

Due to factionalism within the center

2019-01-10 05:33:15 UTC

well to ask another way, which five candidates would have constituted a working majority for the Feds in that election?

2019-01-10 05:36:52 UTC

nvm found this quote from yankee "PMasta and Sestak also fucntioned as quasi-Fed candidates"

2019-01-10 05:37:12 UTC

Yeah

2019-01-10 06:31:44 UTC

Oh wow, the popular vote was 45.7% Fed/quasi-Fed, 42.2% Lab/Peebs, 12.1% Other, and the electoral college works out to 263 Fed/quasi-Fed, 259 Lab/Peebs, 16 Other

2019-01-10 06:32:00 UTC

EC PREDICTS RESULT AGAIN

2019-01-10 06:41:22 UTC

Oof

2019-01-15 01:26:37 UTC

update:

2019-01-15 01:26:39 UTC

December 2018 383-148-7 Labor (Lab 359 Pea 24) IF SOUTH IS LABOR, 329-202-7
October 2018 296-242 Labor wins HPV/ Fed wins EC
August 2018 290-248 Fed (PUP 202 Pea 27 Lab 16 WI Lab 3)
June 2018 334-204 Labor (PUP 171 Pea 163)
April 2018 263-259-13-3 Fed (not majority) (Fed 222 Mar 37, PM 4)
February 2018 303-219-16 Fed (PUP 163 Lab 30 Pea 26)
December 2017 371-144-12 Fed (Lab 132 Pea 12)
October 2017 371-157-10 Fed
August 2017 277-261 Labor
June 2017 397-135-6 Fed
April 2017 292-229-17 Fed
February 2017 271-261-6 Fed
December 2016 271-267 Labor
October 2016 307-231 Labor wins HPV/ Fed wins EC

2019-01-15 01:27:03 UTC

the two times where the EC failed to predict the HPV were October 2016 and October 2018

2019-01-15 01:27:11 UTC

both when the EC favored the Feds

2019-01-15 01:28:10 UTC

In October 2018 retromike's vote was the deciding factor

2019-01-18 01:00:15 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/438831543415209995/535624431213608961/image0.png

2019-01-18 01:00:24 UTC

This just seems so wrong

2019-01-18 01:00:51 UTC

Directly attempting to help a candidate by appointing him to a government position to boost his support in the polls

2019-01-18 01:06:07 UTC

tbh YE seems like a logical choice considering he's leaving his PM position and so we wouldn't have to deal with special elections, but at the same time I don't like this maneuvering by Labor to use it to promote his campaign

2019-01-18 01:10:23 UTC

Oh I certainly don’t doubt he’ll do a fine job

2019-01-18 01:10:30 UTC

But yeah it’s the maneuvering that’s terrible

2019-01-18 16:26:36 UTC

I like YE, but I can't vote for his confirmation after that

2019-01-18 16:27:12 UTC
2019-01-18 16:27:32 UTC

unless federalist leadership advise me otherwise

81 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/1