serious
Discord ID: 452955229227319306
19,279 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 26/78
| Next
@Bogatyr Bogumir I had a feeling that Poland was not nearly as "trad" and patriarchal as people say
I guess my suspicions were correct
Unfortunately so. You can probably thank the EU for that
@Snakeisninja atleast there are no Muslim terror attacks
For now...
And since we are on the topic Vox made what essentially is a hit piece on Poland
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P8MQTgdjcLE
Misrepresented the march that took place last year.
Of the 60,000 that participated in the march only 600 were considered "far right"
Was just wondering, but I was wondering if you thought that there was inequality of opportunity in America?
There will always be inequality
In everything
There are always asymmetries in knowledge and also locational opportunity. As well as network opportunities and so on. This is impossible to prevent, and more significant than any inequality of opportunity that liberals or marxists ever managed to fix. In short, campodin is correct. There will always be inequality no matter what โsolutionsโ are attempted, and anyone who tells you otherwise is a charlatan.
The purpose of economic activity is to create societal inequality (for people to advantage themselves) and in very productive societies it ends up being a lot of inequality. That is because production is contributed to in a hierarchical manner with many people being peripheral to the work being done.
Whenever people complain that wealth brings advantages, they are complaining that advantages are advantages. People work so work so that they are relatively advantaged. Work creates inequality.
Right. So you see the word inequality itself is linguistic trickery. Humans search for balance and symmetry, and the word itself is at odds with this feeling, so it creates an emotional response. What isnโt realized is what you say, and hence why so many young and gullible are leftists.
<:Dude:459545653031469068>
So Kraut and Tea is back...and i can't say I'm to thrilled at the idea
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IPGzF3Jk8-Q
And you should have a general idea as to why I'm not to excited at the prospect if you have payed attention to the drama he garnered last year.
Looks like the vile coalescence of what once attempted to pass as intellect has dried up in this abhorrent cavern, occupied by what could only have been described as the dregs of society. The only things to mourn it's passing or hold a miserable vigil being the bloated rotflies, feasting on whatever droplets of validation they can draw with their weakminded attempts at ill-conjured discourse.
That's one big brained nibba
Save Europe (Children Of The Sun -Thomas Bergersen)
https://youtu.be/Pdxxm7X9r4A
Lol, anyone remember the โpeople of lightโ meme
Yep, was a good one
>3 nogs enter
>3 nogs attack clerk
>clerk gets shoved and hits into container
>clerk almost dead
>nogs decide to pillage store
>nogs leave
>costumer finds clerk when entering store
>costumer calls cops
>clerk almost died, but survives in critical condition
@snakedog why does it look like he fell over himself?
He did, he had a heart attack, then the nogs robbed and left him there, did not even call the police
I see
I read the facebook post
Yep
black people are like that
There's an update to this article, the update says they found them
Disgusting people
Yep
oh he had a heart attack
i thought when they got shovey they caused him to whack right into that water bottle stand
and knock himself out causing a severe conuccsion
they still caused it either way
out of curiosity, is it illegal to not help someone that suffered a life-threatening medical condition in the u.s?
i would assume theres some level of law against it
especially if you A. contributed to the life threatning condition and B. used it to take advantage of the person facing it
in their case you can argue that they may have some degree of responsibility in causing it as well... and also they robbed him afterwards... i'm just wondering like, in general
sure, yes
the term for it in law is "duty to rescue"
its not black and white
its circumstancle
its rare, but yes, you can be held liable for not rescueing someonne
america isnt huge on it
but there are nationsn that mandate it
oh, ok... in my country it is, that's why i'm asking if in the u.s it is as well
Argentina, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Russia, Serbia, and Spain all have laws for it
Russia isnt that big on it, its only if you care fo the person who needs rescue, or cause the need for rescue, and its only a year in prison maximum penalty
greece is only 6 months maximum and requires it not hurting you personally to help them
i think some others nationss have laws for it aswell
in Brazil it's 6, 9 (if the person gets severely hurt as a result) and 18 (if the person end up dying) months...
and the "requires it not hurting you personally" is also a thing...
but in most cases all you need to do is call for help...
It depends however it also depends on proffession for example I am required to help someone
(medical and lifegaurd training) and ignoring them wont necessarily in itself lead me to prison, however if someone sues me I can get in a lot of trouble
Do you think Kavanaugh is going to end Affirmative Action within colleges and other higher levels of learning? What are your thoughts on Affirmative Action as a whole? Who is ultimately on the lower end of the deal from these programs? What benefits come from these programs?
If jews were categorized separately then affirmative action would help jewish nepotism at the ivy leagues
He canโt do any of that on his own even if he wanted to. @JogaFlame
Brown people are running town halls in Sweden
https://youtu.be/e7l8IuHeuC0
nuttin wrong wit dat
Haha thanks for your input Obomba
"Don't just stand there Dr. Mengele, exterminate" -Mr. Bond
Just kidding with a meme
@snakedog interesting video on sweden
Brown lady says don;t limit migration to white countries, who would have thought!
https://youtu.be/iAHoBq1IH5U
Leftists choose a NIGGER for beauty queen in Finland
All leftists should be exterminated
https://youtu.be/YsWozzMrN-4
Check out the new Europe:
https://youtu.be/2HQ8DEAsW7g
that beauty pageant video is fucking hilarious
imagine making that much of a fuss about who some judges in one city in finland subjectively think is the most attractive
i personally would consider the people who won both of the contests to be pretty attractive
@ham addition That black woman is ugly, even for a black woman
She looks worse than the average black woman
Look at her wide ass nose
She looks like a man
She won purely because she was black
There is nothing about her that is attractive
what
iโd say itโs reasonable to at least say sheโs above average looking?
>attractiveness is subjective
only partially true, there is a general trend towards what features humans find attractive
No, calling her average is far too charitable
She is like, the bottom 10% of black women
this is what qualifies for serious around here
Rating women's attractiveness is very serious
anyway thatโs your own opinion about how she looks, but imo itโs a pathetic excuse to make a video complaining
who
Not when it's quite obvious she would have lost if she wasn't black @ham addition
Do you think a white woman who looked identical to her in structure would have won that?
Fuck no
Calling black woman attractive because there are black is so patronizing, it's insulting
i mean iโve just asked a few people just now if they think sheโs any less attractive than the other finalists and theyโve all said something along the lines of โno thatโs stupidโ
who are y'all talking about
Attractiveness is majority objective
k so every single person iโve asked so far has said that they deserved to win so
Yeah attractiveness is rather ojective, psychology agrees on that
generally the biological and cognitive fields agree that what is attractice is rather objective and generally it runs down to "health"
(at least in physical attraction)
@ham addition what country are you from
scotland
Makes sense
what
not sure what you mean by that
Scotts are known to have an outgroup preference.
Something about cold weather seems to cause that.
well this is news to me
Scottland is more pro-migration than Britain, for example
also not sure where the connection to cold weather is lmao
The cold weather thing was a joke
But it is true, the further north you go
the stronger the obsession with foreign cultures
I am starting to believe in Med Supremacy
anyway scotland has a higher percentage of white people than the rest of the uk so
Right, and the UK has a higher percentage of white people than the US
Seems the less non-whites you have, the more you think they're great
and the more you're around,the more you know what they're actually like
i donโt think non-white people are inherently better any more than i think white people are
and a few of my friends are from minority backgrounds and theyโre just the same as anyone else i know
You should trade places with me for a couple months and tell me how they're just like everyone else when they're in larger numbers
k
also, the problem with "muh friends" is that you naturally seek out people who are more like you as friends
in other words
your friends are not representative of all of them
k
i have brown friends too
they are aware of my opinions, some of them I would say even agree to an extent
that doesn't mean the rest are like that
alright but like
if theyโre going to integrate into the local culture and all that just like anyone else then why shouldnโt they be allowed to migrate
because they don't
See America
iโll see my actual real life experiences in my own country thanks
Well I see my real life experiences in my own country
and I have far more experiences with them than you
i donโt know you and you donโt know me but okay
im not even sure what this conversation is about tbh
I have a black friend who agrees with white ethnostates
I am that friend.
I have a 1/100th injun friend who I redpilled and now he wants to kill himself
jesus christ nigel
@snakedog @ham addition
Farage is /ourguy/
your guy is shit
How @ham addition
Based Nigel
What a lad
Hope remains
Will the new ukip leader, Sargon, disavow?
Sargon has been getting mighty high on his own shit
I think in a video as of late he called "hunting Tl;DR"
literalyl said somethign along the lines of "You wont be laughing when I get a interview with trump. but then you'll say 'oh everyone gets na inerview with trump' "
Fucking autism.
@JogaFlame Serious channel is without slander
@Doctor Anon But sargoy.
@JogaFlame s e r i o u s
S A R R G O O O O O O Y @Doctor Anon
ok let me stop.
Lucky I haven't warned you yet
commit die
I guess it goes here
owo
What
nutin
>hitler supporting white people owning black slaves in the us wasnt racial
hmm
lol
@bimmler
Yesterday someone posted a meme that I think fits perfectly as a response
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463779195114225685/492183107873538077/DlVsob-XoAUSUzN.png
What makes you think big business should go unchecked? Especially when they rally behind policies like open borders that they know will drive down wages
Peron had great success with his fascist and third way economics.
Hitler, while certainly pro-private property, implemented social policies that led to an economic miracle in Germany.
>communism
literally the definiton of communism is having no state but go off i guess
@ham addition I think the thought process is that communism requires a big government to reach its end point
most non-tankie communists believe in smaller collectives like local councils having the most power
I know
But the thought process is that it's always going to result in a large government
even if it is not the intent
the problem is that they first have to wrench the power from the government and restructure society into the new social order.
that usually involves central planning, because people are not naturally inclined that way
These dudes are just as much as a joke as ANTIFA
But why are they treated different, by the law and socially? *(This is to begin a discussion; Iโm genuinely interested on otherโs outlooks.)*
Treated differently in what aspect
Like how theyโre seen by the general public?
Yes, and how their message is contrasted to their beliefs and actions.
For instance, CNN and other legacy media outlets portray ANTIFA as some kind of โgood guyโ or ignores their presence completely, meanwhile putting all lights on Alt-Right groups when crimes are committed by their members.
They even called the guy who killed that woman at the protest an โalt right Naziโ
I was once a leftist
The only thing they were right about was that racism is wrong
Everything else they stood for were despicable lies
I feel like racism and xenophobia are a part of human condition.
"The only thing they were right about was that racism is wrong"
HOLD IT RIGHT THERE
I wouldn't say it's wrong, it's more like a barrier you can overcome for better relations.
Hot take: Racism is natural
That doesn't mean you have to go up in arms about somebody being annoyed that their country is flooded with mongrels, and disgusting, loathesome wretches.
Quick tip: Somalians hate other Somalians because they're nasty, depraved curs.
Dirty, diseased, crime-loving, and lazy
It's not racist to make an obvious observation of behaviour.
I would hate a person based on what he believes and does
The problem is that certain people are more inclined to believe certain things and do certain things @warriorman8
Basing it on ethnicity is arbitrary
It's not
If I found them generally distasteful, and unseemly as a majority, I would definitely dislike the nationality as a whole.
Like Somalians.
You're also going in it with a different understanding of the topic than I have, that is to say, you're arguing with the assumption I also think race is skin deep.
I do not @warriorman8
I mean you can distrust a person but not punish them over it
Protecting your country isn't punishing anyone
Well, I'm going to distrust them until they become a problem.
It's a country's right
to exclude who it wants
A country need not allow people into it.
Sure, just like I need not save someone who's about to be run over by a train.
You can just enforce law
True.
It's kinda a shitty thing to do,but I don't *need* to do it.
Why would you?
You would be putting yourself at risk for potentially no reward.
If I could easily do it with minimal risk to myself, then because of basic human empathy
Saving someone else is a reward in and of itself.
For example supreme general duterte is under an ongoing war with criminals
Basic human empathy shouldn't need to be explained
Duterte is a criminal himself, ironically
You have to have an extremely high IQ to understand human empathy
Define criminal
So...
He straight up extra-judicially kills people, such as drug dealers
How do you enforce the law without punishments?
19,279 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 26/78
| Next