#general (Discord ID: 276935978369810432) in Anticom, page 710
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
say it again
>please study history more
not an argument
I gave you a modern example you retard
It literally was an argument.
@everyone if you need vetted, get in get vetted
But a liberal disagrees with it
Is it really an argument then
whos the liberal
Aren't you a libertarian?
kek he ignored my argument after saying "not an argument"
says the beta neet cuck
Molyneux is certainly a liberal
***Daily reminder: DRESDEN WAS A HOAX CREATED BY THE SOVIES***
kek you need to give proof first
You made the claim, Anony
dresden has no proof
nigger its your role
both are neet beta cucks
well, technically a minarchist
So you're a liberal
yall better start **DOIN THINGS**
uh, no sweetie
so you are a non-marxist socialist huh :^)
I used to be a libertarian
Nice, that is actually good
will provide proofs as soon as i can
Just with more rationalization to justify the fucked up worldview
well left wing libertarians are liberals
but not people like me
It's literally in the name
then you'd know the difference between yokeltarians and cosmotarians
LIBERtarianism is a branch of liberalism
one is conservative the other is liberal
I'm well aware of the differences between people who emphasize muh guns
Anarcho-capitalism in an ethnically homogeneous society is right wing
And muh pot
my fucking god
National capitalism is also right wing
are you really trying to make an argument that libertarians are liberals
modern liberal=/= minarchism and right wing libertarinism
I can get some economics on ya
to see who is in what side my dude
It literally is
Monarchism + minarchism
THE FUCKING GOAT
It's says it right on the fucking tin
so natsoc is socialist just like sweden because it's in the name?
Argument from semantics is pretty weak
Can be dismissed
It's part of the same family yeah
1/10 try again
what the actual fuck
That's what happens when you argue with liberals
But we aren't liberals
They get btfod
And then say stupid shit
let me get in this real quick: national socialism is the same thing as libertarian socialm from sweden
well, I think the monkey has a higher IQ
Or throw out stupid fallacies like above
>everyone is a libshit if they aren't my specific brand of ideology
They could be commies too
if you really wanna argue we get in debate my dude
Those aren't liberals
>I got blown out because I was in the wrong channel
and then we have some good **de** ***baiting***
>throw out fallacies
>says this after arguing semantics
what did he mean by this?
hang on, pizza came in
will be back in a moment
What did he mean by this?
probably cheese pizza too
next thing you know he'll be talking about ordering sixty thousand hotdogs
Tfw like cheese
it's best with pineapple
So I can never talk about pizza on here
@mememaestro I know what you're saying but do keep in mind that there are also libertarian liberals now
Gary Johnson ruined the party
we already wen't over that some libertarians are right and some are left
the argument is that if they are all left
I just skimmed to catch up my b
John "I pay Mexicans to shit on my face" mcafee was worse tbh
>implying left libertarianism is even a thing
"H-hey don't stop me from being a degenerate! But gibs me dat!"
Well there's libertarian socialism
Which is silly
But within the libertarian movement
There's people who care more about open borders and weed
the original ideal for communism was more aligned with Ancom tbh
And some who care about guns and property rights
And also weed
Don't violate muh nap
No @Crusading have you read marx's ass dribbles
He calls for a state just refuses to call it one
weed itself isn't bad, its the culture it brings
He literally couldnt escape the state with his ideaology so he just renamed it
Drugs are bad
Weed not so much as most
@Void no i'm talking the first groups of people to follow it, the ones who made little communes
Drug is really too much of a broad term
Oh sure but thats not the first
Yeah it is but people get the idea
Cold medicine is a drug, but so is cocaine
i should rephrase my original statement to "early"
Man I don't have an issue with beer but I hate beer culture
Ill accept it
Beer culture is shit
I don't even like beer
Alcoholism is bad
I like cocaine
But coke culture sucks
STOP TAKING COKE
Honestly if the commies just went off and lived in hippy communes then I wouldnt give a shit we could focus on (((them))) then
the sad part is that i would like to say that things like weed should be allowed, but it is like opening up a door on a warm but muggy day. it'll be okay for a tiny bit, but bring in bad things soon
Where do you think they're proliferating?
If the link between juden and communism isn't something you know of, definitely read up on it
But attacking commies is just a single arm of the octopus
Though the strongest
Just a cohencidence
It'd wipe most of them out desu
The really powerful ones are, sadly, capitalists.
It's all the same to them
Whatever lines their pockets
Plutocrats != capitalists
They're the ultimate pragmatists
How do I vetted?
Ping an interrogator
They endorse communism because theyll be the first to be card carrying party members at the top anyways
With a mic
Its a power grab
Fucking c# faggot
Capitalism is just a lot better than communism at creating wealth
C# is shit and botnet why mention it
Which means there's more for Jews to steal
So they support capitalism now
The Jews will never be proles in a commie state, so they don't care.
They'd be the party members.
Best system is national capitalism.
>strong leadership keeps enemies out of the state
>strong economy means that you won't be easily beaten in wartime
And the volk get to prosper.
Why not just do corporatism
For a stronger economy
It's not socially darwinistic enough
Over the long term, it creates an undeserving aristocracy
Whereas capitalism creates a deserving aristocracy.
Sounds like capitalism
define the system to create a strong economy if you may Sarkly
Capitalism, my dude.
We have a huge undeserving aristocracy
hence "National Capitalism" as opposed to "National Socialism"
We don't live in a national capitalist society
Jews are allowed to manipulate through in-group preference.
I don't see how shrinking the playing field really changes things
Such would not be possible, since everybody would be part of the volk.
We live in a globalist crony capitalist society
but how, with heavy bureaucracy or low regulations?
Simple as that
Just look at ttp
Probably not compatible with capitalism.
Members of the volk are still capable of the same spiritual failings as jews
It's just not endemic
Which means that it is controllable.
Simple competition does the trick.
Shits like shadowrun without the cool parts like trolls and cybermancers
I understand you
whereas with Jews, you always lose.
I'm not saying it wouldn't be better
It absolutely would be
It just doesn't fix all the problems of a capitalist system
Just scales them down
Though getting rid of Jews makes anything run better
It's the most we can do without cutting in to total production.
Corporate states had similar levels of growth to capitalist countries
More controls, like in NatSoc, would inevitably lead to inefficiencies.
Besides killing all the 4/5 jewish guys in society, how do you see we can fix the problems of capitalism? And what actually are they in your opinion?
And we're far more stable
Maybe they're good in the short term, but probably not in the long term.
It's literally the opposite
Were not stable with that huge bureaucracy boy
Chile had a huge economic boom
That went to shit
5 months for some rubber tires is a laugh
After the initial wave of liberalization
They adopted free market principles in Chile.
Whereas neighboring Argentina remained economically stable under Peron
For a longer period of time
Stability isn't always desirable.
It diminishes innovation to some degree.
for the market is
There's still a profit motive under a corporatist system
There's always a profit motive.
But when your livelihood is threatened by your rivals, you'll try even harder.
We always need some problems but generally, stability is preferable
And you'll lose when you deserve to.
And your opponents will provide better goods to consumers.
Which is when you call them fucking bigots
I think the proper term is homophobes
*Eradicates degeneracy internally*
>"but markets are things and things don't exist forever"
>but fatalism works best on the firing line
Oh no something doesnt exist forever lets just all kill ourselves since nothing does