chat
Discord ID: 452955220473806859
89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 63/357
| Next
and it should be a case by case,individual by individual basis
<@&452955166493114378>
Anyone who disagrees is free to challenge me
Well, letโs see if you have any takers.
Are you arguing in favor of adults having sex with children? @bimmler
<:WhatDid:459545655527079946> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:ToMyDrink:459545654323314710>
<:somestuff:459545668676091904>
@Deleted User im saying it should be an individual by individual basis
If an 18 year old and 16-17 year old wanna bang idc
If a 15 and 16 year old wanna,idc
It's not the place of the state to meddle in people's sex lives
What about a 40 yr old and a 3 yr old?
No
That 40 year old needs to be burnt on a cross
all parties aren't able to consent and lacks the knowledge,capacity etc. To understand any of it
They're unable to cosent at all
It's just rape in that case
Kk I sent your request to MOP. Weโve done voice chat debates, you up for that?
Yeah
what about a 20something and a 16 year old
or a 90 something and a 75 year old
@Ordo_Ab_Chao i don't care about either
The latter is just gross to think about
Hello
Hello
>furry
Its a joke
who even invented furry porn
the devil
lmfao
<:Monkas:459545654029713408>
Desensitization is the best thing that happened to the younger generations of today.
๐
<:hqdefault:473230900956495912>
@everyone there has been a debate requested about the age of consent, this debate will start in 30 minutes
Why that topic lol
**HAVE NO AGE OF CONSENT**
get the fuck out
lemme tear up some 5 year old booty
it should be 18 btw
ahhhhh
lemme clap those 12 month old cheeks
giuli vs chew flashbacks
smh
Pedophilia needs to be objectively defined
tbh with the uk where i live its 16 tbh everyone here tho already lost their virginity at 13
To edgy for me
im not even making that up
half my fucking school lost their virginity at 13
13
Jesus
obviously the people who arent autistic
yeah but keep in mind
they are 13 and the other person they fucked where probably 13
British people are retarded
ahem
thank you
twat
at least we aint obese, ish
Ish
ish
nah but ill admit
that could be just the city i live in
fuck im gone for 2 min and the chat went off
i live in liverpool, the most socialist city out of the entire uk
thats what i shows at least
there are a fuck tonne of these emo ass idk sadboy type faggots
so thats mainly the people who are thots
or retarded autismo gays who interchange beds like musical chairs
>when you love lolis so much you pass it as law
not lying we also have a huge amount of gays
why what country is that?
Gas the pedos
Ye
indeed we do need to gas the pedos
i mean personally 16 isnt that bad
It was a joke that it may happen
because in the uk we break up from school at 16
and usually people know their wits about shit
its like a normal code of conduct like a 30 year old doesnt fuck a 16 year old
majority of ppl will be like calling the guy a nonce
but i feel it makes sense seen as even though yes today is a fucked up society a lot of ppl will lose their virginity over their school break up
This had better be some gay ass joke @ken
and most commonly if its not at the aformentioned 13 age which is only for slags its at 16, where massive parties happen for schools break up, and the huge ass time thats given
its about 5 to 6 months off so imagine how much shit they get up to
it was requested to me @Deleted User i dont agree
btw great breed of god
gay who requested
dog
you will find out later when the debate starts
doesnt america have different age of consent laws per state?
fucking dumb that should just have one
No, this is gay as fuck I refuse
Why is there an age of consent debate?
Tell me who requested @ken so I know before I leave
It better be about making it higher if it is
Also, some states have no age of consent I think
I think like 13 or something ridiculous
Who's arguing for this?
@Deleted User it was someone with a unicorn profile picture thats all im saying
Oh
This is a bad topic.
i dont agree but it was asked
i think that if people want a debate then they should be able to debate
wus poppin
12 month on cheeks
?
there is a debate in a bit about the age of consent
Age of consent should be 25
change my mind
FUCKING THATS TO HIGH
change
my
mind
MUST BE AS HIGH AS YOU
FUCK
why 25
That's when you are fully mature
not everyone
if they aren't they broken and shouldn't reproduce
no i mean some people are earlier
and at that point i also believe that the drinking age should be 18
sucks for them
at 18 your a legal adult
Yeah that's a mistake
how
18 years olds are barely capable of taking care of them selves
maybe the new generation, if it was a problem before dont you think it would have changed
no
why not
life spans were shorter
and expectations were way different
In the 1500s it was like 12 n shit
But back then people lived to 20
๐
pretty much
exactly
it changed
In ye olden times young men were married at 15
if it was a problem then change it again
and had jobs
yes
we should
move it up
its not a problem yet
At 8 people had jobs in the mines
and in the army as little drummer boys
people that cant do shit for themselves either
1) cant do it bc of a physical / mental problem they have
2) the new generation
The age of consent I believe should begin at 14, HOWEVER there should be levels in it. 14 year olds can date up 16, 16 to 18, 18 to 26, then it is normal.
It should be abolished entirely and be a personal thing judged on an individual basis
@Obungus if the age of consent should be 25 then what happens when people get married at 21 or 22 then do they need to wait
yep
why
or a death squad gets them
WHAT
and they get circumcised
for a second time if needed
i have a feeling this went from serious to a fucken meme
nah if they're married they can boink
Time to debate in vc?
so why not if not married
That's bad
Or did i mess up the times?
nope your right
@everyone debate for age of consent starts now
where
It needs to be 25
๐ฝ
Everyone can only sex people born same day and same year
Problem solve
the debate is in round table
@ken where the debate be
Round table
14-17, 18-28, 28-50
@warriorman8 round table voice chat
@ken where the debate be
the age of consent should be 20
then join the debate
Ban the gay furry
dead
aye
Doberman
Age of consent
16 and up
That's the lowest I can do tho
18
Abolish age of consent, outlaw all sex outside of marriage.
Marriage requires fathers' approval. No divorce outside of criminal convictions (abuse, adultery)
Wow, it's almost as if living a moral life gets rid of so many of society's problems!
I agree
well I don't
that'd be a good solution but I love freedom too much and think the gov. shouldn't be involved in marriage
muh freedom
Can anyone give a reason why freedom is inherently good?
serious question btw
it isnt
its inhereantly great
but why
I need reasons, Kenny.
i dont see how this is serious
Just justify freedom being inherently good
If it is inherently good then it can be justified in some way
define 'inherently'
in a permanent, essential, or characteristic way.
If a person could be inherently grumpy freedom could be inherently good
bc as in america we can do things that other places dont
Why is that good though
inherently?
bc were never going to be like other places unless they have as much freedom
One values freedom if they value themselves
Is it?
One could argue that hierarchy and subjugation are too
The state isnt natural,it's founder and main ideologue isn't found in your cerebellum
It's found in laws and codes
Formulated,propogated and copied by others
It's completely unnatural
So is what is natural what is good?
That statement makes no sense
Grammatically
Does something being natural make it good?
you googled the definition of inherently
lol
yeah
I don't use fake and gay definitions
I mean that's fine I would just prefer if you defined it in your own words
If something is found in nature it must've had predecessors,it must've overcame challenges and trials and what is left is th refined version of what was
That's stupid
not what you said bim
Suvival of the fittest
Ok
But how does that make it morally good?
Survival of the best
Morals are subjective as they are nothing more than codes of conduct
So you have no objective justification?
Codes of conduct formulated on the basis of personal taste,relgion,ideology etc.
For what?
For freedom being good
other than it is natural or is a result of natural trial and error
It's good because it is the only political value which doesn't violate rights
Negative rights*
So what makes the violation of rights wrong?
The fact that the infringement of rights is illegitimate,unethical,immoral and is based in illogical behaviour
Says who
89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 63/357
| Next