trump let his daughter marry a jew @Sgt.JuiceBox that's reason enough to despise him

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh

WTF whats so bad about marring a Jew @Similar Scowl

>marring

<:facepalm:487682504153628701>

“What’s so bad about marring a Jew”

Democracy is just like communism, it was never tried

and that's a good thing

good point

actually Trump does some action

and doesnt bomb everyone in the planet so

I cant understand why libtards are triggered

>doesnt kill the other nations
>cares for his own country and unemployment
>wants to reduce internal issues caused by illegal immigration

they're triggered because it's how they compete for status

reeeee *autistic screech*

libtards triggered

not being triggered by drumpf is a sign of low status among them

what he does or doesn't do, don't matter

Uhh, we're still bombing tons

well, you wouldn't be an empire if you didn't do it

That was more directed at @|4d|61|74|74|'s initial comment.

We still bomb quite a lot and have active military personnel in hot-zones across the Mid East and North Africa

Trump has really been no different to other presidents

isn't there also military activity in sub-saharan africa?

Probably

if I recall you're engaged in Mali with the French against Boko Haram

or was it Niger?

I was including that in "North Africa"

well, North Africa is generally speaking north of the Sahara (Maghreb, Libya and Egypt)

As a third side to the USA politics, I value Trump more than the last ni*bb*er and the other presidents.

at least he doesnt get a fucking nobel prize for killing people

I don't even see Trump as a "third side"

im the third side

I dont live in USA

Ah, I see what you're saying

Kill blacks

Third side?

You mean the third position

No, a third side to the conflict in USA.
Lel ... just nevermind that

there are no two side in American politics, there is the Inner Party, and the Outer Party to give a semblance of conflict

❌ **You have to be in a voice channel to use this command.**

@^^^ That is a mighty claim you shouldn’t through it around without considering it’s weight.

Niger is in north africa

so is mali

@^^^

He isn't wrong

The Republican and Democratic party are two sides of the same coin

Only until recently have the two parties become more different

Daily Question 🔖 What is the most misused political slur against the right? Fascist? Reactionary? Racist? Or is it something else?
@everyone

Nazi

Nazism.

Fascist 120%

Fascist

Niger

not even close bruh

Niger is a country.

@Deli.v2 niger?

Fascist which is absolutely ironic

fascist

You have to say it like a white man

^

huwhite'

anyone who is not far left is called a fascist

KURWA

I also get called a race traitor

I'm black

нет

But yeah just a reminder that the American left during the 30s actually supported the nazi regime.

fascist and nazi are musused by both sides tbf

Здравствуйте

Да

А ещё

republicucks don't know how to use those words either

Щзж

I call the far left authoritarian

most common slur?

probably holocaust sympathiser

негр

Based

misogynists i'd say, given we oppose the sexual revolution, that means we're the only ones who believe in the sanctity of women's bodies, leftists are the REAL misogynists reeeeee

сука блуат

I'm a Libertarian, and being called a Fascist or Nazi is always ironic considering that they're probably closer to being one than me.

You can't have bestiality without the "best"

I thought it was called beast

fascist

Nazi

@Hotzendorf fellow librty man !!!

!!!!!!!!!1!!1!

ComRaDe

!!!!!1

Комгаде

So you guys watch economic invincibility

ok, this is E🅱ic

He's pretty libertarian

нет

Never heard of em

Ok

https://m.soundcloud.com/ryan-cc/freddie-dredd-ya-bitch-prod-ryan-c

i've been called a Nazi and Fascist before

I've been called a nazi for using the n-word.

Ф

Soviet Union for you

"Shopping Pleasures"

oh hi sid

NoT rEaL gOmMunIsM

@Koninos @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Gommunism

Gothic Communism.

incels

unironnically

LOL

@Koninos pleasures as in

waiting 7 hours for food

Nazi

Incel

Skinhead

Penis.

racist would be the most used

Accurate

Greetings Friends.

Blessed by your days.

Wrong chat.

😂

Penis.

both sides misuse fascist, racist, and Nazi extensively

^

When you wanna fucking die so you join the centrist gang so you can call both sides gay

When you’re too passive and/or lazy to decide for yourself what your ideals are so you just ride the fence

Everyone

I have a super important question

Ask away

Will Vietnam win the Asian cup

What

Will we win the Asian cup

Idk probably

Ok

Vietnam has a track record of winning against insurmountable odds <:HyperLmao:459545665517780993>

And being Commie bastards!

It’s definitely Nazi

guys

you guys wont believe me when i say that i lost my virginity when i was 12

Getting raped in the ass doesn't count

Yeah I remember making him lose his virginity

Was gross

But I was drunk

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

- Should a nation always aim to improve it's economy no matter what? Explain.

No

i don't see why not

Yes

I would say no

yes

no

The immigrants in Europe.

I'm thinking long term though

Finally.

No nation should mindlessly pursue a goal.

Yes.

Definitely.

so if a nation sacrifices money for long term success, it counts

No matter how good intended it sounds.

yes. improve != growth, however

Is this question asking if economic growth should be sought no matter the cost, or are you just asking if growth is always better than stagnation

Definitely

I would say yes but you would have to define utility in a broader sense than wealth

There’s a lot of utility that comes with wealth

yes of course

I don't think anyone can deny this

no

But it's not the end all

While it should be a goal of a nation to improve itself, it shouldn't be at all costs.

i would say no, a nation should try to improve itself in a multitude of ways, but possibly least of these the economy. It should try to improve its culture. By this i mean it should build upon itself in the arts, the culinary arts, architecture, music, drama, etc. It should try to improve the connections within itself, cultural linkages if you will. By this I mean it should foster participation in the Church and community at large. Increasing participation to strengthen local, regional and national identity. This brings purpose to individuals within the nation.

While growing the economy certainly offers benefits, all too often it is hoisted far above the societal goals listed above, and if effort is not made then the economic goals will supercede these goals completely. In the long run the society will run out of creative energy and the individuals will become increasingly isolated, leading to a multitude of problems and the eventual collapse of economy, for the society is no longer dynamic.

Also take into consideration the means.

what the fuck did I just read

@ＩＶ ＬＩ Ｖ Ｓ <:brainlet:487682295889920016>

I guess so

but do you not know that economic growth is *the* driving force behind cultural advances

Merkel said that the influx of immigrants would bring economic growth.

its not, though

better things are made possible by bigger wealth

if it was, america would have a vibrant and growing culture, instead of a regressive and deteriorating one

this has always been the way

no that's a retarded reduction

not at all

I never said that big economy = good culture

if your claim holds, it should hold every time

I think you need to have expanded material possibilities for sure,
@ＩＶ ＬＩ Ｖ Ｓ has a good point

I said that a big economy enables good culture

"but do you not know that economic growth is the driving force behind cultural advances"

It dosent bring it.

learn how to read idiot

Only the people can do that.

without wealth we have stone age stuff lol

Caveman Culture

economy has always pulled technology and social advances behind it

it is a phenomenon of only ultra wealthy civilizations to slip into decadence

@Doctor Anon National pride comes before the economy

recall two things. 1. the question was whether a nation should aim to improve its economy _no matter what_. 2. recall that i never said a nation shouldnt seek to improve its economy. Rather, it should be one of many social goals, usually below cultural enrichment. For a rich cultural environment enhances the economy in a neat feedback loop, generating new markets as well as inspiring new developments. When profit is chased without regard to cultural enrichment, we get essentially the socio-cultural environment we see today in america

But

usually

95% of the time

economic growth is nothing but a net positive

you're creating a disagreement where you don't need to @Jay1532

hows that. i am answering the question posed

just say "yeah, economic power is necessary in conjunction with cultural goals"

thats not what im trying to say, though

instead of talking like a 105 iq pseudo-intellectual

oh

so you're a 95 iq pseudo-intellectual

it was a y/n question whether "a nation should aim to improve its economy _no matter what_"

i answered no

????

are you getting angry at me or at your tiny brain

is that a projection? because i am perfectly calm. Merely puzzled by your confusion at a simple claim made by me

you act like the manifestation of reddit cancer

one day your kind will swing for this

And what, pray tell, is my kind

<:YouTried:459545653723398144> @ＩＶ ＬＩ Ｖ Ｓ

don't ping me fag

@ＩＶ ＬＩ Ｖ Ｓ

<:hangthink:487681962505404416> @ＩＶ ＬＩ Ｖ Ｓ

How are you

i am well toad, hbu

I am swell, thank you

Improve demography

kill Jews

invest in hitler statues

^this

no not at the cost of culture

culture is the driving force of economy
culture is a set of social technics for the purpose of extraction/exchange/distribution/transfer of energy among participants of a semi-closed system, based on cosmological/religious assumptions, enabling non-zero sum and non-violent competition and cooperation (with more or less success)

My answer is an emphatic no.

😍

hellooooooo

@^^^ do you think it's accurate to say that tech/social advances and economic growth leapfrog off each other

I agree with the evola quote here. The economy isnt what brings everything with it, rather you can see massive advances in technology and culture that then also serves the economy, these arent these seperate wagons but rather two wagons, and when combining the two wagons together so say technology (science) and culture, we see the emergence of economy along that.

And advancing either of the former 2 pushes the economy forward and creates a feedback loop, the economy is as such derived frmo somethign, other ofrces, when other things are derived fromthe economy, much like evola states, we are simpyl playing around in degenerative models

Also on the poll, IMO obese people have to go to the doctor and get an ultimatum and eventualyl be refused treatment

the spiral is otherwise absurd

honestly most obese people realize how fucked they are only when their heart is dying

ischemic disease and all

@ＩＶ ＬＩ Ｖ Ｓ care to reformulate? t.ESL
Technic and social technic precede economy growth. Without culture there is no economy, as culture is the actions of humans individually and collectively. It's all very tautological, or I may have very weird definition.

The center of all this activity is calory, or energy, without it there is no motion, no life, no existence, no reality.

That's going a little more esoteric than I was prepared for

What I was referring to was how there is a minimum surplus of wealth required to make any given technological or social advancement

Early man had to become efficient enough at hunting to have time to dick around with agriculture

or how Renaissance era royalty were the only ones with enough money to finance formal scientific experimentation

My assertion was that advancement and growth feed off each other and move each other forward

@^^^ this is why I take in as many calories as physically possible every day

My chi is off the fucking charts