serious
Discord ID: 452955229227319306
19,279 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 72/78
| Next
By the time the military showed up, they would have hostages
I can't imagine what kind of swat teams are on standby in the capital
DC is a ghetto
the mall isnt
as far as I know
the seat of government is like an oasis of cleanliness and order in the city
I'm sure they have big guys on standby
A guy I knew was from Virginia and said "dont ever go to DC unless you want to get shot"
yeah he means the surrounding city which is a shithole
But Hollywood though, that would be a quick takeover
yes
highly viable
or any other California city
you could run mechanized squads through the hills easily
take over the rich jew assholes businesses
I don't think you could field enough men to occupy a city but you could make a significant strike and then withdraw
wait, what if we gave them 12 gauges instead of lmgs?
every breaching team has a 12ga guy but rifles and smgs are much better for fighting
combat shotguns are a meme mostly
What about a lighter rifle, rather than an m42?
Hk43 for example
are you taking about an m4 or an mg42
mg42, fuck this phone
hk43 is an assault rifle, so yeah you'd arm most of your guys with something like that
but smgs are also good to have in an urban environment fighting unarmored opponents
Hk43 is peak a e s t h e t i c
German rifle made by Nazis who fled to Spain after ww2
this is a cool new thing
it's a bullpup
can be
compact, but a bit gross
it's a 7.62 battle rifle that's compact like an m4
better than an m4 actually because it uses a folding stock like it was made by smart men
Why not just go with an AK? its probably cheaper and more common.
AKs are great for dismounted troops, but they are bulky getting in and out of vehicles
that's why modern weapons have gone the carbine route
dude just go with Yugo Ak pistol and an arm brace
ok gamer I'll engage at 200-300 meters with that
You said carbine is the appeal because of bulkiness right?
yes that's the reason they've been adopted
also weight to an extent
Well that "pistol" is just as compact
Unless carbines have the same barrel length as full sized rifles, this seems like a cheap alternative
I'm sure it does an alright job at most things, but I would not want to be in a modern firefight without a full length stock and an optic
cheap yes
that's why insurgents love them
my grandpa taught me about the importance of relying on iron sites because "an optic can get cracked, run out of batteries, or glint and give away your position. An ironight won't."
That is true, I've always liked shooting with iron sights better
but modern optics are very good
I don't deny that, but still.
the stock I understand because keeping your gun steady is upmost improtance.
comfortable cheek weld too
but optics are a bit unreliable. The more parts a thing has, the more things can go wrong with it.
Fuck, my dad bought an eotech knock off and the thing died after every shot because of the recoil shifting the battery
You are overstating their failure rate I think. Modern armies use optics for everything, many day optics do not need batteries, and night vision is too important to forgo
I would just rather not pit my irons against another soldier's optic if my life was on the line
Night vision I agree with
for a long time our military ran 90% of raids at night
because we had the stuff and they did not
I just have bad luck when it comes down to it. I know that the moment I get into a firefight my optic will fuck up and I'll be dead.
Night vision is also expensive as hell
4000 dollars a scope, fuck that
it's the first thing I'd blow money on if I was going up against a modern military or militarized police
before armor probably
I'd prefer numbers and more guns
Numbers do not necessarily provide power.
with bottomless manpower you can afford to do a lot of things wrong
I assumed we were outfitting a small force here
🤔
we have 50 men
I would buy 50 optics
that is a very small force
Who has 50 men?
that's it and we need to make expensive armor first, then use reminding money on guns
🤔
nah armor is a meme for people with lots of money
@Koninos hypothetical jin roh armor stampede
Lol.
if cash is an issue you can't do the jin roh thing period
it's an autistic moneysink you do for the crazy press coverage
I just prefer armor and cheaper guns than more expensive guns and optics.
I guess so
The armor works as intimidation and protection
If you really want to send a message though you'd want to merc a live TV shoot
I get your argument for optics and less armor, I really do.
imagine if a few guys walked on stage on one of these liberal late night shows
and gave the host one of these
not that it would actually air like that but you could film it from the stands and spread it online
I think one of these would be a bit better
most wwII era commando moves would be epic
Just straight up murder these asshats
Jin Roh armor and all
@IV LI V S i want an MSBS but im poor, the WOT and polish military is gonna be using it as the standard rifle soon
only issue with night vision is if someone pops a flare out you better know how to take those off or itll burn your eyes
combat flares are awesome
falres out
Does anybody has an english translation of an non edited version of Mein Kampf?
They're edited ? wow that's why it was a bit weird
Well once i saw a news
That say that Mein Kampf became legal on germany but it's an edited version
Censured
Yet even some translations all these decades have been considered 'edited'. 'Edited' does not necessarily mean 'censored', it can mean edited for propagandizing. The James Murphy translation (probably the most popular), for instance, was partially edited by a member of the Red Orchestra (Greta Lorke) when he fell ill. The Stalag Edition is more-or-less considered the 'true'-est version.
Yes
I’m on my phone so I can’t post it right now
There’s an audiobook on jewtube. Make sure you listen to the Ford translation. It’s the only translation everyone trusts
I enjoy the voice actors, but if you want to read it
Ain't the Stalag edition better?
Physical copy > Audio book
physical copy + audio book is peak
No
Physical copy only
@Crazed Shotgun long time no see. I’ve never heard of the stalag version
Thanks!
@Excalibur sup man
I'll post the stalag edition now
Dunno. Church will be shorter now I guess
Mein_Kampf_-_Hitler_Adolf.pdf
@Axel Yw. It’s on my server as well as carpathids imperium if you lose it or something
You a fan of two hour church?
I dunno. The system seems like attendance in priesthood will be every other week
I hope it will be for the best
One thing for sure, the changing of home teaching has only seemed like a mistake
I just hope the church dosen't go PC and allow gay marriage
` it would be anywhere from right leaning to center gray area in its narratives since those tend to resonate the most with people.` @Bogatyr Bogumir Keep dreaming
though, it's a nice dream
it's amazing that people who are willing to link all kind of behavior to race and even ethnicity can't swallow the black pill here
look at academia
the least liberal faculties are in finance
does that mean finance has the fewest jews?
that should be a hint as to what's going on
Peterson explains it
the homo types are the ones attracted to go into hollywood
that'll be true with or without jews
@Reb Trump By that definition Jews are mostly homosexual, because otherwise you'd have more racial heterogeneity in hollywood.
To add to that, it does not even contemplate the fact Jews also occupy media disproportionately
Unless you want to tell me that on the whole homosexuals go into media and that most Jews are homosexuals
`By that definition Jews are mostly homosexual, because otherwise you'd have more racial heterogeneity in hollywood.` no
one doesn't follow from the other
that's like saying blacks are mostly elite athletes because most of elite athletes are black
and otherwise, you'd have more heterogeneity in the NBA
The issue is that i never claimed that Jews = liberal, rather that jews are driving a narrative in hollywood that is liberal. Generally to analyze jewish influence by saying that it is one thing or another isnt true, since jews are a group that has its own needs and will shift to produce things that its group needs to remain on top. Generally these are almost always in the end detrimental to the host population. Its really the same behaviour of any immigrant population. Except jews have seemed to not only leech on the system but rather run it, in favor of themselves and to the detriment of others. While other immigrant populations simly dont have this power.
Generally my point on hollywood isnt who runs it, its rather who watches it. Upon the fall of hollywood a rather free market situation arises, no advertising aids this, the best movies are watched the rest fall into obscurity, most people respond well to rather traditionalistic narratives.
`Generally to analyze jewish influence by saying that it is one thing or another isnt true, since jews are a group that has its own needs and will shift to produce things that its group needs to remain on top.` You're too used to your echochamber
these then go on to mae more money.
I don't accept that axiom
Dont accept it, reality is very different
in order to reject it you need to demonstrate that jews hve no in group bias, and dont work to get ahead as a group.
alongside all other ethnicities.
no, I don't
you need to show that jews have sufficient ethnocentrism for that to be true
all what hollywood is
whcih I was gonna explain to 4042
is homo olympics
hollywood, jews in ivy legue universities
and it being an intellectual endevour
jews win
as they do on all of them
ok, take academia, because academic awards are more objective than the oscars etc
even if you control for the amount of jews in academia
take that as a given
then those jewish academics win more academic prizes than do goyim
which tells you
"muh jews higher IQ" is a myth, and meritocracy doesnt exist. To claim that this happened due to jews naturally being better is simply untrue.
In academia jews have overepresentation due to again, in group bias.
that those jewish academics didn't need ethnocentrism to get in
as they outperform their collegues
if you think academic awards arent corrupt and are objective you have clearly never worked in a stem field or hard science field
lol again ivy legue school overrepresentation due to in group bias
you're about to tell me Noble prizes are a conspiracy
not a conspiracy, rather natural law of human groups
I did in fact study stem
whats a noble prize
ok, Fields Medal too?
Wolfe Prize?
Turing?
are they all manipulated by the jews?
how about chess - do jews send some waves into the goy's head so that he loses?
so first we go with "that's like saying blacks are mostly elite athletes because most of elite athletes are black
and otherwise, you'd have more heterogeneity in the NBA" This is wrong
BUT because jews win most science prize awards they are smarter isnt wrong?
what is true is that blacks are more athletic on avg
and jews are smarter on avg
that's the connection between those
however the jewish smarts myth has been debunked
quite a few times
it hasn't
I know the alt right thinks it has
"the alt right" rather objective analysis
the prime example i s ivy legue schools, which are supposed to be reserved for the most elite intellectuals and yet they accept inferior jewish candidates
address my argument then
tell me how those undeservant academics
this is therefore an example of in group bias
who get into those places out of jewish ethnocentrism
end up performing better
I think you are approaching this argument the wrong way. It is more viable to look at attitudes shown by prominent jews regarding zionism and promoting degeneracy in white countries and around the world.
I know what you're alluding to
You will not find many jews who are against white genocide or neo-marxist agendas
you think there are 4x times as many jews than there should be in ivy league schools
and you will find a multitude pushing them
im not letting you shift the argument and reframe it. Jews demonstrate in group bias this is demonstrated constantly. You claim this is not the case, then you shift to jews being more intelligent which is not the case.
while upholding the validity of intellectual institutions. Which in themselves tend to be corrupt
for example medical publications are rife with corruption in the alrgest most prestigous publications
the problem is, that analysis which you're alluding to overrestimated the amount of jews in ivy league by a factor of 2 and underestimate the amount of elite jewish highschoolers by a factor of 2; corrected for jews are 1-1 from elite highschool to ivy league
Vit D3 is the perfect example
how am I shifting it?
it's exactly waht you were alluding to
you're the one who won't address why those undeservant jews end up winning all those awards
in order to believe that it's all due to ingroup bias
you have to argue that each award is controlled by jews
are you willing to do so?
thats shifting the argument
i argue that jews have in group bias
your the one that claims they dnt
stop strawmanning
you use scientific awards as proof
i use admissions as proof and generally the fact that jews tend to accumulate in top positions of certain parts of society
as proof that there wasn't bias in them getting academic seats
you're arguing in a circle
"the fact that jews tend to accumulate in top positions of certain parts of society"
not really, im restating what i stated.
the fact that you think scientific institutions are exempt from corruption is absurd. I havent checked the other awards and would need to actualyl go to check them independantly. However scientific awards dont dismiss academic or generally societal bias based on ethnicity.
they have to be extremely corrupt
and all of them
in order to explain the results
Its possible. Its not impossible however id ened to check. Again jewish IQ isnt absurdly high
its comparable to white IQ
your whole argument is that because awards aren't perfect and because jews don't treat all people exactly equally, the results you see must therefore be to jewish nepotism
it's about 1 st.dev higher
i never made the argument based on awards. Rather based on societal observation, you then shifted to awards
because society paints a very different picture
you need to demonstrate that the amount of jewish nepotism is sufficient to explain the results
from intellectual institutions, to media, we see a trend of accumulation, that can be traced historically.
you just like to repeat your thesis
since that's all you can do
We look at hollywood, we look at advertising, we look to intelelctual institutions. These are evidence,
this is rather reality
jewish in group bias perfectly explains the results
let me know when you have an argument for it
feel free to live in denial, however reality tends to confirm the natural human trend towards in group bias in most spheres of life
whatever excuse you have for being a loser
👌
*Ad Hominem*
@GoyimHunter1967 lehi gang
greater israel more like the known universe
i, destroyer of palestine
i, destroyer of palestine
i, destroyer of palestine
i, destroyer of palestine
i, destroyer of palestine
i, destroyer of palestine
Lehi
19,279 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 72/78
| Next