@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

what the fuck

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

@chadmin Listen here you fucking pedo, do you get the point

yes

we have 3 virginities

5

"Kissing" is not sexual intercourse

Oral, as in sucking a dick, is sexual intercourse, but kissing in of itself is __not__

actually technically 4

@iwantfun count the ears bastard

usually a male only loses 1

@chadmin no satire in <#516711835857059867>

it counts as a serious channel

well actually 2

the ears are holes @iwantfun

the mouth is a hole

you can not fuck an ear

the vagina is a hole

you can cum in a ear

vag, mouth, ass

@iwantfun do u want me to ban the pedo

i kinda do but not today

mouth has 2 virginities

kissing and uh oral

technically

im going to fucking crucify you

@iwantfun
virgin

n.
A person who has not experienced sexual intercourse.

kissing is part of sexuality

kissing __does not__ count as a virginity and a loss thereof

Kissing is not sexual intercourse

they are counted separatly because each is on different moral level

i guess

@iwantfun according to who you fucking cunt

or is that moderism though

according to me
kissing could be fine at young age but sucking dick is different

urhfeiruwhgou43y1gbuy45bgren

Maybe because of how traditional my church is, and in effect me, but kissing is looked down upon

until youre dating

regardless of age

and apparently the poophole loophole is a thing and buttsex not sin or whatever for some churches

It is heresy

It is a sin

It is not what sex is meant for, and therefore a sin as the Bible says, sex is meant for reproduction and nothing else

so i mean they are on different levels

Using it for pleasure is sin

but some people say it is less of a sin

?

No

than vag

before marriage

so they do that instead

THATS FUCKING HERESY

cause well i mean niggas can not control themselves perfectly in teen years

All sins end in death

They are all equal in deadliness

[romans 6:23]

well everyone commits a sin so i mean if they pick the sins with the lowest negative value

In Matthew 5:21-28, Jesus equates committing adultery with having lust in your heart and committing murder with having hatred in your heart.

[Matthew 5:21-28]

and do good things and shit

adultery would require marriage first though right

Not in the biblical sense

if your married you can fuck all you want

If you think about having sex with someone (impure thoughts) it is the same as Adultery

that is way to hardcore for me

"if your married you can fuck all you want"

No.

also impossible not to do so

Sex is meant for reproduction __only__

wait so i can not fuck my waifu all night long

@iwantfun Not true, it is within your will to control it

dam

@iwantfun No

Only for reproduction

Not for pleasure

Some say this is too strict

But i remind you of this

so only if you go raw each time it is ok

The gates to Hell are wide and open

But the path to Heaven is narrow and hard

@iwantfun Dont try loopholing, it dosent work

well some people legit have to fuck multiple times to get pregnant though

Then they can.

Or you can not be a dumbass and wait 2 weeks after her period

When a woman is most fertile

what if a woman is infertile

Then no sex.

You can still adopt though

you telling me that artificial impregnation is the most trad way of doing things

The flesh has a massive influence over you and its extremely hard to control your fleshly wants, like sex.

@iwantfun No, natural reproduction is

but you get pleasure from that

And?

It's a by-product

and it doesnt always work so you have to do it again

You can have pleasure from sex while reproducing

@iwantfun So then you do it again

But you have to fully intend for it to be reproductional, not trying to loophole it in any way

It has to be genuine

if you married you can fuck

No

?

Not for pleasure

Only for reproduction

when can you do it for pleasure?

Go scroll up fucking idiot and read

never?

Never

rip porn stars

well

what if it is to put her in her place

@iwantfun that dosent make any fucking sense

@Doctor Anon punish them

like i mean to make her stay in her role

like a daddy thing

How is sex going to make that happen?

That makes 0 fucking sense

instead of doing degenerate work

punish with fucking

marry a trad woman you idiots

Colossians 3:18-19

[Colossians 3:18-19]

i know but i like to find the true extent of rules/regulations

This is the most retarded thing ive heard come from you

bending rules is sinning

not every sentence is going to apply 100% of the time if you follow full text instead of 1 line

sometimes i am sure there are some times/situations where your encouraged to do other things

It seems that line 2 prevents the abuse of line 1. Therefore as long as the man abides by line 2 and the woman line 1 it all works just peachy.

+setversion GNT

In regards to both eternal consequences and salvation, all sins are the same. Every sin will lead to eternal condemnation (Romans 6:23). All sin, no matter how “small,” is against an infinite and eternal God, and is therefore worthy of an infinite and eternal penalty.

hehe

<@&516817984782729217> Daily Question <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586>

- Are humans predestined for hell or heaven? Or do we have free will to choose our end?

it's everyday bro with the disney channel flow

5 mil on youtube in 6 months never done before

Fucking reee

hey

hey

[Romans 8:26-31]

**Romans 8:26-31 - King James Version (KJV)**

```Dust


<26> Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. <27> And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God. <28> And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. <29> For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. <30> Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified. <31> What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us? ```

@Doctor Anon

Who put the Bible bot back!

@Da_Fish me

It's superior fight me

Don't remove it

Romans 8:26-31

**Romans 8:26-31 - Good News Translation (GNT)**

```Dust
God's Love in Christ Jesus

<26> In the same way the Spirit also comes to help us, weak as we are. For we do not know how we ought to pray; the Spirit himself pleads with God for us in groans that words cannot express. <27> And God, who sees into our hearts, knows what the thought of the Spirit is; because the Spirit pleads with God on behalf of his people and in accordance with his will. <28> We know that in all things God works for good with those who love him, those whom he has called according to his purpose. <29> Those whom God had already chosen he also set apart to become like his Son, so that the Son would be the first among many believers. <30> And so those whom God set apart, he called; and those he called, he put right with himself, and he shared his glory with them. <31> In view of all this, what can we say? If God is for us, who can be against us? ```

begone

romans 1126

romman 11:26

Romans 11:25

**ਰੋਮੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ 11:25 - Punjabi Bible: Easy-to-Read Version (ERV-PA)**

```Dust


<25> ਮੇਰੇ ਭਰਾਵੋ ਅਤੇ ਭੈਣੋ, ਮੈਂ ਚਾਹੁੰਦਾ ਹਾਂ ਕਿ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਇਸ ਗੁਪਤ ਸੱਚ ਨੂੰ ਸਮਝੋ। ਇਹ ਸੱਚ ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਇਹ ਤੱਥ ਸਮਝਣ ਵਿੱਚ ਮਦਦ ਕਰੇਗਾ ਕਿ ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਸਭ ਕੁਝ ਨਹੀਂ ਪਤਾ। ਸੱਚ ਇਹ ਹੈ; ਇਸਰਾਏਲੀਆਂ ਦਾ ਇੱਕ ਹਿੱਸਾ ਕਠੋਰ ਬਣਾ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ। ਪਰ ਉਹ ਉਦੋਂ ਬਦਲੇਗਾ ਜਦੋਂ ਕਾਫ਼ੀ ਸਾਰੇ ਗੈਰ ਯਹੂਦੀ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਕੋਲ ਆ ਜਾਣਗੇ। ```

<:gay:487682214604046336>

Leviticus 18:22 KJV

**Leviticus 18:22 - King James Version (KJV)**

```Dust


<22> Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. ```

👌

if youre christian you cannot use leviticus

ofcourse not 100% is predestination, thats a heretic belief

we also have free will

Calvinists believe in predetermination but many other Christian sects believe in free will. I personally believe that God has the ability to see all out our fates but that because fate is fluid, he sees all possibilities but choses to not solidify any of them. We have freedom of choice within a context.

@el pebble Christians can in fact use the old testament because the doctrine itself is fine, when Jews decided to betray god and follow their own path, that's when they fell out of God's grace. The Torah or Old Testament is a holy book written with inspiration from God while the Babylonian Talmud is a work of man used to subvert a host nation and promote within the group. The following of the Talmud caused corruption and decadence to profligate within the ancient Jewish community. Today's "Jews" are not direct descendance of the tribe of Judea but are descendances of King Nebuchadnezzar who was a convert to the faith.

After Nebuchadnezzar, the only remaining documents were the Torah and the Talmud. By taking the name Jew, they have successfully subverted the meaning of Zionism

I believe we have free will, so predestination is a no-go, and i'm not even a Christian, I just know that Calvinism is not the answer

just believe in islam lol

islam good

Tsk.

Yes, people, believe in Islam! It is dope and it gives you a great advantage in war with Jihad! __Though,__ I hope you don't mind if slavery is legal, if we are *somewhat* pedophiles, I hope that you don't mind if we beat you up, in case you're a woman, I hope you don't mind that you will get killed if you leave Islam, I hope you don't mind if you get killed in case you fuck someone outside marriage and I hope you don't mind that it is an extremely violent religion! Islam good!

@Crazed Shotgun the Christian's cannot use Leviticus as an example because they are not expected to uphold the Law

@Koninos first of all jihad means struggle. such as your struggle to find good source of information about islam. second of all. Muhammad did not marry a 6 year old third of all beating one up is not permissible fourth of all. there is no prescribed punishment for apostates fifth of all. why judge islam when the torah has the same punishment

if you want to learn about a religion look at its AUTHENTIC scriptures

not the followers

didn't he marry her at 9?

and boink her when she was 16 or somethin?

Jihad technically means struggle, but it is mainly used as an excuse to justify terrorist action

How is someone called muhammad an aryan

I mean even if youre born a westerner i think you lose a bit of your purity when you change your name

many western names are Jewish, tho

^ Unfortuneately yes

I unironically think we need to bring back more and more authentically indoeuropean names to our people

eeeh

They're still around

so there's no need for such things

@Obungus He married her at 6, and had sex with her at 9.

Facts.

Prove me wrong, Western culture isn't white and should be torn down

What do you even mean by "Western Culture is not white"?

I mean, I won't prove that wrong, because I prefer spending my time on some rational matters..

Based anprim

ugh

siegeprims are the worst

Papa Kazcynski would have you mail-bombed!

@Koninos Western civilization at It's core is semitic in nature

Founded on Christian roots

Christianity is semitic

Western civilization at It's core is liberal

@Obungus @Koninos no...

which is why it needs to be destroyed

^

but basically the age of aisha, there multiple hadith from where we can derive she's older . in one hadith an aunt of the prophet tells him to marry aisha because she can console him and help him with the house and stuff. a 6 year old cant give someone emotional support nor help in the house, a 6 year old would rather need help. Also theres a hadith where a sahabi asked to fight in the battle of uhud. but he wasnt 15 so the prophet didnt let him go. But the prophet let aisha go help at the battlefield which would make aisha older when she married the prophet

''one hadith says that he married her at 6 and started living with her at 9. It is known and undisputed that aisha married the prophet 2 years after the migration to medina. If we then look at a hadith which also is in sahih bukhari we see that aisha herself narrates that from the moment she could start thinking, aka becoming like 5 years old, that her parents were muslims. Meaning that around the migration of the muslims to habasah she would be around 5. The migration to habasah was by consensus 5 years after the prophet starting preaching. Thus we can conlude that when islam was 5 years old she was atleast 5 herself. The migration to medina was 13 years after the prophet started preaching. Thus Aisha was 13 years old at the migration to medina. She married the prophet 2 years after therefore she was atleast 15. This is assuming a child starts reasoning at 5 and not older hence she probably was even older

traditionalism best

I've heard something like that before

the inly problem is that whether someone opposes or supports Islam, finding quotes from the Quran seems to be difficult.

@Muhammad Al-Tajir shut up sand spic lol

This is how one debates a Semite

@Mikael He’s kurdish so he’s technically aryan I think

White as fuck

Huh, i guess he’s race-mixed then(?)

Arab

Iraqi I think

them eyebrows, fuck no that ain't white