general
Discord ID: 276935978369810432
188,296 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 549/1883
| Next
Literally who
^^
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2-EoP6h0TWHQwUEL-7TpjQ he went from a libertarian to far-right in response to leftism
like molyneaux but he isnt as big
>anarchist
(((atheism)))
he was half responsible for that
hes not an anarchist anymore
>mfw anarchists turn other anarchists away
>mfw moonman has had eyes this whole time
>62 people RSVP'ed within a day for the Southeast meetup
63 I just forgot to fill it out
thx fam
DELET
kek
LOL
I don't get it?
it's a tire presure gage
his mom's a dumbass and thinks it's a drug thing
there we go
now the joke is killed
gj
Oh, that's stupid of her.
when the stupid person in a stupid person joke is so stupid you don't get it.
wrong one
@๐ ฑarD That's where I was at.
"how did I know the couple's names weren't Sven and Lagertha? "
How have you fallen so much northern lion!
so any word on the website laddies?
the official site is already up fam
has been for a while
i love the christopher cantwell show
im defo not a racist but hes funny as shit
very talented writer
quick with the jokes
just saw someone mention him earlier
he takes in calls too thats the best part
one guy called in with a molyneux impression
one of the funniest things
cantwell is still an-cap.. he has the flag on his set still and in the About section on his site it says he is an-cap
why is it that any time some libertarian embraces hoppean ideas that idiots say "he isn't an anarchist any more, he is super right wing"
they do the same thing to molyneux, even when he still says he is a voluntarist and that he isn't right wing
do people not have the mental capacity to realize that these things aren't mutually exclusive?
I dunno.
Anarchists are a very whiny lot, they tend to be ideology over pragmatics as an absolute rule.
doesn't really have anything to do with my complaint
Hoppe has been saying we need to remove undesirables from society for a long time (in a stateless society) on principal, this doesn't make him "right wing" or a statist
so now that molyneux and cantwell start saying things similar to hoppe, now they get called right wing and statist
Well, removing people involuntary kinda goes against voluntarism.
And while in order to assure a libertarian society it'd be a necessity, as I stated previously, anarchists are autistic and unwilling to compromise.
not against voluntarism if those people are a threat
which is not really my gripe
it's just that the purposeful mischaracterization of people's positions just to make themselves feel better about their own views, is retarded
it's time to stop.avi
Yes, but if we didn't strawman people we'd have to talk to them and end up having our fundamental views questioned.
it sounds like someone is about to launch their tomahawk missles
i don't have enough tomahawks to get rid of all of the strawman-ers
You'd have to remove almost everyone.
i just want them to stop being bad at arguments and thinking
if burnside sees this he will memacaust you again @Iamawesom
@Benzmiller People are almost always unwilling to get over themselves.
i know, but what else can i say, other than to call them retards and tell them to stop
or maybe they're unable to
Well, you can't reason a person out of somewhere they didn't reason themselves into.
But there are more advanced argument methods.
Socratic is good, make them ask questions about the fundamental nature of their ideology.
Of course this only works if the person understands the difference between a question and answer. Fact and opinion.
i'm sure they don't even understand the socratic method
No, but you can make them use it in an argument.
this is why i generally don't engage them. they can't stay on topic
That's another thing.
If you're talking about convincing people to stop supporting communist horseshit, it takes experience of the real world before they wake the fuck up. I've never known a working person who has ever supported communism.
we're not
The proliteriat don't wanna be dictators.
They just wanna have a beer with the missus.
The proles realize that it's better to be able to climb a ladder than to be stranded on the floor for life
It's pseudo intellectual middle class idiots who think they can fix the world via leveling the plane.
I don't want level, that's shit, I wanna be able to not work one day.
I want movement, thriving, life that is questioned and vibrant with a relied source of income.
also, it's kind of hard to use the socratic method with a person who is unwilling to participate
That's the big thing.
If a person isn't willing to debate then don't debate them.
In that situation they usually only listen to "authority"
In which case I'd recommend becoming and authority of some kind.
sadly that's most people
Well, I've yet to meet a girl who can debate using rationality.
And as far as men go it's a very small minority.
hard to escape it. i would say that i want to go into academia, but it's not like it's a huge step up, but at least the platform for debate is more defined at a college that isn't taken over by communists
yes, both sexes are terrible at it
Perhaps, but show me a university that isn't marxist at some point.
some private schools
plus, i'd be willing to go in and combat them, somebody has to keep them from having a monopoly on it
That's a fair point.
inspiring some students can change their minds for the better and add more people to our way of thinking
or to reason, logic, etc
And it'd be good to break the echo chamber a bit.
Though I'm quite sure that if I expressed many of my views I'd be... unwelcome.
yeah, the only way to get in is to lay low till you get tenure
i've spoken with professors who have done that, it's kind of the only way i think
Or get independence and go controversial in a big way.
hard to do that in a school with opposite views, it's a fast way to get fired
Nah, I mean like get economic independence from the school and go massively controversial from there.
188,296 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 549/1883
| Next