chat
Discord ID: 452955220473806859
89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 98/357
| Next
why are u paying respects to johm mccain
he was a literal piece of shit
Imagine respecting him
s
Yes, spit just like the people who spat on vietnam war vets
Which he actually was
I don't understand the hatred for John McCain.
Guess it's easy to be edgy if you've never had anyone close to you die.
Or if you're 15.
enough hating on 15 year olds jesus
They're execrable.
that's hate speech
Name: Fredo
F
@εïз irma εïз let me court you
No thank you.
WAHHHHHHHHHH
STOP HATING A GLOBALIST
In February 2000, McCain said "As long as Saddam Hussein is in power, I am convinced that he will pose a threat to our security."[127]
McCain supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the U.S. decision to overthrow Saddam Hussein.[155]
In April 2004, McCain was asked by Peter G. Peterson what the United States should do if the "Iraqi government asks us to leave, even if we are unhappy about the security situation there?" McCain responded, "I think it's obvious that we would have to leave because – if it was an elected government of Iraq...."[156]
Following the invasion he criticized the Bush Administration's conduct of the occupation, and he later pushed for "significant policy changes" in the Iraq War.[157] He criticized The Pentagon on a number of occasions, most notably in December 2004, concerning low troop strength in Iraq,[158] and has called for a diversification of Iraqi national forces to better represent the multiple ethnic groups contained within the country.
In January 2005, McCain said that "one of our big problems has been the fact that many Iraqis resent American military presence. ... as soon as we can reduce our visibility as much as possible, the better I think it is going to be."[159]
In November 2005 McCain said in a speech that the U.S. government must do more to keep public support high for the war, and that more troops were needed, as well as a number of other changes in the U.S. approach to the war. He concluded his speech by saying that "America, Iraq and the world are better off with Saddam Hussein in prison rather than in power…and we must honor their sacrifice by seeing this mission through to victory."[160]
He supported the destruction of solid states and the replacement of them with complete anarchy that probably killed thousands purely for ZOG
No one cried when they died, no one should cry when McCain dies.
Sorry I just don't see anything virtuous or decent about jerking off to some old Republican dying of brain cancer.
Maybe I'm just not high IQ enough.
I mean...i respect his service in the military, but that doesn't make me like his political stance.
Oh well. I'm not going to mourn over his death, nor will i celebrate. It's a thing that happened, and with him goes his political policies.
^
I don't have to whip myself into a frenzy and be an autist when someone I disagree with dies.
How can you not understand the hated for McCain?
What kind of run-of-the-mill GOP drone are you?
He’s the most toxic selling-out to lobbyists neo-con weasel the party ever had
Stop having opinions
They are not worth having
Back to the kitchen with you
I'm pretty sure I just said that I don't like his policies though.
-zexy furiously typing-
McCain dying is a great thing for the GOP
He was holding the party back with his undo influence
And MUH WAR HERO bullshit
what, are you an anti-war hippie?
I’m an imperialist
But that doesn’t mean fighting every war pushed for by a lobby
Good riddance to McCain
Why are you an imperialist?
>imperialism
Because we will never have a bipolar balance of powers
Imperialism causes a nation to collapse by becoming too diverse ethnically and culturally
Large powers will always try to outcompete each other
There needs to be a “top dog” so to speak
Lol muh diversity destroys empires argument
You dont need imperialism to do that though tf?
Is just historically inaccurate
Imperialism is expanding ones one borders, i think you mean interventionism
If you want to preserve culture don’t be American in the first place
America practices economic imperialism
It’s the same effect
interventionism
America is an imperialistic nation
Lol okay call it what you eat
Want
Only jealous cucks call it imperialism
But those are just propaganda buzzwords
1 minute the old lady wants me to sort laundry
>muh diversity destroys empires
>looks at Britain
Definitely seems to be the case.
Yes lets conquer areas with peoples diametrically opposed to us and expect everything to be fine and dandy
I won't deny America has definitely acted in a Imperialistic/Interventionist manner
If you really think these are wars of intervention then you are dimwit
They are proxy wars for economic benefit
And puppet leaders are installed
Imperialism is expanding one's own borders
Integrating that territory as a part of your nation
Lol you are going to play semantics with me after using a propaganda buzzword
As if there’s anything inventionist about American foreign policy
That’s dribble fed to sheep like you
And I’m not inherently against Americans actions
I just don’t try to put sprinkles on it to make it look prettier
Meh, imperialism is mega gay if you dont go isolationist prior
GUYS
GUYS
oh ded server
nvmd
@Deleted User cuck its late at night
obv no one is going to talk to a sperg rn
eew
radical centrist here
Okay
Centrism is soft Communism
Most things are communism nowadays
i love communism
It gay and dumb, debunked.
thank you
I'll debunk it with one four minute video
>being so far right that centrism is communism
just how?
I thought this was worth to share
The Civil War was about slavery to the south but didn't become an issue for the North until 1863.
Almost every state declared it the reason for secession.
<:WhatDid:459545655527079946> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:ToMyDrink:459545654323314710>
The move to make it a moralizing war was realpolitik on Lincoln's part. Him along with many other abolitionists believed the blacks were inferior but simply disagreed with their enslavement.
muh states rights is meme revisionism to turn slavery into a euphemism that distracts from itself
ik ik,but I thought it would be fun to see a confederate black guy
I think it's dumb for a black person to support the Confederacy directly.
it's hilarious tho because most of the time he focuses more on the South's ideals outside of the main reason it existed,which was slavery
Lost Cause weeb right there
Yeah he avoided the issue of slavery almost entirely.
Focused mainly on how bad the Union was it seemed like.
the Confederate flag is no longer aa symbol of racism
change my mind
the confederate flag is retarded, change my mind
the confederate flag is shit, change my mind
The confederate flag looks cool as h*ck
It's disgusting
It isn't though
That's just your authoritarian speaking
The design is just horrid
wrong
And it was never the official flag of the confederacy even
Then it wan't the confederate flag
It was the battle flag of Northern Virginia or something
The real flag is better
Nice flag you got there
wrong one retard
looks like an autist with ms paint made it in 5 minutes
The actual Stars and Bars looked too similar to the Union flag so most of the military created their own battle flags.
And eventually the Stars and Bars was ignored in favor of the Virginia battle flag.
It definitely wasn't the only flag with that design though.
@εïз irma εïз My dad believes in the "muh state's rights" meme
And no matter what evidence I show him against it, he won't accept it as proof because it's either "on the internet, so someone made it up" or if it's in print, then "it's just revisionist propaganda"
Have you shown him the original documents detailing the reasons for secession?
I've tried to
But the only way I can show them to him is by finding it online, and my dad is one of those proto-boomer types that thinks anything found on the internet is a work of fabrication when it doesn't confirm what he thinks @εïз irma εïз
You have to kill him.
find the original documents in a museum
20 min until livestream debate
Some old encyclopedias may have the information or college libary
@εïз irma εïз that’s patently incorrect revisionism
The issue of slavery was the root cause of the confederacy seceding from the union
Lincoln’s personal feelings dug up from his journals on the matter aside
Literally what I said.
You're losing your touch. You did the same thing yesterday.
👎
That’s not what you said at all
I’m re-reading your comments
You're free to rereread them.
The issue of slavery was central in political conversations of the day
You are claiming otherwise
It's exactly what I'm claiming though.
Why is it that everyday I have to correct another arrogant “hot take” from you
Again, you are free to rereread.
“The Civil War was about slavery to the south but didn't become an issue for the North until 1863.”
Just wrong on so many accounts
Hurr Durr
You literally pulled a date out of your ass to sound more intelligent
Lincoln did not want to risk losing support from vital border states like Maryland which were vital for supplying assaults into the South.
It wasn't until later that it became a moralizing issue.
That’s patently false
And you know it
That’s downright revisionism
1863 was the Emancipation Proclamation, so no. Not pulled out of my ass.
How are you so horribly ignorant?
Stop wasting my time. 🤷
And just please I take issue with nuance doesn’t mean that I am disregarding your words
The discussion on slavery began before that
One would argue it was an issue for the north years before the civil war
But you read excerpts from Lincoln’s journals
And came to this absurd conclusion that 1863 is the date that slavery becomes an issue for the north
It’s just wrong on so many levels
I'm talking about the context of war rhetoric.
Lovely backpedaling
The Civil War was about slavery to the south but didn't become an issue for the North until 1863.
It's easy to contrive your own meanings and strawman your way into sophistry and purple prose.
Again, stop wasting my time.
I have never read such a wildly inaccurate statement
Ok.
Is this how you always back out of critiques
I know what I meant and I'm agreeing with pretty much everything you're saying.
It seems that you don't know what I meant.
Perhaps on purpose.
Say someone is wasting your time and slander them as a sophist
I respectfully disengage m'lady.
Really the virtues of a scholar you are exhibiting here
Even your context makes it inaccurate
It is wrong on so many levels
This nightly ritual is getting tedious. Don't you have someone else to talk to?
Oh someone called out my historical revisionism and I’m going to call it tedious
No I've repeatedly said things to that effect, that you're tedious.
Stop posting peabrained statements in a public discord if you do not want to be corrected
I'll try to be better.
Go back to the kitchen where you belong if you are too sensitive for this
Adios. 🤠
Bye coward
I love how she pathologically “corrects” other people with misinformation and gets frustrated when people do it back to her
Imagine being this angry at your reflection
Her lack of self awareness is astounding
I wonder if she’s even capable of meta cognition
@εïз irma εïз please confirm if you are too pigheaded for self reflection
@here has anyone seen Irma self reflect? Can she pass a mirror test?
no
i have raped irma too many times for it to have brains
Pebble is transfluid
<:PINGREE:459545653350105088> <:PINGREE:459545653350105088> <:PINGREE:459545653350105088> <:PINGREE:459545653350105088>
💦
Hello
@Deleted User She did say slavery was the cause of the war
“The Civil War was about slavery to the south but didn't become an issue for the North until 1863.”
She goes on to contradict herself
She cannot even form a coherent thought and acts like I misread her
The north declared the war so what was it @εïз irma εïз
Can you clarify the confused mess you posted?
And of course she won’t because she’s a coward
She cowers away in her kennel whenever I appear
Wait hold up am I just stupid
I didn’t know @εïз irma εïз was a girl
oh
She is
I don't make a point of it.
Impossible. We both know Girls on Discord are a myth.
Confederates fired first, secession started months before Lincoln took office, and there was no declaration of war as the Confederacy was not recognized legally by the Union or literally anyone else.
Sorry I didn't get your pings, I block you when I'm not talking to you for the reason that you ping so much.
^ggraph
Ooooof
The escalation of war was done by both sides. The Confederacy had seized territory claimed before the actual conflict at Sumpter.
But everyone knew war was coming.
The US civil war was politically caused by slavery, but most southern soldiers didn’t care about it
It was just seen as the natural order of things
Just like moth Northerners didn't care.
Exactly
Like I said earlier, it didn't even become an issue until 1863.
Ahahahahahaha
Ahahahahahaha
Lincoln said if he could preserve the Union with slavery he would
Lincoln didn't want to jeopardize support from vital border states like Maryland which had slaves.
It had been an issue for a long time standing
Both you have no idea what you are talking about
Like I said **politically** it was the main cause but most Union and Confederate troops didn’t care
Look at the songs of the war
Just regurgitating shit you read on /pol/
Only a few mention slavery
Nobody is suggesting that it wasnt an issue, just that it wasn't for the average person and wasn't made a political issue until 1863.
I’m taking more issue with Zexy
It definitely was an issue for the political elite of the South however.
Yes
Because she keeps pulling this date out of her ass
Ignoring that slavery had been a force of tension in congress for a long time
89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 98/357
| Next