depression is a disorder

I don't get what you're saying <:GWvertiPeepoSadMan:405951684339302400>

that it doesnt really matter

so who cares whether it results from a disorder or not

Let all serial killers free in India and China to decrease populations

I never said it did matter

It does matter for a child though

the only way it affects a child is if their assulted

yeah it does cause a gay couple is another couple that can adopt children

Serial killer = choice that removes life
Gay = weird genetic consequence that doesn't remove life

Worst equivalency ever

/\

<:GWvertiPeepoSadMan:405951684339302400>

"the human population needs to decrease anyhow"

ur mean Lp

"yeah it does cause a gay couple is another couple that can adopt children"

This doesn't make sense

gay people cannot make babies

therefore they cannot make children of their own

but many still want to adopt

so they adopt children

take them out of foster homes

and give them a loving home with two parents

sounds like a win-win to me

it's not that simple, each sex has their own role to play. A child needs the input of a mother and a father to understand how both sexes work, and how to understand the essential archetypes that men and women teach (man: aggression and power, woman: safety and agreeableness)

nevertheless, I think gay parents can be good parents

but I don't think it's as simple as it being the same as straight parents

however kids need adoption and what's the alternative?

the answer is nuanced and not simple unfortunately

never is

Lol

There are normal couples who want children

but not enough cause there's still tons of children in foster care

if you'd rather have children have no parents and live in unsupportive distress than have two parents of the same sex idek

you are arguing to keep children in statistically horrible foster care instead of giving them loving care takers.

there's also another argument that so many straight parents become parents by """accident"""

you can't adopt by accident

I put triple quotes around it because accidental pregnancy is people's bs excuse for not being responsible

And therefore a purposeful parenting situation is more likely to be thought out and stable than two people thrown into it

So there's that argument

There's about 400,000 children in foster care

in the US

"you are arguing to keep children in statistically horrible foster care instead of giving them loving care takers."

You're making it seem like foster care is the worst thing ever and all gay couples are amazing caretakers

There *is* good foster care

And there are plenty of horrible gay parents

statistically is shit

But yeah foster is majority bad because it's an easy way to make free money

you get paid $x/month/child

neglect the child and make money

the incentives align with evil

~~if the US was true, not fake, Christians, we wouldn't have a lot of these problems~~

there's tons of loving gay parents, not all are yeah, but thats the same with straight parents

I also have a problem with kids thinking they're gay because they have gay parents

No (normal human) is born gay

No normal human is born straight either wots yet point mate?

When puberty hits, they will start liking the opposite sex

But parents are the biggest influencers in a child's life

On their sexuality?

Fuck this will require at least 2 paragraphs of explaining

Hahahaha you don't sound too good right now.

@everyone 🔖 Daily Question

- What can be good about censorship?

some material is not worth allowing

Nothing

nothing

@Slendy, it can stop shit ideas from arising and gaining influence.

Absolutely nothing you commie

Censorship in what

When there's a movie that insults god I like to watch it censored so my feelings aren't hurt and so my faith isn't shaken

@Deleted User who decides if an idea is shit?

I hope that's a joke

@shlomar

you should only censor things that the bible doesnt approve of

He's joking

censor faggotry

Depending on the realm.. to support comfort. And not really absolute censorship, but more less understood self sensorship, and checks for when this is abused.

@Slendy, don't know; but the principal still stands. If you want my take then, an idea that harms the community, however you want to quantify that.

censor anything that breaks my NAP

censor what goes against the bible yeah

And create curiosity?

thats what inquisitions are for?

duh

"create curiosity"

I mean, I have a curiosity for crashing my car into a brick wall; doesn't mean I'm gonna do it.

much of the laws of the bible are already in place

They still exist in media

"censor what goes against the bible"

what do you mean by that?

@PebbЛe

do not allow the metastasizing of material for the sake of partaking in what the bible prevents

its simple

Lmao

What can be good about censorship

Nothing

What's being censored tho

🤔 @PebbЛe

anything that goes against the bible

ofcourse

Why

god wills it?

I'm a fascist and I disagree with that

Cuz people dont like getting their feelings hurt

I'm no libertarian, but jeese

I dont give a shit what you believe, you have the right to believe and spread your ideas

Even if i hate them

"you have the right"

wrong

obviously you won't have the right once we censor it

<:FeelsSmugMan:428690424056512522>

can't have a right if there is no enumeration of it

Who said, "You have the right"?

I'll just gas the people who go against the Bible when I get into power

Oh me

Lol

Lmao oof, it's Monday

@Hot Singles in Your Area, when are you going to join us and support European-American nationalism?

You saying im not a nationalist?

Are you a European-American nationalist?

Depends what you mean by that

I mean that you support a soviegn homeland for European-Americans.

When you put it like that, no

Why's that?

What I mean by nationalism is cultural nationalism, thats the kind of nationalism i believe in. Not ethnic or civic

Why not ethnic? What would it take for me to make you an ethnic nationalist?

You wouldnt, ethnic nationalism is too limiting, america (my country) was essentially built on immigration and blocking off mostly all forms of immigration would be kind of hypocritical, dont you think?

And besides, if you are worried about terrorism and all that crap.....

I doubt that would stop

uh

calm down there lad

I brb, gonna read that

Well, your country was built off of mainly European-Americans and more immigrants would actually be replacing those same European-Americans who founded and built the nation.
That being said, if the founders said you had to cut your dick off, would you do it? Because if you don't, that's hypocritical, wouldn't it? @Hot Singles in Your Area

well I mean the jews tell us to and we started doing that

so why not

The founding fathers wouldn't have said that

so uh

Well, they wouldn't have enforced it

I mean

Okay, replace *dick* with *XYZ bad thing*.

cut our tumors off

idk sounds pretty nice to me

@Deleted User Poor point tbh

That made no sense

<:smug1:424005084398223363>

Migrant solidarity with European heritage is one thing

We don't need to import the brown third world

Nazis (natsocs) and fascists actually push me further from authoritarianism tbh

@Hot Singles in Your Area
No, it's a good point; the nation was built of off Europeans who became European-Americans and immigrants replace that group.
The other point is showing that doing something because the founders intended it is stupid because someone saying *do X because XYZ said so and we're meant to* is an appeal to authority and it's nonsensical because we could come up with stupid shit they wanted to do that you don't agree with. For instance, the founders signed in the 1790 naturalization act for whites only being naturalized: do you agree with that?

Just as communism pushed me away from leftism, nazism is gonna push me away from authoritarianism

Who said I'm a fascist or a NatSoc?

I never said you were

I wont name names but still

That's a pretty fucking offhand comment. It's like me saying *a pedophiles push me away from authorizations*.

I know, just saying lol

🤔

Anyhow, the far majority of America has been European-Americans. You love America but insist on replacing European-Americans. What gives, big guy?

1. I meant your second point, I wasn't talking about your first one
2.Who said i wanted to do what the founders intended? 🤔

I dont recall even mentioning the founders

but then again

Its late at night

So maybe i said something like that?

1. How is saying that European-Americans built the country and are being replaced a stupid point?
2. I was using the founders as an example. You can replace *founders* with *country* and still get the same argument.

im tired of the third world being here

1. I never said *that* was stupid, but now this is starting to get.... whats the word.... petty? Dunno, replace that word with a better one. But what was this argument about anyways?

I better get to bed soon, so lets wrap this up as soon as possible, please

1. Pretty sure you called it stupid. But whatever, my apologies if you did not.

Basically the argument was that if European-Americans should have their own soviegn homeland or not. You say no, I say yes.

What do you mean by sovereign homeland though?

As in a territory to which they own and make up the super majority of demographics in.

Does that matter

Yes.

White people still make up most of the US population

I mean its best to have some outside input so i guess limited immigration is important

Do they make up a super majority and/or is the country set for their ownership, @Deleted User? What percentage of the U.S. do they make up?

77%

@Hot Singles in Your Area, a European-American state doesn't mean you can't have a limted immigration system. It just means that EuroAmericans stay the super majority.

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045216

^

76.9% rounded up is 77%

@Deleted User Then i agree, to a certain degree at least

@Deleted User, that's counting Hispanics, which can have mixed or no European ancestry. Try looking up the number when it's non-Hispanic whites.

OBJECTION

Go on.

Hispanic is 17%

white ALONE

Actually nevermind

white in American census is North African, Middle Eastern and European

its 61.3 percent

European white is nearer to 50%

a lot of times they count hispanic

as white

which usually is mestizo in America

>white alone
Okay, but when we look up White non-Hispanic we get 62%.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_non-Hispanic_white_population

White alone is 61%

Again, i corrected myself. Its 61 percent

That's still a majority

It doesn't matter either

A pretty decently sized one, too

So what's going on? Went from 90% of the populas to 60%. That sounds like demographic replacement to me.

While the political leanings are pushed against them and the social climate is geared towards the minorities

hmmm

>It doesn't matter either
Why would it not matter?

A lot of the fault goes to sanctuary cities, actually

^

Wow

I dont know how much of them count but still

its almost like there is subversion against whites

in their own land

Does 1965 not ring a bell

If we start deporting or executing criminals then the percentage of white people will go up

Actually it won't

yea it will actually

Well nvm it will

over half of nonwhites will disappear

make up your mind

Black people commit the most violent crimes

How much will it go up by? There's only so many criminals.

True

I cant say you are wrong

over half of all nonwhite males will get a serious felony

if you look at DoJ statistics

Not me, I'm a good mulatto

@Hot Singles in Your Area, who are you talking to?

milky boy

@Hot Singles in Your Area, anyhow, do you admit that European-Americans are being demographically replaced?

I never said they weren't

Very, but I ask anyhow.

Then i do

I'm trying to find my stats where only males contribute positively to the tax base
and the separate one where only whites contribute positively to the tax base:
Aka, two sources, showing only White Males have a net positive on Government Revenue

So which one would be in European American interest, a country to which they hold only a small amount of power and demographic power or a country to which they have a monopoly on, @Hot Singles in Your Area?

Is it really a question you have to ask?

Yes.

Then obviously the monopoly

Government should be small

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Except huge military

yes

Whelp, then now we're at the point that ethnic nationalism is in European-American interest. So are you one now?

http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/05/11/fiscal-impact-of-whites-blacks-and-hispanics/

Still no, but im tired so fuck you

Whoah.

^ well sourced article on how whites are the only contributors to American society

"only whites"

Funny

and asians

but they aren't tracked due to their lower pop

and very small percentages of other races

But not only whites

How does being mixed feel anyhow?

I feel like a human

How does that feel?

Being mixed means absolutely nothing