#general (Discord ID: 276935978369810432) in Anticom, page 646
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
Still china is the best of vitue and functionality.
It will be shit
and also you can have a non-shit ethnicity and still have a shit country (sweden)
This is true
it's not a guarentee by any stretch
As a baseline you need racial homogenity
From there you can still fuck it up
We need something to last for 1000 years. All else has failed and led to our destruct.
i suppose there are other systems that could work with a more diverse population
just not libertarianism
or direct democracy
How about based on fascism, but fluid with the times.
Well crap, these guys from that thread?
Fascism is historically the best system/worldview
Why should a government always be the same type of govt? We should set in place a process of transition .
I'm sure it would still work today
i was asking what indianaisfull meant
I'd have to respectfully disagree with y'all there
Sprinkle it with monarchy, sometimes democracy, whatever is needed.
how do you sprinkle fascism with monarchy and democracy
Except as tools
I want feudalism
Ultimately there's no place for either
My idol is Charles Martel
Then it would no longer be fascism
Martel was the real kebab remover
if you want god tier feudalism do anarcho capitalism and wait 20 minutes
o o h
Divine right of kings
My boss isn't appointed by God
The kang is
kang of kangz
@Guan Fascism is the foundation, which only wants the Ax to continue prostrate. It doesn't care what type of rope holds the sticks together.
that's debatable, but its a free country, you be fascist if you want
A man of one cannot be fascist.
It is a group ideology
that's a bit pedantic now isnt it
>giving an open platform that doesn't allow an open platform
ill rephrase: I don't *respecfully* disagree, but i am bound within the rules of this server and therefore am forced to do so
You're free to disagree
Just not be a retard about it
Doesn't stop people
that's what im trying to do
Guan you can debate eachother all you want
You aren't allowed however to post porn, or anything that is homosexual/promotes homosexuality
i didnt know the extent of what we can do in this thread
forum? what do you call this
This is discord my bigger nigger
chat i guess
Either a discord or a chat will do.
>you will never be able to drive the ottomans from Vienna as a winged hussar
>when your beats are so sick everyone dies of the black plague and you're hung for witchcraft.
I'm going to go watch cat videos. See ya.
I really wish I was born during the 1300s
Indeed, peasantry is a lot better.
swords > democracy
Short life too.
Short life but you don't have to go through the bullshit of feminism
And women didn't have power
Other than a monarchal status
>you will never singe the spanish kings beard with Sir Francis Drake
20s are better
What is done can be undone. The conservative spirit have become too weak, too defensive.
People are too weak and defensive these days man
When the capitalism hits hard
This is why we need feudalism
They're going to be rulers one way or another.
Conscription would help a lot
What do you mean (((feudalism)))?
the one thing europoors got correct was conscription
So here's the thing, feudalism really only works in this age if there's no foreign influence.
What disgusts me is how Republicans are being blamed for people dying without healthcare coverage when those people shouldn't have had half-assed healthcare coverage and should have died in the first place.
I've had liberal friends go to Europe and come back advocating conscription
republicans are gay
It gets really easy for a country that subscribes to it to be influenced.
the normie narrative is powerful
After all, you only need but replace parts of the monarchy/ruling class.
I'm kind of in favor of having to work for the rights of a citizen through civil service, not simply being born with them
Even though that is corruptible
Monarchy literally eminates tradition throughout the country
It is a beacon for family values and traditions
Unless its the English Crown
Yes it can be corrupt, but corrupt monarchies never live long
I like the idea of one not being a citizen until they do a sweden-style 1 year service
at age 18 for natural-born citizens
I like the idea that nobody is a citizen unless you go through military service
Kind of like how it is in the book "Starship Troopers"
because then being a citizen actually matters
yeah like that, even though it's a satire
The book isn't satire
The movie is
Read the book
yeah except Starship Troopers was a satire of it
No it wasn;t you cocks
i thought they were both critiques, just on different things
Robert Heinlein believed in those values
The original was written by a literal fascist
the movie was a satire
ahh i see
the movie is still damn good imo, when you're aware of the critique it's hilarious in a weird way
It's kinda like a Space Age Sparta
or the Germanic Legions the Romans used
whatever their fucking name was
Only citizens can vote, and since all citizens went through military service, the government is always hardline fascism/conservatism
still technically democracy ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
just like the DPRK
what could go wrong
It's not really a democracy
that's p much why democracy isnt inherently virtuous
North Korea has elections
but Kim is the only candidate
Because whoever the leader they vote in always has absolute power
Kim always gets 100% of the vote
isnt that still democracy by definition
He is so popular
North Korea would have worked if they weren't dumb commies
if it isnt rigged of course
No, presidents and prime ministers today do not have absolute power
North Korea wouldn't have existed without COmmies
I do like North Korea's "Juche" though
pick one, really.
yeah but couldnt you have a direct democracy with a dictator that must be voted on
Robert Heinlein was so fucking amazing
Juche is like North Korea's national spirit and tradition
it is why their work ethic is so strong yet living in a complete shithole
"The politics of North Korea takes place within the framework of the official state philosophy, Juche, a concept created by Hwang Jang-yop and later attributed to Kim Il-sung. The Juche theory is the belief that through self-reliance and a strong independent state, true socialism can be achieved."
Just replace socialism with <your_ideology>
that is socialism dummy
how tf does any anarchist ideology exist
its really just another flavor of social marxism
youwalk up to someone and say "hey bro there is no laws now but its anarcho communism so help eachother out!!!1"
they dont really work in practice, they're the absence of system
And they spit in your face, shoot you and take your shoes
"The WPK is the ruling party of North Korea. It has been in power since its creation in 1948. Two minor political parties also exist, but are legally bound to accept the ruling role of the WPK.[better source needed] They, with the WPK, comprise the popular front Democratic Front for the Reunification of the Fatherland (DFRF). Elections occur only in single-candidate races where the candidate is effectively selected beforehand by the WPK."
Anarchy is anarchy, chaos. It doesn't work
TIL there are 3 political parties in North Korea
"Elections occur only in single-candidate races where the candidate is effectively selected beforehand by the WPK."
he did it
he broke democracy
still technically democratic
g e n i u s
they found democracy that works tbhfam
to be esoteric, how is having only 2 selected by their respective parties any better
we are korea confirmed
In communism, everyone is poor, in capitalism, there are many poor and many rich, in fascism everyone is rich, through spirit in their leader, people and nation
Well it depends on the Fascism
imo if it's socialism it's socialism
National Socialism actually worked
"at least the trains run on time"
Probably the best system we have ever had
it's really hard to tell, considering that little war that they dealt with
Happiness levels in people were so high, how did Hitler do it, I will not know
Nazi Germany relied on conquest though
Will we ever have another Hitler like figure? I hope
its economy was not sustainable without war
They were successful prior to any conquest
Nazi Germany through 33-39 was absolutely amazing
doesnt jingoism also lead to a rome situation eventually
Berlin was no longer the hooker capital of europe
Corporatism was still a far better system than capitalism
Is non fascist states where it was implemented
Similar/better rates of growth
Without being concentrated in the hands of private corporations
And without the moral degeneracy that accompanies capitalism
Francoist Spain is a good example
*moral degeneracy that accompanies liberalism
the problem with that though, is that the real problems don't kick in untill far later down the road (if we're talking about the socialist form of it)
Protestant Capitalism was not degenerate by any means
You really think suppressing fags and stopping immigration is good for business
In the short term it's very profitable
no, and that's why i am not a fan of corporatism
It isn't but if they don't exist in a society do they affect the business?
they always exist though
yeah but potential ones do
And a capitalistic system will always degenerate into that
and corporations would be in favor of immigration to gt cheap labor
not in the future
Eventually someone will sink to a new low to raise the bottom line
why not have an isolationalist policy that cant be democratically removed, and instate capitalism internally
That would be better
But still imperfect
I think Capitalism can be good, but I viciously oppose monopoly capitalism where small businesses cannot compete
nothing is perfect
you can only approach perfection
has a true monopoly ever existed
yeah that's the thing about strict libertarians is what happens when monopolies arise?
I might get flack for this, but I think dirigisme in France is a decent model to draw from
what is google
what is amazon
what is walmart
what is mcdonalds
bing, safari, internet explorer compete
They aren't technically monopolies
they aren't true monopoly
because competition still exists
Oligopolies are similar
what he said
competition between 6 companies?
Especially with the amount of collaboration between companies that happens
It should be competition between thousands
what;s the difference
between 6 and 1000
if the 6 are superior to the 994
But if you have thousands of companies it ultimately becomes 6 over time
and then a new untapped market is created
and thousands of companies are created
It makes it so the small businesses are outclassed
and they become few as well
It's immoral for that to happen, when people's own companies can't compete
National free market with protectionist trade policies and restrictions on monopolies.
why would anyone want a small business search engine, it would be terrible though
That's the way to do it.
Protectionism is a terrible trade policy though