This is a CONSERVATIVE server

Okay, but it's not *my* server

I'm sure they will do something about it

I don't want to overstep my bounds

If you just wanna make your own server and break off, we'll join you

@Alice Redacted Just change it in the mean time

I'll give you thirty minutes @Alice Redacted

then I'll deport you ig

Straight up autism to ban a dude with an anime pic

this better?

Yes

@Deleted User The image was lewd, but he/she changed it, so it's over with

Check the mod chat

<#452955302812319764>

@Alice Redacted yes

a huge amount tbqh. Without a moral compass individualism reigns, and with that a host of social problems. Religion should guide and direct the mission of a country, and it should be integrated into all levels of community and government.

All adult men should be initiated into the Church, and given a role within its hierarchy. Membership to the predominant church needs to be a prerequisite for obtaining a marriage license, and of course heresy needs to be prosecuted with the strictest punishments

No religious law, but Christianity must assert its presence in politics even if just through messaging with on the ground push for social conservative policies, conservative policies in general

the primary reason our adult men and women are so confused about everything is that they have an unclear sense of identity. Individualism is the cause of that. Humans evolved in a tribe setting. While (((they))) have tried very hard to provoke only the negative connotations of tribe, there are also key positives. 1. clear sense of identity 2. a sense of order and hierarchy. 3. mentorship and initiation rituals where the knowledge and traditions of the tribe are passed down. there are many others.

These are the things humans evolved with, and one of the key things that people feel is "missing" in their life: identity, mission, purpose. Why? all because of individualism. Its not how we are meant to live. Its not what we are supposed to do. Its like a fish trying to survive out of the water.

humans need a community. they need to be taught things. right now we have ceded control of all of this to our (((educational system))), and look how broken our society has become.

the most expedient fix to this is a resurgence of Christianity within our communities. It fills many of the roles described, though not all of them by any means, and serves overall to generate identity, purpose, and a foundation of truth

muh lewd

still a dumb thing to change when you have people literally calling for genocide on this server

Saying it's justified to kill non-christians

then you threaten banning a dude with a lewd pic

righto

I'm not against any of it, I just think it's inconsistent and arbitrary rules

@Deleted User I did not threaten to ban him/her (claims to be a girl)

I was going to do nothing until someone pointed out that it was, in fact, shirtless

All I did was just make them change it

I mean

you said you'd "give me 30 minutes" to change it

with the implication being a ban

if I didn't change it

or, rather

you'd "deport" me

I presume that's a ban

I mean, regardless, it's kinda weird how you're all bothered by mild lewdness

but don't give a fuck about, well, as oscar said, calls for genocide, or antisocial behavior

no

*sigh*

I dont get why people fail to understand there is a difference between a mod and an admin

Not saying that it's the admin's fault, but I doubt they're going to appreciate me banning everyone on sight, especially since they told us not to ban without asking,

and second, I didn't even see whatever is being talked about @Alice Redacted

Why don

"to avoid bias, before deporting get the confirmation of another minister"
@Deleted User

Yes, thank you @Doctor Anon

I mean, you said I had 30 minutes

before "deportation"

Well I dont give a shit whatever problem you have with it, considering I could have banned you if I wanted to

unless you're saying that my old pfp was fine

Nah, I just find it weird how you don't care about people literally advocating for killing others

but some censored picture is a massive moral dilemma

I find it weird how you won't even fucking show me what you're talking about

LaZy yOu dOnT hAvE pErMs tO bAn

I do

Just not directly

Through the bot

Unless you mean I have to ask an admin first

In which case that is true

"I'll give you thirty minutes @Slutty Goddess
then I'll deport you ig"

But this dipshit here lacks the chromosome count (or possibly has too many) to understand that

then just search "kill all"

and see the countless examples of advocacy for genocide or murder

First page of results

all memes

"Kill SJWs"

Not exactly good evidence

and when I search the first page of the entire server

this is what I get

Having a lewd pfp isn't against server rules, only posting NSFW is

Then he/she can change it back

@Alice Redacted You don't know how discord works anyway

And you're trying to somehow act like I singled you out alone

No, I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about when you say "calls of genocide"

religion is good for society, but the state shouldn't enforce it

@Deleted User But it should encourage Christianity

Also, deportations aren;t bans @Alice Redacted

You're isolated into a channel where you can be let out if a mod wants you to be

But no

<:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586> <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586>

what really happened

What I really did

Is I singled you out specifically just for no reason

so muting, essentially

If I'm going to abuse my powers, I could have just banned you, just saying

I'm not really saying

you specifically

just the server in general

You talk a lot of shit for someone who won't give screengrabs or context of what you're talking about

You know

If I saw something like that, I'd give a picture to go along with what I said

Lazy, moia can't use Dyno to ban I'm fairly certain

I think they can

But it doesn't matter

I banned one person, *i think*

let me test

(this is my alt)

I fixed it

Okay, so I can't anymore?

Now they cant*

alright

Get ur alt in

?mute @boi boi boi

sdfsdfs

Ok güt

not working

I can't mute

Ok

Just use deport

That works

I deported my alt

I'll make a custom warn command once I'm home

what is the command to un-deport?

I forgot

`?undeport`

got it

religion should play no role in politics except to inform the ethical codes politicians rely on

Only posting NSFW is against server rules, ay?

No

<#452955195542863883>

The state should ensure the preservation of it's nations culture which includes religion.

that means restricting who can enter your country on a religious basis

the state should ensure all the peoples wants, which can sometimes be religion

it should have no say in what religion the people within the nation decide to adopt

The state should be secular, but promote christianity.

@Doctor Anon how do you feel about catholics

@L0GAN Don't like them, but whatever.

I think that is what i'm arguing for @Doctor Anon

@Doctor Anon good, i was worried youd be mad if i started hating on em rn

at least for a christian nation

Orthodox is far superior to Catholicucks

they ruin the point of religion and use fear to enforce heirarchal standards

also they give sainthood to those who steal millions from children in poverty aswell as turn a blind eye to rape

^

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Do you support a right to keep and bear arms? If so then should the right be unlimited (no restrictions)? If you don't support it then why?

Yes

No

gay

no u

Shall not be infringed

yes

unlimited

Unlimited power

Recreational nukes

I suppose the right to protect property, yes. I believe in background checks and that's pretty much it

background checks are a spook

Yes, and nothing that has ability to affect lots of unintended targets

Lol

I support the right to bear a sword.

And a crossbow

No mcnukes or supervirus

Not sure about guns, though.

i support the right of qualified mentally sound people to own pistols or whatever

nope

Everyone gets an AK

guns but too many you get the american paradox too cowardly to use

them on globalists

More guns = less violent crime

Yes. Maybe limit explosives & rpg type weaponry.

nope

But honestly, I only care if I can wear a sword around.

@Mr. Wright no, the point of 2A is to resist the tyranny of the state. We need to be able to be equally as armed a the state.

Yes for guns, only requirement is either going to the military so ergo all young men with mandatory 6 months training/ service or 1 year. Otherwise 3 tier system starting with pistols and short weapons of small caliber, psychological screen, and practicla traiing for combat, Second tier is bolt action and semi auto, shotgins, tactical training as well, third tier is anything military like, long weapons, tactical training as well as military preperation and a final combat exam. each tier gives you access to a certain tier of weapons and trains you in their use, prservation, and in the end makes you combat capable and at least coherent in your use of firearms when in a live fight.

so98+ % men get it off the bat, but women and those who either skip mandatory service or those who cant serve get the chance to be armed but on an equal playing field. Which creates a healthy culture around firearms as well

Unlimited

Yes and yes.

Only unions should have guns.

I think we should make both the right to carry arms that can't be concealed and the right to vote tied to some kind of military training, only those trained in how to use weapons should hold them and determine how the state uses them in war for instance

@Doctor Anon are you catholic or protestant

he is a baptist\

i think

@The American Nationalist Currently Baptist

aslong as your not catholic

I’m a Congregationalist

i'm atheist but hey i'm not catholic

🌪

Atheism is big gay

Unless you're agnostic

i'm agnostic but i'm functionally atheist

deism is the chad religion

Deism isn’t a religion

<:WhatDid:459545655527079946> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:ToMyDrink:459545654323314710>

i like to think that any sentence using chad as an adjective is supposed to be ironic in some way

deism is a belief that people of other religions can believe in or some shit apparently

False.

nah, deism is light-weight enlightenment drivel

it actually removes the useful parts of religion, and leaves them with what?

it was the 18th century version of atheist

when that was too controversial to say

t. former unironic deist

@Jay1532 You are exactly right!

t. former unironic deist

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Should positive rights such as a right to protection by police exist?

Yes

that's like one of the only things I expect of the state

I mean, arguably not "protection by police", as the institution of the police should be replaced with more community oriented groups

but

>anarchist bitch
>Yes

People are failing to understand the ramifications of a positive right like that though

The right to housing, the right to healthcare, etc

maybe I worded it badly

yes, that spooky idea that things will need to be provided

Police in the USA have no obligation to protect you

Also, I'm not even an anarchist, this name is just intentionally edgy

Police in the USA only punish crime

they don't stop it

or prevent it

I mean

that's not their job

there shouldn't be "preventative arrests"

Prevention is one aspect of punishment

Like if they see someone actively committing a crime

that just leads to the potential of arresting anyone for any reason

and is hella authoritarian

so

but they don't have any obligation to protect you

if you look it up

they do, though

to some degree

I mean, in practice, they don't always

no

so like if someone is being killed, wait till the assault is over to arrest them?

but apprehending active criminals is a form of protection

They can do that griselda

that's a form of protection

I feel like I don't understand the question then

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html

you can't really preemptively protect someone

Simply put police have no obligation to protect

wtf do police do then

kill black people

put people in jail afterwards

that's their only job

that's not preventative at it's core

Police should have a duty to protect citizens from criminals

Actively

to what degree

I think the institution should be abolished as a whole and replaced with community watches

Should police be forced to stay by you if you feel you're in danger?

Police should help out the community in general, and build stronger relationships with the people

Investing individuals with the power of the institution of the police leads to abuse of said power

naturally

In my opinion, the perfect government takes some taxes for the purpose of infrastructure, defense, borders, and protection from each other in the form of police.

I mean, the Stanford Prison Experiment reveals that to some degree

but statistics reveal real world applicable examples

@Deleted User No, not forced, but if a criminal is Robbing you, and you call on an officer to help you, they should help because it's a criminal