I think Arpario and Ward will split their Base and McSally will win. If she does we will keep that seat

McSally still has a tough battle

Arizona is purple, but susceptible to turning blue because of all the hispanics

AZ is actually pretty red

Like 55-60%

The McCain and flake vs trump stuff probably put a few percent against trump

That really triggered me before I became redpilled cuz I used to really like flake and mccain

Now I think flake is a normal Republican and mccain a total neocon shill

Flake is on his way out and McCain's about to expire, if we can get solid Rs in their places we'll be set on the right path.

I definitely think we should go for McSally

yeah but muh apraio

mcsally isnt that much of a trumper

whereas apraio is hardcore

she votes the way she needs to on immigration is the thing, which is all I need

if we go for mcsally I doubt doucey will appoint arpaio

whereas if we go for arpaio doucey will likely appoint mcsally

@Cade Every GOP Senator votes with Trump 80-90% of the time. The Democrat who votes the most often for Trump is Manchin and it's only 50%

if mcsally is likely to be chosen to McCain's seat, I think our choice for this election would be Ward

I mean 80%-100% of the time and Collins is the outlier at 80%

Arpaio's a great guy, but I see the possibility of a moore scenario being too likely

idk he didn't do any groping

Arpaio is too old. That alone could cost him the election

neither did Moore

thats true..

yeah we should probably go for a woman

it's too divisive, especially in a state that's riding the line

that way that shit won't take off

I feel terrible not going to arpaio

Both Moore and Apario are extremely divisive though. Moore only won is SCOTUS seat with 52% of the vote

hes not thaaaaat old

In Alabama that is horrible

it'd be funny but we've got to be realistic, that's the way it is

look at this

I think a normal Republican could have survived the Media there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2022#Arizona

look at the arizona section

holy fuck

I changed it XD

lmao I don't think anyone'll notice for a long time

yeah XD

ah fuck it got changed back

damnit

lol

Ward would lose against Sinema

Sinema is kinda an underdog conservative democrat

'conservative'

somewhat

Sinema will honestly probably win

she is a absolute bombshell canidate

she could even win the presidency in the 2020s or 2030s

I don't know about any of that

she is probably the most likely woman to become president

Arizona always has the best statesmen

and woman

not when it comes to our side

McSally is a badass pilot, Arpaio is a badass sheriff

let's push mcsally

fuck it lets go full mcsally

arpaio would lose

and sinema is a tough opponent

no recent polling on that race unfortunately, latest is from November

I think that was when the GOP was in the dumps, right?

yeah

Sinema I feel is going to be strong with seniors

she is on e of the most bipartisan members of congress

AZ-08 Primary on February 27th

@Red Storm (in NYC) pin this^

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 I'll just make you an admin

ty

You see the candidate list?

lot of admins now it seems

yeah

do you want to be an admin @FLanon

eh sure

Who do you support for Arizona US Senate?

Arpaio (A) McSally (B) Ward (C)

SO how is arizona still red, im suprised because of all the illegals

Majority white

And it has a voter ID law (not a photo ID law however)

But what happens when the Mexicans start having kids

this is why we've got to act on immigration immediately.

^

Hispanics already outnumber White infants in the state of Arizona

the border has effectively moved north

Indeed.

It's spreading, too.

They outnumber white infants in Texas.

We periodically see white infants become a plurality nationwide.

But it shifts because young married people always make a new one when they see the news

I remember the first time they said that white infants were a minority like 9 months later we had the news talking about a "mini baby boom"

If we could just curb the immigrants coming from the southern border, and then maybe through policy encourage capable people to have kids (ahem, whites) then I think we could make it

@FLanon @Nuke @TrippyTurtle too late

miss me with that shit, it's about birth rates, and we can help that

Yeah

I think abolishing affirmative action is absolutely crucial to white population growth

Thanks, Juan McCain

like right now I can't really hit up girls and go "I see you want to wait until marriage too. Want to be my housewife?" when I can't actually support a housewife because some AA hire always beats me

Which is extremely common for those who haven't gone to college--and when you add the fact AA is factored into college admission, you've got this sort of thing turn into a massive systemic issue hindering white people from making kids

these would be what we have to target

an executive order, I just can't believe that shit

Fuck you LBJ

Most federal AA is either by executive order, implied law, or something like that.

like you write "anti-discrimination" in a law and wink if you're the Congress because no one will vote for this shit without it being shady

53 years and no R president has thought to repeal this?

Like this is where the US Code prevents hiring discrimination based on IQ

And no, in fact the movement against this only began with David Duke in 1993 or so

It just fucking bewilders me

it's so easy if it's just executive order

if I ever run, I swear what I'd do

(a) Employer practicesIt shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer—
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

This is literally the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The courts have interpreted this as prohibiting IQ discrimination because blacks are stupid.

The way I see it, the generic Bachelor's req commonly in use today is basically discriminatory by this standard, by the way.

Because the SCOTUS extended this to any job requirement not directly related to the job

While IQ is relevant to any job, it's not good enough for the Supreme Court--so obviously, "education," which is obviously somehow obscurely related to any job (but not as much as IQ), is only legally distinguished by the fact AA affects it.

God doesn't have an anti-discrimination policy when He assigns your DNA.

LBJ is the worst thing to ever happen to the country

<@&414481037620543488>

VOTE MCSALLY IN THE PRIMARIES TODAY GO GO GO

That primary for the senate is today?

**VOTE**

https://ballotpedia.org/United_States_Senate_election_in_Arizona,_2018

@FLanon apparently it's on August 28

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 What are you referring to

oops

it's the AZ-08 one

**VOTE**

Likewise, that is in August. The filing deadilne hasn't passed yet.

thanks

https://ballotpedia.org/Arizona%27s_8th_Congressional_District_special_election,_2018

RED STORM ALERT
RED STORM ALERT
RED STORM ALERT
RED STORM ALERT

THE NEXT BIG RACE IS IN ARIZONA. APRIL 24

DEBBIE LESKO (R) VS HIRAL TIPIRNENI (D)

Let's go full speed ahead on the midterms. THE MIDTERMS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT THING FOR US! REALIZE THIS!

PA-18 shows that EVERY SINGLE VOTE MATTERS. The GOP needs to learn that their messaging SUCKS, and hopefully we can get it through their thick skulls

SORRY DRUMPFKINS

ALABAMA,

PENNSYLVANIA

AZ IS NEXT

Dear god the smug radiating off this makes me need a hazmat suit

it's supposed to anger you to go out and vote

GET ANGRY

ANGERY

I’m sorry, whenever I see the term Drumpfkin I immediately want to kill myself. You did a good job emulating twitter on a daily basis

Arizona is essential.

Make propoganda posters to scare D's into voting R.

well i guess pa is cucked

beyond restoration

no, they had to run basically an R to win that district

he didn't run on the dnc party line, he may end up voting that way, but the thing is, they had to run someone like that to even compete

not to mention the absolute laziness coming from saccone

no

republicans aren't winning ever

I'm blackpilled now bitches

just kidding

lol

But this could be worrying. The Dems see this as a working strategy. Who’s to say that they won’t run a “totally Republican” Democrat and flip the tables.

yeah, that's gonna be a big problem

This seat seems to be safe, though.

I don't think the Democrat can win over enough voters.

the issue is the incumbent is retiring, which is good because he's a RINO, but it's much much harder without someone already there

Essentially, if they don’t run a retarded candidate we’ll be fine

@GermanEastAfrica Yeah, that's a strategy that will work exactly once.

State senator is running.

Seems to be a good Republican.

that's what we hope

@Pielover19 where?

@Captain Who I suppose so, I’m just a bit paranoid about it is all.

It is a legit thing to be paranoid about.

“I have a reputation of doing things that directly help my constituents,” Lesko told Fox News. “People in my district believe in everything that everyone else in the nation believes in: securing the border … national security, a good economy, good jobs. But they also really care about local issues, and I have a history of helping them with that.”

Many of those national issues, according to Lesko’s campaign website, echo some of President Trump’s agenda items, such as building a border wall, strengthening the country’s missile defense program against potential threats from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (who her website calls an “insane madman”) and protecting the Second Amendment.

Aside from those issues, Lesko also wants to talk about domestic violence. She said she was able to leave an abusive husband about 25 years ago.

“Domestic violence is a very prevalent problem, and it can happen to anyone. It doesn’t matter what their status is, what their educational background is,” she said. “It happens to so many women, and I just want them to know they can get out of it and become successful, because I did it. I’m living proof of it.”

She has since remarried and has three children.

Lesko first got into politics with her local Republican Party, starting off as a district chairman, an elected volunteer position. She rose through the ranks, becoming a state Republican Party officer before she won a state House seat. She served as a representative for six years and as a state senator for three.

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, has endorsed Lesko, his office confirmed to Fox News.

This is the Republican candidate.

I think that Arizona's best chance is probably going to be McSally, she'll vote the way she's supposed to.

For Frank's old seat.

But progressives trying to pretend as a conservative democrat anywhere but Pennsylvania will come off as disingenuous as Hillary Clinton quoting the bible.

I mentioned it last night, Pennsylvania Democrat is a category of its own.

Tipirneni knows that she is running as a Democrat in a conservative district, but she doesn’t dwell on that. For her, it’s not about a political party so much as it is about representing the district.

“One of the big reasons I decided to run is I’m so frustrated by the lack of forward progress, divisiveness and standing solely on a partisan [ground],” Tipirneni told Fox News.

“I’m looking to bring people together to the table to have a conversation,” she continued. “A lot of folks feel alienated. I would fight on their behalf and not fight about ideology.”

Her campaign website pushes for more bipartisan solutions to hot-button issues. For example, on the Second Amendment, Tipirneni says she supports the rights of “law-abiding Americans to obtain firearms through legal channels to protect their homes, themselves and their families, and for hunting and sport.” But she also supports “commonsense gun reform,” such as eliminating certain background check loopholes.

The top of the Second Amendment section on Tipirneni's site declares: “When progressives and conservatives work together, we can accomplish great things.”

While Tipirneni has volunteered on other campaigns, this is her first foray into politics. She said she isn’t “looking to build [her] political resume” but just wants to help those in her district.

“The reason I’m doing this is because I am a constituent as well in this district, and I’ve spent many years frustrated, feeling that I don’t have a voice in D.C.,” she said.

This is Democrat.

Looks bad, actually.

The senate seat probably will be McSally vs. Sinema

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/14/arizona-special-election-features-debbie-lesko-hiral-tipirneni-what-to-know-about-race.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29&utm_content=Yahoo+Search+Results

This is the article I'm quoting for the special election.

Dem is against the border wall, a HUGE issue in Arizona, so hopefully we can win.

oh, the potential McCain one?

No, the April special election.

For Trent Frank's seat.

In the House.

Lesko seems pretty good

ah, okay, thanks, I was pretty confused

Dem running on healthcare to appeal to the elderly voting base.

Hopefully it'll work out, we need some sort of momentum

Rep running on immigration.

We need to spam pro-immigration spiel around this area.

So the usual Dem points

REALLY far-left positions.

Scare people who don't want their district to be 20 percent white.

One thing to look at is how the blue checkmark squad will influence this. Twitter can be a powerful tool

Trump might hold a rally here.

I would love to see that.

Announce his endorsements for Lesko and the senate candidate.

I'd like to see how multiple rallies would work out

TRUMP TRUMP
TRUMP TRUMP
TRUMP TRUMP
TRUMP TRUMP
TRUMP TRUMP

He's going to do a ton of rallies later this year,

Whenever he holds rallies the morale goes up pretty significantly

This is a very red district, then again, so is everything.

He needs to fix his approval, fix the GOP's position in the generic ballot, and hold a ton of rallies in these areas.

Hopefully he throws one of these high-up dems in prison like a week before the election happens or something like that.

https://youtu.be/iLmojl6Qfi4

@FLanon @Deleted User <@&414481037620543488>
Thoughts?

This is the R, right?

I'll look at it in a bit

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 she needs to lose weight

Immigration and healthcare are main concerns in this district.

And each one of the candidates is emphasizing one.

^

Another (((moderate))) Dem is running.

Blue dogs our the biggest challenge to us in these elections.

Doesn't help that this is a suburban district

#1 priority should be protraying the Dem as an extremist.

Phone calls might be useful here.

Elders love talking to youth, AKA most of this discord.

They might vote Lesko because the nice young man on the phone said she was a great candidate.

Hmm,

this district went for Trump by 25 points

We should keep in mind,

The average national swing since 2016 was +25 for Democrats

Well Pennsylvania votes for trump with 20 points and look how that turned out.

Isn't this plus 21?

And the average swing was more in the 16-point area?

If you count state legislatures

It's 25

I see.

We need to do some real IRL-ops.

I still think acting like SJW-like people will stop these blue dogs.

I can probably go to Phoenix next month

For Intel

Do that.

Maybe be double agents for the Dem here?

Is that only State Seats that Republicans lost

It's a concern of mine that Joe Arpaio will deprive Kelli Ward (a viable conservative candidate) the election in the primary and deliver it unto McSally, a neoconservative.

Arpaio is being a selfish prick. He's 85 and extremely unpopular among non-Republicans.

the consensus here is that McSally isn't so bad

Kelli Ward can get the Libertarian votes.

McSally isn't too bad, but we still want Arpaio to win.

http://hiralforcongress.com

this is the next Democrat to face

I don't think she's another Conor Lamb

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/12/who-is-hiral-tipirneni-what-to-know-about-arizona-congressional-candidate.html

well......

This experience also shapes her position on immigration. She said that while she believes the U.S. needs to secure its borders, it also “must remain a land of opportunity for those who are willing to work for it.”

Tipirneni has called for a solution for DACA and comprehensive immigration reform. She said she is opposed to Trump’s proposed border wall, as she believes the funds for it “would be better spent towards securing our border in other ways.”

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 @FLanon what do you think