chat
Discord ID: 452955220473806859
89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 81/357
| Next
the protestants I know all say gay people are pedophiles,
I don't know if that qualifies under "fags"
Protestantism is true christianity
Depends if you are dealing with Baptist and evangelicals vs Lutherans
Congregationalism
is best
Not all Protestants denominations are the same and it is silly to lump them all together. We all can most likely agree Mormons are not Christians and more like a cult.
Protestants are all the same because they're all wrong.
Deport them to Guyana.
I could not follow cuck Francis
Mormonism is kind of christianity
its polytheistic christianity
eh
God gives us good popes and bad popes.
Yes
The Pope is subject to secular imperfection.
Francis is a bad pope.
Oh great
And we can choose to follow
a V2 catholic
๐
Iโm not
The Pope is meaningless
As he should be
The Pope is a spiritual leader and nothing more.
haha
Wait, there's actually people who still pray to the Jew v2?
The Catholic Church considers him the vicar of christ
Catholic Church dosent exist here anymore are u retarded lmao
great apostasy began ages ago
You go though the pope in Catholicism. He is middle management.
Anon calling someone else retarded. I've seen it all.
Probably a sign of the end times.
All popes are vipers
You must speak to God himself through jesus
1 Tim 2:5
No pope needed
@Zavjeru Bible teaches the only middle man is Jesus
Catholics @Doctor Anon
The Pope as a Representative is heresy and sinful
I would agree. He is a man therefore fallible.
I'm cool with living beside Christians as much as the next guy, hell, Martin Luther was kind of a boss... but why would you still actually, you know, believe in that stuff?
>athiest
Atheist ๐
Agnostic
Atheist lite
Oh, I am an Atheist as well, just narrowing it down ๐
Like I said, got nothing against Christians
And I got nothing against you
Just curious
The answer is faith.
So you value faith over empiricism?
Iโm not going to elaborate
Fair enough. I am honestly curious.
Values do matter very much to me.
If you are indeed curious either read a bible or attend a local church service. They would be much better at answering your questions in person than one can do online.
I've attended many, I used to be a Christian when I was young myself. I was curious why individuals here would still believe in it.
And I read the bible already
I used to be athiest, then i converted.
atheism is depressing
sad life
So you converted because you found it to be too much emotionally?
no
So why did you convert?
Why accept the void of nothingness? If I am wrong when I die Iโll never know. Yet if I am right and atheism is wrong well that sucks for atheist.
Pascal's Wager has been debunked
I converted after looking into the odds of humanity existing, and drawing correlations between the big bang theory and the biblical story of creation. Among hundreds of other correlations between scientific fact and biblical teachings. I think science is not anti-christian, quite the opposite.
Hello!
Intelligent design is a good thing to look into.
Gwyn, you are aware that Pascal's Wager has been debunked, correct?
Doctor Anon - Which creation story are you talking about?
its been DEBUNKED xdxdxd
๐คฃ
Pray tell who came back from the dead and told us idiots?
It's simple rationality. You would have to apply it to all faiths, not just one. So there is the Pascal's Wager of Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam, Taoism, etc... Each one, by not believing in them, you are taking a risk. Pascal's Wager only applies to believing in some sort of afterlife-reward versus not, but the problem arises when you take into account that there are thousands of different possible ones to believe in, and most are quite exclusionary for receiving the ultimate prize.
This is without taking into account the fact that if one lives their life according to a religious code that prevents them from fully experiencing their short time on earth and they are wrong, then they have squandered precious years of a finite existence.
Therefore, Pascal's Wager, even from a superficial analysis, is quite flawed.
^^
No that just means it applies to other faiths as well as atheism. What kind of pseudointellectual garbage is this?
Using debunked is still not appropriate terminology ๐๐ปโโ๏ธ
You could have said "I'm full of shit" in fewer words.
I was using it in the manner of 'demonstrate the hollowness of', which is correct.
Which is fine if you believe in the void
It's not hallow though.
Boils down to subjective opinion.
โ๏ธ
Even if it could only apply to atheism you are still taking less of a chance.
But it is an irrational subjective opinion upon which to build your faith.
Again, pseudointellectual garbage.
Pascels wager was never "debunked", it's a fair critizism of that type of thinking. what's wrong with it
all it points out is "what if you're wrong you could go to hell" is an unsound argument for being religous
I don't think anybody builds their faith on "well if I'm wrong I'm going to Hell".
I just told you, it applies to all faiths, but yes, even I suppose to a lack thereof, but therein lies the issue, if you can apply Pascal's Wager to all beliefs regarding the afterlife, its usefulness becomes moot.
not saying anyone does, but some people use that argument on athiests
it's been used on me
It isn't meant to be useful in the first place.
Nobody bases faith on it.
It is just the hypothetical question
Then why did she give it as a reason?
a lot of people do mean for it to, I'm not saying you do
but I've experienced it
No one care in the end
Ask her if she builds her faith on it.
It's a catch-22, if that is your sole reason for being faithful then it isn't real faith.
Pathetic mental gymnastics.
I quite literally asked why those who believed did... and that was her answer... so now you're calling her a... liar?
Read above.
People don't use pascals wager for their own faith, they use it to try to tell atheists that they are dumb
Are you illiterate as well as a pseudointellectual now?
You have to ask me if I base my faith in a fear to going to hell
Itโs that simple
Zexy, I'm not sure why you're so hostile.
Gwyn, so what is your basis?
Low tolerance for pseuds.
Namecalling is silly.
whats a pseud
I'm calling you a pseudointellectual. Hardly "name calling".
i need the name of the fucken song meme where its a charachter and its name and a short desc
halp
that's just trying to dismiss an argument rather then engage it
Dumb poopy head is namecalling.
He's calling me a pseudo intellectual because he disagrees with me and finds it easier to accuse me of overintellecualizing in a false manner than to actually engage with the argument.
someone help
My faith is based on accepting Jesus Christ as my lord and savior. I believe he died on the cross for all humanityโs sins. Hell got thing to do with it.
I found your criticism of Pascal's Wager a strawman, superficial, and irrelevant to faith as a whole.
You used at some kind of crux which I found idiotic.
Zexy, I used Pascal's Wager, because Gwyn brought it up.
I was talking to her specifically when deconstructing it.
because she used it.
So no
^yeah
It was quite relevant.
Based lolbertarian DECONSTRUCTS arguments with FACTS and LOGIC
See, again, the hostility
You belong on the pseud section of YouTube.
Dude you're being kind of an ass rn
I'm kind of an ass.
Fair, nevermind then
But I'm also watching a movie with my brothers right now, so I'll respectfully leave the conversation. Would love to insult you at a later date.
Rather than engage in a productive conversation (and admit you made a mistake) you'd rather bluster.
alright, bye Zex
No I was pretty productive, I just insulted you too.
Later
lets cool down K0R it's over
Get a thicker skin.
Goodbye everyone else.
Oh, you are mistaken, I was amused, not insulted ๐
Will do, Gris.
That turned into a mess real fast, and I think it all just came down to Zex not seeing the full context and getting overinvested
It would seem
It's not his fault, having your core beliefs questioned is uncomfortable.
He can get kind of passionate about this stuff from what I've seen of him
He'll get used to it with more time on the internet.
He may be young
I'm suspecting so. Nothing wrong with that. He has the advantage of more time.
we're not trying to insult him by questioning his age or ego
But moving on
Yeah, trust me. When I was a young Christian, I would practically burst into flames at the first prod at my faith. When I first became an Atheist, I was probably worse.
But yeah, anyways
Pretty much you have to look at the universe and ask is it just random or was intelligence behind it. From that point you can see you are either atheist leaning or faith leaning.
discussions about stuff like this are best viewed as us coming together to look at the problem, not defending our views from each other
Exactly
we're all just people trying to find the answers
Believing or not is never the problem
As long as one's set of beliefs doesn't lead to... you know, blowing yourself up in a crowded place or taking a joyride with a rented van... (There's a reason I said I'm quite content to live around Christians)
๐ฏ
If you cause harm to anyone due to faith as stated above you need to reevaluate your beliefs.
Well, that's just it... I must say that I also have more respect for the man who lives according to the letter of his belief system, than the moderate apologist.
Pretty much one should not harm others in order to convert
But... Suppose one's core text told one to? And suppose one had a very good reason to believe in it?
Are they harming innocent people?
Or are these people causing harm as in invading army?
Sorry, could you clarify the second sentence? I think I'm reading it wrong.
As in said people are invading the other
Military action
Oh, well in either case innocents are being hurt, yes?
Yes but one is hurting citizens and military alike the other is only attacking a peaceful populace
Well to me, either would be evil. But suppose someone had a very good reason to believe in a faith that told them to do both?
Example that applies to neither New Testament Christians nor Atheists-
Jews believe that their God has ordained in the past that it is good and right to genocide entire peoples.
The convert via sword? Thatโs whatโs youโre asking?
It is wrong imo
Yes, it would be to a Christian like yourself.
The horrifying thing is, there are many ideologies.. popular ideologies that don't see the world through that lens.
Agree, however it does not mean all religion is bad
I never said that
and don't intend to imply it
I said ideology for a reason
Pretty much you are saying some faiths are wrong due to their belief in harming others in the name of their God. Right?
Not at all. It doesn't make them wrong at all. That an ideology tells someone to do things that are repugnant to you or I has nothing to do with whether they're right or not.
I mean there's nothing stopping a god from inciting violence and being immoral
True
so we all agree on that
Nor is there anything stopping a man from doing the same.
Communism, Islam, Judaism, National Socialism... Ultimately, there's little we can say as to whether they are 'right' or 'wrong'. We just know that they demand morally repugnant action (to myself, at least).
That is the one comforting thing about belief in an objective morality, though. At least the Christian can say "They are wrong because God said so."
An atheist who is true to him or herself has to admit that all they have ultimately is their own subjective preferences/values.
Do we want to move on or someone have something to add?
Well, my bootycall just arrived, so I gotta run. Was nice meeting y'all. Take care!
bye
I'm going to sleep so
I don't have anything to add
Be safe and night
Let's do part 2
pls
get dabbed on liberals
Finally found a proper powerlifting gym near me
yawn
@Deleted User stop powerlifting
@6ฯ why
@Alexander Ramsey TIL, hadn't heard of that before
<:PINGREE:459545653350105088>
@Deleted User cuz u will never beat me
@iwantfun 3pm what time?
@6ฯ I am going to put your head under my quads and snap ur face
my wilks is prolly 200-300 higher than urs
@iwantfun What timezone ffs
est
Oof
I already said to another mod
Did he not distribute it?
I deadlift 1200
Kilograms
Who's ready to get smashed?
Lies
Supposedly Trump said the n word a long time ago
well, *nigger
when he ran celebrity apprentice
No proof yet
<:GWfroggyBlobThonk:400751075776397322>
Of course there's no proof.
Who cares either way.
^
why does it matter
fucken papa john dude sued the company bc of them saying he said it
This is pretty much a witch hunt.
i think its dumb that its a big fucking deal
๐ฏ
It has no baring in the present. The past is the past. Everyone has done or said dumb shit.
well that poll was ez
...
what was that for
Excuse me
<#479347145649029156>
Keep the discussion in poll answes
Answers
Ahhj
kk
Fuck discord mobiel
Mobile
reeeeee
89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 81/357
| Next