and judaism

yes

If you consider killing or converting anyone by force for thousands of years peaceful

jews are good

they gib sheckal

jews are not okay

the holy land must be turned pagan

No

pagans gay

jews are gayer

no they give us shekal

no they give us holohoax

pagans give gay

pagans give english men fucking death

pagans give muslim

death

https://youtu.be/leK2WkAHLYk

Is anyone serious here?

@Christian G. <#452955229227319306>

@chadmin what do u think of islam and whats ur religion

pagans are nearly eradicated but the keep coming and coming

fucking shits

Eh the pqgans must continue to exist otherwise you are facing a massove insurmountablw pit between nihilism and any monitheistic modern religion of your choising. Erqdicating then is also bad because there is some wisdom within the ancient myths that are worth intellectuakky investigating either to furtuer your own intellext, improve argu entatiin etc.

I really hate my Phone key oard reee

(turn auto-correction on)

<@&516817984782729217> Daily Question <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586>

- Is Apostolic Succession valid? Why or why not?

(Give me that role)

@Koninos <#516818342250807346> idiot

Oof

what

Yes

This new system is gay.

Says the gay

no u

°

Apostolic Succession, hmm, I'm still unsure on it's validity

There are verses that they use to validate it, but it's really up to how to interpret those verses

It is

But the line of succession, like all dynasties, has often experienced interregnums

Also @Earl of Morrrrgantown for future qotds can you not focus on election stuff as hard

More so on topics

I believe that the only Protestant church where the Apostolic Succession is much of an issue is the Church of England. Although they claim to have maintained the Apostolic Succession intact through the days of Henry VIII (or VII, I don't really remember), the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches do not agree with them, and therefore do not consider their sacraments valid. The Orthodox Churches and the Roman Church, although separated on several issues, recognize the validity of each other's sacraments, since the chain Apostolic Succession was never broken, despite the schisms, and all the differences between them.

Personally, I am still undecided on that topic.

*However*, some people say that the Apostolic succession in general is viewed differently from the Catholics by the Orthodox. It is important to be ordained by someone who himself has apostolic succession, but this ordination must take place inside the Church. The Orthodox see the Catholics as having left the Church, and so while they may have maintained valid forms, the Orthodox cannot say if they have grace or not. The same applies to the various small vagante groups that have split from the Orthodox: they may have maintained technically correct apostolic succession, but having cut themselves off from the Church are treated as any other heterodox body.

@Doctor Anon alright

Well put👌

Apostolic succession is real and biblical through verses of laying on hands and transferring power from the presbyteri

Yes. I concur.

I can agree there

Some good input you two

Apostolic succession is legitimate

it just isn't in the catholic church anymore

Papists tarnished any faith they had

Apostolic succession does not get tarnished

It is one of the few things within the church which cannot be tarnished.

Or at least is set up so it is extremely hard to do so.

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-basics-part-1

<@&516817984782729217> Daily Question <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586>

Is genetic modification (on humans) okay? Are we going against God's teachings?

Genetic modification is the work of satan

It's not okay

It's morally wrong.

Now for a reason.... 🤔

We as humans should not try to play God

Modification = crucifixion

The atheist scientists want to destroy all morality in our world. Genetic modification on humans is wrong.

<:this:487682424562647060>

Do you guys think there could ever be an alliance between Christians of all (or most) denominations?

Yes

Genetic modification? FUCK no

Protestantism needs to disappear though

It's by its very definition dividing

I'm a protestant smh

So am I

But im considering Orthodoxy or Catholicism

As a Catholic, it confuses me when Protestants have faiths very similar to Catholicism (for example Lutheranism)

@Lord Tachanka My slavic church is pretty much exactly orthodox, just not connected to the Orthodox church and therefore protestant

Maybe we can compromise in a way so that the faith is unchanged, but people can interpret God in their own ways so that they stay with their church

@Lord Tachanka there are some very big differences

Like Sola Fide

Belief you can be saved by faith *alone*

Genetic modification is the future

Good day

Religion is essential for unity and values though

It's beyond essential

I know, but Orthodoxy and a lot of Protestant Churches are similar to Catholicism

eek

Wrong wording

Orthodox and Catholic are very similar

Protestantism is not very similar

Catholics and Orthodox Churches both come from the Early Church (the first christian church made by Apostle Paul)

Some Churches are though, and only have small differentiations. Now some Churches are very different, which I respect, I'm talking about the similar ones

Protestantism does not, it came from a rebellion against the Catholic Church

Modern day Lutheranism is similar, while Calvinism and Evangelicalism are not

Those are just examples

I just want to avoid a conflict where Christians kill other Christians because some greedy businessmen can make a fortune.

tbh, some genetic modification is fine

The thing i don't like about catholicism

What are you getting at?

Is that they have the rosary thing

If you want to cure a disease or resolve some immune system issues, fine