Kill the student..

then Kaarna is RIGHT

How so?

I fucking hate if anyone tried to steal my motherfucking beer.

hehehe

No seriously..

It is a violation to have an unknown entity repeatedly enter your home and steal.

There was some minor vandalism. Something was burnt or something.

shoot the vandals

seriously...

Ended up, Diren Dede wasn't the original vandal though.

Just saw the bait and went for it.

Property right is more important than the offenders life.

Then you should arrest all the other kids

Original person fessed up IIRC and got off, in light of Kaarma's high profile case.

I would gather all the kids in the gang and their parents
and shame their parents to death.
Do you see DEAD PERSON??
THAT COULD BE YOUR KID!
YOU SHOULD BE THANKFULL

then I put all the kids on 2 years disciplinary school

http://www.telegram.com/article/20141209/news/312099480

Yeah, breaking into someone's place in MT will get you shot.

Hey

Howdy

What are we talking about?

Kaarma COULD HAVE BEEN IN DANGER.. how the fuck would he know?

Lots of stuff. Castle Doctrine. Making a better society.

Hey Dingo!

pleased to meet you, new person!

generally speaking, I think the rule is as follows

if you dont break the rules you are free
and if you break the rules you have forfit
the contract to the state that grants you that freedrom.

What if the rules are written specifically to the detriment of individuals and the benefit of the state?

because otherwise people will just use their freedrom
to shit and urinate in public
or even in their nighbours postbox..I seen that happen.

You are right on track!

Yes, the rules should not be unjust..

The but problem is not the mere existence of rules..
like some liberals think.

Definitely urinated in public before. It was a relief.

bad you..

We built public toilets for people like you
and the vandals still prefere mailboxes

Maybe we could get catheters

If I urinate in public I will at least use the forest or a harbour..

What is a harbour?

Anyone should avoid this no matter the cost..

I agree it should be avoided. Sometimes you have to weigh the consequences though.

dock!

Piss yourself and be forced to be around people who don't want you smelling of piss, or piss on a tree.

A small fee or a stern look would be more than today..

I think I got a point with the public toilets.

True.

You're probably in a more urban environment

😃

If we build public toilets EVERYWHERE
and people dont use them..
then there is only one thing left that can be the cause..
lack of discipline...

Yep

Also even if you fucking pay for free public school to everyone..
most kids WILL NOT STUDY

I prefer to be in places where there are trees and mountains. If anyone complains that you're watering a tree, they're to blame for being a snoop.

and if you give free money to unemployed services
THEY WILL NOT SHOW UP

the evidence is everywhere

a large percent of poverty
is caused by lazy motherfuckers who
dont want to job

then rest are hard working poor
who serve to give the parasites a good face.

I think you need to give people in the bottom of society some guidelines
or some restrictions.
untill they prove they can take care of themselves.

I agree. And my stance on these issues varies depending on which dystopian future we're proposing as a fix 😃

okej you asked before why I suggested so many things should be goverment owned or regulated
but none of them would be social welfare... this is why.

also I want the old food banks we used to have BACK

How are food banks different?

And why do you spell things the european way? (harbour)

I live in Sweden so I only know how it is here.

Okay, that makes sense then 😃

No what we used to do in Sweden was

that the food that was not sold or consumed was sold or given
to a food bank.
and the poor could get food copongs.

Sounds reasonable.

but then the poor wanted cash instead..
which proves that poor can be assholes
and it defeats the entire purpose

And now they get cash instead of food money? Or as well as food money?

because giving poor people cash
means the food only goes to waste
and .. yeah

Now they just get more goverment aids..

aid I mean..

if you just set a limit right there.. that would have been a reasonable discplay of authority..

you cannot let people in the bottom of society who has no stakes in it
vote and control the conditions
on how the state is helping them..

That makes sense.

Speaking of voting rights, and people at the bottom, I have a strong opinion regarding voting rights for felons.

Virtue, there is truth in what you are saying, but, remember how alien and judaised our society and culture have become. A lot of people also feel like theyre complete and utter slaves..and they are really..

I dont think felongs should have rights..

There is more going on then that they are simply lazy. But yeh...there is a huge dysgenic effect going on too. Theyre becoming less and less in IQ it seems..

@Pretorius
But the poor and the slaves cannot know for themselves
how to get out their situation, because they dont understand how the food and money was wasted.
Only a person who is NOT a slave can help them.

No at least 30 percent of the poor are just lazy

But since they have been robbed of their purpose and identity what are they working toward? Society also seems to hate them. Speaking about white working class also

Not non whites

I agree.

@Virtue What if we don't give them money, but instead give them food and shelter?

giving them food and shelter was already on the list I gave you

_nods._

It was white culture to build a home for a newly wed couple

Yes that is basically what I already was going to do.

As i understand it

Now we give them a usurous loan

I am sorry I was mistaken

when I said lazy, I meant all psychological factors

<-- lazy

I agree that if you give the poor a purpose or direction
they will walk to a better future !
but left on their own they will not.

I have a normie in my spare room reeeee

A NORMIE

He is watching talmudvision

kill it with fire!

or pretzels!