Django Reinhardt for me

nice guy

I look up to Corneliu Zelea Codreanu.

Or Huey Long.

The russians got involved b/c of serbia

i mean they couldn't just fucking not help their ally

So it was unavoidable

If only the archduke didn't get fucked.....

Is infinity god?

Catholic Hitler

The f in John f Kennedy was for respect

JFK big gay

George Washington

I'm not even patriotic but that man was pretty alright tbh

St. Athanasius

Hitler

Gaius Marius or Germanicus

(in case you couldn't tell)

The left believes in marxian oppressed oppressor classes, the right is not the left.

The Left believes in the delusion of absolute equality

Not really, some extremists for sure, but not all.

I mean, Marxian powers structures are all about the proletariat being higher up then the bourgeoise

I wouldnt sya its just the extremist that believe in absolute equality

most yu ask on the street would say "yes I do believe in equality, because all men are equal etc. etc."

and in the end dont hav ean arugment for why their own mother is mor eimportant than someone elses mother

or why they should nad are allowed to care more for their parents and siblings than say someone halfway across the world

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Was the Iraq war a good idea? Was it justified? Was it about preventing nuclear proliferation?

killing shitskins is always a good idea

it was justified, the investigation claimed it had nuclear and chemical weapons

fuck nuclear proliferation, give everybody nukes

when the USA arrived there was fuck all

@Deleted User go to politigram retard

lmao at your life

@Deleted User what are you ancap?

he is a troll

an eschatological pure land buddhist anarcho-khaganist

smh some people

***oil***

Iraq isn't really an oil country is it?

it's not a large producer, even tried annexing Kuwait because of oil shortages

Imo

Iraq did had some sort of WMD

Possibly a Chem

Do you think they pretended it was a nuke to make it seem scarier?

I don't blame the USA or Bush for thinking he had nuclear weapons, Saddam Hussein was always an ambitious man

he tried annexing Kuwait, Invading Iran, and many more. The guy was interesting

imo many people saw it as some sort of second pearl harbor, USA gets attacked, USA goes out to kick ass

except not this time

Also yeah i think they cover it up with something biggwr like a nuke

Possibly as a deterrent

no no and no

@Deleted User would you say the us had greater interests than just WMDs and terrorism?

I mean

yeah

Saddam had destabilized the middle east twice by this point, no shit the Bush at least would want to fuck him off

I don't think anyone other than literal time travelers would know shit would go south that much

Well if the US just let him do his thing

Sooner or later he'll just fuckover the entire middle east

^

That means fucking the oil supply

he did in the 80s, the 90s, it was only time until something happens in the 00s

fuck america

^

So the main interest was middle Eastern oil?

no?

muh oil

No

Main interest was defending the US oil supply from the middle East

Iraq isn't a large oil producer, anyone who thinks so has learned politics through intagram memes

the interest imo was to get rid of Saddam and clear Iraq of whatever fucking WMDs they found

But you just said he was a destabilizing factor to other nations that had oil.

I'm fucking confused rn

you worded it like Iraq had oil

that the USA wanted

Sorry, not what I meant

I meant the ultimate goal was to secure oil supply in the region

Would you agree?

50

Oop nevermind

Yeah their most main priority was to protect Middle Eastern nation's that supply the oil for the US

Iraq produces a significant amount of oil and a regime hostile to the USA threatens their partners in the region, simple as that. The WMDs and terrorists were bs.

no the war was not justified

solving things are not as easy as dropping bombs in everything

not to meantion we only went to war cause 9/11 was rigged by (((them))) when in actuality those terrorists were in saudi arabia and pakistan

the countries we trade for oil with

eeeevil jews rigging everything

omg zog u guys

>middle east an important source of oil
>Canada meaning almost half of US imports
>most of the OPEC countries aren't in the middle east

although this might've been different back in the 2000s without fracking being as relevant as it is today and such

Hello! What are we talking about?

that the war in Iraq was for their oil is trash since it only means 6% of the US imports

Why would we start a war, JUST, for oil.

Trade is easier, no?

It could've been a political move though, make bush like a man of war.

yet again

ok,nvm

I didn't read your thing well

I see the latter as more plausible

make a war to open trade sounds a little counterproductive since you'll just get in trouble with civilians over there

jesus christ people actually think they went to war for oil

how many fucking instagram memes do you get fed daily

Operation Iraqi Liberation

O.I.L

Lmao t hats ironic

To think that the top govorment officials were fooled by "muh WMD's" is absurd, its like saying the deep state doesnt actually know what its doing. The US gov knew full well that there were no WMD's, however the US also knew directly that as you guys said the oil supply was at risk. However this is not justification to, and since then, destabilize the middle east more than hussein could have ever done.

Generally right now it looks like "izrael says big bad Syria is dangerous to them -> Mysteriously war breaks out. Izzrael says Iran is a threat -> War looms on the horizon. Izrael says -> X that doesnt actually have WMD's is a threat -> war breaks out"

which is why kim Jon Un is a genius in his striving to develope WMD's, its literally most likely the only thing that saved korea from absolute war and disaster. Trump really didnt do muich, its Kim tha forced the Us's hand. funny what actually having WMD's (although not confirmed, but somehow the deep state as usual knew) can do.

Gaddafi had a deal with Italy to greatly reduce flow of Africans into Italy and Europe in general. Obama took out Gaddafi allowing the flow of Obama's people into white lands.

FYI in reference why the US destabilised the Middle East and Africa.

Obama did nothing wrong

LOL Obomba did nothing wrong for non-whites

The destruction of the white race is good for the world

@Obungus b8

no

Whites have been more harmful to the rest of the world than helpful

Woke

it's true and you can't deny it

That's why whites need to be enslaved by Jews.

That is too dangerous

If whites ever escaped slavery they could lash out and do more harm

thats liberal

It's true you dingus

@Obungus

Tbh I think America should have invaded Iraq, not because there were WMDS or whatever crap the government came up with, but because Saddam was a dictator. And I'm Iraqi. My family was shia and my grandfather was killed because of saddams regime.

This is epic.

The white race is the only race that has ever substantially helped any other race LOL.
Whites stopped slavery. Only slavery now is by Africans of Africans LOL

Whites are still trying to stop Africans from murdering each other in the name of "voodoo" or "magic" or islam

<#463779195114225685> pls

@21tagtmeiern Just trying to shut up the nagger

@Obungus ok, this is epic

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Should and will Kavanaugh be confirmed?

Yes

no and maybe

shutup libtard

yes and maybe

Yeah

Kavanugh has done nothing wrong

Yes, and definitely

The Preliminary vote was almost a 50-50 split.

51-49.

Ended debate.

Yes

Yes, but the Democrats will try to drag it as long as possible, but eventually we'll get him through. This is one of these events we can't afford to lose.

nope

he will be but he shouldn't

I'm sick of how all Liberals hate him, but Republicans love him. Can we please stop politicizing things for 5 seconds?

That's impossible

stop pinging

Why the hell shouldn't he be confirmed

Hes done literally nothing wrong.

It's all just character assassination because he was chosen by President Trump.

He was a Saint.

the non political version is simply yes

the political version with all implications involved is -> He must be confirmed, because the consequences would be too dire

I mean, there's allegations - I personally believe them due to evidence in the form of older therapist notes, before he was considered for the SCOTUS

But beyond that, he's got quite a terrible record in terms of what he's supported

The evidence for the allegations have been literally disproven though, there is nothing that can indicate that he was remotely involved.

in terms of what he supported I mean it depends im not particularly wel read in that field but generally I think he might be whats necessary to rectify a lot of what the US has going wrong in it. I mean its not like it will change much, its not like the deep state or any state actually provides change on it sown that is good for the people :/ Not this state at least

He supported the US threatening crimes against humanity to a civilian.

Someone completely innocent.

He also supported not allowing a lawsuit for the torture said civilian had to go through

He said that Exxon mobile shouldn't be charged for human rights violations they committed in Indonesia because the US didn't have jurisdiction in Indonesia

Even though it's a US company...

and thus, would need to be sued here

He's also advocated for the NSA and metadata collection

Arguing that it shouldn't be limited or blocked whatsoever

So unless you think that companies being prosecuted for violating human rights, a lack of torture, and not enough governmental wiretapping are all blights on America

you really shouldn't be for him

But hey, Trump nominated him.

I used to support Trump, but it's impossible to at this point.

It's a lost cause

Of course, while my ideology has heavily shifted...

I still don't see how one can justify supporting Trump or his nomination for the SC

Whether or not what is "torture" for what you're referencing is actually debatable. On top of that, if you murder someone and flee across a national border, you aren't tried in that new country. You're extradited to the country the crime was committed in. So, Exxon should be tried in Indonesia. *"But they're human rights violations!"* What kind of point is that? If an entity is committing human rights violations anywhere, they aren't held to the laws of a different land. Human rights are not American rights, they're __human__ rights. That means Exxon will not, and should not, be tried by the US government, but by an international court @SilverLining

That still doesn't cover the NSA wiretapping which he endorsed

Also, to add to that...

How is being secretly imprisoned, being denied due process, being denied counsel, being threatened with torture, forcibly disappeared (an international human rights violation), and tortured acceptable?

This was to a US citizen, done by US troops...

It's not "debatable" whatsoever

The crime committed was fleeing to Kenya from Somalia (where the American was studying abroad) after a civil war erupted.

Also, the citizens couldn't file their charges within Indonesia was the government, particularly the military, was complicit.

He also, of course, believes the president should not be able to be prosecuted

As in, the person who occupies the office of the president - not just Trump

He believed Nixon shouldn't have been persecuted in the Watergate Scandal

this is not epic

@SilverLining I have my reserves on the kid, however the issue of the wiretapping is an issue, IMHO I think Trump is a false revolutionary, here to appease the apetite of the potentially revolutionary right wing, bring the simmering water down a few degrees. Then when the waters have clamed, one, two terms later, the dems or the repubs will simply go and continue turning america into a dystopia

it seems to be a method of either 1) stopping the revolution or 2) controlling the revolution before, or after, it happens

are you talking about a right-leaning revolution?

because yeah, no

I feel like President Trump is a puppet to a bigger puppet.

The terms deep state

@JogaFlame Trump is /ourguy/

He is playing 5d chess

Hes too intelligent for you to understand his plans

Trump sucks up to the Jews @Doctor Anon

^

That's what I was thinking

Because he hasn't said shit in terms of Israel.

So I don't know if he's fully our guy.

If he went against Jews he would lose

Surprising he even managed to have racist ambitions without being shutdown completely by the kikekind

@L0GAN @JogaFlame @The Big Oof
No he doesn't, he's playing 5d chess with the Jews. Multiple WikiLeaks articles detail how Trump *knows* who is Jewish in the government and has lists detailing every Jew in the government. He's using them to his own benefit, he's double crossing them.

Oh yes

The double triple of the D’s

@L0GAN
"U.S. President Donald Trump's White House, says Trump has "creepy" knowledge about who around him is Jewish."

Alright then.

Looks like I was just paranoid, that's all.

perhaps it is because trump has worked in business so long, he knows a jew when he sees one

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/188332750

I saw those spray painted and all that

honestly its at least somewhat of an effort

but IMO its still not what is needed, people respond to simpler mediums, ones that also affect the emotional and usually visual immediately

ergo art

it explains why the left took over art before it made a move on anything else

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

What happened to Rhodesia? Was it justifiable? If you don't know what Rhodesia is: Should we or should we not have white settlements and colonies/nations in Africa? Why?

uhh

well

Rhodesia was ZO

Not justifiable but we should just fucking stay out of africa

Rhodesia was a tragedy

Rhodesia was epic

It is evidence that whites can't and shouldn't stay in Africa.

Only white genocide will occur

The African land is a land of demons and beasts. Diseased and barbaric, it is only fit for habitation by peoples who are equally as barbaric. We have no place there

Rhodesia should've been dealt with better. The UN should've let the whites come back to their homes as refugees or just let the white stay a separate country all together if they would not capitulate.

^

And I mean capitulate to let them return home gradually as normal. But considering there was no fucking country when Rhodesia was made in that area. The African Bushmen that descended the Mugabians, don't exactly have a massive claim to that area. And neither do the South Africans as a whole.

I'm not saying the Black Africans have no reasonable arguments. But the two sides of this story are not (excuse my pun here) Black and White.

White rule of Africa is needed.

*too bad cuz China’s taking it over*

Chinas just going to stagnate that continent.

Just like they've done with their own country tbh. China is a shell of a country with a shitty economy based upon GDP growth. See there Ghost cities.

Tbh China is more of a threat to America than Russia

And since America, thanks to trump, has been demolishing relationships, people will side with the East.

*cough cough* Jerusalem Embassy *cough cough*

China is the Far East

And I’m fairly certain he didn’t hurt our relationships with them

Colonialism hurt our race more than anything else

A lot of it depends, is the land uninhabited, was it uninhabited? Generally anything else will lead to conflict and literlaly getting swarmed by a more primitive albeit more determined force.

This meme is beyond me

Stirner

Rhodesia?? What about zulu???

How would the United States do if they were the top nuclear energy producers instead of oil?

Global economy and industry would be centered around nuclear reactors instead of refineries

@Froce

white settlement in Africa is generally a bad idea

the type of settlements and civilizations we create are incompatible to the climate